Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About CFP Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About CFP Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
Review ArticlePractice

Understanding elder abuse in family practice

Mark J. Yaffe and Bachir Tazkarji
Canadian Family Physician December 2012, 58 (12) 1336-1340;
Mark J. Yaffe
Professor in the Department of Family Medicine at McGill University and St Mary’s Hospital Centre in Montreal, Que, and Director of Education and Training for the International Network for Prevention of Elder Abuse.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: mark.yaffe@mcgill.ca
Bachir Tazkarji
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objective To discuss what constitutes elder abuse, why family physicians should be aware of it, what signs and symptoms might suggest mistreatment of older adults, how the Elder Abuse Suspicion Index might help in identification of abuse, and what options exist for responding to suspicions of abuse.

Sources of information MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Social Work Abstracts were searched for publications in English or French, from 1970 to 2011, using the terms elder abuse, elder neglect, elder mistreatment, seniors, older adults, violence, identification, detection tools, and signs and symptoms. Relevant publications were reviewed.

Main message Elder abuse is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in older adults. While family physicians are well placed to identify mistreatment of seniors, their actual rates of reporting abuse are lower than those in other professions. This might be improved by an understanding of the range of acts that constitute elder abuse and what signs and symptoms seen in the office might suggest abuse. Detection might be enhanced by use of a short validated tool, such as the Elder Abuse Suspicion Index.

Conclusion Family physicians can play a larger role in identifying possible elder abuse. Once suspicion of abuse is raised, most communities have social service or law enforcement providers available to do additional assessments and interventions.

Case

Mrs B. is an 88-year-old widow who has been a patient in your practice for 27 years. She has stable ischemic heart disease and diet-controlled diabetes mellitus. You are concerned that her progressive hearing loss is interfering with her ability to comprehensively benefit from social contacts, but she resists repeated recommendations for audiology testing. You note to her that over time there has been marked deterioration in her short-term memory and suggestion of problems with judgment. She downplays these deficits and her current Mini-Mental State Examination score of 25 by insisting these are only “paper tests.” When she ignores your advice to stop driving, you notify the motor vehicle bureau about your concerns.

In order to better understand Mrs B., you do an audit of her chart. You are reminded that 25 years ago you had assisted in getting her holiday respite care for her 85-year-old father. On Mrs B.’s return she found her father thin, dehydrated, and confused. The nursing home explained he had refused to eat and that communication with him had been limited because few of the staff spoke Spanish. Mrs B. had expressed dismay over her father’s deterioration and the failure of the nursing home to contact her at the emergency telephone numbers she had provided.

Mrs B. currently lives alone and you have discussed with her that there are likely inadequacies in her food intake and that you are concerned about safe stove use. She has resisted these observations and your suggestion of a home visit assessment by a nurse or social worker. She does, however, consent to your proposal that you share your concerns with her only child, who lives about 2000 km away. The latter is difficult to reach by telephone, and voice messages you leave are not returned. When contact is eventually made, the daughter indicates she has adequate contact with Mrs B. through once-a-week telephone calls, and that her mother is a “normal 88-year-old” who requires no interventions.

Sources of information

MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Social Work Abstracts have been searched annually since 2003 by one of the authors (M.J.Y.) for publications from 1970 onwards in English or French, using the terms elder abuse, elder neglect, elder mistreatment, seniors, older adults, violence, identification, detection tools, and signs and symptoms. Relevant publications were reviewed, acknowledging certain limitations. Specifically, it has been noted that the field of elder abuse research is “young,” comprising primarily descriptive, observational, and case studies, no meta-analyses, and only a few intervention trials.1

Main messages

Elder abuse carries not only considerable morbidity, but also a surprisingly high rate of mortality not directly associated with specific acts of abuse.2 Physicians working with older adults therefore need to be aware of and sensitive to what is interchangeably called elder abuse, abuse of older adults, and mistreatment of seniors. It is defined as single or repeated acts of omission or commission causing harm or distress to an older person, occurring within any relationship where there is an expectation of trust by an individual with responsibility for the care of a protected person as a result of a family relationship or who assumes responsibility for care of the person voluntarily by contract or ties of friendship.3 Elder abuse is distinct from random or incidental criminal acts aimed at older people by individuals outside such relationships. While mistreatment can occur as a result of ignorance, most elder abuse is believed to be nonaccidental or intentional.4 In some societies the word elder never appears in the definition of abuse of seniors, reflecting a practice of identifying any community leader as an elder, independent of age.

Identification of elder abuse

Identification of elder abuse is dependent on victims or on people commonly in a position to be alert or sensitive to mistreatment of older adults: bank employees, law enforcement personnel, home care workers, lawyers, notaries, nurses, social workers, psychologists, and physicians. While various professions approach elder abuse differently,5 family physicians are well positioned to see signs or symptoms suggestive of abuse, given that they see unique patients an average of 4 to 5 times per year.6 Despite this, physician reporting of elder abuse has been suggested to be the lowest among health and social service workers.7

Prevalence estimates

Prevalence estimates for elder abuse differ because studies have tended to use varying definitions, methodologies, and locales.1,8–10 Most research has been conducted in Western countries and among cognitively intact, community-dwelling elderly patients, with reported estimates ranging from 2.2% to 18.4%.11–15 A study conducted in Canadian family practices, although not formally designed to measure prevalence, has suggested rates of senior mistreatment in the range of 12.0% to 13.3%.16

Risk factors

Research into elder abuse risk factors initially sought common factors for all aspects of abuse.17 For example, factors suggested to predispose care receivers to mistreatment include frailty, older age, female sex, dependency on the abuser, decline in mental health or cognitive impairment, impaired activities of daily living, problem behaviour, tendency to be physically or verbally abusive, isolation, and absence of anyone to call on for help. In contrast, factors suggested to predispose caregivers to mistreating someone include presence of caregiver stress, poor mental health, psychiatric illness, alcoholism, drugs, financial dependency on the care receiver, and being male. Research is now beginning to suggest that each manifestation of elder abuse might carry its own specific risk factors.

Elder abuse manifestations

Physical abuse: Physical abuse might include infliction of physical pain, injury, or willful deprivation by a caregiver or other provider of services necessary to maintain mental and physical health. Specific examples are summarized in Box 1.18–20 Resultant signs and symptoms might include unexplained bruises (especially finger- or knuckle-shaped bruises, commonly on the face, neck, and trunk); welts (especially on palms and soles in a linear distribution); lacerations, abrasions, and scars; unexplained sprains, fractures, or multiple traumas; unexplained behaviour changes suggesting undermedication or overmedication; unexplained physical pain; bruising, inflammation, tenderness, abrasions, or trauma to the genital area, suggesting sexual abuse; and apprehensiveness, withdrawal, anxiety, and sadness (which might include a spectrum of depressed mood, minor depressive symptoms, or major depression).

Box 1.

Acts suggestive of physical abuse

The following are suggestive of physical abuse:
  • Improper physical or chemical restraint

  • Use of a weapon

  • Individual hit, slapped, kicked, tied, shaken, choked, grabbed, pushed, shoved, slammed against a wall, punched, pinched, scratched, bit, burned, or scalded

  • Twisted limbs

  • Rough transfers

  • Frequent, unexplained, or inconsistently explained falls and injuries

  • Multiple visits to the emergency department

  • Sexual abuse

    • -Sexual contact, touching, rubbing, or masturbation that is forced, tricked, coerced, or manipulated, or when senior lacks capacity to consent

    • -Verbal threats or forced (hitting, holding down, weapon use) to give or receive oral, genital, or anal sex

    • -Individual forced to view or participate in pornographic or sexually explicit pictures or videos

    • -Offensive sexual talk

  • Data from Aravanis,18 Lachs and Pillemer,19 and Dyer et al.20

  • Psychological abuse: Psychological abuse might include willful or reckless verbal or nonverbal infliction of emotional or mental anguish and the use of physical or chemical restraint, medication, or isolation as punishment or as a substitute for treatment or care. Specific examples are summarized in Box 2.21,22 Resultant signs and symptoms might include apprehensiveness or physical avoidance; avoidance of eye contact or continual eye darting; unexplained quietness, passivity, withdrawal, and decreased social contact with people; anger, depression, or weight loss; a caregiver who tries to answer for the senior or to prevent a private interview or examination of the older adult; frequent requests for sedating medication; and frequently canceled appointments.

    Box 2.

    Acts suggestive of psychological abuse

    The following are suggestive of psychological abuse:
    • Lying to the individual

    • Hiding belongings

    • Humiliating or infantilizing

    • Making demeaning jokes

    • Coercion

    • Inappropriate shouting or yelling

    • Controlling contact with people (social isolation from family, friends, etc)

    • Threatening to hit or throw something

    • Talking disrespectfully

    • Not respecting privacy

    • Not respecting belongings or threatening to destroy property

    • Insulting, swearing, name calling, or putting down

    • Threatening with weapons, deprivation, punishment, guardian-ship, abandonment, or institutionalization

    • Intentional overmedication

  • Data from Clarke and Pierson,21 and Bonnie and Wallace.22

  • Financial or material abuse: Financial or material abuse might include expenditure, diminution, or use of property, assets, or resources of a person without the voluntary consent of that person or that person’s legally authorized representative. Specific examples are summarized in Box 3.23–26 Resultant signs and symptoms might include unexplained anxiety, apprehensiveness, or avoidance; social withdrawal and decreased contact with people; depression and weight loss; being under-medicated; clothing that is inadequate or inappropriate for the weather; and tearfulness or guilty feelings about identifying the abuser.

    Box 3.

    Acts suggestive of financial or material abuse

    The following are suggestive of financial or material abuse:
    • Improper taking, misuse, or concealment of resources, property, or assets with or without coercion, enticement, intimidation, or deception

    • Use of bank account, money, or credit or debit cards against the individual’s will or without his or her knowledge

    • Individual forced to give power of attorney

    • Cashed cheques or property sold and money kept

    • Forged signatures

    • Individual forced to sign documents against will or understanding

    • Misinformation about funds

    • Misappropriation of funds, property, or power of attorney for personal gain

    • Employment of service people for personal gain

  • Data from National Center on Elder Abuse,23,26 Tueth,24 and Hafemeister.25

  • Neglect: Neglect is the failure of a caregiver or mandated person to comprehensively attend to food, water, shelter, clothing, medication, safety, access to health care services or appointments, and protection from abuse or exploitation. Self-neglect (not unique to seniors) might be reflective of personal problems that generally fall outside the realm of elder abuse. Specific examples of neglect from third parties are summarized in Box 4.18,20,21 Resultant signs and symptoms might include poor mobility; decubitus ulcers, bedsores, and pressure sores; poor hygiene and body odour; frequent infections; unexplained or uncontrolled medical conditions; weight loss, fearfulness, anxiety, or depression.

    Box 4.

    Acts suggestive of neglect

    The following are suggestive of neglect:
    • Denial of access to or assistance with necessary aids (eg, walkers, wheelchairs, eyeglasses, hearing aids)

    • Individual left alone or unsupervised

    • Unsanitary living conditions

    • Home too hot or too cold

    • Individual denied access to telephone

    • Inappropriate clothing; diapers or bedding not changed

    • Medications not or irregularly supervised

    • Poor dietary intake; cachexia

    • Delays in seeking treatment

    • Inconsistent follow-up

    • Frequent switching of physicians

  • Data from Aravanis,18 Dyer et al,20 and Clarke and Pierson.21

  • Institutional neglect: Elder abuse is not limited to the home or to a community encounter, but might occur within retirement homes, assisted living facilities, nursing homes, and hospitals. Specific examples are summarized in Box 5.27 Factors postulated to explain neglect of residents include poor working conditions, unpredictable work schedules, low salaries, inadequate staff training and supervision (especially to deal with disruptive or insulting behaviour by the residents), low staff motivation, prejudiced attitudes to certain seniors, and noncongruence between a facility’s mission and the particular health and environmental needs of an older adult.28

    Box 5.

    Acts suggestive of neglect in institutions

    The following are suggestive of institutional neglect:
    • Inadequate custodial care

    • Inadequate supervision of institution residents

    • Low or unpredictable nursing and nursing aide care

    • Delays in response time to needs of seniors

    • Inadequate nutrition

    • Substandard, overcrowded, or unsanitary living environments

    • Poor staff communication skills

    • Language competencies not adequate to meet seniors’ needs

    • Inappropriate or aggressive staff-client interactions

    • Misuse of physical or chemical restraints

  • Data from Hawes et al.27

  • Case evolution

    You consider other ways to reach out to Mrs B. You wonder to what extent her resistance (self-neglect) reflects suspicion of the health care community because of the memory of her father’s experience with institutional neglect, and how much is the outcome of denial about her deterioration. Parallel to this you also reflect on how much the apparent family neglect from the daughter is owing to the daughter’s own denial versus some potential secondary gain. You contact the daughter again to inquire in a general way about what financial assets Mrs B. might have to support her care in the future. You learn that the daughter holds power of attorney, but infrequently checks into Mrs B.’s financial affairs. In fact, while Mrs B. employs a woman a few times a week to help with cleaning and meals, the daughter acknowledges she knows little about this person and what she is paid.

    The multifaceted nature of this case prompts you to seek further information on elder abuse and how to proceed, while keeping the identity of the patient anonymous. Within most communities this support is available from local police dedicated to mistreatment of seniors or from adult protection or social services. The social worker you contact observes that while Mrs B. appears to show some signs of poor judgment, she is nonetheless not legally impaired and cannot be forced to change things against her will. The social worker reminds you of the often subtle and frustrating presentation of elder abuse, and that a number of manifestations of abuse might coexist. For example, she notes that Mrs B.’s infrequent office visits might be a way of hiding manifestations of physical abuse. She therefore recommends periodically scheduled visits initiated by your office to help you and your nurse keep an eye on Mrs B. on a regular basis.

    Detection of elder abuse

    Elder abuse detection is challenging because of its sometimes vague or confusing signs and symptoms, and its complex social implications. Guidelines do not agree about whether physicians should screen for mistreatment of older adults29; nonetheless, physicians might be confronted with situations that arouse suspicions of such abuse. The Elder Abuse Suspicion Index (EASI) (Table 1) might be a useful tool to employ in that context. Family physicians report that the EASI is simple to use and can be administered quickly, and that its use is a convenient means of learning about the scope of elder abuse.29 It comprises questions that are validated for use in the office setting on seniors with Mini-Mental State Examination scores of 24 or higher, and its psychometric properties and their implications have been described.29 It is available in several languages,30 and in its English and French versions the wording has been found to be understandable and acceptable to seniors across a broad age spectrum.31 It can be used repeatedly to desensitize patients to questioning.29 Its simplicity might help minimize negative feelings intrinsic to many victims, including denial; reluctance to report abuse because of not wanting to see the abuser punished; a sense of embarrassment, humiliation, or shame; or fear of breaking family solidarity, of abuser retaliation, or of loss of abuser help with care.32

    View this table:
    • View inline
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Elder Abuse Suspicion Index: Questions 1 through 5 are asked of the patient and question 6 is answered by the physician; 1 or more positive responses on questions 2 to 6 could suggest elder abuse.

    Mandatory elder abuse reporting laws for detected cases exist in only a few Canadian jurisdictions, and currently there is no case law in Canada addressing physicians’ failure to report suspected cases. The EASI was designed not necessarily as a definitive diagnostic tool but rather to generate reasonable suspicion to justify a physician doing a more in-depth exploration. This might include a culturally sensitive inquiry with a possible victim in the absence of others, an abuse-oriented physical examination, or obtaining patient permission to make referral to an appropriate community expert in elder abuse. To facilitate this process a pocket card has been created that reproduces the EASI questions and provides unique Canadian provincial and territorial resources that doctors can use to get assistance or advice once there is a concern or suspected case of abuse. This EASI pocket card is available online,33 or durable hard copies can be purchased.34

    Conclusion

    Elder abuse is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in older adults for which family physicians need to be vigilant. Family physicians are, by virtue of their frequent contact with seniors (and optimally a strong trusting relationship established with them over time), well placed to try to identify and comprehensively document signs and symptoms suggestive of mistreatment. The EASI is an internationally recognized tool validated for use by family physicians to help in this process. Once there is a suspicion of abuse, physicians are encouraged to consult with adult protection or social services or with police officers trained in assessment of and response to mistreatment of older adults.

    Notes

    KEY POINTS

    Physicians working with older adults need to be aware of and sensitive to the signs of elder abuse. The Elder Abuse Suspicion Index is a validated tool for use by family physicians to help identify such abuse. Once there is a suspicion of abuse, physicians are encouraged to consult with adult protection or social services or with police officers trained in assessment of and response to mistreatment of older adults.

    The Care of the Elderly series was developed as an initiative of the Continuing Professional Development Committee of the Canadian Geriatrics Society in collaboration with Canadian Family Physician to provide articles on geriatric topics written by family physicians for family physicians.

    Footnotes

    • This article is eligible for Mainpro-M1 credits.

    • To earn credits, go to www.cfp.ca and click on the Mainpro link.

    • La traduction en français de cet article se trouve à www.cfp.ca dans la table des matières du numéro de décembre 2012 à la page e692.

    • This article has been peer reviewed.

    • Competing interests

      None declared

    • Contributors

      Dr Yaffe completed the literature search. Both authors reviewed the literature and prepared the article for publication.

    • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada

    References

    1. ↵
      1. Daly JM,
      2. Merchant ML,
      3. Jogerst GJ
      . Elder abuse research: a systematic review. J Elder Abuse Negl 2011;23(4):348-65.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    2. ↵
      1. Lachs MS,
      2. Williams CS,
      3. O’Brien S,
      4. Pillemer KA,
      5. Charlson ME
      . The mortality of elder mistreatment. JAMA 1998;280(5):428-32.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    3. ↵
      1. World Health Organization
      . The Toronto declaration on the global prevention of elder abuse. Geneva, Switz: World Health Organization; 2002.
    4. ↵
      1. Hamp LF
      . Analysis of elder abuse and neglect under state law. In: Bonnie RJ, Wallace RB, editors. Elder mistreatment: abuse, neglect, and exploitation in an aging America. National Research Council Panel to Review Risk and Prevalence of Elder Abuse and Neglect, Committee on National Statistics and Law, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2003. p. 181-237.
    5. ↵
      1. Yaffe MJ,
      2. Wolfson C,
      3. Lithwick M
      . Professionals show different enquiry strategies for elder abuse detection: implications for training and interprofessional care. J Interprof Care 2009;23(6):646-54.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    6. ↵
      1. Harrell R,
      2. Tornjo CH,
      3. McLaughlan J,
      4. Pavlik VN,
      5. Hyman DJ,
      6. Dyer CB
      . How geriatricians identify elder abuse and neglect. Am J Med Sci 2002;32(1):34-8.
      OpenUrl
    7. ↵
      1. O’Brien JG
      . Elder abuse and the physician. Mich Med 1986;85(11):618, 620.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    8. ↵
      1. Thomas C
      . The first national study of elder abuse and neglect: contrast with results from other studies. J Elder Abuse Negl 2000;12(1):1-14.
      OpenUrl
      1. Van Bavel M,
      2. Janssens K,
      3. Schakenraad W,
      4. Thurlings N
      . Abuse in Europe: background and position paper. Utrecht, Germany: The European Reference Framework Online for the Prevention of Elder Abuse and Neglect; 2010.
    9. ↵
      Definition Consensus Workshop report: defining and measuring elder abuse and neglect—preparatory work required to measure the prevalence of abuse and neglect of older adults in Canada. Toronto, ON: National Initiative for Care of the Elderly; 2010. Available from: www.nicenet.ca/detail.aspx?menu=52&app=234&cat1=651&tp=2&lk=no. Accessed 2011 Jul 29.
    10. ↵
      1. Podnieks E
      . National survey on abuse of the elderly in Canada. J Elder Abuse Negl 1993;4(1–2):5-58.
      OpenUrl
      1. Biggs S,
      2. Manthorpe J,
      3. Tinker A,
      4. Doyle M,
      5. Erens B
      . Mistreatment of older people in the United Kingdom: findings from the First National Prevalence Study. J Elder Abuse Negl 2009;21(1):1-14.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Lowenstein A,
      2. Eisikovits Z,
      3. Band-Winterstein T,
      4. Enosh G
      . Is elder abuse and neglect a social phenomenon? Data from the First National Prevalence Survey in Israel. J Elder Abuse Negl 2009;21(3):253-77.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Naughton C,
      2. Treacy MP,
      3. Drennan J,
      4. Lafferty A,
      5. Lyons I,
      6. Phelan A,
      7. et al
      . Abuse and neglect of older people in Ireland. Dublin, Ireland: National Centre for the Protection of Older People, University College Dublin; 2010.
    11. ↵
      1. Acierno R,
      2. Hernandez MA,
      3. Amstadter AB,
      4. Resnick HS,
      5. Steve K,
      6. Muzzy W,
      7. et al
      . Prevalence and correlates of emotional, physical, sexual, and financial abuse and potential abuse in the United States: the National Elder Mistreatment Study. Am J Public Health 2010;100(2):292-7.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    12. ↵
      1. Yaffe MJ,
      2. Weiss D,
      3. Wolfson C,
      4. Lithwick M
      . Detection and prevalence of abuse of older males: perspectives from family practice. J Elder Abuse Negl 2007;19(1–2):47-60.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    13. ↵
      1. Bonnie RJ,
      2. Wallace RB
      , editors. Elder mistreatment: abuse, neglect, and exploitation in an aging America. National Research Council Panel to Review Risk and Prevalence of Elder Abuse and Neglect, Committee on National Statistics and Law, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2003. Risk factors for elder mistreatment; p. 88-103.
    14. ↵
      1. Aravanis SC
      . Diagnostic and treatment guidelines on elder abuse and neglect. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association; 1996.
    15. ↵
      1. Lachs MS,
      2. Pillemer K
      . Abuse and neglect of elderly persons. N Engl J Med 1995;333(7):437-43.
      OpenUrl
    16. ↵
      1. Dyer CB,
      2. Connelly MT,
      3. McFeeley P
      . The clinical and medical forensics of elder abuse and neglect. In: Bonnie RJ, Wallace RB, editors. Elder mistreatment: abuse, neglect, and exploitation in an aging America. National Research Council Panel to Review Risk and Prevalence of Elder Abuse and Neglect, Committee on National Statistics and Law, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2003. p. 339-81.
    17. ↵
      1. Clarke ME,
      2. Pierson W
      . Management of elder abuse in the emergency department. Emerg Med Clin North Am 1999;17(3):631-44.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    18. ↵
      1. Bonnie RJ,
      2. Wallace RB
      , editors. Elder mistreatment: abuse, neglect, and exploitation in an aging America. National Research Council Panel to Review Risk and Prevalence of Elder Abuse and Neglect, Committee on National Statistics and Law, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2003. Concepts, definitions, and guidelines for measurement; p. 34-59.
    19. ↵
      1. National Center on Elder Abuse
      . The National Elder Abuse Incidence Study: final report. Washington, DC: National Aging Information Center; 1998.
    20. ↵
      1. Tueth MJ
      . Exposing financial exploitation of impaired elderly persons. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2000;8(2):104-11.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    21. ↵
      1. Hafemeister TL
      . Financial abuse of the elderly in domestic settings. In: Bonnie RJ, Wallace RB, editors. Elder mistreatment: abuse, neglect, and exploitation in an aging America. National Research Council Panel to Review Risk and Prevalence of Elder Abuse and Neglect, Committee on National Statistics and Law, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2003. p. 385-9.
    22. ↵
      1. National Center on Elder Abuse
      . Elder abuse: questions and answers. Washington, DC: National Aging Information Center; 1996.
    23. ↵
      1. Hawes C,
      2. Blevins D,
      3. Shanley L
      . Preventing abuse and neglect in nursing homes: the role of the nurse aide registries. Report to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (formerly HCFA) from the School of Rural Public Health. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University System Health Science Center; 2001.
    24. ↵
      1. Lachs M,
      2. Bachman R,
      3. Williams CS,
      4. O’Leary JR
      . Resident to resident elder mistreatment and police contact in nursing homes: findings from a population-based cohort. J Am Geriatr Soc 2007;55(6):840-5.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    25. ↵
      1. Yaffe MJ,
      2. Wolfson C,
      3. Lithwick M,
      4. Weiss D
      . Development and validation of a tool to improve physician identification of elder abuse: the Elder Abuse Suspicion Index (EASI). J Elder Abuse Negl 2008;20(3):276-300.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    26. ↵
      1. Yaffe MJ,
      2. Lithwick M,
      3. Wolfson C
      . Elder Abuse Suspicion Index. Montreal, QC: McGill University; 2006. Available from: https://secureweb.mcgill.ca/familymed/sites/mcgill.ca.familymed/files/EASI_Web.pdf. Accessed 2012 Mar 13.
    27. ↵
      1. Yaffe MJ,
      2. Weiss D,
      3. Lithwick M
      . Seniors’ self-administration of the Elder Abuse Suspicion Index (EASI): a feasibility study. J Elder Abuse Negl 2012;24(4):277-92.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    28. ↵
      1. Baumhover LA,
      2. Beall SC
      . Prognosis: elder mistreatment in health care settings. In: Baumhover LA, Beall SC, editors. Abuse, neglect, and exploitation of older persons. Baltimore, MD: Health Professions Press; 1996.
    29. ↵
      Elder Abuse Suspicion Index [French]. Toronto, ON: National Initiative for Care of the Elderly; 2006. Available from: www.nicenet.ca/files/U_of_T_Nice_175084_EASI_Revised_5_Panel.PDF. Accessed 2011 Nov 25.
    30. ↵
      National Initiative for Care of the Elderly [website]. Tool overview. Toronto, ON: National Initiative for Care of the Elderly; 2011. Available from: www.nicenet.ca/detail.aspx?menu=43&app=206&cat1=664&tp=2&lk=no. Accessed 2011 Nov 25.
    View Abstract
    PreviousNext
    Back to top

    In this issue

    Canadian Family Physician: 58 (12)
    Canadian Family Physician
    Vol. 58, Issue 12
    1 Dec 2012
    • Table of Contents
    • About the Cover
    • Index by author
    Print
    Download PDF
    Article Alerts
    Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
    Email Article

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Understanding elder abuse in family practice
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
    Citation Tools
    Understanding elder abuse in family practice
    Mark J. Yaffe, Bachir Tazkarji
    Canadian Family Physician Dec 2012, 58 (12) 1336-1340;

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    Respond to this article
    Share
    Understanding elder abuse in family practice
    Mark J. Yaffe, Bachir Tazkarji
    Canadian Family Physician Dec 2012, 58 (12) 1336-1340;
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Jump to section

    • Article
      • Abstract
      • Case
      • Sources of information
      • Main messages
      • Conclusion
      • Notes
      • Footnotes
      • References
    • Figures & Data
    • Info & Metrics
    • eLetters
    • PDF

    Related Articles

    • Comprendre la maltraitance des aînés en pratique familiale
    • Scopus
    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar

    Cited By...

    • Elder abuse: an approach to identification, assessment and intervention
    • Scopus (23)
    • Google Scholar

    More in this TOC Section

    Practice

    • Palliative care in patients with severe mental illness
    • Quick and painless
    • Navigating cannabinoid choices for chronic neuropathic pain in older adults
    Show more Practice

    Clinical Review

    • Colorectal cancer screening for patients with a family history of colorectal cancer or adenomas
    • Demystifying spasticity in primary care
    • Degenerative cervical myelopathy
    Show more Clinical Review

    Similar Articles

    Navigate

    • Home
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Collections - English
    • Collections - Française

    For Authors

    • Authors and Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Permissions
    • Terms of Use

    General Information

    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Subscribers

    Journal Services

    • Email Alerts
    • Twitter
    • RSS Feeds

    Copyright © 2019 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

    Powered by HighWire