Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
Article CommentaryCommentary

Toronto’s G20 one year later

Missed opportunity for a Canadian contribution to global health

Barry N. Pakes, Jane Philpott, Lynda Redwood-Campbell and Katherine Rouleau
Canadian Family Physician June 2011, 57 (6) 650-651;
Barry N. Pakes
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: barry.pakes@utoronto.ca
Jane Philpott
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lynda Redwood-Campbell
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Katherine Rouleau
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

As we mark 1 year since world leaders gathered in Toronto, Ont, for the G8 and G20 summit, we reflect on a missed opportunity. When the world looked to Canada for leadership in solving urgent global problems, instead of overzealous security and a lacklustre maternal-child health initiative, we should have showcased a uniquely Canadian solution to the challenge of global health—a domestic resource, which if exported and adapted abroad, could improve or save billions of lives worldwide: Canadian family medicine.

All countries, from the wealthiest to the most impoverished, can learn something from the Canadian model of primary care. Family medicine, as a cornerstone of strong primary care, has been repeatedly shown to contribute to better health outcomes and to more cost-effective health care around the world.1,2 While not every country enjoys our good fortune—abundant natural resources, a well-educated population, and a stable democracy—every country could benefit from applying elements of the 4 principles of Canadian family medicine to their primary care systems.3

Family physicians are skilled clinicians

Canadian family physicians are more than general practitioners. They are specialists in primary care who have completed 2 or more years of competency-based specialty training. They are skilled, broad-thinking problem solvers, anchored in generalism and trained to address complex and undifferentiated health issues. The depth, breadth, and quality of care provided by family physicians effectively alters the nature of specialty medicine, allowing specialists to see only those for whom a consultation is truly indicated. Unlike some other high-income countries where general practitioners are mere gatekeepers, Canadian family medicine specialists are competent to care holistically for patients from cradle to grave. They are comfortable with a range of roles, procedures, and interventions—from suturing lacerations to dynamic psychotherapy; from foreign body removals in the emergency department to steroid injections in a pain clinic; from obstetrics to palliative care. Countries can only improve their primary care infrastructures by developing and investing in family medicine as a specialty—specialists in generalism.

The patient-physician relationship is central to the role of the family physician

The Canadian public values the role of the family physician. Canadians have unique relationships with their family doctors based on trust, history, and mutual responsibility. Even where excellent specialist care is available, Canadians seek the care, advice, and engagement of their family doctors. Countries can achieve a high ratio of family physicians to specialists by investing in the human resources for primary care, ensuring that everyone has access to a team that includes well-trained family physicians. The Canadian doctor-patient relationship provides a uniquely rich conduit for the transfer of information, the application of preventive measures, and the enhancement of adherence to jointly developed care plans. More than a utopian goal, the doctor-patient relationship translates into longer and healthier lives.

Family medicine is a community-based discipline

Family physicians have relationships not only with their patients, but with their communities. The family physician’s practice is both a window into the health needs of a community and a set of tools to address them. Family medicine training recognizes the role of values in shaping this relationship and cites social responsibility as the animating driver of physicians’ work. Family physicians see patients in their homes, hospitals, nursing homes, and offices as part of a network of health professionals. Because we are not competing with fellow physicians or other health professionals (such as nurses, physiotherapists, and occupational therapists), we have every incentive to collaborate with them to care for our patients. The ever increasing emphasis on interprofessional care is part of family medicine training, and is encouraged and rewarded by the health system. It is cost-saving and it is in the best interest of the patients. Through family health teams, the family medicine specialist remains at the centre of this broader network of shared care.

Family physicians are a resource to a defined population

Family physicians in Canada are unique in the world. They are private practitioners, not government employees, billing a single public insurer for the care provided. As such, they effectively function as independent and trusted stewards of scarce health care resources, advocating for patients without fear of reprisal, and they can orchestrate health system changes from within. This translates into considerable independence and control over their practices and fosters a culture of professionalism, allowing family physicians to assume leadership and advocacy roles in their communities and nationally. Family physicians are trusted by their patients to have only their best interests in mind and by the government to make wise decisions and not abuse the great responsibility with which they have been entrusted.

Of course, the true secret of Canada’s success is our government-administered, universal, accessible, transportable, and comprehensive publicly funded health care system. While most countries will not be able to replicate this system, understanding why it so important for health—not only health care—can be helpful in moving toward better health for all. The evidence and literature on the merits of equity-based publicly funded health systems is overwhelming.4 For Canadian family physicians, the principles of the Canada Health Act listed above have a number of tangible effects. In a privately funded system, physicians compete for patients and have no stewardship over the collective health care resources. Consumer demands and the ever present threat of lawsuits tend to drive overprescribing and overtesting, raising the cost of medical care and medical liability insurance, and putting patients at risk of over-diagnosis and harmful interventions. By not competing for patients, Canadian physicians can be honest with patients and provide them the best evidence-based and patient-centred care. They have every incentive to provide patients with the preventive knowledge they need to stay healthy and away from their clinics, hospitals, imaging machines, and emergency departments.

The World Health Report on primary health care in 2008 emphasized 4 areas of reform to achieve health for all: service delivery, universal coverage, public policy, and leadership.5 While many Canadians reading this article might have a few constructive comments or an example of how our principles are more lofty than our practice, the Canadian system of primary care has much to teach the world in each of the World Health Report domains. Rather than showcase our crowd-control prowess or even our beautiful lakes (real or faux), next time we must show the world what Canada has to contribute to global health—the specialty of family medicine.

Footnotes

  • Cet article se trouve aussi en français à la page 652.

  • Competing interests

    None declared

  • The opinions expressed in commentaries are those of the authors. Publication does not imply endorsement by the College of Family Physicians of Canada.

  • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. ↵
    1. Macinko J,
    2. Starfield B,
    3. Shi L
    . The contribution of primary care systems to health outcomes within Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries, 1970–1998. Health Serv Res 2003;38(3):831-65.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Macinko J,
    2. Starfield B,
    3. Erinosho T
    . The impact of primary healthcare on population health in low- and middle-income countries. J Ambul Care Manage 2009;32(2):150-71.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. College of Family Physicians of Canada
    . Four principles of family medicine. Mississauga, ON: College of Family Physicians of Canada; 2006. Available from: www.cfpc.ca/Principles. Accessed 2011 Mar 3.
  4. ↵
    Canadian Doctors for Medicare [website]. Toronto, ON: Canadian Doctors for Medicare; 2011. Available from: www.canadiandoctorsformedicare.ca. Accessed 2011 Apr 14.
  5. ↵
    1. World Health Organization
    . World health report 2008: primary health care (now more than ever). Geneva, Switz: World Health Organization; 2008. Available from: www.who.int/whr/2008/en/index.html. Accessed 2011 Mar 3.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 57 (6)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 57, Issue 6
1 Jun 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Toronto’s G20 one year later
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Toronto’s G20 one year later
Barry N. Pakes, Jane Philpott, Lynda Redwood-Campbell, Katherine Rouleau
Canadian Family Physician Jun 2011, 57 (6) 650-651;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Toronto’s G20 one year later
Barry N. Pakes, Jane Philpott, Lynda Redwood-Campbell, Katherine Rouleau
Canadian Family Physician Jun 2011, 57 (6) 650-651;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Family physicians are skilled clinicians
    • The patient-physician relationship is central to the role of the family physician
    • Family medicine is a community-based discipline
    • Family physicians are a resource to a defined population
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Le G20 à Toronto, un an après
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Training policy limits career exploration in family medicine
  • Our role in making the Canadian health care system one of the world’s best
  • Food for thought, feeding the medical soul: COVID-19 pandemic lessons and reflections
Show more Commentary

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2023 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire