Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
Research ArticleProgram Description

Training in interprofessional collaboration

Pedagogic innovation in family medicine units

Line Paré, Jean Maziade, Francine Pelletier, Nathalie Houle and Maximilien Iloko-Fundi
Canadian Family Physician April 2012; 58 (4) e203-e209;
Line Paré
MSW
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: line_pare@ssss.gouv.qc.ca
Jean Maziade
MD CCMF FCMF MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Francine Pelletier
MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nathalie Houle
MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maximilien Iloko-Fundi
MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1

    Practical training objectives accepted by participating disciplines

    OBJECTIVESCOMPETENCIES
    Use interprofessional collaboration to solve primary health care problems while respecting the patient as an essential partner
    • Describe the philosophy of interprofessional collaboration and explain how it can be used to solve problems requiring a comprehensive approach, specifically for patients who are vulnerable or who present with complex problems

    • Explain the role, fields of intervention, and expertise of health care professionals and social workers active in the clinical setting

    • Become familiar with the resources available in the community

    • Assess the merits of interprofessional collaboration in the patient’s best interest

    • Make good use of referral and consultation procedures while ensuring that the patient agrees with the intervention goals and resources selected

    • Share decisions in the problem-solving process

    Develop the skills required for effective interprofessional collaboration
    • Be open to collaborative work

    • Clearly transmit relevant information (concise summary of key facts, visual contact with others, etc)

    • Communicate clearly, effectively, and respectfully

    • Actively participate in collaborative work in a cooperative manner by respecting different points of view and truly listening to what people have to say

    • Write in a concise, structured, and readable manner using the right terminology

    • Take into account differences in disciplinary jargon when sharing information in order to foster mutual understanding

    • Know how to use communication tools to solve problems and manage conflict

    Assume one’s ethical, moral, and legal professional responsibilities by involving the patient when working in a collaborative context
    • Assume one’s responsibilities based on one’s professional role and work in a team with other resources and partners

    • Coordinate professional interventions associated with one’s professional role, taking into account the team and the patient

    • Determine how professional liability influences the interprofessional collaborative approach ethically, morally, and legally

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Training themes

    SESSIONPHASE 1: PROFESSIONALSPHASE 3: STUDENTS
    1
    • Introduction

    • General concepts

    • Communication

    • Interprofessional collaboration: from theory to practice

    2
    • The role of team members

    • Teamwork

    • The role of professionals

    3
    • Problem solving and conflict management

    • A guide to interprofessional collaboration

    • Teamwork

    4
    • A plan for continuous improvement

    • Interprofessional collaboration on a day-to-day basis

    • View popup
    Table 3

    Participating professionals (N = 42) and students (N = 71) per discipline who completed the evaluation questionnaire

    RESPONDENTSNURSINGMEDICINESOCIAL WORKNUTRITIONOCCUPATIONAL THERAPYPSYCHOLOGYOTHERTOTAL*
    Professionals, n10156111135
    Students, n8447000059
    • ↵* The evaluation took place during the final training activity. Those who were absent owing to vacation or to required clinic or teaching duties did not complete the evaluation. Analysis indicated no reason to expect a nonresponse bias, as there was no relationship between the training activity date and the assignment of vacation and required duties.

    • View popup
    Table 4

    Perception of knowledge and skills acquisition before-and-after testing: Scores are presented as the average rating on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree).

    KNOWLEDGE AND SKILLS ACQUIRED OR DEVELOPEDPROFESSIONALS* (N = 35)STUDENTS* (N = 59)
    BEFOREAFTERBEFOREAFTER
    Know the concepts of interprofessional collaboration applied to practice in primary health care and services2.773.91†2.884.12†
    Know the role and expertise of other professionals3.424.14†3.464.12†
    Recognize and respect the contribution of other professionals and the obstacles they face in accomplishing their tasks3.894.40†4.374.46
    Master the skills required for effective patient-centred, interprofessional collaboration3.203.86†3.544.04†
    Share information and decisions with other professionals on referrals or joint follow-up needs3.794.37†3.884.42†
    Be equipped to participate in interprofessional collaboration when providing primary health care and services2.804.09†3.024.00†
    Identify clinical situations in which interprofessional collaboration is in the patient’s best interest3.604.14†3.544.29†
    Recognize the sources of problems or conflicts that could impede care and service delivery3.173.89†3.234.17†
    Assume one’s professional responsibilities in the context of interprofessional collaboration3.974.40†3.884.37†
    Be equipped to consider the patient as an essential partner3.544.06†4.024.43†
    Take into account the views of other professionals in the context of interprofessional collaboration3.944.46†4.294.56†
    Overall average3.464.15†3.654.27†
    • ↵* Crude data are presented because the differences with respect to sex and profession of the participants were not statistically significant.

    • ↵† The change in score is statistically significant (P < .05); Wilcoxon nonparametric test used.

    • View popup
    Table 5

    Changes in attitude toward interprofessional collaborative practice: Attitudes were significantly more positive (P < .001) after training (Wilcoxon nonparametric test).

    ATTITUDE BEFOR→ AFTER THE TRAININGPROFESSIONALS* (N = 38), N (%)STUDENTS* (N = 57), N (%)
    Very positive → very positive3 (7.9)11 (19.3)
    Very positive → positive01 (1.75)
    Positive → very positive19 (50.0)13 (22.8)
    Positive → positive7 (18.4)21 (36.9)
    Neutral → very positive3 (7.9)2 (3.51)
    Neutral → positive6 (15.8)8 (14.0)
    Neutral →neutral01 (1.75)
    • ↵* Crude data are presented because the differences with respect to sex and profession of the participants were not statistically significant.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 58 (4)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 58, Issue 4
1 Apr 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Training in interprofessional collaboration
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Training in interprofessional collaboration
Line Paré, Jean Maziade, Francine Pelletier, Nathalie Houle, Maximilien Iloko-Fundi
Canadian Family Physician Apr 2012, 58 (4) e203-e209;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Training in interprofessional collaboration
Line Paré, Jean Maziade, Francine Pelletier, Nathalie Houle, Maximilien Iloko-Fundi
Canadian Family Physician Apr 2012, 58 (4) e203-e209;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Program description
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Notes
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Mental health and addictions capacity building for community health centres in Ontario
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The SAFE (Social Accountability as the Framework for Engagement) for Health Institutions project
  • Chronic noncancer pain management
  • Home-based primary care in Canada
Show more Program Description

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2025 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire