Article Figures & Data
Figures
- Figure 1
Electronic medical record adoption framework
EMR—electronic medical record.
Reproduced from Price et al with permission.16
- Figure 2
Approach to qualitative data analysis
PI—principal investigator, SC—strengths and challenges.
- Figure 3
Electronic medical record adoption scores, by clinic
* Data from the 2 jointly operated clinics were merged.
Tables
TOTAL CLINICIANS AND STAFF INTERVIEW PARTICIPANTS, N (%) Family physicians and nurse practitioners (N = 38) 32 (84) Other specialists (N = 6) 3 (50) Nurses (N = 18) 8 (44) Office staff (N = 14) 14 (100)
In this issue
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- Barriers and facilitators for implementation of electronic consultations (eConsult) to enhance specialist access to care: a scoping review protocol
- The impact of financial incentives to improve quality indicators in patients with diabetes in Swiss primary care: a protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial
- Statin-prescribing trends for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease
- Data quality in electronic medical records in Manitoba: Do problem lists reflect chronic disease as defined by prescriptions?
- Implementation of data management and effect on chronic disease coding in a primary care organisation: A parallel cohort observational study
- Progress in electronic medical record adoption in Canada
- Horses and buggies have some advantages over cars, but no one is turning back
- New conceptual model of EMR implementation in interprofessional academic family medicine clinics
- Effects of implementing electronic medical records on primary care billings and payments: a before-after study