Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
Article CommentaryCommentary

Choosing wisely

Avoiding too much medicine

Bartosz Hudzik, Michal Hudzik and Lech Polonski
Canadian Family Physician October 2014; 60 (10) 873-876;
Bartosz Hudzik
Attending physician in the Third Department of Cardiology at the Silesian Centre for Heart Disease at the Medical University of Silesia in Zabrze, Poland.
MD PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: bartekh@mp.pl
Michal Hudzik
Vice Dean of Kozminski Law School and Adjunct Professor in the Department of Criminal Law at Leon Kozminski University in Warsaw, Poland; Assistant to the President of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Poland in the Criminal Law Chamber; and Member of the Research and Analyses Office of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Poland.
JD PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lech Polonski
Professor and Chair of the Third Department of Cardiology in the Silesian Centre for Heart Disease.
MD PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Traditionally, the main concern of the medical profession has been to preclude diagnostic errors, with a primary focus on the issues of underdiagnosis and undertreatment. Therefore, we have witnessed, particularly in the 20th century, the rapid development of laboratory medicine, imaging techniques, and therapeutic procedures. The number of available diagnostic tests and treatments has increased dramatically over the past 2 decades.1 In fact, the use of imaging studies has grown faster than that of any other physician service (Figure 1).1,2 It is estimated that in the United States overused or misused diagnostic tests cost approximately $210 billion annually (10% of health care costs).3

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 1.

Growth in volume of physician services in the United States per Medicare beneficiary from 2000 to 2009

E&M—evaluation and management services.

Data from the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission.1

Sceptics have long warned us about the downside of too much medicine.4,5 A growing body of evidence suggests that the increasing numbers of medical tests and procedures drive up health care costs and, above all, can be harmful to patients. Even seemingly safe diagnostic modalities can be potentially harmful or even fatal if they lead to a cascade of additional unnecessary testing and invasive procedures with predictable complication rates.

But what to avoid?

For many years, we have had the benefit of practice guidelines issued by medical societies. However, these recommendations have tended to focus primarily on what procedures to follow, rather than on what tests and treatments to avoid. In an attempt to minimize medical resource overuse and to reduce the risk of harm, the American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation, along with Consumer Reports, partnered with 9 specialty societies to launch the Choosing Wisely campaign in the early spring of 2012.6 The societies joining the project included the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology; the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP); the American College of Cardiology; the American College of Physicians; the American College of Radiology; the American Gastroenterological Association; the American Society of Clinical Oncology; the American Society of Nephrology; and the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology. These 9 organizations were asked to choose 5 tests or treatments that were prone to overuse within their areas of expertise. Consequently, a list of 45 tests and therapeutic procedures was announced on April 4, 20126; it has subsequently drawn widespread attention in the media.7,8 The most important items for each organization are presented in Table 1. Eight of the 9 societies listed at least 1 imaging-related test among their 5 items; in all, of 45 items, 24 specifically involved imaging techniques.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Most important items listed by each of the initial 9 organizations included in the Choosing Wisely campaign

Currently, the project brings together more than 40 organizations representing more than 600 000 members. In addition, some medical societies released a new (second or third) list in 2013. The list of partners and the complete inventories of the “Five Things Physicians and Patients Should Question” can be found at www.choosingwisely.org/doctor-patient-lists. Each “Five Things” list is the result of a long process within the organization, and each recommendation is accompanied by the reasoning and evidence for its selection.

Five Things and family medicine

The AAFP compiled its Five Things list in 2012 (Box 1).9 It is an endorsement of the 5 recommendations for family medicine previously proposed by the National Physicians Alliance and published in the Archives of Internal Medicine as part of its Less is More series.10 The rationale for the selection of each item on the list is presented on the Choosing Wisely website.9 The goal was to identify items common in primary care practice, strongly supported by the evidence and literature, that would lead to substantial health benefits, reduce risks and harm, and reduce costs. A working group was assembled for each of the 3 primary care specialties: family medicine, pediatrics, and internal medicine. The field testing with family physicians showed support for the final recommendations, the potential positive effect on quality and cost, and the ease with which the recommendations could be implemented.9 As part of an ongoing effort to help physicians curtail the practice of ordering unnecessary tests and procedures, the AAFP released its second Choosing Wisely list of recommendations on February 21, 2013, followed by a third list on September 24, 2013 (Box 1).9 The campaign underscores family physicians’ long-term commitment to ensuring high-quality, cost-effective care for patients. According to Dr Glen Stream, board chair of the AAFP, The American Academy of Family Physicians is committed to the Choosing Wisely campaign and its mission of sharing evidence-based clinical information about tests and procedures to help family physicians and their patients make informed decisions. So much so that the AAFP has extended its involvement, developing a second list of five screenings and treatments that are frequently overused or misused.11

The initiative seeks to encourage physicians and patients to follow evidence-based recommendations in managing health problems, while avoiding medical tests and procedures that are unlikely to help. Physicians and patients must both understand that more care is not always better care; in some instances, it can bring more harm than good. This campaign promotes physician-patient dialogue about making wise choices for tests and procedures. These actions will also reduce the rapidly expanding costs of the health care system. The campaign seeks to inform the public that not every test and procedure is appropriate for a particular condition. These lists will also stimulate the debate about the right care, at the right time, for the right patient.

The campaign is reaching millions worldwide through the efforts of consumer partners led by Consumer Reports, the world’s largest independent product-testing organization,12 which has worked with the American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation and the specialty societies distributing patient-friendly resources that facilitate consumer conversations with physicians. The Choosing Wisely consumer partners include the following, among others: Alliance Health Networks, the National Business Coalition on Health, the National Partnership for Women and Families, Union Plus, and Wikipedia.13 Such lists will not only help patients stay informed about common diagnostic and therapeutic procedures but will also enable them to make wise treatment decisions.

Box 1.

List of commonly used tests and treatments to question compiled by the American Academy of Family Physicians

The original “Five Things Physicians and Patients Should Question” released in April 2012
  • Do not do imaging for low back pain within the first 6 weeks, unless red flags are present

  • Do not routinely prescribe antibiotics for acute mild-to-moderate sinusitis unless symptoms last for 7 or more days, or symptoms worsen after initial clinical improvement

  • Do not use dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry screening for osteoporosis in women younger than 65 years or men younger than 70 years with no risk factors

  • Do not order annual electrocardiograms or any other cardiac screening for low-risk patients without symptoms

  • Do not perform Papanicolaou tests for women younger than 21 years or who have had a hysterectomy for noncancer disease

The second “Five Things Physicians and Patients Should Question” released in February 2013
  • Do not schedule elective, non-medically indicated inductions of labour or cesarean deliveries before 39 weeks, 0 days gestational age*

  • Avoid elective, non–medically indicated labour induction between 39 weeks, 0 days, and 41 weeks, 0 days, unless the cervix is deemed favourable*

  • Do not screen for carotid artery stenosis in asymptomatic adult patients

  • Do not screen women older than 65 years of age for cervical cancer who have had adequate previous screening and are not otherwise at high risk of cervical cancer

  • Do not screen women younger than 30 years of age for cervical cancer with human papillomavirus testing, alone or in combination with cytology

The third “Five Things Physicians and Patients Should Question” released in September 2013
  • Do not prescribe antibiotics for otitis media in children aged 2 to 12 years with nonsevere symptoms where the observation option is reasonable

  • Do not perform voiding cystourethrogram routinely in first febrile urinary tract infection in children aged 2 to 24 months

  • Do not routinely screen for prostate cancer using prostate-specific antigen testing or digital rectal examination

  • Do not screen adolescents for scoliosis

  • Do not require a pelvic examination or other physical examination to prescribe oral contraceptive medications

  • Data from the American Academy of Family Physicians.9

  • ↵* Written in collaboration with the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists to develop the final language.

Limitations of the recommendations

As the list of medical services expands and becomes more widely implemented, the Choosing Wisely campaign will permit physicians to provide safe, effective, high-quality care with the additional benefit of lowering health care costs. By establishing these recommendations as standards of care, the societies reduce the risk that doing less might spur malpractice suits, which currently prompt many doctors to overtest and overtreat—so-called defensive medicine.14

The proposed recommendations could serve as a road map to help physicians and patients navigate a maze of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. However, some experts express caution, warning that the recommendations could be misinterpreted and applied too broadly at the expense of patient health. Some say that the group’s advice might make tailoring care for the individual patient harder. Both medical professionals and patients need to be aware that the necessity of tests is a highly individual matter. We have to bear in mind that the choice of diagnostic and therapeutic modalities might not be the same for any 2 patients, even those with the same condition.

As this campaign is relatively new, it is too soon to tell whether it has reduced the use of tests and treatments itemized in the Five Things lists. At some point a rigorous evaluation of the methods used by the project will be needed. Future studies should spur conversation about what is appropriate and necessary treatment, and not whether these recommendations should be used to establish coverage decisions or exclusions.

Worldwide action

The Choosing Wisely campaign builds on the standards and ideas set by the Physician Charter,15 the Less is More series of the Archives of Internal Medicine,16,17 and the National Physicians Alliance.10 Recently, more institutions joined the effort to combat overmedicalization, producing the Avoiding Avoidable Care (http://avoidablecare.org) and Selling Sickness (http://sellingsickness.com) conferences, as well as the Preventing Overdiagnosis conference (www.preventingoverdiagnosis.net), of which BMJ was a partner.18

Although the Five Things project is prepared by American specialty societies, medical resource overuse is a problem in many countries around the world and needs international action. In Canada, a similar campaign called Choosing Wisely Canada (www.choosingwiselycanada.org) was launched on April 2, 2014.19Several societies took part in the initial wave, including the Canadian Cardiovascular Society, the Canadian Association of Radiologists, the Canadian Medical Association Forum on General and Family Practice Issues, the Canadian Orthopaedic Association, the Canadian Society of Internal Medicine, the Canadian Rheumatology Association, the Canadian Geriatrics Society, the Canadian Association of General Surgeons, and the College of Family Physicians of Canada, who are all interested in working collaboratively to move this forward. The Canadian Medical Association has the support of 30 medical societies, currently at various stages of engagement in the campaign.19

The hope is that all of these projects will prompt discussions among physicians, patients, consumer advocates, policy makers, and health care reformers about the appropriateness of many frequently ordered diagnostic tests and therapeutic interventions. What is more, all of these campaigns are important policy initiatives that could restore public trust in the medical profession.

Footnotes

  • This article is eligible for Mainpro-M1 credits.

    To earn credits, go to www.cfp.ca and click on the Mainpro link.

  • This article has been peer reviewed.

  • Cet article se trouve aussi en français à la page 884.

  • Competing interests

    None declared

  • The opinions expressed in commentaries are those of the authors. Publication does not imply endorsement by the College of Family Physicians of Canada.

  • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. 1.↵
    Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. A data book: health care spending and the Medicare program. Washington, DC: Medicare Payment Advisory Commission; 2013.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Iglehart JK
    . Health insurers and medical-imaging policy—a work in progress. N Engl J Med 2009;360(10):1030-7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Clarke JL,
    2. Laskowski RJ,
    3. Coons C,
    4. Hood V,
    5. Slavin PL,
    6. Nash DB,
    7. et al
    . Proceedings of the Christiana Care Health System Value Institute Value Symposium. Am J Med Qual 2012;27(6 Suppl):3S-20S.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Brownlee S
    . Overtreated: why too much medicine is making us sicker and poorer. New York, NY: Bloomsbury; 2008.
  5. 5.↵
    1. Moynihan R,
    2. Smith R
    . Too much medicine? BMJ 2002;324(7342):859-60.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation [press release]. Choosing Wisely: five things physicians and patients should question. Washington, DC: American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation; 2012. Available from: www.choosingwisely.org/choosing-wisely-five-things-physicians-and-patients-should-question-press-release-april-4-2012/. Accessed 2014 Aug 19.
  7. 7.↵
    1. Rabin RC
    . Doctor panels recommend fewer tests for patients. The New York Times 2012 Apr 4. Available from: www.nytimes.com/2012/04/04/health/doctor-panels-urge-fewer-routine-tests.html?_r=0. Accessed 2013 Mar 18.
  8. 8.↵
    1. Jaslow R
    . Doctors unveil “Choosing Wisely” campaign to cut unnecessary medical tests. CBS News 2013 Jul 26. Available from: www.cbsnews.com/8301-504763_162-57409204-10391704/doctors-unveil-choosing-wisely-campaign-to-cut-unnecessary-medical-tests/. Accessed 2013 Mar 18.
  9. 9.↵
    American Academy of Family Physicians. Fifteen things physicians and patients should question. Philadelphia, PA: Choosing Wisely; 2013. Available from: www.choosingwisely.org/doctor-patient-lists/american-academy-of-family-physicians/. Accessed 2013 Jun 17.
  10. 10.↵
    1. Good Stewardship Working Group
    . The “top 5” lists in primary care: meeting the responsibility of professionalism. Arch Intern Med 2011;171(15):1385-90. Epub 2011 May 23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    American Academy of Family Physicians [press release]. American Academy of Family Physicians identifies list of commonly used tests and treatments to questions. Leawood, KS: American Academy of Family Physicians; 2013. Available from: www.aafp.org/media-center/releases-statements/all/2013/choosing-wisely-phase-two.html#contentpar_gridblock_0. Accessed 2013 Jun 17.
  12. 12.↵
    Consumer Reports [website]. How we test. Consumer Reports; 2014. Available from: www.consumerreports.org/cro/about-us/whats-behind-the-ratings/testing/index.htm. Accessed 2014 Aug 19.
  13. 13.↵
    Choosing Wisely [website]. Choosing Wisely consumer partners. Philadelphia, PA: Choosing Wisely; 2014. Available from: www.choosingwisely.org/partners/choosing-wisely-consumer-partners/. Accessed 2014 Aug 19.
  14. 14.↵
    1. Brody JE
    . When costly medical care just adds to the pain. The New York Times 2012 May 28. Available from: http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/28/when-costly-medical-care-just-adds-to-the-pain/?ref=janeebrody. Accessed 2013 Jul 5.
  15. 15.↵
    1. ABIM Foundation; ACP-ASIM Foundation; European Federation of Internal Medicine
    . Medical professionalism in the new millennium: a physician charter. Ann Intern Med 2002;136(3):243-6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Grady D,
    2. Redberg RF
    . Less is more: how less health care can result in better health. Arch Intern Med 2010;170(9):749-50.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Redberg R,
    2. Katz M,
    3. Grady D
    . Diagnostic tests: another frontier for less is more: or why talking to your patient is a safe and effective method of reassurance. Arch Intern Med 2011;171(7):619. Epub 2010 Dec 13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Moynihan R,
    2. Glasziou P,
    3. Woloshin S,
    4. Schwartz L,
    5. Santa J,
    6. Godlee F
    . Winding back the harms of too much medicine. BMJ 2013;346:f1271.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    Canadian Medical Association [website]. Choosing Wisely Canada. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Medical Association; 2014. Available from: www.cma.ca/En/Pages/choosing-wisely-canada.aspx. Accessed 2014 Aug 19.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 60 (10)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 60, Issue 10
1 Oct 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Choosing wisely
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Choosing wisely
Bartosz Hudzik, Michal Hudzik, Lech Polonski
Canadian Family Physician Oct 2014, 60 (10) 873-876;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Choosing wisely
Bartosz Hudzik, Michal Hudzik, Lech Polonski
Canadian Family Physician Oct 2014, 60 (10) 873-876;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • But what to avoid?
    • Five Things and family medicine
    • Limitations of the recommendations
    • Worldwide action
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Choisir avec soin
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Clinical decision support systems to improve drug prescription and therapy optimisation in clinical practice: a scoping review
  • Patient-centred approach is the way
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Reflections on the value of Canadian multiculturalism in health care delivery
  • The environmental elephant in the office: medications
  • Six-sentence and 3-citation research proposals
Show more Commentary

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2025 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire