Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
OtherCollege

It’s about time: 3-year FM residency training

Sandy Buchman
Canadian Family Physician September 2012; 58 (9) 1045;
Sandy Buchman
MD CCFP FCFP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
Figure

Australia, New Zealand, and Ireland offer 5-year family medicine (FM) residency training. The UK is recommending moving to a 4- and eventually 5-year program on top of a 2-year foundational program.1 All European countries train FM residents longer than 3 years. When the US soon moves from a 3- to a 4-year residency, Canada will have the shortest program in the world by a full 2 years. What do our international colleagues understand about the optimal length of training that we do not?

Debate about the length and scope of FM residency is not new.2–9 Indeed, our FM residency started as a 3-year program in 1966, but was reduced to 2 years in the 1970s owing to funding concerns. The literature has scant evidence for what constitutes adequate time for training.2 So why re-open this conversation? Because while the length of training has remained the same since the 1970s, medicine, family practice, and the health care needs of our patients have not. Canada is not the same in 2012 as it was in 1972 or even 1992. A culturally mixed, aging population with multiple chronic comorbidities and complex needs, an evolution to interprofessional care, nonphysician providers’ claims that they can adequately provide most care currently delivered in ambulatory settings, increasing social disparity, technological innovation, exploding medical knowledge and primary care research, new public health issues, recent restrictions on residency training hours, and a huge shift of medical care from hospitals to communities are but a few of the challenges faced by our FM residencies.

It is to our 2-year programs’ credit that, despite these challenges, graduating FPs provide excellent care to Canadians. But there are problems. Fewer FPs are providing full-scope, comprehensive care. More graduates are opting for office-based practice only. Only 10.5% of FPs practise intrapartum obstetrics.10 Most are not performing procedures that were once frequent in family practice. Many are opting out of hospital or emergency care. Proportionally fewer practise in remote and rural areas. Only 42% provide care in the home, and of those younger than 35, only 30% do.10 About a third opt for restricted or focused practices.

Many factors contribute, but it is likely that Canada’s current 2-year residency is too short to adequately enable residents to feel confident and achieve the many high-level competencies required to practise FM today. There just is not enough time to learn it all—especially the “out-of-office” or “harder-to-deliver” care described above. It is time to extend FM residency to at least 3 years so our residents can confidently practise full-scope, comprehensive FM safely and effectively anywhere in Canada.

As other providers seek increasing scopes of practice, and governments support their efforts, it is time for FPs to emphasize the secondary and tertiary competencies that distinguish us—especially the “harder-to-deliver” care FPs are leaving behind. Such care necessitates physician involvement and, owing to its complexity, logically requires more time to learn than it did 30 or 40 years ago.

As is now well known, the CFPC’s Triple C curriculum11 is moving from time-based to competency-based training. The prediction is that most residents will achieve the current core competencies within 2 years.2 In a Triple C world this is suggested as the minimum time required to develop confidence, competence, and professional identity. It is argued that it is not possible to determine the optimal length of training until each program has a competency-based, in-training assessment in place. This makes intuitive sense, but can we afford to wait 5 to 10 years to find out, while fewer FPs practise truly broad-scope care?

Triple C also does not address some of the shortcomings noted above in practising comprehensive care, which might be related to graduates’ competence and confidence. Some argue confidence is not a reason to lengthen training, but it is cited in other countries as a valid reason.1

Approximately 23% of residents undertake a third-year enhanced-skills program; an additional 30% consider it.10 Thus perhaps 40% of residents will be training longer than 2 years anyway. Green et al showed that third-year training is strongly associated with increased care outside the office.12 They suggest that longer training might help ensure more Canadian graduates practise comprehensive FM. A 3-year FM residency could well diminish the need for enhanced-skills training and the tendency to more focused practice.

Longer FM residency is not exclusive to competency-based education. Improved efficiency in teaching2 will help in increasingly legislated time-restricted programs, but training longer than 2 years is needed to practise comprehensive FM in the 21st century. It really is about time.

Footnotes

  • Cet article se trouve aussi en français à la page 1046.

  • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. ↵
    1. Gerada C,
    2. Riley B,
    3. Simon C
    . Preparing the future GP: the case for enhanced GP training. London, UK: Royal College of General Practitioners; 2012.
  2. ↵
    1. Tannenbaum D,
    2. Kerr J,
    3. Konkin J,
    4. Organek A,
    5. Parsons E,
    6. Saucier D,
    7. et al
    . Length of training in the core family medicine residency: report of the Working Group on Postgraduate Curriculum Review. Mississauga, ON: College of Family Physicians of Canada; 2012.
    1. Vinger I
    . Graduate training in family medicine: two years or three? Can Fam Physician 1979;25:1107-8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Lehmann F
    . Should family medicine residency be 3 years? Yes [Debate]. Can Fam Physician 2009;55:342, 344. (Eng), 346, 348 (Fr).
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    1. Raiche P
    . Should family medicine residency be 3 years? No [Debate]. Can Fam Physician 2009;55:343-4. (Eng), 347–8 (Fr).
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    1. Noel K
    . Two years is not enough: learning from the past, looking to the future. Can Fam Physician 2010;56:410-1. (Eng), e167–8 (Fr).
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    1. Wilson JG
    . Two years could be enough [Letter]. Can Fam Physician 2010;56:633.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    1. Saucier D
    . Second thoughts on third-year training. Can Fam Physician 2004;50:687-9.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Saucier D,
    2. Blais J
    . Enfin une résidence de quatre ans en médecine familiale. Actual Med 1998 Jun 21.
  4. ↵
    National Physician Survey 2010. Mississauga, ON: College of Family Physicians of Canada; 2010.
  5. ↵
    Triple C competency-based curriculum. Report of the Working Group on Postgraduate Curriculum Review—part 1. Mississauga, ON: College of Family Physicians of Canada; 2011.
  6. ↵
    1. Green M,
    2. Birtwhistle R,
    3. MacDonald K,
    4. Kane J,
    5. Schmelzle J
    . Practice patterns of graduates of 2- and 3-year family medicine programs. In Ontario, 1996 to 2004. Can Fam Physician 2009;55:906-7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 58 (9)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 58, Issue 9
1 Sep 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
It’s about time: 3-year FM residency training
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
It’s about time: 3-year FM residency training
Sandy Buchman
Canadian Family Physician Sep 2012, 58 (9) 1045;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
It’s about time: 3-year FM residency training
Sandy Buchman
Canadian Family Physician Sep 2012, 58 (9) 1045;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Il était grand temps: 3 ans de résidence
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Enhanced skills training in family medicine maternity care: Cross-sectional study of graduates experiences
  • Family practice versus specialist care for low-risk obstetrics: Examining patient satisfaction in Newfoundland and Labrador
  • Length of family medicine residency
  • It's more than "just" a year
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

College

  • Le leadership au service d’autrui
  • Money talk: a CFPC financial update
  • Servant leadership
Show more College

President’s Message

  • Servant leadership
  • Creative solutions to improve access to care
  • Advance care planning: sustainable patient-centred care
Show more President’s Message

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2025 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire