Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
Research ArticlePractice

Risk assessment for physical activity and exercise clearance

In pregnant women without contraindications

Shannon S.D. Bredin, Heather J.A. Foulds, Jamie F. Burr and Sarah A. Charlesworth
Canadian Family Physician May 2013, 59 (5) 515-517;
Shannon S.D. Bredin
Assistant Professor in the School of Kinesiology at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, Director of the Cognitive and Functional Learning Laboratory and the Systematic Reviews Research Laboratory, and Co-Director of the Physical Activity and Chronic Disease Prevention Unit. She is also Co-Director of the Physical Activity Support Line and a certified exercise physiologist.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: shannon.bredin@ubc.ca
Heather J.A. Foulds
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jamie F. Burr
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarah A. Charlesworth
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Traditionally, exercise was advised with caution or not recommended for pregnant women. Women active before pregnancy were advised by physicians to reduce their habitual exercise levels, while previously inactive women were advised to refrain from initiating exercise programs.1 However, guidelines for exercise during pregnancy have evolved substantially during the past 30 years; recommendations have become less restrictive as evidence-based information becomes more readily available.2 Moreover, an increasing number of pregnant women wish to maintain prepregnancy physical fitness levels during the prenatal period, and others wish to initiate exercise for healthier pregnancies.2,3

The conservative nature of medical advice in the past was intended to safeguard the health of both the mother and the growing fetus.2,3 Advice was intentionally conservative because of concern that exercise might shift oxygenated blood and energy substrates away from the fetus to maternal skeletal muscle, as well as increase core body temperature during vulnerable developmental periods such as embryogenesis. Therefore, it was largely unknown whether exercise increased the risk of congenital abnormalities and caused disturbances in optimal fetal growth.2 There were also maternal concerns that excessive exercise might cause conditions such as chronic fatigue and hypoglycemia, or increase the risk of injury (eg, low back pain, musculoskeletal injury).4,5 A more contemporary view of exercise during pregnancy emphasizes that women and their care providers need to consider the risks of not participating in regular physical activities during the prenatal period.3

Previous work in prenatal exercise did not systematically evaluate the prevalence of adverse exercise-related events. This article provides an executive summary of findings from a systematic review of the risks of physical activity for pregnant women without contraindications.6 It is one in a comprehensive series about the risks of physical activity participation in patients with various medical conditions.7 The overall purpose of these systematic reviews was to provide evidence-based recommendations for tools to simplify exercise clearance and prescription: the new Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire for Everyone (PAR-Q+)8 and the electronic Physical Activity Readiness Medical Examination (ePARmed-X+).9 The purpose of this summary is to present evidence-based information regarding adverse exercise-related events during uncomplicated pregnancy and discuss this information in relation to the family physician’s task of screening patients for physical activity participation.

Discussion

A systematic and rigorous examination of the literature published between 1982 and 2009 showed that pregnant women without contraindications were at low risk of adverse events during exercise irrespective of physical activity and fitness level before pregnancy. A total of 49 655 hours of exercise were examined to determine the risk of adverse events, identifying the prevalence of both major and minor maternal events, as well as any exercise-related fetal events. Based on the available evidence, the major adverse event rate was calculated to be 1.4 per 10 000 hours of exercise. When including minor events and exercise-related fetal events, the adverse event rate increased to an overall rate of 6.8 per 10 000 hours of exercise.

It is important to note that both calculations are likely conservative. A major event was generally determined from the reporting of reasons for participant dropout; therefore, it is unknown whether a major adverse event was specifically exercise related. Only 1 major adverse event was reported directly following exercise (ie, uterine contractions requiring 72 hours of medical observation). Examples of minor adverse events reported during or following exercise were leg cramps, nausea, and fatigue. We have purposely erred on the side of caution; however, these events could potentially be classified as common “discomforts” of exercise rather than true adverse events. Although rare, the most frequently reported exercise-related adverse event was fetal brady-cardia. In all instances, the event was reported as transient, and fetal heart rate returned to normal following exercise cessation.

Rates of adverse events must be interpreted in the context of general prescreening for absolute and relative contraindications to exercise, as well as qualified exercise professionals in the environment. The above rates are based on women presenting without contraindications and, accordingly, screening procedures to exclude at-risk pregnant women from participation were administered in most exercise studies reviewed (eg, completion of the Physical Activity Readiness Medical Examination for Pregnancy). Many investigations also evaluated exercise in pregnant women under the supervision of qualified exercise professionals. We contend that prescreening and the supervisory role of qualified exercise professionals contributed to the low incidence of adverse exercise-related events. The role of the qualified exercise professional might be especially important for previously inactive pregnant women when initiating exercise programs.

Although there was high variability in exercise prescription, the most common exercise prescriptions were exercise intensity of 50% to 70% of maximum, frequency of 3 times per week, exercise sessions of at least 30 minutes per day, and programs lasting between 12 and 24 weeks. Risk of an adverse event was low across trimesters and across a variety of types of exercise (eg, stationary cycling, walking, water-based activities like swimming). Table 1 presents specific recommendations concerning the risk of adverse events during exercise in pregnant women presenting without contraindications. A decision tree for physical activity screening and general risk classification is presented in Figure 1.

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 1

Clinical decision tree for assessing the risk of adverse events during physical activity in pregnant women: This decision tree can be used to categorize a pregnant woman as high or low risk, thereby informing requirements for the prescription of physical activity and the monitoring of exercise programs.

*Despite being at low risk, pregnant women who were not previously active might wish to consult qualified exercise professionals for advice on preferred activities.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Evidence-based recommendations for consideration in physical activity screening in pregnant women without contraindications

Conclusion

Healthy pregnant women with uncomplicated singleton pregnancies are at low risk of adverse maternal or fetal exercise-related events when participating in moderate-intensity activities. Moreover, inactivity before pregnancy should not be a barrier to exercise participation when women are stratified as low risk. Before continuing physical activity or initiating an activity program, it is critical that prescreening occurs in pregnancy to control risk for adverse events and to safeguard the well-being of mother and child. Although the evidence supports regular physical activity during pregnancy at a moderate intensity using a variety of exercises, pregnant women are always advised to participate in activities that minimize the risk of balance loss and joint and ligament trauma to the body, as well as to avoid activities that could cause trauma to the fetus.3 The provision of evidence-based physical activity information and the development of exercise prescriptions for pregnancy can also be facilitated via collaboration with qualified exercise professionals. The next step in this process is to systematically examine the available literature to determine the risk of exercise-related adverse events in women stratified as high risk in the screening process.

Footnotes

  • This article is eligible for Mainpro-M1 credits. To earn credits, go to www.cfp.ca and click on the Mainpro link.

  • Competing interests

    None declared

  • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. ↵
    1. Davies GA,
    2. Wolfe LA,
    3. Mottola MF,
    4. MacKinnon C,
    5. Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada, SOGC Clinical Practice Obstetrics Committee
    . Joint SOGC/CSEP clinical practice guideline: exercise in pregnancy and the post-partum period. Can J Appl Physiol 2003;28(3):330-41.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Wolfe LA,
    2. Davies GA
    . Canadian guidelines for exercise in pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2003;46(2):488-95.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Davies GA,
    2. Wolfe LA,
    3. Mottola MF,
    4. MacKinnon C,
    5. Arsenault MY,
    6. Bartellas E,
    7. et al
    . Exercise in pregnancy and the postpartum period. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2003;25(6):516-29.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Wolfe LA,
    2. Mottola MF
    . Aerobic exercise in pregnancy: an update. Can J Appl Physiol 1993;18(2):119-47.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Stevenson L
    . Exercise in pregnancy. Part 1: update on pathophysiology. Can Fam Physician 1997;43:97-104.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Charlesworth S,
    2. Foulds HJ,
    3. Burr JF,
    4. Bredin SS
    . Evidence-based risk assessment and recommendations for physical activity clearance: pregnancy. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2011;36(Suppl 1):S33-48.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Warburton DE,
    2. Gledhill N,
    3. Jamnik VK,
    4. Bredin SS,
    5. McKenzie DC,
    6. Stone J,
    7. et al
    . Evidence-based risk assessment and recommendations for physical activity clearance: consensus document. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2011;36(Suppl 1):S266-98.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. PAR-Q+ Collaboration
    . The Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire for Everyone (PAR-Q+). Vancouver, BC: PAR-Q+ Collaboration; 2011. Available from: www.eparmedx.com. Accessed 2013 Apr 9.
  9. ↵
    1. PAR-Q+ Collaboration
    . The electronic Physical Activity Readiness Medical Examination (ePARmed-X+). Vancouver, BC: PAR-Q+ Collaboration; 2011. Available from: www.eparmedx.com. Accessed 2013 Apr 9.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 59 (5)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 59, Issue 5
1 May 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Risk assessment for physical activity and exercise clearance
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Risk assessment for physical activity and exercise clearance
Shannon S.D. Bredin, Heather J.A. Foulds, Jamie F. Burr, Sarah A. Charlesworth
Canadian Family Physician May 2013, 59 (5) 515-517;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Risk assessment for physical activity and exercise clearance
Shannon S.D. Bredin, Heather J.A. Foulds, Jamie F. Burr, Sarah A. Charlesworth
Canadian Family Physician May 2013, 59 (5) 515-517;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Physical Therapists' Views and Experiences of Pregnancy-Related Low Back Pain and the Role of Acupuncture: Qualitative Exploration
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Practice

  • Determining if and how older patients can safely stay at home with additional services
  • Managing type 2 diabetes in primary care during COVID-19
  • Effectiveness of dermoscopy in skin cancer diagnosis
Show more Practice

Physical Activity Series

  • Do adventure sports have a role in health promotion?
  • Physical Activity Line
  • Qualified exercise professionals
Show more Physical Activity Series

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2023 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire