Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
Research ArticlePractice

Pacifier use in the first month of life

Ran D. Goldman
Canadian Family Physician May 2013; 59 (5) 499-500;
Ran D. Goldman
MD FRCPC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: rgoldman@cw.bc.ca
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Question As a family physician who frequently attends deliveries and follows up with neonates, parents often ask me if they can provide their newborns with pacifiers in order to calm infants down, reduce crying, and improve sleep. Is pacifier use safe in the first month of life?

Answer While pacifiers are useful for soothing, there is concern that their use might cause early weaning of breastfeeding owing to “nipple confusion.” Several organizations, such as the World Health Organization and the United Nations Children’s Fund, recommend avoiding use of pacifiers in term infants who breastfeed. However, evidence suggests that it might not be pacifier use that causes premature cessation of breastfeeding, and that use of pacifiers might only be a sign of a maternal decision to stop breastfeeding.

Breastfeeding has been promoted heavily in recent decades as the sole means of nutrition for infants up to 6 months of age. The Canadian Paediatric Society1 and the American Academy of Pediatrics2 recommend exclusive breastfeeding for the first 6 months of life for healthy, term infants, recognizing breast milk as the optimal food for infants. After that period, additional food should be introduced, and breastfeeding can be continued as a complementary source of food.

Infants have a strong sucking reflex that helps with breastfeeding. The process of sucking was also found to be helpful in calming and soothing babies. In one Canadian study, more than 80% of parents used pacifiers for their babies.3 However, in recent years a potential “nipple confusion” between breast, bottle, and pacifier was suspected.

Should parents avoid pacifiers?

Owing to the possibility of premature weaning, the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative of the World Health Organization and United Nations Children’s Fund recommends avoiding pacifier use in term infants who breastfeed.4

One Canadian study found that pacifier use was possibly a marker of breastfeeding difficulties or a potential lack of motivation to breastfeed among mothers rather than a true cause of early weaning.3 In this randomized trial in Montreal, Que, 140 mothers were asked to avoid pacifier use (experimental group) and were compared with a similar group that was not asked to restrict use (control group). The experimental group avoided pacifier use more often (38.6% vs 16.0% in the control group) and reduced infants’ daily use of pacifiers (40.8% vs 55.7% in the control group); however, similar rates of early weaning were reported (18.9% in the experimental group vs 18.3% in the control group in the intention-to-treat analysis). Interestingly, in a separate analysis based on treatment given (ignoring randomization), an association was found between daily exposure to pacifiers and weaning by 3 months of age (25.0% of the exposed group vs 12.9% of the unexposed group).3

Recent evidence—more confusion

A 2011 Cochrane review5 looked at randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials investigating the effects of pacifiers in healthy, breastfeeding, full-term newborns. In 2 trials with almost 1300 newborns, pacifier use had no significant effect on the proportion of infants exclusively breastfed at 3 months of age (risk ratio [RR] 1.00; 95% CI 0.95 to 1.06) and at 4 months of age (RR 0.99; 95% CI 0.92 to 1.06). Similarly, there was no effect on partial breastfeeding at 3 months of age (RR 1.00; 95% CI 0.97 to 1.02) and at 4 months of age (RR 1.01; 95% CI 0.98 to 1.03). However, Jaafar et al cautioned that short-term breastfeeding difficulties faced by mothers and the long-term effects of pacifier use on infants’ health were not investigated.

Most recently, a retrospective before-and-after study attempting to determine the association between removing routine distribution of pacifiers in a mother-baby unit and breastfeeding initiation was conducted in Oregon.6 Restricting pacifiers (while not restricting access to formula) actually decreased exclusive breastfeeding, increased supplemental formula feeding, and increased exclusive formula feeding.

The issue of pacifier use is still under some debate. While awaiting more definitive studies, the Pediatric Research in Emergency Therapeutics program recommends following current guidelines: avoid pacifier use in the first month of life for healthy, breastfeeding newborns.

Notes

PRETx

Child Health Update is produced by the Pediatric Research in Emergency Therapeutics (PRETx) program (www.pretx.org) at the BC Children’s Hospital in Vancouver, BC. Dr Goldman is Director of the PRETx program. The mission of the PRETx program is to promote child health through evidence-based research in therapeutics in pediatric emergency medicine.

Do you have questions about the effects of drugs, chemicals, radiation, or infections in children? We invite you to submit them to the PRETx program by fax at 604 875–2414; they will be addressed in future Child Health Updates. Published Child Health Updates are available on the Canadian Family Physician website (www.cfp.ca).

Footnotes

  • Competing interests

    None declared

  • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. ↵
    1. Blonde M
    . Nutrition for healthy term infants: recommendations for birth to six months. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Paediatric Society; 2013. Available from: www.cps.ca/documents/position/nutrition-healthy-term-infants. Accessed 2013 Mar 24.
  2. ↵
    1. American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Breastfeeding
    . Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics 2012;129(3):e827-41. Epub 2012 Feb 27.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Kramer MS,
    2. Barr RG,
    3. Dagenais S,
    4. Yang H,
    5. Jones P,
    6. Ciofani L,
    7. et al
    . Pacifier use, early weaning, and cry/fuss behavior: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2001;286(3):322-6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. United Nations Children’s Fund [website]
    . The Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative. New York, NY: United Nations Children’s Fund; 2013. Available from: www.unicef.org/programme/breastfeeding/baby.htm. Accessed 2013 Mar 24.
  5. ↵
    1. Jaafar SH,
    2. Jahanfar S,
    3. Angolkar M,
    4. Ho JJ
    . Pacifier use versus no pacifier use in breast-feeding term infants for increasing duration of breastfeeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;(3):CD007202.
  6. ↵
    1. Kair LR,
    2. Kenron D,
    3. Etheredge K,
    4. Jaffe AC,
    5. Phillipi CA
    . Pacifier restriction and exclusive breast-feeding. Pediatrics 2013;131(4):e1101-7. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 59 (5)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 59, Issue 5
1 May 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Pacifier use in the first month of life
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Pacifier use in the first month of life
Ran D. Goldman
Canadian Family Physician May 2013, 59 (5) 499-500;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Pacifier use in the first month of life
Ran D. Goldman
Canadian Family Physician May 2013, 59 (5) 499-500;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Should parents avoid pacifiers?
    • Recent evidence—more confusion
    • Notes
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Practice

  • Effectiveness of dermoscopy in skin cancer diagnosis
  • Spontaneous pneumothorax in children
  • Is 45 the new 50 in colorectal cancer screening?
Show more Practice

Child Health Update

  • Accidental cannabis ingestion in young children
  • All-terrain vehicle injuries in children and adolescents
  • Screen time and sleep in children
Show more Child Health Update

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2025 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire