Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
EditorialEditorial

Will Triple C produce more and better family physicians?

Roger Ladouceur
Canadian Family Physician October 2012, 58 (10) 1059;
Roger Ladouceur
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
Figure

Many believe that family medicine is dying out. There are several reasons for this: when compared with other specialties, family medicine has the largest clinical scope and the shortest training; the demands and expectations, especially from patients, are very high; and the remuneration is much lower than in other specialties. Therefore, it is not surprising that few residents opt to specialize in family medicine. Nationally, only about 35% of postdoctoral training positions have been filled by family medicine residents, while many more family physicians will be needed to meet the demands of the population.1,2

New postgraduate training curriculum

The College of Family Physicians of Canada was possibly influenced by these facts. In June 2009, the College‘s Board of Directors passed a resolution stating that the Working Group on Postgraduate Curriculum Review (WGCR), a subcommittee of the Section of Teachers Council, was to prepare a report outlining a proposal for the introduction of a competency-based curriculum for family medicine residency training, using the CanMEDS–Family Medicine framework3 to guide its development. In March 2011, the WGCR produced the Triple C Competency-based Curriculum.4 Eleven recommendations were endorsed by the working group for the implementation of Triple C. The central one states that each family medicine residency training program in Canada is to establish a competency-based curriculum that is comprehensive, focused on continuity of care, and centred in family medicine.4

Even if this proposal appears logical, the central question is, will Triple C really provide better family physicians? Incidentally, this is the topic of the debate presented to you this month. Tannenbaum5 is in favour of Triple C—not surprising, as he is Chair of the WGCR (page 1070)—whereas Whitehead6 has several objections (page 1071).

This is a fundamental question. Even though the report re-maps the 4 principles of family medicine (the family physician is a skilled clinician; family medicine is a community-based discipline; the family physician is a resource to a defined population; the physician-patient relationship is central to the role of the family physician),7 some propositions bring substantial modifications: the scope of learning in family medicine should be comprehensive and defined by a set of competencies organized under the 7 professional roles of the CanMEDS–Family Medicine framework; a competency-based approach should be used to guide curriculum development and planning; family medicine program planners should maintain ownership over all aspects of the curriculum; experienced and skilled family medicine teachers should form the core of the educational faculty; and the duration of the program will be based on reaching the expected learning outcomes of the core family medicine program. Further, these modifications should apply to all family medicine teaching programs in Canada.

Many changes on the horizon

Faced with such modifications, one might question if these are well-founded recommendations. Has the proposed curriculum been tested? Do we have assurances that the result will be better-trained family physicians? Will there be more residents who choose to embrace this profession? Sadly, there is very little evidence to answer these questions. Indeed, the WGCR recognized this fact: “The impact of rotation structure on actual learning outcomes has been little examined.”4 As well, “Quality educational research is needed to answer questions about how certain competencies are best taught and evaluated.”4

So many unanswered questions leave us perplexed! Before the family medicine curriculum is changed and implemented in 17 medical faculties across Canada, would it not be preferable to evaluate the effects, or at least think about interim evaluations? Would it not be prudent to implement these changes in certain units only, and increase implementation once the curriculum has been tried and tested? Triple C is certainly a good idea, but will family physicians be better and more numerous as a result? This has yet to be proven.

Footnotes

  • Cet article se trouve aussi en français à la page 1060.

  • Competing interests

    None declared

  • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. ↵
    1. Macinko J,
    2. Starfield B,
    3. Shi L
    . Quantifying the health benefits of primary care physician supply in the United States. Int J Health Serv 2007;37(1):111-26.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Pierard E
    . The effect of physician supply on health status as measured in the NPHS. Waterloo, ON: University of Waterloo; 2009. Available from: http://economics.uwaterloo.ca/sites/economics.uwaterloo.ca/files/download_doc/The%20effect%20of%20physician%20supply%20on%20health%20status%20as%20measured%20in%20the%20NPHS.pdf. Accessed 2012 Sep 7.
  3. ↵
    1. Frank JR
    , editor. The CanMEDS 2005 physician competency framework. Better standards, better physicians, better care. Ottawa, ON: Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; 2005. Available from: www.royalcollege.ca/portal/page/portal/rc/common/documents/canmeds/resources/publications/framework_full_e.pdf. Accessed 2012 Sep 10.
  4. ↵
    1. Tannenbaum D,
    2. Kerr J,
    3. Konkin J,
    4. Organek A,
    5. Parsons E,
    6. Saucier D,
    7. et al
    . Triple C competency-based curriculum. Report of the Working Group on Postgraduate Curriculum Review—part 1. Mississauga, ON: College of Family Physicians of Canada; 2011. Available from: www.cfpc.ca/uploadedFiles/Education/_PDFs/WGCR_TripleC_Report_English_Final_18Mar11.pdf. Accessed 2012 Sep 10.
  5. ↵
    1. Tannenbaum D
    . Will the Triple C curriculum produce better family physicians? Yes [Debate]. Can Fam Physician 2012;58:1070-1072. (Eng), 1074,1076,1078 (Fr).
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Whitehead C
    . Will the Triple C curriculum produce better family physicians? No [Debate]. Can Fam Physician 2012;58:1071, 1073. (Eng), 1075,1077–8 (Fr).
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    College of Family Physicians of Canada [website]. Four principles of family medicine. Mississauga, ON: College of Family Physicians of Canada; 2012. Available from: www.cfpc.ca/Principles/. Accessed 2012 Sep 10.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 58 (10)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 58, Issue 10
1 Oct 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Will Triple C produce more and better family physicians?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Will Triple C produce more and better family physicians?
Roger Ladouceur
Canadian Family Physician Oct 2012, 58 (10) 1059;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Will Triple C produce more and better family physicians?
Roger Ladouceur
Canadian Family Physician Oct 2012, 58 (10) 1059;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • New postgraduate training curriculum
    • Many changes on the horizon
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Will the Triple C curriculum produce better family physicians?
  • Will the Triple C curriculum produce better family physicians?
  • Le nouveau cursus Triple C produira-t-il de meilleurs médecins de famille et en plus grand nombre?
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • La douleur chronique en pratique familiale : recherche et réflexions
  • Chronic pain in family practice: research and insights
  • La compression de la morbidité est morte; longue vie à la compression de la morbidité
Show more Éditorial

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2023 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire