Clinical question
What risks do different family histories of cardiovascular disease (CVD) carry?
Bottom line
Family history of CVD modifies future CVD risk depending on the number and age of affected first-degree relatives. Siblings of patients with CVD have about a 40% risk increase, while offspring of parents with premature CVD have a 60% to 75% risk increase. Consistent definitions of premature CVD would allow a better estimate of the true attributable risk.
Evidence
Where possible, odds ratios (ORs) have been converted to relative risks (RRs).
-
A total of 2302 male and female Framingham offspring study participants with parental history of premature CVD (father < 55 years, mother < 65 years) were analyzed for CVD risk.1 After 8 years of follow-up, CVD increased 75% with paternal and about 60% with maternal history of premature CVD.
-
Using the same cohort for 8 years, CVD increased about 40% in those whose siblings had CVD.2
-
In identical (or monozygotic) twins, the hazard ratio of death from coronary artery disease (CAD) increased 3.8 to 15 times if an identical sibling died of CAD before age 75.3
-
-Risk was 3 times higher for identical than for non-identical twins.
-
-Risk was greater the earlier the other twin died.
-
-
More than 49 000 primarily white men in the United States were analyzed for CAD in their extended families (sibling, aunt or uncle, parent, or grandparent) and the risk of future CVD.4
-
-After 16 years, a family history of premature CAD (age < 50) conferred a 44% increased risk of CVD mortality.
-
-
A large international case-control study5 found an increased risk of myocardial infarction (MI) if
-
-one parent had MI (OR = 1.67);
-
-one parent had MI before age 50 (OR = 2.36);
-
-both parents had MI (OR = 2.90); and
-
-both parents had MI before age 50 (OR = 6.56).
-
—Results were similar when adjusted for CVD risk factors across socioeconomic status of household or country, and for maternal or paternal MI history.
-
-
Context
Implementation
Only a few risk calculators (eg, QRISK2, JBS3, Reynolds) include family history of CVD in calculating a patient’s risk. Unfortunately, the definition of a family history of CVD is either not explicit or differs among these calculators. Risk from family history depends on the number of first-degree relatives affected and the age CVD developed. A reasonable approach might be to use baseline risk estimation (without family history) from a validated risk calculator (like Framingham) and then adjust the additional family history risk with the ORs and RRs given above. In some cases, family history might increase the estimated CVD risk to a level where statin therapy could be offered.
Notes
Tools for Practice articles in Canadian Family Physician (CFP) are adapted from articles published on the Alberta College of Family Physicians (ACFP) website, summarizing medical evidence with a focus on topical issues and practice-modifying information. The ACFP summaries and the series in CFP are coordinated by Dr G. Michael Allan, and the summaries are co-authored by at least 1 practising family physician and are peer reviewed. Feedback is welcome and can be sent to toolsforpractice{at}cfpc.ca. Archived articles are available on the ACFP website: www.acfp.ca.
Footnotes
-
The opinions expressed in Tools for Practice articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily mirror the perspective and policy of the Alberta College of Family Physicians.
- Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada