Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
Research ArticlePractice

Improving the diagnosis of asthma in a primary care practice

Michelle Greiver, Clea Lang, Jon Hunchuck and Karen Rothschild
Canadian Family Physician July 2012, 58 (7) 773-774;
Michelle Greiver
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Clea Lang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jon Hunchuck
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karen Rothschild
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • CFPlus
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

As part of a provincial quality improvement program,1 we recently reviewed our practice processes for diagnosing and managing asthma. Our quality team includes an office manager, a clinical pharmacist, a nurse practitioner, a family physician, and a quality improvement facilitator.

Process for asthma diagnosis

Our first step was to correctly identify all patients with asthma in this practice of 1296 patients. We used an electronic medical record query to look for any encounter with a diagnosis of asthma (ICD-9 code 493) during the past 4 years. We found 100 patients. Asthma guidelines recommend that patients with suspected asthma have objective testing of lung function to confirm the diagnosis; this consists of pulmonary function tests (PFTs) before and after bronchodilator inhalation, followed by methacholine challenge (MC) if the PFT results are negative.2,3 Eight patients either had positive objective test results in the past or could not be tested because they were younger than 6 years old, had dementia, or had other conditions that precluded testing. A chart review found that 26 patients had been incorrectly assigned a code of 493, as they had bronchitis or other nonasthmatic conditions. Sixty-six patients, therefore, had clinically suspected but unconfirmed asthma.

We then mailed letters to all patients with unconfirmed asthma inviting them to have PFTs. (The letter inviting patients for PFTs is available from CFPlus.*) We collaborated with staff members at our hospital’s respiratory department; the PFTs were to be done at their facility, and they also automatically offered MCs to all patients with negative PFT results and with no contraindications to MC. The hospital’s respiratory department telephoned all patients who received invitation letters to offer them appointments. We mailed a second letter to those patients who did not respond to the first letter or telephone call.

Results

Thirty-one patients (47%) had PFTs done. Five (16%) of those patients’ PFT results were consistent with asthma. Twenty-four of the 26 patients who had normal PFT results then had MCs. Thirteen (54%) of those patients’ MC results were consistent with asthma.

We have an alert in the electronic charts of the 35 patients who did not go for PFTs, reminding us to discuss and offer them the test at their next clinical visit.

There is evidence that asthma might be overdiagnosed.4 We found that 48% of the patients who presented for testing because they had clinically suspected asthma did not have objective evidence of asthma. The practice asthma registry now includes 27 patients (2% of the total practice population). If all 35 patients who did not respond were found to have positive results on objective testing, our proportion of patients with asthma would be 5%; this is less than the reported prevalence in Ontario, which is 13.3%.5

Conclusion

Figure 1 is the process map we created for asthma diagnosis and management in our office. It is possible to improve the diagnosis of asthma in a primary care practice by systematically inviting patients with suspected asthma for objective testing. However, many of our patients did not go for testing, most initial PFTs had negative results, and we also had fewer asthmatic patients than expected.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 1.

Office process map for asthma management

Dx—diagnosis, EMR—electronic medical record, ICS—inhaled corticosteroid, MC—methacholine challenge, PFT—pulmonary function test, Rx—prescription.

Acknowledgments

We thank Drs Alan Kaplan and Anthony D’Urzo for their review of our asthma process map.

Notes

We encourage readers to share some of their practice experience: the neat little tricks that solve difficult clinical situations. Praxis articles can be submitted online at http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/cfp or through the CFP website www.cfp.ca under “Authors and Reviewers.”

Footnotes

  • ↵* The invitation letter for pulmonary function testing is available at www.cfp.ca. Go to the full text of this article online, then click on CFPlus in the menu at the top right-hand side of the page.

  • This article is eligible for Mainpro-M1 credits. To earn credits, go to www.cfp.ca and click on the Mainpro link.

  • La traduction en français de cet article se trouve à www.cfp.ca dans la table des matières du numéro de juillet 2012 à la page e382.

  • Competing interests

    None declared

  • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. ↵
    Quality Improvement and Innovation Partnership [website]. Toronto, ON: Health Quality Ontario; 2012. Available from: www.qiip.ca. Accessed 2012 May 18.
  2. ↵
    1. Lougheed MD,
    2. Lemière C,
    3. Dell SD,
    4. Ducharme FM,
    5. Fitzgerald JM,
    6. Leigh R,
    7. et al
    . Canadian Thoracic Society Asthma Management Continuum—2010 consensus summary for children six years of age and over, and adults. Can Respir J 2010;17(1):15-24.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Kaplan AG,
    2. Balter MS,
    3. Bell AD,
    4. Kim H,
    5. McIvor RA
    . Diagnosis of asthma in adults. CMAJ 2009;181(10):E210-20. Epub 2009 Sep 21.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Aaron SD,
    2. Vandemheen KL,
    3. Boulet LP,
    4. McIvor RA,
    5. Fitzgerald JM,
    6. Hernandez P,
    7. et al
    . Overdiagnosis of asthma in obese and nonobese adults. CMAJ 2008;179(11):1121-31. Erratum in: CMAJ 2008;179(12)1301.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Gershon AS,
    2. Guan J,
    3. Wang C,
    4. To T
    . Trends in asthma prevalence and incidence in Ontario, Canada, 1996–2005: a population study. Am J Epidemiol 2010;172(6):728-36. Epub 2010 Aug 17.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 58 (7)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 58, Issue 7
1 Jul 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Improving the diagnosis of asthma in a primary care practice
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Improving the diagnosis of asthma in a primary care practice
Michelle Greiver, Clea Lang, Jon Hunchuck, Karen Rothschild
Canadian Family Physician Jul 2012, 58 (7) 773-774;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Improving the diagnosis of asthma in a primary care practice
Michelle Greiver, Clea Lang, Jon Hunchuck, Karen Rothschild
Canadian Family Physician Jul 2012, 58 (7) 773-774;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Process for asthma diagnosis
    • Results
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • CFPlus
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Améliorer le diagnostic de l’asthme en pratique de soins primaires
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Practice

  • Managing type 2 diabetes in primary care during COVID-19
  • Effectiveness of dermoscopy in skin cancer diagnosis
  • Spontaneous pneumothorax in children
Show more Practice

Praxis

  • Aide à la décision d’utiliser ou non les gliflozines pour l’insuffisance cardiaque avec fraction d’éjection supérieure à 40 %, à l’intention des patients
  • Patient decision aid for flozins in heart failure and ejection fraction greater than 40%
  • Examens et traitements à reconsidérer en médecine du sport et de l’exercice pédiatrique
Show more Praxis

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2023 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire