Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
LetterCorrespondance

Clarification required: FOBT or not?

Lawrence C. Loh
Canadian Family Physician October 2014, 60 (10) 889;
Lawrence C. Loh
Burnaby, BC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

I appreciated the review by Del Giudice et al1 on the topic of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening referral in the August issue of Canadian Family Physician. These guidelines, for the most part, are an excellent overview of a complex process. I write to simply ask for further clarification around the role of fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) as described by the authors.

Del Giudice et al1 state that positive FOBT results require semiurgent referral, while negative FOBT results do not rule out CRC. Presumably, patients with negative FOBT results would then fall back into the wider pool, in which if their symptoms did not resolve within 4 to 6 weeks, they would also undergo semiurgent referral.

These guidelines seem to propose the following pathways for low-risk, symptomatic patients:

  • semiurgent referral for a positive FOBT result (with a test presumably completed over 1 to 2 weeks);

  • semiurgent referral for symptoms persisting longer than 4 weeks following a negative FOBT result, or in the absence of an FOBT; and

  • no referral required if symptoms resolve in 4 weeks, irrespective of FOBT being done.

The key issue here is that regardless of whether the FOBT is done, a failure of symptoms to resolve in 4 weeks triggers a semiurgent referral and resolution does not. To me, the residual value of ordering an FOBT thus seems to be not to prevent referral, but rather to trigger a semiurgent referral slightly early (perhaps practicably possible 1 to 2 weeks earlier than waiting).

Given the increasing resource pressures on our health care system, there is a growing awareness of the need to avoid unnecessary testing (eg, the Choosing Wisely2 campaign comes to mind). I wonder if Del Giudice and colleagues could comment on the evidence for improved outcomes and the health system resource burden provided by positive FOBT results triggering semiurgent referrals only slightly earlier, rather than a referral being triggered after 4 weeks of symptoms irrespective of whether the FOBT is ordered; and also explain what evidence led to the guidance that negative FOBT results do not rule out the need for a referral.

Taken together, to my mind, these 2 considerations seem to notably reduce the necessity and value of FOBT as an investigation in CRC screening and diagnosis, which in turn has considerable practice and health system implications.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests

    None declared

  • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Del Giudice ME,
    2. Vella ET,
    3. Hey A,
    4. Simunovic M,
    5. Harris W,
    6. Levitt C
    . Guideline for referral of patients with suspected colorectal cancer by family physicians and other primary care providers. Can Fam Physician 2014;60:717-23. (Eng), e383–90 (Fr).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Choosing Wisely [website]. Philadelphia, PA: ABIM Foundation; 2014. Available from: www.choosingwisely.org/. Accessed 2014 Aug 27.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 60 (10)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 60, Issue 10
1 Oct 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Clarification required: FOBT or not?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Clarification required: FOBT or not?
Lawrence C. Loh
Canadian Family Physician Oct 2014, 60 (10) 889;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Clarification required: FOBT or not?
Lawrence C. Loh
Canadian Family Physician Oct 2014, 60 (10) 889;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Power of words and expectation
  • More tools against misinformation
  • Methadone is methadone
Show more Correspondance

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2021 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire