Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
  • Log out
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
Review ArticlePractice

Prescribing smoked cannabis for chronic noncancer pain

Preliminary recommendations

Meldon Kahan, Anita Srivastava, Sheryl Spithoff and Lisa Bromley
Canadian Family Physician December 2014; 60 (12) 1083-1090;
Meldon Kahan
Associate Professor in the Department of Family and Community Medicine at the University of Toronto in Ontario and Medical Director of the Substance Use Service at Women’s College Hospital.
MD MHSc FRCPC FCFP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: meldon.kahan@wchospital.ca
Anita Srivastava
Assistant Professor and Research Scholar in the Department of Family and Community Medicine at the University of Toronto and a staff physician with the St Joseph’s Health Centre Family Health Team.
MSc MD CCFP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sheryl Spithoff
Staff physician with the Women’s College Hospital Family Health Team.
MD CCFP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lisa Bromley
Staff physician at Sandy Hill Community Health Centre in Ottawa, Ont.
MD CCFP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objective To offer preliminary guidance on prescribing smoked cannabis for chronic pain before the release of formal guidelines.

Quality of evidence We reviewed the literature on the analgesic effectiveness of smoked cannabis and the harms of medical and recreational cannabis use. We developed recommendations on indications, contraindications, precautions, and dosing of smoked cannabis, and categorized the recommendations based on levels of evidence. Evidence is mostly level II (well conducted observational studies) and III (expert opinion).

Main message Smoked cannabis might be indicated for patients with severe neuropathic pain conditions who have not responded to adequate trials of pharmaceutical cannabinoids and standard analgesics (level II evidence). Smoked cannabis is contraindicated in patients who are 25 years of age or younger (level II evidence); who have a current, past, or strong family history of psychosis (level II evidence); who have a current or past cannabis use disorder (level III evidence); who have a current substance use disorder (level III evidence); who have cardiovascular or respiratory disease (level III evidence); or who are pregnant or planning to become pregnant (level II evidence). It should be used with caution in patients who smoke tobacco (level II evidence), who are at increased risk of cardiovascular disease (level III evidence), who have anxiety or mood disorders (level II evidence), or who are taking higher doses of opioids or benzodiazepines (level III evidence). Cannabis users should be advised not to drive for at least 3 to 4 hours after smoking, for at least 6 hours after oral ingestion, and for at least 8 hours if they experience a subjective “high” (level II evidence). The maximum recommended dose is 1 inhalation 4 times per day (approximately 400 mg per day) of dried cannabis containing 9% delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (level III evidence). Physicians should avoid referring patients to “cannabinoid” clinics (level III evidence).

Conclusion Future guidelines should be based on systematic review of the literature on the safety and effectiveness of smoked cannabis. Further research is needed on the effectiveness and long-term safety of smoked cannabis compared with pharmaceutical cannabinoids, opioids, and other standard analgesics.

The new Health Canada regulations on medical marijuana permit physicians to prescribe dried cannabis to patients who can then purchase the cannabis directly from licensed distributors.1 The prescription must specify the dose to be used per day and the amount to be dispensed per month (to a maximum of 150 g per 30 days, or 5 g per day). Unlike all other prescribed medications, Health Canada has not reviewed data on the safety or effectiveness of medical cannabis and has not approved cannabis for therapeutic use.

This review offers preliminary guidance on the indications, contraindications, and dosing of smoked cannabis in the treatment of chronic noncancer pain, pending the development of formal guidelines. Pain is the most common reason for using medical cannabis.2–6

Quality of evidence

We searched PubMed from 2007 to 2014 using the search term medical marijuana. We also used search terms combining cannabis or marijuana with its therapeutic or harmful effects, including the terms pain, analgesia, cardiovascular, respiratory, anxiety, psychosis, substance use disorders, and motor vehicle accidents. We reviewed the abstracts of 301 studies and reviews, selecting those articles we thought most relevant to prescribing in primary care (102 articles in total). Our review was not systematic, and we did not employ explicit inclusion or exclusion criteria. Recommendations were graded as level I (based on well conducted controlled trials or meta-analyses), level II (well conducted observational studies), or level III (expert opinion). When relevant, level III recommendations were based on opioid research, as summarized in the Canadian guideline on opioid prescribing.7 We relied on the Health Canada monograph on cannabis8 for information on pharmacokinetics and dosing.

Main message

Figure 1 outlines recommendations for prescribing dried cannabis. Indications, contraindications, and other considerations are detailed below.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 1.

Prescribing dried cannabis

NSAID—nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, SNRI—serotonin noradrenergic reuptake inhibitor, VAS—analogue scale.

Smoked cannabis is indicated for severe neuropathic pain that has failed to respond to standard treatments (level II evidence)

The evidence supporting smoked cannabis is limited and weak. To date, 5 controlled trials have examined smoked cannabis for the treatment of chronic pain.9–13 The trials found that smoked cannabis was superior to placebo for neuropathic pain from HIV, multiple sclerosis, and other causes. The trials had small sample sizes and only lasted between 1 and 15 days. Other important outcomes including functional status or quality of life were not measured because the trials were only a few days’ duration. We could not find any clinical trial that compared smoked cannabis to standard analgesics. Therefore, we recommend that smoked cannabis be prescribed only for severe neuropathic pain syndromes that have not responded to adequate trials of pharmaceutical cannabinoids and other analgesics.

Smoked cannabis is not indicated for patients with pain conditions commonly seen in primary care (level III evidence)

Most medical cannabis users have common pain conditions such as fibromyalgia or low back pain.14 We advise against prescribing smoked cannabis for these conditions because the safety and effectiveness of smoked cannabis have not been studied, and because better and more evidence-based treatments are available.

Cannabinoids have important acute and chronic cognitive effects (level II evidence)

Acutely, smoked cannabis can cause perceptual distortions, cognitive impairment, and euphoria.8 Chronic cannabis use is associated with persistent neuropsychological deficits, even after a period of abstinence.15 As long-term studies have been observational, causality cannot be definitively established. Nonetheless, these studies indicate that cannabis can have clinically important adverse effects; therefore, long-term prescribing should be undertaken with caution.

Smoked cannabis is contraindicated in some patient groups (levels II and III evidence)

Smoked cannabis is contraindicated in patients younger than 25 years of age; those with a current, past, or strong family history of psychosis; those with a current or past cannabis use disorder (CUD); those with a current substance use disorder; those with cardiovascular or respiratory disease; or those who are pregnant or planning to become pregnant ( Box 1).

Patients younger than 25 years of age (level II evidence):

Youth who smoke cannabis are at greater risk than older adults of cannabis-related psychosocial harms, including crime, suicidal thoughts, illicit drug use, CUD, and long-term cognitive impairment.16–21

Cannabis use disorder (level III evidence):

The prevalence of CUD among medical marijuana smokers is the same as that among regular recreational smokers.22 Patients with CUD should be counseled to discontinue their cannabis use and attend treatment, even if they claim that the cannabis is helping their pain. Research has demonstrated that pain patients who are addicted to prescription opioids experience marked improvements in pain, mood, and function when they discontinue opioids and receive addiction treatment.23 While research on CUD and pain is lacking, we would expect similarly positive outcomes in pain patients who are successfully treated for CUD.

Current substance use disorder (level II evidence):

Cannabis should not be prescribed to patients with current problematic use of alcohol, opioids, or other drugs. There are potentially dangerous drug interactions between cannabis and high doses of opioids, alcohol, and other sedating drugs. Although causality has not been established, patients who use cannabis are more likely to misuse prescription opioids24 and to have a higher severity of problematic alcohol and cocaine use.25–27 Finally, substance users are more likely to divert prescribed cannabis to support their drug use. In a study of adolescents attending an addiction treatment program in the United States, 47% reported using medical marijuana supplied to them by a registered marijuana patient.28

Current, past, or strong family history of psychosis (level II evidence):

Observational studies have demonstrated an association between cannabis use in adolescence and persistent psychosis. Cohort studies suggest that cannabis is a dose-related risk factor for the later development of psychosis.29–35

Cardiovascular disease (level III evidence):

Cannabis smoking causes acute physiologic effects including elevations in blood pressure and heart rate, catecholamine release, elevations in carboxyhemoglobin levels, postural hypotension, and reversible cerebral vascular syndrome.36,37 There have been reports of young people suffering cardiac events shortly after smoking cannabis.38–40 We therefore recommend against prescribing cannabis to patients with known cardiovascular disease.

Respiratory disease (level II evidence):

Although it is difficult to control for the confounding effects of tobacco smoke, evidence suggests that heavy cannabis smoking might be an independent risk factor for impaired respiratory function and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.41,42

Pregnant or planning to become pregnant (level II evidence):

Preliminary evidence links cannabis use during pregnancy to subtle neurodevelopmental abnormalities in infants.43

Cannabis should be prescribed with caution in certain patients (levels II and III evidence)

Patients who have current, active mood or anxiety disorders, those who smoke tobacco, those with risk factors for cardiovascular disease, and those who use high doses of alcohol, opioids, or benzodiazepines should be prescribed smoked cannabis with caution (Box 1).

Box 1.

Smoked cannabis prescription: Contraindications and precautions

Contraindications
  • Current, past, or strong family history of psychosis

  • Pregnant or planning to become pregnant

  • Younger than 25 y of age

  • Current or past cannabis use disorder

  • Current substance use disorder

  • Respiratory disease

  • Cardiovascular disease

Precautions
  • Current mood or anxiety disorder

  • Tobacco smoking

  • High risk of cardiovascular disease

  • Taking higher doses of opioids or benzodiazepines

Current mood and anxiety disorders (level II evidence):

Although a causal relationship has not been confirmed, there is a strong relationship between cannabis use and anxiety and mood disorders, as well as suicidal thoughts.16,44–54 Acute cannabis use can trigger anxiety and panic attacks, especially at high doses.55,56 Cannabis use might worsen psychiatric impairment in patients with anxiety disorders.52,57,58 Heavy cannabis smokers who report relief of anxiety with cannabis might be experiencing early symptoms of cannabis withdrawal when they abstain; withdrawal symptoms can be resolved through cannabis cessation.59 If cannabis is prescribed to patients with underlying anxiety disorders, it should be prescribed at low doses and discontinued if it worsens anxiety or triggers panic attacks.

Tobacco smokers (level II evidence):

Even after controlling for tobacco exposure, cannabis smoking has been associated with lung cancer60 and chronic bronchitis.61,62 Patients who smoke tobacco should be strongly encouraged not to use cannabis or to use it via oral or vaporized routes.

Risk factors for cardiovascular disease (level III evidence):

Physicians should prescribe cannabis with considerable caution in patients with risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Only a low dose should be prescribed, and the patient should be encouraged to use a vaporizer or to ingest it orally rather than smoking it.

Use of alcohol, opioids, or benzodiazepines in high doses (level III evidence):

Cannabis use could worsen the cognitive impairment caused by high doses of alcohol, opioids, and benzodiazepines. Combining alcohol with cannabis increases the risk of motor vehicle accidents to a greater extent than if either drug is used alone.63 If cannabis is prescribed, it should be prescribed at a low dose and should be discontinued if it affects patients’ memory, mood, or function. Patients should be advised to use alcohol in moderation, and physicians should consider tapering high opioid or benzodiazepine doses.7

Cannabis users should be advised not to drive after use (levels II evidence)

Cannabis use before driving is a risk factor for motor vehicle accidents. Those using cannabis should not drive for at least 3 to 4 hours after smoking, for at least 6 hours after oral ingestion, and for at least 8 hours if they experience a subjective “high” (level II evidence).64–68

Physicians should always prescribe an adequate trial of pharmaceutical cannabinoids before prescribing smoked cannabis (level II evidence)

Oral or buccal cannabinoids have far greater evidence of efficacy than smoked cannabis does for the treatment of neuropathic pain,69–74 and there is no evidence that smoked cannabis is a more effective analgesic than pharmaceutical cannabinoids.75 Pharmaceutical cannabinoids are also safer, with fewer cognitive effects. The inhalation route delivers a higher peak level more quickly than the oral route, and the total bioavailable dose of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) is higher in a smoked cannabis cigarette than in oral or buccal cannabinoids. Experimental and clinical studies have confirmed that the acute cognitive effects of oral or buccal cannabinoids are milder and their effects on driving and memory are less strong than with smoked cannabis.8,73,75–80 A database review found that nabilone is associated with very low rates of misuse.81

Physicians should follow the regulations of their provincial college when prescribing dried cannabis (level III evidence)

Physicians should review the complete policies of their provincial colleges of physicians and surgeons before prescribing cannabis (Box 2).

Box 2.

Prescribing policies that have been recommended by at least 1 provincial college of physicians and surgeons

The following have been recommended by at least 1 provincial college:

  • State the patient’s medical condition on the prescription

  • Register with the college as a marijuana prescriber

  • Send the college a copy of the prescription

  • Keep all prescriptions on a separate record for possible inspection by the college

  • Only the physician who manages the patient’s condition may prescribe cannabis for that condition

  • Do not prescribe cannabis through telemedicine

  • Have the patient sign a written treatment agreement

  • Document that other treatments have been tried and that the patient is aware of the risks of dried cannabis

  • Use a standardized tool to assess the patient’s risk of addiction

  • Have a procedure or protocol for identifying cannabis misuse

  • Do not charge the patient fees

Physicians should advise cannabis smokers about harm-reduction strategies (level III evidence)

Patients should be advised about ways to mitigate the potential harms of smoked cannabis (Box 3). Exposure to the toxic byproducts of combustion can be avoided by vaporizing cannabis (heating the dried plant until the cannabis on the plant’s surface vaporizes). This produces much lower concentrations of exhaled carbon monoxide (and probably other toxins) than smoking does.82 Physicians should advise patients not to use cannabis with alcohol or other sedating drugs, and not to put tobacco into marijuana joints. Patients should be warned not to give or sell their cannabis to others, as this is both dangerous and illegal. Patients with adolescent children at home should let the physician know how they intend to safely store the cannabis. Patients should be advised not to hold their breath after inhalation.

Box 3.

Harm-reduction strategies

Patient warnings

  • Do not drink or use sedating drugs while using cannabis

  • Do not to drive for at least 3 h after smoking cannabis, 6 h after oral ingestion of cannabis, and 8 h if you experience a “high”

Avoiding medical harms

  • Do not mix cannabis with tobacco

  • Use a vaporizer or ingest the cannabis orally

  • Stop cannabis if pregnant or planning to become pregnant

Avoiding drug diversion

  • Do not give or sell your cannabis to others or buy it from anyone other than a licensed distributor

  • Keep the cannabis in a safe, secret location, particularly if adolescents live at home

Before prescribing cannabis, physicians should conduct a pain assessment and assess the patient for substance use disorders and anxiety or mood disorders; after cannabis is prescribed, physicians should monitor the analgesic response to cannabis (level III evidence)

The assessment outlined in the Canadian guideline for opioid prescribing is useful for cannabis prescribing as well.83 The physician should ask the patient to rate his or her pain on a 10-point scale, and to describe the effect of the pain on daily activities. The physician should take a careful history of current and past mood and substance use (cannabis, tobacco, alcohol, opioids, benzodiazepines, and cocaine). A urine drug screening test is suggested; cannabis prescribing should be avoided in patients whose urine drug screening results are positive for cocaine or other illicit drugs. Several colleges recommend use of a standardized tool to identify problematic use. The CAGE-AID (CAGE Adapted to Include Drugs) might be the easiest (Box 4).84 At each office visit, the physician should inquire about the effects of cannabis on pain and function. The physician should also ask about psychoactive effects of cannabis, compliance with the dosing recommendations, and use of any other substances.

Box 4.

The CAGE Adapted to Include Drugs: One or more positive responses indicate the need for further assessment. A urine drug screening test is also recommended.

Have you ever felt you ought to Cut down on your drinking or drug use?
Have people Annoyed you by criticizing your drinking or drug use?
Have you ever felt bad or Guilty about your drinking or drug use?
Have you ever had a drink or used drugs first thing in the morning (Eye-opener) to steady your nerves, get rid of a hangover, or get the day started?
  • Data from Brown and Rounds.84

  • Physicians should discontinue cannabis prescriptions if they are ineffective or cause harm (level III evidence)

    Smoked cannabis should be discontinued in the following circumstances.

    • The patient experiences insufficient analgesia (less than 2 points improvement on a 10-point scale and no improvement in function). As with opioids, patients whose pain has rendered them unable to work or engage in productive activities should be considered to have experienced treatment failure if the cannabis use does not result in improved functioning, even if the patient reports subjective pain relief (level III evidence). Smoked cannabis can cause fatigue and cognitive impairment, which might worsen function in patients who are already disabled by pain.

    • The patient experiences side effects such as drowsiness, perceptual disturbances, memory impairment, or worsening mood and functioning.

    • The patient shows clinical features of CUD (Box 5). Physicians should consider referring patients with a suspected CUD to an addiction medicine physician for assessment and management.

    Dried cannabis should be prescribed to a patient only by the physician who manages that patient’s pain. Physicians should avoid referring patients to “cannabinoid” clinics (level III evidence)

    Experience from the United States suggests that medical marijuana practices tend to prescribe to large volumes of patients. In Colorado, 49% of more than 36 000 medical recommendations for medical marijuana were written by only 15 physicians.85 We believe that this could lead to potentially unsafe prescribing, given the risks of smoked cannabis and its uncertain evidence of effectiveness. Therefore, before referring a patient for an opinion on prescribing dried cannabis, the family physician should first ensure that the consultant is an expert in pain management who routinely conducts a complete assessment, who has an unbiased and comprehensive understanding of the evidence on the risks and benefits of smoked cannabis, and who does not charge patients fees and does not have any financial involvement with licensed cannabis distributors.

    Several provincial colleges specify that only the physician who manages the patient’s pain condition may prescribe dried cannabis for that patient. In effect, this restricts cannabis prescribing to the patient’s primary care physician or, in patients with complex neuropathic pain conditions, the patient’s neurologist or pain specialist. This is a sound policy because it reduces the risk of dangerous drug interactions (for example, the cannabinoid clinic prescribes high-dose, potent THC while the primary care physician prescribes high-dose opioids). Also, the primary care physician is much more likely than a high-volume specialized clinic to identify cannabis-related problems, such as CUD, anxiety, or cognitive impairment.

    Box 5.

    Clinical features of cannabis use disorder in patients with chronic pain

    The following are indicative of cannabis use disorder:

    • Patient insists on cannabis prescriptions despite having a pain condition that is amenable to treatments other than smoked cannabis

    • Patient uses cannabis daily or almost daily, spending a considerable amount of nonproductive time on this activity

    • Patient has poor school, work, and social functioning

    • Patient is currently addicted to or misusing other substances (other than tobacco)

    • Patient has risk factors for cannabis use disorder: is young, has a current mood or anxiety disorder, or has a past history of addiction or misuse

    • Patient reports having difficulty stopping or reducing use

    • Friends or family members have expressed concern

    Physicians should prescribe no more than 400 mg per day of 9% THC, which is a dose that is effective for pain but which causes minimal cognitive impairment (level III evidence)

    This optimal dose should be effective for pain, while causing minimal euphoria or cognitive impairment. Subjects in a controlled trial13 experienced relief of pain with 1 inhalation 3 times per day of 9.4% smoked cannabis. The single inhalation produced a serum level of 45 μg/L, which is slightly lower than the level associated with euphoria (50 to 100 μg/L). The subjects in this trial did not experience serious cognitive effects such as confusion and disorientation, whereas these effects were observed in subjects using higher doses.8 Patients should be advised to hold their breath after inhalation for no more than a few seconds. If they notice that a dose causes cognitive impairment, they should take smaller or less frequent inhalations and hold their breath for shorter periods of time.

    Treatment should be initiated with 1 inhalation per day. Smoked cannabis has a duration of action of about 2 to 4 hours.8 We suggest a dose of no more than 1 inhalation 4 times per day to avoid cannabis intoxication and cognitive impairment. Four inhalations per day for 30 days can be provided with a prescription of 400 mg per day (half of a joint per day), or 12 g per month. The prescription should specify “maximum 9% THC,” as the concentration of THC produced by distributors varies widely (less than 1% to 30%). Lower doses are suggested for heavy drinkers, those taking opioids or benzodiazepines, and patients with mood or anxiety disorders.

    Oral ingestion of dried cannabis:

    Because THC has 2.5 times greater bioavailability through smoking than through oral ingestion,8 for patients who only ingest dried cannabis mixed in food, we recommend a dose of no more than 1 g per day.

    Physicians should be prepared to manage patient disagreements over cannabis prescriptions (level III evidence)

    The indications, precautions, and contraindications outlined in this paper will exclude many current medical cannabis users. Medical cannabis users tend to be young with the same types of pain as the general pain population but with higher rates of substance use disorders and mental illness.86–88 Further, our suggested maximum dose (400 mg per day) is lower than the average dose smoked by medical cannabis users (1 to 3 g per day).8 The best strategy for managing disagreements with patients is to offer clear explanatory statements. These are outlined in more detail in Box 6.

    Box 6.

    Messages to patients who disagree with your decision not to prescribe cannabis

    The following messages might be useful for explaining your decision not to prescribe cannabis:

    • Smoked cannabis has serious risks and minimal evidence of benefit

    • Neither Health Canada nor any national medical organization has endorsed smoked cannabis as a medicine, and physicians are bound to comply with the standards of our profession

    • As your physician, I suggest we work together to devise an individualized treatment plan for you. Safe and effective treatments are available for your condition

    If the patient is at high risk of cannabis-related harms (eg, young, concurrent anxiety, substance use disorder):

    • As your physician, I cannot prescribe any medication that might harm you

    If the patient claims that oral cannabinoids are ineffective:

    • Explore the possibility that the patient is using smoked cannabis for its effects on mood

    If the patient remains dissatisfied:

    • I will not prescribe cannabis, but I will refer you to a comprehensive pain physician who might prescribe it if he or she feels it is appropriate

    If cannabis use disorder is suspected:

    • In my opinion, your use of cannabis could be causing you harm. We need to talk about ways to reduce or stop your cannabis use

    If the patient says that your refusal forces him or her to purchase cannabis illegally:

    • I would advise you not to buy cannabis or any other drug from the street. In my opinion, using street cannabis is not benefiting your health and could be causing you harm

    Conclusion

    Readers are encouraged to review the preliminary guidance document on dried cannabis recently released by the College of Family Physicians of Canada.89 Future guidelines should be based on systematic review of the literature on the safety and effectiveness of smoked cannabis. The guideline’s recommendations should be based on a consensus of clinicians and researchers who do not have important conflicts of interest. Further research is needed on the effectiveness and long-term safety of smoked cannabis compared with pharmaceutical cannabinoids, opioids, and other standard analgesics. Smoked cannabis should be prescribed only for patients with severe neuropathic pain conditions that have not responded to standard analgesics and synthetic cannabinoids. It should not be prescribed to those younger than 25 years of age; pregnant women; those with cannabis or other substance use disorders; those with current, past, or strong family history of psychosis; or patients with cardiovascular or respiratory disease. The maximum recommended dose is 400 mg per day or 12 g per month.

    Notes

    EDITOR’S KEY POINTS

    • New Health Canada regulations on medical marijuana allow patients with physicians’ prescriptions to purchase dried cannabis from licensed distributors. Unlike all other prescribed medications, Health Canada has not reviewed data on the safety or effectiveness of medical cannabis and has not approved cannabis for therapeutic use.

    • The evidence supporting smoked cannabis is limited and weak. Pain is the most common reason for using medical cannabis. This review offers preliminary guidance on the indications, contraindications, and dosing of smoked cannabis in the treatment of chronic noncancer pain to assist physicians until formal guidelines are produced. Readers are encouraged to review the preliminary guidance document on dried cannabis recently released by the College of Family Physicians of Canada.

    Footnotes

    • This article is eligible for Mainpro-M1 credits. To earn credits, go to www.cfp.ca and click on the Mainpro link.

    • This article has been peer reviewed.

    • La traduction en français de cet article se trouve à www.cfp.ca dans la table des matières du numéro de décembre 2014 à la page e562.

    • Contributors All authors contributed to the literature review and interpretation, and to preparing the manuscript for submission.

    • Competing interests None declared

    • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada

    References

    1. 1.↵
      Marihuana for medical purposes regulations. Canada Gazette Part I 2012;146(50):3422-536.
      OpenUrl
    2. 2.↵
      1. Reinarman C,
      2. Nunberg H,
      3. Lanthier F,
      4. Heddleston T
      . Who are the medical marijuana patients? Population characteristics from nine California assessment clinics. J Psychoactive Drugs 2011;43(2):128-35.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    3. 3.
      1. Swift W,
      2. Gates P,
      3. Dillon P
      . Survey of Australians using cannabis for medical purposes. Harm Reduct J 2005;2:18.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    4. 4.
      1. Prentiss D,
      2. Power R,
      3. Balmas G,
      4. Tzuang G,
      5. Israelski DM
      . Patterns of marijuana use among patients with HIV/AIDS followed in a public health care setting. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2004;35(1):38-45.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    5. 5.
      1. Ware MA,
      2. Adams H,
      3. Guy GW
      . The medicinal use of cannabis in the UK: results of a nationwide survey. Int J Clin Pract 2005;59(3):291-5.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    6. 6.↵
      1. Ogborne AC,
      2. Smart RG,
      3. Weber T,
      4. Birchmore-Timney C
      . Who is using cannabis as a medicine and why: an exploratory study. J Psychoactive Drugs 2000;32(4):435-43.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    7. 7.↵
      National Opioid Use Guideline Group. Canadian guideline for safe and effective use of opioids for chronic non-cancer pain. Hamilton, ON: National Opioid Use Guideline Group; 2010. Available from: http://nationalpaincentre.mcmaster.ca/opioid. Accessed 2014 Oct 27.
    8. 8.↵
      Controlled Substances and Tobacco Directorate. Information for health care professionals: cannabis (marihuana, marijuana) and the cannabinoids. Ottawa, ON: Health Canada; 2013. Available from: www.hc-sc.gc.ca/dhp-mps/marihuana/med/infoprof-eng.php. Accessed 2014 Oct 27.
    9. 9.↵
      1. Abrams DI,
      2. Jay CA,
      3. Shade SB,
      4. Vizoso H,
      5. Reda H,
      6. Press S,
      7. et al
      . Cannabis in painful HIV-associated sensory neuropathy: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Neurology 2007;68(7):515-21.
      OpenUrlCrossRef
    10. 10.
      1. Wilsey B,
      2. Marcotte T,
      3. Tsodikov A,
      4. Millman J,
      5. Bentley H,
      6. Gouaux B,
      7. et al
      . A randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover trial of cannabis cigarettes in neuropathic pain. J Pain 2008;9(6):506-21.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    11. 11.
      1. Ellis RJ,
      2. Toperoff W,
      3. Vaida F,
      4. van den Brande G,
      5. Gonzales J,
      6. Gouaux B,
      7. et al
      . Smoked medicinal cannabis for neuropathic pain in HIV: a randomized, crossover clinical trial. Neuropsychopharmacology 2009;34(3):672-80.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    12. 12.
      1. Corey-Bloom J,
      2. Wolfson T,
      3. Gamst A,
      4. Jin S,
      5. Marcotte TD,
      6. Bentley H,
      7. et al
      . Smoked cannabis for spasticity in multiple sclerosis: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. CMAJ 2012;184(10):1143-50.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    13. 13.↵
      1. Ware MA,
      2. Wang T,
      3. Shapiro S,
      4. Robinson A,
      5. Ducruet T,
      6. Huynh T,
      7. et al
      . Smoked cannabis for chronic neuropathic pain: a randomized controlled trial. CMAJ 2010;182(14):E694-701.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    14. 14.↵
      1. Aggarwal SK,
      2. Carter GT,
      3. Sullivan MD,
      4. Zumbrunnen C,
      5. Morrill R,
      6. Mayer JD
      . Characteristics of patients with chronic pain accessing treatment with medical cannabis in Washington State. J Opioid Manag 2009;5(5):257-86.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    15. 15.↵
      1. Gonzalez R
      . Acute and non-acute effects of cannabis on brain functioning and neuropsychological performance. Neuropsychol Rev 2007;17(3):347-61.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    16. 16.↵
      1. Fergusson DM,
      2. Horwood LJ,
      3. Swain-Campbell N
      . Cannabis use and psychosocial adjustment in adolescence and young adulthood. Addiction 2002;97(9):1123-35.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    17. 17.
      1. Nocon A,
      2. Wittchen HU,
      3. Pfister H,
      4. Zimmermann P,
      5. Lieb R
      . Dependence symptoms in young cannabis users? A prospective epidemiological study. J Psychiatr Res 2006;40(5):394-403.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    18. 18.
      1. Lynskey MT,
      2. Vink JM,
      3. Boomsma DI
      . Early onset cannabis use and progression to other drug use in a sample of Dutch twins. Behav Genet 2006;36(2):195-200.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    19. 19.
      1. Meier MH,
      2. Caspi A,
      3. Ambler A,
      4. Harrington H,
      5. Houts R,
      6. Keefe RS,
      7. et al
      . Persistent cannabis users show neuropsychological decline from childhood to midlife. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012;109(40):E2657-64.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    20. 20.
      1. Lisdahl KM,
      2. Price JS
      . Increased marijuana use and gender predict poorer cognitive functioning in adolescents and emerging adults. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2012;18(4):678-88.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    21. 21.↵
      1. Jager G,
      2. Ramsey NF
      . Long-term consequences of adolescent cannabis exposure on the development of cognition, brain structure and function: an overview of animal and human research. Curr Drug Abuse Rev 2008;1(2):114-23.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    22. 22.↵
      1. Bonn-Miller MO,
      2. Boden MT,
      3. Bucossi MM,
      4. Babson KA
      . Self-reported cannabis use characteristics, patterns and helpfulness among medical cannabis users. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 2014;40(1):23-30.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    23. 23.↵
      1. Neumann AM,
      2. Blondell RD,
      3. Jaanimägi U,
      4. Giambrone AK,
      5. Homish GG,
      6. Lozano JR,
      7. et al
      . A preliminary study comparing methadone and buprenorphine in patients with chronic pain and coexistent opioid addiction. J Addict Dis 2013;32(1):68-78.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    24. 24.↵
      1. Reisfield GM,
      2. Wasan AD,
      3. Jamison RN
      . The prevalence and significance of cannabis use in patients prescribed chronic opioid therapy: a review of the extant literature. Pain Med 2009;10(8):1434-41.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    25. 25.↵
      1. Stein MD,
      2. Caviness CM,
      3. Anderson BJ
      . Alcohol use potentiates marijuana problem severity in young adult women. Womens Health Issues 2014;24(1):e77-82.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    26. 26.
      1. Chun TH,
      2. Spirito A,
      3. Hernández L,
      4. Fairlie AM,
      5. Sindelar-Manning H,
      6. Eaton CA,
      7. et al
      . The significance of marijuana use among alcohol-using adolescent emergency department patients. Acad Emerg Med 2010;17(1):63-71.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    27. 27.↵
      1. Lindsay JA,
      2. Stotts AL,
      3. Green CE,
      4. Herin DV,
      5. Schmitz JM
      . Cocaine dependence and concurrent marijuana use: a comparison of clinical characteristics. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 2009;35(3):193-8.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    28. 28.↵
      1. Salomonsen-Sautel S,
      2. Sakai JT,
      3. Thurstone C,
      4. Corley R,
      5. Hopfer C
      . Medical marijuana use among adolescents in substance abuse treatment. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2012;51(7):694-702.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    29. 29.↵
      1. Hall W,
      2. Degenhardt L
      . Cannabis use and the risk of developing a psychotic disorder. World Psychiatry 2008;7(2):68-71.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    30. 30.
      1. Arseneault L,
      2. Cannon M,
      3. Witton J,
      4. Murray RM
      . Causal association between cannabis and psychosis: examination of the evidence. Br J Psychiatry 2004;184:110-7.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    31. 31.
      1. Dragt S,
      2. Nieman DH,
      3. Schultze-Lutter F,
      4. van der Meer F,
      5. Becker H,
      6. de Haan L,
      7. et al
      . Cannabis use and age at onset of symptoms in subjects at clinical high risk for psychosis. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2012;125(1):45-53.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    32. 32.
      1. Manrique-Garcia E,
      2. Zammit S,
      3. Dalman C,
      4. Hemmingsson T,
      5. Andreasson S,
      6. Allebeck P
      . Cannabis, schizophrenia and other non-affective psychoses: 35 years of follow-up of a population-based cohort. Psychol Med 2012;42(6):1321-8.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    33. 33.
      1. Le Bec PY,
      2. Fatséas M,
      3. Denis C,
      4. Lavie E,
      5. Auriacombe M
      . Cannabis and psychosis: search of a causal link through a critical and systematic review [article in French]. Encephale 2009;35(4):377-85.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    34. 34.
      1. Kuepper R,
      2. van Os J,
      3. Lieb R,
      4. Wittchen HU,
      5. Höfler M,
      6. Henquet C
      . Continued cannabis use and risk of incidence and persistence of psychotic symptoms: 10 year follow-up cohort study. BMJ 2011;342:d738.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    35. 35.↵
      1. Davis GP,
      2. Compton MT,
      3. Wang S,
      4. Levin FR,
      5. Blanco C
      . Association between cannabis use, psychosis, and schizotypal personality disorder: findings from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Schizophr Res 2013;151(1–3):197-202.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    36. 36.↵
      1. Sheik HU,
      2. Matthew PG
      . Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome: updates and new perspectives. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2014;18(5):414.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    37. 37.↵
      1. Wolff V,
      2. Lauer V,
      3. Rouyer O,
      4. Sellal F,
      5. Meyer N,
      6. Raul JS,
      7. et al
      . Cannabis use, ischemic stroke, and multifocal intracranial vasoconstriction: a prospective study in 48 consecutive young patients. Stroke 2011;42(6):1778-80.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    38. 38.↵
      1. Hartung B,
      2. Kauferstein S,
      3. Ritz-Timme S,
      4. Daldrup T
      . Sudden unexpected death under acute influence of cannabis. Forensic Sci Int 2014;237:e11-3.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    39. 39.
      1. Rodríguez-Castro CE,
      2. Alkhateeb H,
      3. Elfar A,
      4. Saifuddin F,
      5. Abbas A,
      6. Siddiqui T
      . Recurrent myopericarditis as a complication of marijuana use. Am J Case Rep 2014;15:60-2.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    40. 40.↵
      1. Deharo P,
      2. Massoure PL,
      3. Fourcade L
      . Exercise-induced acute coronary syndrome in a 24-year-old man with massive cannabis consumption. Acta Cardiol 2013;68(4):425-8.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    41. 41.↵
      1. Reid PT,
      2. Macleod J,
      3. Robertson JR
      . Cannabis and the lung. J R Coll Physicians Edinb 2010;40(4):328-3.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    42. 42.↵
      1. Hall P,
      2. Degenhardt L
      . Adverse health effects of non-medical cannabis use. Lancet 2009;374(9698):1383-91.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    43. 43.↵
      1. Wong S,
      2. Ordean A,
      3. Kahan M
      . Substance use in pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2011;114(2):190-202.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    44. 44.↵
      1. Saban A,
      2. Flisher AJ,
      3. Grimsrud A,
      4. Morojele N,
      5. London L,
      6. Williams DR,
      7. et al
      . The association between substance use and common mental disorders in young adults: results from the South African Stress and Health (SASH) survey. Pan Afr Med J 2014;17(Suppl 1):11.
      OpenUrl
    45. 45.
      1. Crippa JA,
      2. Zuardi AW,
      3. Martín-Santos R,
      4. Bhattacharyya S,
      5. Atakan Z,
      6. McGuire P,
      7. et al
      . Cannabis and anxiety: a critical review of the evidence. Hum Psychopharmacol 2009;24(7):515-23.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    46. 46.
      1. Cheung JT,
      2. Mann RE,
      3. Ialomiteanu A,
      4. Stoduto G,
      5. Chan V,
      6. Ala-Leppilampi K,
      7. et al
      . Anxiety and mood disorders and cannabis use. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 2010;36(2):118-22.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    47. 47.
      1. Horwood LJ,
      2. Fergusson DM,
      3. Coffey C,
      4. Patton GC,
      5. Tait R,
      6. Smart D,
      7. et al
      . Cannabis and depression: an integrative data analysis of four Australasian cohorts. Drug Alcohol Depend 2012;126(3):369-78.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    48. 48.
      1. Serafini G,
      2. Pompili M,
      3. Innamorati M,
      4. Rihmer Z,
      5. Sher L,
      6. Girardi P
      . Can cannabis increase the suicide risk in psychosis? A critical review. Curr Pharm Des 2012;18(32):5165-87.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    49. 49.
      1. Kokkevi A,
      2. Richardson C,
      3. Olszewski D,
      4. Matias J,
      5. Monshouwer K,
      6. Bjarnason T
      . Multiple substance use and self-reported suicide attempts by adolescents in 16 European countries. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2012;21(8):443-50.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    50. 50.
      1. Fergusson DM,
      2. Boden JM,
      3. Horwood LJ
      . Cannabis use and other illicit drug use: testing the cannabis gateway hypothesis. Addiction 2006;101(4):556-69.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    51. 51.
      1. Degenhardt L,
      2. Coffey C,
      3. Romaniuk H,
      4. Swift W,
      5. Carlin JB,
      6. Hall WD,
      7. et al
      . The persistence of the association between adolescent cannabis use and common mental disorders into young adulthood. Addiction 2013;108(1):124-33.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    52. 52.↵
      1. Buckner JD,
      2. Heimberg RG,
      3. Schneier FR,
      4. Liu SM,
      5. Wang S,
      6. Blanco C
      . The relationship between cannabis use disorders and social anxiety disorder in the National Epidemiological Study of Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC). Drug Alcohol Depend 2012;124(1–2):128-34.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    53. 53.
      1. Cougle JR,
      2. Bonn-Miller MO,
      3. Vujanovic AA,
      4. Zvolensky MJ,
      5. Hawkins KA
      . Posttraumatic stress disorder and cannabis use in a nationally representative sample. Psychol Addict Behav 2011;25(3):554-8.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    54. 54.↵
      1. Wong SS,
      2. Zhou B,
      3. Goebert D,
      4. Hishinuma ES
      . The risk of adolescent suicide across patterns of drug use: a nationally representative study of high school students in the United States from 1999 to 2009. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2013;48(10):1611-20.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    55. 55.↵
      1. Dannon PN,
      2. Lowengrub K,
      3. Amiaz R,
      4. Grunhaus L,
      5. Kotler M
      . Comorbid cannabis use and panic disorder: short term and long term follow-up study. Hum Psychopharmacol 2004;19(2):97-101.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    56. 56.↵
      1. Moreira FA,
      2. Wotjak CT
      . Cannabinoids and anxiety. Curr Top Behav Neurosci 2010;2:429-50.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    57. 57.↵
      1. Lev-Ran S,
      2. Le Foll B,
      3. McKenzie K,
      4. Rehm J
      . Cannabis use and mental health-related quality of life among individuals with anxiety disorders. J Anxiety Disord 2012;26(8):799-810.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    58. 58.↵
      1. Arendt M,
      2. Rosenberg R,
      3. Fjordback L,
      4. Brandholdt J,
      5. Foldager L,
      6. Sher L,
      7. et al
      . Testing the self-medication hypothesis of depression and aggression in cannabis-dependent subjects. Psychol Med 2007;37(7):935-45.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    59. 59.↵
      1. Budney AJ,
      2. Moore BA,
      3. Vandrey RG,
      4. Hughes JR
      . The time course and significance of cannabis withdrawal. J Abnorm Psychol 2003;112(3):393-402.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    60. 60.↵
      1. Callaghan RC,
      2. Allebeck P,
      3. Sidorchuk A
      . Marijuana use and risk of lung cancer: a 40-year cohort study. Cancer Causes Control 2013;24(10):1811-20.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    61. 61.↵
      1. Hancox RJ,
      2. Poulton R,
      3. Ely M,
      4. Welch D,
      5. Taylor DR,
      6. McLachlan CR
      . Effects of cannabis on lung function: a population-based cohort study. Eur Respir J 2010;35(1):42-7.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    62. 62.↵
      1. Tetrault JM,
      2. Crothers K,
      3. Moore BA,
      4. Mehra R,
      5. Concato J,
      6. Fiellin DA
      . Effects of marijuana smoking on pulmonary function and respiratory complications: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med 2007;167(3):221-8.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    63. 63.↵
      1. Sewell RA,
      2. Poling J,
      3. Sofuoglu M
      . The effect of cannabis compared with alcohol on driving. Am J Addict 2009;18(3):185-93.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    64. 64.↵
      1. Mann RE,
      2. Adlaf E,
      3. Zhao J,
      4. Stoduto G,
      5. Ialomiteanu A,
      6. Smart RG,
      7. et al
      . Cannabis use and self-reported collisions in a representative sample of adult drivers. J Safety Res 2007;38(6):669-74.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    65. 65.
      1. Drummer OH,
      2. Gerostamoulos J,
      3. Batziris H,
      4. Chu M,
      5. Caplehorn J,
      6. Robertson MD,
      7. et al
      . The involvement of drugs in drivers of motor vehicles killed in Australian road traffic crashes. Accid Anal Prev 2004;36(2):239-48.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    66. 66.
      1. Laumon B,
      2. Gadegbeku B,
      3. Martin JL,
      4. Biecheler MB,
      5. SAM Group
      . Cannabis intoxication and fatal road crashes in France: population based case-control study. BMJ 2005;331(7529):1371.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    67. 67.
      1. Ramaekers JG,
      2. Berghaus G,
      3. van Laar M,
      4. Drummer OH
      . Dose related risk of motor vehicle crashes after cannabis use. Drug Alcohol Depend 2004;73(2):109-19.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    68. 68.↵
      1. Neavyn MJ,
      2. Blohm E,
      3. Babu KM,
      4. Bird SB
      . Medical marijuana and driving: a review. J Med Toxicol 2014;10(3):269-79.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    69. 69.↵
      1. Barnes MP
      . Sativex: clinical efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of symptoms of multiple sclerosis and neuropathic pain. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2006;7(5):607-15.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    70. 70.
      1. Bestard JA,
      2. Toth CC
      . An open-label comparison of nabilone and gabapentin as adjuvant therapy or monotherapy in the management of neuropathic pain in patients with peripheral neuropathy. Pain Pract 2011;11(4):353-68.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    71. 71.
      1. Frank B,
      2. Serpell MG,
      3. Hughes J,
      4. Matthews JN,
      5. Kapur D
      . Comparison of analgesic effects and patient tolerability of nabilone and dihydrocodeine for chronic neuropathic pain: randomised, crossover, double blind study. BMJ 2008;336(7637):199-201.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    72. 72.
      1. Toth C,
      2. Mawani S,
      3. Brady S,
      4. Chan C,
      5. Liu C,
      6. Mehina E,
      7. et al
      . An enriched-enrolment, randomized withdrawal, flexible-dose, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel assignment efficacy study of nabilone as adjuvant in the treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain. Pain 2012;153(10):2073-82.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    73. 73.↵
      1. Aragona M,
      2. Onesti E,
      3. Tomassini V,
      4. Conte A,
      5. Gupta S,
      6. Gilio F,
      7. et al
      . Psychopathological and cognitive effects of therapeutic cannabinoids in multiple sclerosis: a double-blind, placebo controlled, crossover study. Clin Neuropharmacol 2009;32(1):41-7.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    74. 74.↵
      1. Namaka M,
      2. Leong C,
      3. Grossberndt A,
      4. Klowak M,
      5. Turcotte D,
      6. Esfahani F,
      7. et al
      . A treatment algorithm for neuropathic pain: an update. Consult Pharm 2009;24(12):885-902.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    75. 75.↵
      1. Cooper ZD,
      2. Comer SD,
      3. Haney M
      . Comparison of the analgesic effects of dronabinol and smoked marijuana in daily marijuana smokers. Neuropsychopharmacology 2013;38(10):1984-92. Epub 2013 Apr 22.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    76. 76.
      1. Mendelson JH,
      2. Mello NK
      . Reinforcing properties of oral delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol, smoked marijuana, and nabilone: influence of previous marijuana use. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1984;83(4):351-6.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    77. 77.
      1. Issa MA,
      2. Narang S,
      3. Jamison RN,
      4. Michna E,
      5. Edwards RR,
      6. Penetar DM,
      7. et al
      . The subjective psychoactive effects of oral dronabinol studied in a randomized, controlled crossover clinical trial for pain. Clin J Pain 2014;30(6):472-8.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    78. 78.
      1. Wesnes KA,
      2. Annas P,
      3. Edgar CJ,
      4. Deeprose C,
      5. Karlsten R,
      6. Philipp A,
      7. et al
      . Nabilone produces marked impairments to cognitive function and changes in subjective state in healthy volunteers. Psychopharmacol 2010;24(11):1659-69.
      OpenUrl
    79. 79.
      1. Kurzthaler I,
      2. Bodner T,
      3. Kemmler G,
      4. Entner T,
      5. Wissel J,
      6. Berger T,
      7. et al
      . The effect of nabilone on neuropsychological functions related to driving ability: an extended case series. Hum Psychopharmacol 2005;20(4):291-3.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    80. 80.↵
      1. Karschner EL,
      2. Darwin WD,
      3. McMahon RP,
      4. Liu F,
      5. Wright S,
      6. Goodwin RS,
      7. et al
      . Subjective and physiological effects after controlled Sativex and oral THC administration. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2011;89(3):400-7.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    81. 81.↵
      1. Ware MA,
      2. St Arnaud-Trempe E
      . The abuse potential of the synthetic cannabinoid nabilone. Addiction 2010;105(3):494-503.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    82. 82.↵
      1. Abrams DI,
      2. Vizoso HP,
      3. Shade SB,
      4. Jay C,
      5. Kelly ME,
      6. Benowitz NL
      . Vaporization as a smokeless cannabis delivery system: a pilot study. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2007;82(5):572-8.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    83. 83.↵
      1. Kahan M,
      2. Mailis-Gagnon A,
      3. Wilson L,
      4. Srivastava A
      . Canadian guideline for safe and effective use of opioids for chronic noncancer pain: clinical summary for family physicians. Part 1: general population. Can Fam Physician 2011;57:1257-66. (Eng), e407–18 (Fr).
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    84. 84.↵
      1. Brown RL,
      2. Rounds LA
      . Conjoint screening questionnaires for alcohol and other drug abuse: criterion validity in a primary care practice. Wis Med J 1995;94(3):135-40.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    85. 85.↵
      1. Nussbaum AM,
      2. Boyer JA,
      3. Kondrad EC
      . “But my doctor recommended pot”: medical marijuana and the patient-physician relationship. J Gen Intern Med 2011;26(11):1364-7.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    86. 86.↵
      1. Pesce A,
      2. West C,
      3. Rosenthal M,
      4. West R,
      5. Crews B,
      6. Mikel C,
      7. et al
      . Marijuana correlates with use of other illicit drugs in a pain patient population. Pain Physician 2010;13(3):283-7.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    87. 87.
      1. Reisfield GM,
      2. Wasan AD,
      3. Jamison RN
      . The prevalence and significance of cannabis use in patients prescribed chronic opioid therapy: a review of the extant literature. Pain Med 2009;10(8):1434-41.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    88. 88.↵
      1. Ste-Marie PA,
      2. Fitzcharles MA,
      3. Gamsa A,
      4. Ware MA,
      5. Shir Y
      . Association of herbal cannabis use with negative psychosocial parameters in patients with fibromyalgia. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2012;64(8):1202-8.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    89. 89.↵
      College of Family Physicians of Canada. Authorizing dried cannabis for pain or anxiety: preliminary guidance from the College of Family Physicians of Canada. Mississauga ON: College of Family Physicians of Canada; 2014.
    PreviousNext
    Back to top

    In this issue

    Canadian Family Physician: 60 (12)
    Canadian Family Physician
    Vol. 60, Issue 12
    1 Dec 2014
    • Table of Contents
    • About the Cover
    • Index by author
    Print
    Download PDF
    Article Alerts
    Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
    Email Article

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Prescribing smoked cannabis for chronic noncancer pain
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Citation Tools
    Prescribing smoked cannabis for chronic noncancer pain
    Meldon Kahan, Anita Srivastava, Sheryl Spithoff, Lisa Bromley
    Canadian Family Physician Dec 2014, 60 (12) 1083-1090;

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    Respond to this article
    Share
    Prescribing smoked cannabis for chronic noncancer pain
    Meldon Kahan, Anita Srivastava, Sheryl Spithoff, Lisa Bromley
    Canadian Family Physician Dec 2014, 60 (12) 1083-1090;
    Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Jump to section

    • Article
      • Abstract
      • Quality of evidence
      • Main message
      • Conclusion
      • Notes
      • Footnotes
      • References
    • Figures & Data
    • eLetters
    • Info & Metrics
    • PDF

    Related Articles

    • Prescrire du cannabis fumé pour la douleur chronique non cancéreuse
    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar

    Cited By...

    • Predicting the Potential for Cannabinoids to Precipitate Pharmacokinetic Drug Interactions via Reversible Inhibition or Inactivation of Major Cytochromes P450
    • Position Statement: A Pragmatic Approach for Medical Cannabis and Patients with Rheumatic Diseases
    • Evidence for THC versus CBD in cannabinoids
    • Lignes directrices simplifiees en matiere de prescription de cannabinoides medicaux en soins de premiere ligne
    • Simplified guideline for prescribing medical cannabinoids in primary care
    • Google Scholar

    More in this TOC Section

    Practice

    • Managing type 2 diabetes in primary care during COVID-19
    • Effectiveness of dermoscopy in skin cancer diagnosis
    • Spontaneous pneumothorax in children
    Show more Practice

    Clinical Review

    • Top studies of 2024 relevant to primary care
    • Approach to steatotic liver disease in the office
    • Foreskin care
    Show more Clinical Review

    Similar Articles

    Navigate

    • Home
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Collections - English
    • Collections - Française

    For Authors

    • Authors and Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Permissions
    • Terms of Use

    General Information

    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Subscribers

    Journal Services

    • Email Alerts
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • Instagram
    • RSS Feeds

    Copyright © 2025 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

    Powered by HighWire