Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
ReplyLetters

Response

Keith M. Laycock
Canadian Family Physician March 2011; 57 (3) 278-279;
Keith M. Laycock
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

While I acknowledge the differing opinions expressed by those responses supporting the concept of the FP’s ability to assess fitness to drive,1,2 their supportive reasons are addressed either in the debate3 or in the rebuttal4 and are challenged or refuted. Yes, FPs are able to diagnose medical conditions that could, or do, affect some aspects of driving ability; and when they do so, the physician should bear a responsibility to report those finding to the Office of the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles or the Ministry of Transportation. And, indeed, they should support patients and their families at the time of possible loss of driver’s licences. Yes, there are different ways to interpret fitness to drive, and my expressed opinion clearly extends beyond simple medical diagnosis, although I do not think the Yes side of the debate5 or some of the responses have done so. Irrespective of the contrary opinions expressed, the reality is still that important aspects of physiological function that relate to safe driving cannot be tested in an FP's office. As they cannot be tested, should they simply be ignored? I sympathise with Ms Hickey and her unfortunate experience with the Ministry of Transportation; both she and the FP acted appropriately. The apparent lack of knowledge and ability of the instructor to adequately assess Ms Hickey’s husband is regrettable and difficult to understand. However, that example does not alter the validity of simulated or on-road driving tests remaining the criterion standard for testing driving ability. That test should come first; if it is failed and there is a possibility that an extant medical condition is, in part or in whole, a factor in that failure, then it should be addressed in a way that considers the patient's autonomy and the collective community's safety.

  • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Hickey ML
    . Debating assessment of driving fitness [Letters]. Can Fam Physician 2011;57:278.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Winkelaar PG
    . Fitness does not equal competence [Letters]. Can Fam Physician 2011;57:172.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Laycock KM
    . Should family physicians assess fitness to drive? No [Debate]. Can Fam Physician 2010;56:1265, 1267, 1269, 1271. Eng. (Fr).
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Laycock KM
    . Should family physicians assess fitness to drive? No [Rebuttal]. Can Fam Physician. Vol. 56. 2010. p. e412, p. e414. Eng. (Fr). Available from: www.cfp.ca/cgi/reprint/56/12/e412. Accessed 2011 Feb 9.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Adams AJ
    . Should family physicians assess fitness to drive? Yes [Debate]. Can Fam Physician 2010;56:1264, 1266, 1265, 1267. Eng. (Fr).
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 57 (3)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 57, Issue 3
1 Mar 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Response
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Response
Keith M. Laycock
Canadian Family Physician Mar 2011, 57 (3) 278-279;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Response
Keith M. Laycock
Canadian Family Physician Mar 2011, 57 (3) 278-279;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Response
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Correction
  • Long-term monitoring needed for lichen sclerosus
  • Private-public partnerships not a threat to Canada’s health care system
Show more Letters

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2025 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire