Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
Research ArticleCollege

Identifying new referrals from FPs using EMRs

Heather Maddocks, Bridget L. Ryan, Joshua Shadd, Amanda Terry and Vijaya Chevendra
Canadian Family Physician October 2014, 60 (10) 949;
Heather Maddocks
Research scientist at CSFM at Western.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bridget L. Ryan
Assistant Professor in the family medicine and the epidemiology and biostatistics departments at Western
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joshua Shadd
Adjunct Professor in the Department of Family Medicine at Western.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amanda Terry
Assistant Professor in the family medicine and the epidemiology and biostatistics departments at WesternAssistant Professor in the Schulich Interfaculty Program in Public Health at Western.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vijaya Chevendra
Research IT consultant at CSFM at Western.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Interest in health policy issues around physician referrals has been growing. Referral patterns reflect not only the clinical needs of patients but also issues of standards of care, scopes of practice, and physician human resources. Electronic medical records (EMRs) give researchers a new window into patterns of referrals from primary care physicians to other specialist physicians.1 Although the process of cleaning and coding EMR data recorded for clinical rather than research purposes is complex, EMRs contain valuable patient-level information not available in health administrative data that could provide important insights into referral patterns. Accordingly, methods are being developed to enable this research using EMR databases.

Ryan and colleagues at Centre for Studies in Family Medicine (CSFM) at Western University, London, Ont, used the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network (CPCSSN) database as the source for their study on patterns of referral. The CPCSSN 2012 data contained information from 64 practice sites across 9 networks, representing 353 660 patients and containing 612 190 referral records. Ascertaining the new referrals to specialist physicians among these 612 190 records presented 2 challenges: 1) distinguishing referrals to specialist physicians from those to allied health or other professionals; and 2) distinguishing new—ie, outgoing—referrals from incoming consultation reports.

To address the first challenge, the researchers decided to include only sites where 90% or more of referral records included information about the type of specialist: 28 practice sites across 6 networks.

Next, they selected a cohort of patients with complete age and sex information who were 18 years of age or older and who had had at least 2 appointments occurring 12 or more months apart during a 5-year period (July 1, 2007, to June 30, 2012). These patients’ data included 107 112 referral records. Referrals to specialist physicians were then identified. Among these, referrals for nonmedical consultations or without a description of the type of specialist were removed.

Without careful inspection, the remaining referral records might be assumed to be new outgoing referrals from the FP to a medical specialist. However, in some practices, the referrals section of the EMR is used for both outgoing referrals and information on completed referrals with consultation feedback returned by the specialist. To be identified as new outgoing referrals, referral records had to be linked to an in-office patient visit and not have a specialist appointment date before the physician visit. Referral records were considered linked to an in-office visit if they had a linked encounter number or if the record date created for the referral was the same date as an in-office visit in the FP’s appointment schedule. For each patient, duplicate records to the same specialist type with the same date were removed, on the assumption that the FP made the decision to contact multiple medical specialists to find one accepting patients. Following these inspections, the number of referral records had been winnowed to 88 077.

The date of the appointment with the specialist was also used to identify new referrals. When this information is available, it additionally allows the calculation of wait times to see specialists.2 In this study, this date was not essential to the research question and so any records without the date of appointment with the specialist were included. However, when the date of the specialist appointment was present, it had to be on (in rare occurrences) or after the date of the patient visit. If the medical specialist appointment was before the patient visit (n = 9346), it was not considered a new referral, because it could represent a consult note returned by the specialist and stored in the EMR; this reduced the records to a final total of 78 731.

These steps illustrate the need to follow a careful process using all available information in the EMR to arrive at meaningful data. To improve the utility of patient-level primary care data for future studies, it is critical that methods to code and structure EMR data for use in research be developed. Understanding the complexity of EMR data, and its principal function for clinical practice rather than research, requires investigators to critically assess database contents before identifying patient cohorts and associated clinical information. The CPCSSN database is a valuable source of information on referral patterns from primary care to medical specialists. The work of Ryan and colleagues adds to the inventory of methods for examining data in CPCSSN and other EMR-derived databases by proposing a process for ascertaining new referrals.

Notes

Sentinel Eye is coordinated by CPCSSN, in partnership with the CFPC, to highlight surveillance and research initiatives related to chronic illness prevalence and management in Canada. Please send questions or comments to Anita Lambert Lanning, CPCSSN Project Manager, at all{at}cfpc.ca.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests

    None declared

  • La traduction en français de cet article se trouve à www.cfp.ca dans la table des matières du numéro d’octobre 2014 à la page e502.

  • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Shadd J,
    2. Ryan BL,
    3. Maddocks H,
    4. Thind A
    . Patterns of referral in a Canadian primary care electronic medical record database: retrospective cross-sectional analysis. Inform Prim Care 2011;19:217-23.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Thind A,
    2. Stewart M,
    3. Manuel D,
    4. Freeman T,
    5. Terry A,
    6. Chevendra V,
    7. et al
    . What are wait times to see a specialist? An analysis of 26,942 referrals in southwestern Ontario. Healthc Policy 2012;8(1):80-91.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 60 (10)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 60, Issue 10
1 Oct 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Identifying new referrals from FPs using EMRs
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Identifying new referrals from FPs using EMRs
Heather Maddocks, Bridget L. Ryan, Joshua Shadd, Amanda Terry, Vijaya Chevendra
Canadian Family Physician Oct 2014, 60 (10) 949;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Identifying new referrals from FPs using EMRs
Heather Maddocks, Bridget L. Ryan, Joshua Shadd, Amanda Terry, Vijaya Chevendra
Canadian Family Physician Oct 2014, 60 (10) 949;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Notes
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Identifier les nouvelles demandes de consultation par les MF à l’aide des DME
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Methods to describe referral patterns in a Canadian primary care electronic medical record database: modelling multi-level count data
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

College

  • CMFCApprendre : n’importe quand, n’importe où, par les MF, pour les MF
  • Split between two worlds
  • À cheval entre deux mondes
Show more College

Sentinel Eye

  • Update from CPCSSN
  • Supporting primary care public health functions
  • Harnessing the power of longitudinal data
Show more Sentinel Eye

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2021 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire