Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
LetterLetters

Chiropractors respond

Dean L. Smith, Katherine A. Pohlman and Gregory D. Cramer
Canadian Family Physician December 2013, 59 (12) 1265-1268;
Dean L. Smith
Oxford, Ohio
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Katherine A. Pohlman
Oxford, Ohio
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gregory D. Cramer
Oxford, Ohio
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

In the October issue of Canadian Family Physician, Bellamy’s letter1 suggests an insufficient account of risks associated with chiropractic treatment of pregnant patients in regards to an article by Oswald et al.2 However, Bellamy provides no evidence of these risks herself. In addition, she suggests that the prudent family physician contemplating referring any patient to a chiropractor be fully informed about chiropractic practice before doing so. We want to provide some evidence related to these unreferenced concerns.

Concerning risks with chiropractic care in pregnant patients, 2 recent reviews of the literature found few adverse events in this population.3,4 Khorsan et al4 conducted a systematic review on the use of manipulative therapy, a common therapy used by chiropractors, as well as physiotherapists, medical doctors, and doctors of osteopathy, for pregnancy and related conditions. Of the 32 reviewed articles,4 only 1 adverse event was reported (from a manipulation performed by the patient’s general medical doctor). This review concluded that the use of manipulative therapy for pregnancy-related back pain might be considered by clinicians if contra-indications are not present. Another even more recent critical literature review5 of adverse events from spinal manipulation in the pregnant and postpartum periods found a total of 7 reported events (over a period of 31 years), 2 postpartum, and 5 during pregnancy. These 7 reports included the following: increasing pain resolving within a few days, fracture, stroke, and epidural hematoma. Note that 2 of these 7 reports on adverse reactions were attributed to a physiotherapist and a medical doctor, respectively.5 Additionally, a randomized clinical trial published in 2013 found that a multimodal approach including standard obstetric care and chiropractic manual therapy for low back and pelvic pain during midpregnancy benefits patients more than standard obstetric care alone.6 This study noted that no adverse events were reported from the chiropractic manual therapy.

Since the Institute of Medicine first published its report To Err Is Human,7 all facets of health care have been faced with the necessary task of supporting a patient safety culture. Chiropractors are community-based providers who face the same challenges identified for those in community-based primary care settings: time-consuming processes, under-reporting of adverse events, and inaccuracies of medical records.8 From the reviews and clinical trial mentioned above, as well as the lack of community-based patient safety culture research, it is evident that research is needed to support and measure patient safety cultures within all health care professions.

As to the concern of family physicians being fully informed about chiropractic practice before referring, we wholeheartedly agree with this statement. We would recommend all practitioners, including family physicians, examine the scientific literature for the safety and effectiveness of any proposed treatment. With respect to chiropractic care, the best available evidence supports manipulative therapy as a reasonable option for many complaints such as back pain, neck pain, and headaches.9 Consequently, manipulation has been included as an effective care option in a number of national and international guidelines on back pain.10,11 Chiropractic care also holds potential value for the treatment of a variety of extremity conditions.9 Also note that chiropractors refer patients to other health care providers and also receive referrals from medical physicians.12 In fact, family practitioners were the most likely physicians to refer to chiropractors, followed by family nurse practitioners, internists, neurologists, neurosurgeons, gynecologists, and general surgeons.12 We appreciate the opportunity to respond to the letter by Bellamy,1 and we hope this additional information will assist interdisciplinary dialogue between medical doctors and chiropractors to provide the best care for their patients, including those who are pregnant.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests

    None declared

  • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Bellamy JJ
    . Concerns about referring patients to chiropractors [Letters]. Can Fam Physician 2013;59:1049-53.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Oswald C,
    2. Higgins CC,
    3. Assimakopoulos D
    . Optimizing pain relief during pregnancy using manual therapy. Can Fam Physician 2013;59:841-2.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Stuber KJ,
    2. Smith DL
    . Chiropractic treatment of pregnancy-related low back pain: a systematic review of the evidence. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2008;31(6):447-54.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Khorsan R,
    2. Hawk C,
    3. Lisi AJ,
    4. Kizhakkeveettil A
    . Manipulative therapy for pregnancy and related conditions: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2009;64(6):416-27.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Stuber KJ,
    2. Wynd S,
    3. Weis CA
    . Adverse events from spinal manipulation in the pregnant and postpartum periods: a critical review of the literature. Chiropr Man Therap 2012;20:8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. George JW,
    2. Skaggs CD,
    3. Thompson PA,
    4. Nelson DM,
    5. Gavard JA,
    6. Gross GA
    . A randomized controlled trial comparing a multimodal intervention and standard obstetrics care for low back and pelvic pain in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;208(4):295. e1–7. Epub 2012 Oct 23.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Kohn LT,
    2. Corrigan JM,
    3. Donaldson MS
    , editors. To err is human. Building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.
  8. 8.↵
    1. Wetzels R,
    2. Wolters R,
    3. van Weel C,
    4. Wensing M
    . Mix of methods is needed to identify adverse events in general practice: a prospective observational study. BMC Fam Pract 2008;9:35.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Lefebvre R,
    2. Peterson D,
    3. Haas M
    . Evidence-based practice and chiropractic care. J Evid Based Complementary Altern Med 2012;18(1):75-9.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    1. Dagenais S,
    2. Tricco AC,
    3. Haldeman S
    . Synthesis of recommendations for the assessment and management of low back pain from recent clinical practice guidelines. Spine J 2010;10(6):514-29.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Koes BW,
    2. van Tulder M,
    3. Lin CW,
    4. Macedo LG,
    5. McAuley J,
    6. Maher C
    . An updated overview of clinical guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care. Eur Spine J 2010;19(12):2075-94. Epub 2010 Jul 3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Christensen MG,
    2. Kollasch MW,
    3. Hyland JK
    . Practice analysis of chiropractic, 2010. A project report, survey analysis, and summary of the practice of chiropractic within the United States. Greeley, CO: National Board of Chiropractic Examiners; 2010.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 59 (12)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 59, Issue 12
1 Dec 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Chiropractors respond
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Chiropractors respond
Dean L. Smith, Katherine A. Pohlman, Gregory D. Cramer
Canadian Family Physician Dec 2013, 59 (12) 1265-1268;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Chiropractors respond
Dean L. Smith, Katherine A. Pohlman, Gregory D. Cramer
Canadian Family Physician Dec 2013, 59 (12) 1265-1268;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • We are humans first
  • Truth about grief
  • Today’s residents are ready to lead
Show more Letters

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2023 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire