Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
OtherCollege

Assessing quality

Giving patients a voice

Marie-Dominique Beaulieu
Canadian Family Physician March 2013; 59 (3) 317;
Marie-Dominique Beaulieu
MD MSc CCMF FCMF
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
Figure

What gets measured gets improved.

Robin S. Sharma1

We talk a lot about quality improvement these days, and with good reason. Providing high-quality care is what drives professionals. Developing continuous quality improvement mechanisms is intrinsic to success in clinical settings, which is why one of the objectives of the Patient’s Medical Home is to carry out ongoing evaluation of the effectiveness of its services (objective 9).2 But what is quality and how can it be measured?

According to the Institute of Medicine, quality is “the degree to which health services for individuals and populations increase the likelihood of desired health outcomes and are consistent with current professional knowledge.”3 Traditionally, in medicine, much importance is given to the latter part of the definition, and we focus on assessing recognized best professional practices, as defined in clinical practice guidelines. Are we suggesting appropriate screening tests and prescribing the right medication? These questions are important. In the eyes of the public, our patients, and the health care system, we are first and foremost accountable for providing effective care in accordance with the highest standards of practice. Hence the pertinence for us of obtaining information about our clinical practices. We rely heavily on electronic medical records (EMRs) to generate this information, and rightly so.

But are we in danger of overlooking important dimensions of quality by limiting ourselves to indicators based on clinical practice guidelines? Let’s go back to the definition of quality. What is meant by “desired health outcomes”? Certainly reductions in mortality, hospitalization, and complications are all desired health outcomes. But are they the only outcomes of high-quality services? And when we say desired, desired by whom? By professionals, managers, and decision makers? And what about patients—do they have any say in the matter? What would patients and their families say to us if we gave them a voice? Of course they would talk to us about the importance of practising in accordance with professional standards. They trust us to do so and know that we are in the best position to judge. But they would also talk to us about the importance of timely access to services, taking their preferences and priorities into account when treating their health problems, answering their questions so that they can understand their treatments, and coordinating with one another when we work as a team or refer them to consultants.4 So many desired outcomes of our interventions are important to them and contribute—we often forget—to enhancing health care safety.5

How are we to know whether we are achieving these desired outcomes as we move toward patient-centred services if we do not assess them? “What gets measured gets improved,” said Robin S. Sharma.1 By limiting quality assessment to what can be assessed by EMRs, we are limiting ourselves to a single dimension of quality. A few years ago, I and some colleagues, who were practising in family medicine units in our teaching network, decided to assess the quality of care given to a sample of our patients being treated for certain chronic illnesses. We used a validated questionnaire to assess patients’ experiences of care, in addition to looking in our medical records to verify the degree of compliance with practice guidelines. The results surprised us: we were very good with respect to indicators taken from the medical records, but less so with respect to our patients’ experience of care.6 This finding allowed us to start thinking about how we could improve this dimension of our practices.

There is only one way to find out if our care is centred on patients: we must ask them. Professionals are often cautious about integrating surveys into the quality “tool kit.” These are “subjective” measures, whereas medical record indicators are “objective” measures. However, accessible and validated instruments are available for assessing these dimensions of quality with patients.7 Moreover, it might be easier to carry out a survey of one’s patients than to extract data from the EMR. So, why do without?

Footnotes

  • Cet article se trouve aussi en français à la page 318.

  • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. ↵
    1. Sharma RS
    . The greatness guide: powerful secrets for getting to world class. New York, NY: HarperCollins; 2006.
  2. ↵
    1. College of Family Physicians of Canada
    . A vision for Canada. Family practice: the patient’s medical home. Mississauga, ON: College of Family Physicians of Canada; 2011. Available from: www.cfpc.ca/uploadedFiles/Resources/Resource_Items/PMH_A_Vision_for_Canada.pdf. Accessed 2013 Jan 28.
  3. ↵
    1. Institute of Medicine
    . Medicare: a strategy for quality assurance, volume 1.Lohr KN, editor. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1990.
  4. ↵
    1. Grol R,
    2. Wensing M,
    3. Mainz J,
    4. Ferreira P,
    5. Hearnshaw H,
    6. Hjortdahl P,
    7. et al
    . Patients’ priorities with respect to general practice care: an international comparison. European Task Force on Patient Evaluations of General Practice (EUROPEP). Fam Pract 1999;16(1):4-11.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Institute of Medicine
    . Crossing the quality chasm. A new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001. p. 48-50.
  6. ↵
    1. Houle J,
    2. Beaulieu MD,
    3. Lussier MT,
    4. Del Grande C,
    5. Pellerin JP,
    6. Authier M,
    7. et al
    . Patients’ experience of chronic illness care in a network of teaching settings. Can Fam Physician 2012;12:1366-73.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Canadian Institute for Health Information [website]
    . Pan-Canadian Primary Health Care Indicator Update Report. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Institute for Health Information; 2012. Available from: https://secure.cihi.ca/free_products/Pan-Canadian_PHC_Indicator_Update_Report_en_web.pdf. Accessed 2013 Jan 29.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 59 (3)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 59, Issue 3
1 Mar 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Assessing quality
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Assessing quality
Marie-Dominique Beaulieu
Canadian Family Physician Mar 2013, 59 (3) 317;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Assessing quality
Marie-Dominique Beaulieu
Canadian Family Physician Mar 2013, 59 (3) 317;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Évaluer la qualité
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

College

  • Le leadership au service d’autrui
  • Money talk: a CFPC financial update
  • Servant leadership
Show more College

President’s Message

  • Servant leadership
  • Creative solutions to improve access to care
  • Advance care planning: sustainable patient-centred care
Show more President’s Message

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2025 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire