Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
Review ArticlePractice

Pharmacologic treatment of depression in the elderly

Christopher Frank
Canadian Family Physician February 2014, 60 (2) 121-126;
Christopher Frank
Associate Professor in the Department of Medicine at Queen’s University and Clinical Lead of Specialized Geriatrics at St Mary’s of the Lake Hospital in Kingston, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: frankc@pccchealth.org
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objective To discuss pharmacologic treatment of depression in the elderly, including choice of antidepressants, titration of dose, monitoring of response and side effects, and treatment of unresponsive cases.

Sources of information The 2006 Canadian Coalition for Seniors’ Mental Health guideline on the assessment and treatment of depression was used as a primary source. To identify articles published since the guideline, MEDLINE was searched from 2007 to 2012 using the terms depression, treatment, drug therapy, and elderly.

Main message The goal of treatment should be remission of symptoms. Improvement of symptoms can be monitored by identifying patient goals or by use of a clinical tool such as the Patient Health Questionnaire–9. Treatment should be considered in 3 phases: an acute treatment phase to achieve remission of symptoms, a continuation phase to prevent recurrence of the same episode of illness (relapse), and a maintenance (prophylaxis) phase to prevent future episodes (recurrence). Initial dosing should be half of the usual adult starting dose and be titrated regularly until the patient responds, until the maximum dose is reached, or until side effects limit further increases. Common side effects of medications include falls, nausea, dizziness, headaches, and, less commonly, hyponatremia and QT interval changes. Strategies for switching or augmenting antidepressants are discussed. Older patients should be treated for at least a year from when clinical improvement is noted, and those with recurrent depression or severe symptoms should continue treatment indefinitely. Treatment of specific situations such as severe depression or depression with psychosis is discussed, including the use of electroconvulsive therapy. Criteria for referral to geriatric psychiatry are provided; however, many family physicians do not have easy access to this resource or to other nonpharmacologic clinical strategies.

Conclusion The effectiveness of pharmacologic treatment of depression is not substantially affected by age. Identification of depression, choice of appropriate treatment, titration of medications, monitoring of side effects, and adequate duration of treatment will improve outcomes for older patients.

Case

Mr C. is an 85-year-old man with complaints of fatigue, decreased appetite, and a 2.5-kg weight loss over the past 6 months. He also reports changes in his short-term memory. His medical history is relevant only for cardiovascular disease, and he currently takes an angiotension-converting enzyme inhibitor and a statin.

You administer a Montreal Cognitive Assessment1 to assess his cognition and he performs well, scoring 26 out of 30. You conduct a full history and physical examination and no underlying physical illness is identified. You wonder whether Mr C. might be suffering from major depression. You apply the SIG E CAPS mnemonic (Table 1)1 to screen for symptoms.

He has had a change in sleep habits lately and reports considerable worry that his symptoms might be a sign of underlying cancer. He used to be active with his local Rotary Club and walked 3 km daily with a seniors group, but now spends much of his time resting on the couch. He no longer enjoys the weekly visits from his grandchildren. He denies suicidal thoughts or thoughts of self-harm.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Presentation of depression in the elderly: X indicates the symptom is prominent; XX indicates the symptom is very prominent.

Major depression affects up to 15% to 20% of people older than 65 years of age.1 It has serious consequences for health, including decreased function, poor nutritional intake, and increased risk of death by suicide. The diagnosis of depression is difficult, particularly in the presence of frailty and comorbidities. In the elderly the presentation of depression might be variable and atypical (Table 1).1,2

Optimal outcomes might also be challenging to obtain with frail older patients. Although medications are only part of the treatment of depression, this article will focus on pharmacologic treatment, including choice of antidepressants, titration of dose, and treatment of unresponsive cases.

Sources of information

The 2006 Canadian Coalition for Seniors’ Mental Health (CCSMH) guideline on the assessment and treatment of depression1 was used as a primary source. In order to identify English-language research articles published since the guideline was developed, MEDLINE was searched from 2007 to 2012 using the terms depression, treatment, drug therapy, and elderly. Articles cited in papers were also reviewed and referenced when appropriate.

Main message

Initiation of therapy

Mr C. appears to have a unipolar major depressive episode without psychotic features. Sharing the diagnosis is an important first step. Evidence suggests many older patients taking antidepressants are unaware of their diagnosis of depression,3,4 and increasing patient and family understanding might affect outcomes by improving treatment adherence. Sharing the diagnosis also provides the opportunity to identify treatment goals for the individual patient, which can be important for gauging response and titrating medication dose. For example, anxiety is a common manifestation of depression in older people and can be set as a possible target symptom.

The goal of treatment has traditionally been improvement in symptoms using a validated scale (eg, 50% reduction on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale or the Patient Health Questionnaire–9).5 However, the ideal goal should be remission of symptoms.6 Choosing a more aggressive target is less likely to lead to undertreatment or “therapeutic nihilism” that might be more common when treating older patients.7 Monitoring response using a self-administered clinical tool such as the Patient Health Questionnaire–9 might be helpful.

Given Mr C.’s presentation, antidepressant medication or psychotherapy or a combination of both is recommended (strength of CCSMH recommendation A; A recommendations are directly based on evidence from meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials or at least 1 randomized controlled trial). In most centres in Canada, access to psychology or psychotherapy services is limited (unless the family physician can provide it), given the low likelihood of third-party insurance among elderly patients to support privately paid care.

Treatment should be considered in 3 phases:

  • an acute treatment phase to achieve remission of symptoms;

  • a continuation phase to prevent recurrence of the same episode of illness (relapse); and

  • a maintenance (prophylaxis) phase to prevent future episodes (recurrence).8

Regardless of the therapy chosen, it is important to consider the social and environmental context of each patient.9 There is evidence that improved socialization and supportive approaches including life review,10 music therapy, and exercise11 can prevent and improve depression (A recommendation). Psychotherapies recommended for geriatric depression include behaviour therapy, cognitive-behavioural therapy, problem-solving therapy, brief dynamic therapy, interpersonal therapy, and reminiscence therapy (A recommendation).

Mr C. reluctantly concedes that you might be right with the diagnosis and consents to starting an antidepressant. You work with him to identify treatment goals: improved sleep, return to Rotary Club activities, and being able to get back to his walking. His most important goal is to begin enjoying his grandchildren again.

Pharmacologic treatment

Many older patients with depression have substantial comorbidities such as heart failure, diabetes, and cancer; chronic disease is a risk factor for development of depression. Optimization of medical conditions and selection of antidepressants with regard to minimizing drug interactions is relevant to depression management. Concurrent psychiatric disorders such as anxiety and dementia can have an effect on outcomes, but antidepressants appear to have similar effectiveness in elderly and younger patients.12,13 Although the presence of medical illness can make the diagnosis of depression more difficult, there is no clear evidence that comorbid conditions substantially decrease the effectiveness of antidepressants.14

Treatment of depression in patients with dementia can be challenging. Recent evidence suggests that there is lower efficacy for antidepressants in patients with dementia.15,16 Cholinesterase inhibitors should be considered in the treatment of depressive symptoms such as apathy and decreased initiative, as antidepressants might not be helpful for these symptoms.17

Factors to guide antidepressant choice (Table 2) can include previous response, concurrent conditions (eg, avoiding anticholinergic agents in men with benign prostatic hypertrophy), type of depression (eg, bipolar versus unipolar, presence of psychotic features), other medications, and risk of overdose.1,18 There is some evidence that choices can also be guided by concurrent symptoms (eg, nortriptyline or duloxetine for concurrent pain19 and mirtazapine with anxiety20).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Antidepressant choices for older patients

Psychostimulants are not well studied in the elderly and have the potential to contribute to agitation and insomnia. A Cochrane review found small benefits in small studies.21

Benzodiazepines have, at best, a very limited short-term role in handling anxiety and insomnia symptoms until safer and more comprehensive antidepressants start working.

Side effects

Side effects are common; up to 12% of participants in studies drop out because of side effects.22,23 Antidepressants share similar side-effect profiles; nausea, constipation or diarrhea, dizziness, headache, insomnia or somnolence, and sexual dysfunction are commonly reported.24 Patients who switch agents commonly report similar side effects with the replacement agent.24 Although tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), particularly amitriptyline, anecdotally have considerable effects on cognition and cardiac conduction abnormalities, they are as well tolerated as newer agents in studies.22 If TCAs are used, nortriptyline and desipramine have the lowest anticholinergic burden. Attention to other medications is crucial in avoiding adverse drug reactions and interactions.23

Increased risk of falls is a well recognized side effect of antidepressants, including the newer agents.25 Patients at high risk of falls should undergo a falls assessment to mitigate this risk before receiving antidepressants.

Approximately 8% of people starting selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or venlafaxine will develop hyponatremia related to syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone. This is reversible but should be monitored by checking blood levels at about 1 month after starting (C recommendation; C recommendations are directly based on evidence from nonexperimental descriptive studies or are extrapolated from more rigorous studies). A 2009 systematic review did not find an association between SSRI use and suicide in older patients.26 However, the elderly are at higher risk of suicide overall, and identification of suicide risk at the time of assessment and during follow-up is important.26

In May of 2012, Health Canada issued a warning of caution related to higher doses of citalopram and escitalopram, citing concerns about prolongation of QT interval.27 Official guidelines have not arisen from this recommendation, but caution should be exercised when prescribing doses greater than 20 mg of citalopram and 10 mg of escitalopram in patients older than 65 years of age, and attention should be paid to concurrent prescribing of other agents that can affect QT interval. A baseline electrocardiogram (ECG) can help to inform this decision, and follow-up ECG can be considered if treatment is started in patients with QT intervals in the high-normal range or if medications with risk of interaction are started.

Titration and monitoring

The CCSMH guidelines recommend starting with half of the “usual” starting dose cited in the Compendium of Pharmaceuticals and Specialties,28 with a scheduled titration based on tolerance and response. It is advisable to develop a plan for titration at the time of initiation and to review patient and physician goals that will indicate response. Without such a schedule, patients might take longer to reach therapeutic doses and endure a longer period of symptoms.29 It is recommended that doses be increased regularly until the maximum cited dose is reached, side effects limit further increases, or good symptom improvement occurs. The geriatric adage “start low and go slow” should be modified to “start low and go slow, but go!”

Mr C. starts taking 10 mg of citalopram and experiences mild nausea and some increase in anxiety. After 10 days his dose is increased to 20 mg, which is tolerated. After 2 weeks he reports a small improvement in sleep and anxiety. He has gone with the walking group a few times but is still spending much of the time in his house. After 1 month of treatment his serum sodium level is checked to rule out syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone and the results are found to be normal. An ECG shows no change in QTc (< 450 milliseconds), and the dose is increased to 30 mg with no ECG change. After 4 weeks at this dose you review his target symptoms.

If titration leads to the maximum dose, it is important that patients receive an adequate duration of therapy at that dose. Checking adherence is important, as patients might not voluntarily report missing doses accidently or intentionally owing to side effects. Change in medication should be considered if patients have no response after 4 weeks on the maximum dose or have only partial response after 8 weeks of treatment (C recommendation). There is no clarity on the optimal approach to switching or augmenting treatment. If there has been no benefit, the agent can be switched to another drug in the same or in a different class. Although the risk of serotonin toxicity and side effects might increase with more than 1 agent, it is not usually necessary to discontinue an antidepressant completely before starting a new agent; usually one can start the new agent at the lowest dose of the initial medication. If fluoxetine is the initial antidepressant, a wash-out of several weeks will be needed given its long elimination half-life and potential for interaction.30

Augmentation usually involves addition of another antidepressant, lithium, or an atypical antipsychotic. Lithium is most advisable in patients with possible bipolar disease and should be avoided with patients in multiple medical issues and risk of drug interactions. There remains little evidence to support augmenting with antipsychotics in the very elderly who have higher risks of adverse events including extrapyramidal symptoms.31–33 Family physicians without experience in augmentation should consider referral to geriatric psychiatry.

Approximately 10% to 20% of patients develop chronic depressive symptoms despite treatment and 25% to 30% of patients fail to respond to initial therapy. Risk factors for poor response include comorbid dementia, substance abuse, and substantial physical disabilities.

Mr C. reports partial improvement in his symptoms; he is only doing his walk a few times a week. Visits with the grandchildren remain difficult and he is sleeping poorly. You decrease his citalopram to 20 mg and titrate off, overlapping with 37.5 mg venlafaxine. The dose of venlafaxine is increased every 2 weeks and at 150 mg daily he reports better sleep and improved interest and is much better with visits. He asks you how long he needs to continue taking the medication.

Continuation and maintenance treatment

There is some evidence for higher rates of relapse after discontinuation of treatment in older patients compared with younger people,34 and it is recommended that the duration of treatment should be a minimum of 12 months starting from the time of remission (and up to 2 years) (B recommendation; B recommendations are directly based on evidence from non-randomized controlled trials or other quasi-experimental studies, or extrapolated from evidence from randomized controlled trials). In a systematic review of “continuing treatment phase” (duration of studies 24 weeks to 3 years), the number of patients needed to treat (NNT) for all antidepressants to prevent 1 additional relapse or recurrence was 3.6 (95% CI 2.8 to 4.8). Interestingly, the NNT for TCAs was 2.9 (95% CI 2.2 to 4.6), compared with an NNT for SSRIs of 4.2 (95% CI 3.2 to 5.9).22

If the decision is made to stop antidepressants, the dose should be reduced over several months with monitoring for relapse (D recommendation; D recommendations are based on expert opinion). Indefinite treatment should be considered for patients who have severe depression, have a history of recurrent depression, require electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), or have only partial resolution of symptoms (D recommendation).

Specific circumstances

Psychotic depression: The presence of psychosis should prompt referral to geriatric psychiatry when available, as the risk of morbidity and mortality becomes higher and management can be more difficult. Electroconvulsive therapy should be considered early in psychotic depression.1 If pharmacologic treatment is used, antipsychotics and antidepressants in combination with ECT should be considered if treatment is not effective (D recommendation).35

Electroconvulsive therapy: Electroconvulsive therapy can also be a life-saving treatment in cases in which metabolic or nutritional derangement is severe or in which suicidal thoughts are not responding to other treatments. It should be considered in severe cases of depression and when other treatment strategies are ineffective. For some patients, ECT might be the only treatment that helps improve quality of life and decreases the health effects of depression (D recommendation).36

Criteria for referral: The criteria for psychiatric referral are outlined in Box 1.1 Geriatric psychiatrists have specific expertise in the diagnosis and treatment of late-life depression, but many family physicians will not have access to geriatric psychiatry services. Patients in long-term care commonly have comorbidities and complexities that can make management difficult, but they often have limited access to psychiatric services. It is worth being aware of resources for depression in one’s region, especially with the aging population and increasing complexity of patients.

Box 1.

Criteria for referral

At the time of diagnosis, clinicians should refer patients with the following conditions to psychiatry services, if available:
  • psychotic depression

  • bipolar disorder

  • depression with suicidal thoughts or intent

Patients with the following conditions might also benefit from such referral:
  • depression with comorbid substance abuse

  • major depressive episode or severe depression

  • depression with comorbid dementia

Additionally, when physicians experience the following, referral might be warranted:
  • uncertainty about management of partial or unresponsive depression

  • inexperience with use of augmentation options and agents

  • Modified from the Canadian Coalition for Seniors’ Mental Health with permission.1

  • After a year of remission, you discuss titration off the antidepressant with Mr C. He is sceptical, given concerns about relapse. At 18 months he feels he is taking too many medications and agrees to try stopping the venlafaxine. This is titrated down over 4 months without withdrawal symptoms, and 6 months later he reports no recurrence of symptoms.

    Notes

    EDITOR’S KEY POINTS

    • Major depression affects up to 20% of people older than 65 years of age. Assessment and management of depression is challenging in older patients, especially those who are frail and those with comorbidities.

    • Elderly patients with depression should be informed of their diagnosis, as many older patients taking antidepressants are unaware of their diagnosis of depression, and increasing patient and family understanding might affect outcomes by improving treatment adherence.

    • Many older patients with depression have substantial comorbidities, and optimization of medical conditions and selection of antidepressants with regard to minimizing drug interactions is important. Concurrent psychiatric disorders can also affect outcomes. Factors to guide antidepressant choice can include previous response, concurrent conditions, type of depression, other medications, and risk of overdose.

    Footnotes

    • This article is eligible for Mainpro-M1 credits. To earn credits, go to www.cfp.ca and click on the Mainpro link.

    • This article has been peer reviewed.

    • La traduction en français de cet article se trouve à www.cfp.ca dans la table des matières du numéro de février 2014 à la page e95.

    • Competing interests

      None declared

    • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada

    References

    1. 1.↵
      Canadian Coalition for Seniors’ Mental Health. National guidelines for seniors’ mental health. Toronto, ON: Canadian Coalition for Seniors’ Mental Health; 2006.
    2. 2.↵
      1. Korten NC,
      2. Comijs HC,
      3. Lamers F,
      4. Penninx BW
      . Early and late onset depression in young and middle aged adults: differential symptomatology, characteristics and risk factors? J Affect Disord 2012;138(3):259-67.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    3. 3.↵
      1. George K,
      2. Davison TE,
      3. McCabe M,
      4. Mellor D,
      5. Moore K
      . Treatment of depression in low-level residential care facilities for the elderly. Int Psychogeriatr 2007;19(6):1153-60.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    4. 4.↵
      1. Harris T,
      2. Carey IM,
      3. Shah SM,
      4. DeWilde S,
      5. Cook DG
      . Antidepressant prescribing in older primary care patients in community and care home settings in England and Wales. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2012;13(1):41-7.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    5. 5.↵
      MacArthur Initiative on Depression and Primary Care. Patient health questionnaire. Hanover, NH: MacArthur Initiative on Depression and Primary Care; 2012. Available from: www.depression-primarycare.org/clinicians/toolkits/materials/forms/phq9. Accessed 2012 Dec 5.
    6. 6.↵
      1. Kennedy SH,
      2. Lam RW,
      3. Nutt DJ,
      4. Thase ME
      . Treating depression effectively: applying clinical guidelines. 2nd ed. London, UK: Martin Dunitz, Ltd; 2004.
    7. 7.↵
      1. Burroughs H,
      2. Lovell K,
      3. Morley M,
      4. Baldwin R,
      5. Burns A,
      6. Chew-Graham C
      . ‘Justifiable depression’: how primary care professionals and patients view late-life depression? A qualitative study. Fam Pract 2006;23(3):369-77.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    8. 8.↵
      1. Alexopoulos GS,
      2. Katz IR,
      3. Bruce ML,
      4. Heo M,
      5. Ten HT,
      6. Raue P,
      7. et al
      . Remission in depressed geriatric primary care patients: a report from the PROSPECT study. Am J Psychiatry 2005;162(4):718-24.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    9. 9.↵
      1. Bosworth HB,
      2. Voils CI,
      3. Potter GG,
      4. Steffens DC
      . The effects of antidepressant medication adherence as well as psychosocial and clinical factors on depression outcome among older adults. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2008;23(2):129-34.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    10. 10.↵
      1. Serrano Selva JP,
      2. Latorre Postigo JM,
      3. Ros Segura L,
      4. Navarro Bravo B,
      5. Aguilar Córcoles MJ,
      6. Nieto López M,
      7. et al
      . Life review therapy using autobiographical retrieval practice for older adults with clinical depression. Psicothema 2012;24(2):224-9.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    11. 11.↵
      1. Rimer J,
      2. Dwan K,
      3. Lawlor DA,
      4. Greig CA,
      5. McMurdo M,
      6. Morley W,
      7. et al
      . Exercise for depression. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;(7):CD004366.
    12. 12.↵
      1. Gerson S,
      2. Belin TR,
      3. Kaufman A,
      4. Mintz J,
      5. Jarvik L
      . Pharmacological and psychological treatments for depressed older patients: a meta-analysis and overview of recent findings. Harv Rev Psychiatry 1999;7(1):1-28.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    13. 13.↵
      1. Mittmann N,
      2. Herrmann N,
      3. Einarson TR,
      4. Busto UE,
      5. Lanctot KL,
      6. Liu BA,
      7. et al
      . The efficacy, safety and tolerability of antidepressants in late life depression: a meta-analysis. J Affect Disord 1997;46(3):191-217.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    14. 14.↵
      1. Rayner L,
      2. Price A,
      3. Evans A,
      4. Valsraj K,
      5. Higginson IJ,
      6. Hotopf M
      . Antidepressants for depression in physically ill people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;(3):CD007503.
    15. 15.↵
      1. Nelson JC,
      2. Devenand DP
      . A systematic review and meta-analysis of placebo-controlled antidepressant studies in people with depression and dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc 2011;59(4):577-85.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    16. 16.↵
      1. Banerjee S,
      2. Hellier J,
      3. Dewey M,
      4. Romeo R,
      5. Ballard C,
      6. Baldwin R,
      7. et al
      . Sertraline or mirtazapine for depression in dementia (HTA-SADD): a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2011;378(9789):403-11.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    17. 17.↵
      1. Berman K,
      2. Brodaty H,
      3. Withall A,
      4. Seeher K
      . Pharmacologic treatment of apathy in dementia. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2012;20(2):104-22.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    18. 18.↵
      1. Alexopoulos GS
      . Pharmacotherapy for late-life depression. J Clin Psychiatry 2011;72(1):e04.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    19. 19.↵
      1. Robinson M,
      2. Oakes TM,
      3. Raskin J,
      4. Liu P,
      5. Shoemaker S,
      6. Nelson JC
      . Acute and long-term treatment of late-life major depressive disorder: duloxetine versus placebo. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2012 Jul 21. Epub ahead of print.
    20. 20.↵
      1. Watanabe N,
      2. Omori IM,
      3. Nakagawa A,
      4. Cipriani A,
      5. Barbui C,
      6. Churchill R,
      7. et al
      . Mirtazapine versus other antidepressive agents for depression. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;(12):CD006528.
    21. 21.↵
      1. Candy B,
      2. Jones L,
      3. Williams R,
      4. Tookman A,
      5. King M
      . Psychostimulants for depression. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;(2):CD006722.
    22. 22.↵
      1. Kok RM,
      2. Heeren TJ,
      3. Nolen WA
      . Continuing treatment of depression in the elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis of double-blinded randomized controlled trials with antidepressants. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2011;19(3):249-55.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    23. 23.↵
      1. Mark TL,
      2. Joish VN,
      3. Hay JW,
      4. Sheehan DV,
      5. Johnston SS,
      6. Cao Z
      . Antidepressant use in geriatric populations: the burden of side effects and interactions and their impact on adherence and costs. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2011;19(3):211-21.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    24. 24.↵
      1. Katz AJ,
      2. Dusetzina SB,
      3. Farley JF,
      4. Ellis AR,
      5. Gaynes BN,
      6. Castillo WC,
      7. et al
      . Distressing Adverse Events After Antidepressant Switch in the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) trial: influence of adverse events during initial treatment with citalopram on development of subsequent adverse events with an alternative antidepressant. Pharmacotherapy 2012;32(3):234-43.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    25. 25.↵
      1. Sterke CS,
      2. Ziere G,
      3. van Beeck EF,
      4. Looman CW,
      5. van der Cammen TJ
      . Dose-response relationship between selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors and injurious falls: a study in nursing home residents with dementia. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2012;73(5):812-20.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    26. 26.↵
      1. Barbui C,
      2. Esposito E,
      3. Cipriani A
      . Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and risk of suicide: a systematic review of observational studies. CMAJ 2009;180(3):291-7.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    27. 27.↵
      Lundbeck Canada Inc. Health Canada endorsed important safety information on Celexa (citalopram). Ottawa, ON: Health Canada; 2012. Available from: www.hc-sc.gc.ca. Accessed 2012 Dec 5.
    28. 28.↵
      1. Repchinsky C editor-in-chief.
      . Compendium of pharmaceuticals and specialties. The Canadian drug reference for health professionals. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Pharmacists Association; 2013.
    29. 29.↵
      1. Baldwin RC,
      2. Chiu E,
      3. Katona C,
      4. Graham N
      . Guidelines on depression in older people; practicing the evidence. London, UK: Martin Dunitz, Ltd; 2002.
    30. 30.↵
      1. Solai LK,
      2. Mulsant BH,
      3. Pollock BG
      . Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for late-life depression: a comparative review. Drugs Aging 2001;18(5):355-68.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    31. 31.↵
      1. Lenze EJ,
      2. Sheffrin M,
      3. Driscoll HC,
      4. Mulsant BH,
      5. Pollock BG,
      6. Dew MA,
      7. et al
      . Incomplete response in late-life depression: getting to remission. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 2008;10(4):419-30.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    32. 32.
      1. Nelson JC,
      2. Papakostas GI
      . Atypical antipsychotic augmentation in major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of placebo-controlled randomized trials. Am J Psychiatry 2009;166(9):980-91.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    33. 33.↵
      1. Nelson JC,
      2. Thase ME,
      3. Bellocchio EE,
      4. Rollin LM,
      5. Eudicone JM,
      6. McQuade RD,
      7. et al
      . Efficacy of adjunctive aripiprazole in patients with major depressive disorder who showed minimal response to initial antidepressant therapy. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 2012;27(3):125-33.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    34. 34.↵
      1. Rost K,
      2. Nutting P,
      3. Smith JL,
      4. Elliott CE,
      5. Dickinson M
      . Managing depression as a chronic disease: a randomised trial of ongoing treatment in primary care. BMJ 2002;325(7370):934.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    35. 35.↵
      1. Weissman J,
      2. Flint A,
      3. Meyers B,
      4. Ghosh S,
      5. Mulsant B,
      6. Rothschild A,
      7. et al
      . Factors associated with non-completion in a double-blind randomized controlled trial of olanzapine plus sertraline versus olanzapine plus placebo for psychotic depression. Psychiatry Res 2012;197(3):221-6.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    36. 36.↵
      1. Stek M,
      2. van der Wurff FFB,
      3. Hoogendijk W,
      4. Beekman A
      . Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) for depression in elderly people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003;(2):CD003593.
    PreviousNext
    Back to top

    In this issue

    Canadian Family Physician: 60 (2)
    Canadian Family Physician
    Vol. 60, Issue 2
    1 Feb 2014
    • Table of Contents
    • About the Cover
    • Index by author
    Print
    Download PDF
    Article Alerts
    Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
    Email Article

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Pharmacologic treatment of depression in the elderly
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Citation Tools
    Pharmacologic treatment of depression in the elderly
    Christopher Frank
    Canadian Family Physician Feb 2014, 60 (2) 121-126;

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    Respond to this article
    Share
    Pharmacologic treatment of depression in the elderly
    Christopher Frank
    Canadian Family Physician Feb 2014, 60 (2) 121-126;
    Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Jump to section

    • Article
      • Abstract
      • Case
      • Sources of information
      • Main message
      • Notes
      • Footnotes
      • References
    • Figures & Data
    • Info & Metrics
    • eLetters
    • PDF

    Related Articles

    • Pharmacothérapie de la dépression chez les aînés
    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar

    Cited By...

    • No citing articles found.
    • Google Scholar

    More in this TOC Section

    Practice

    • Managing type 2 diabetes in primary care during COVID-19
    • Effectiveness of dermoscopy in skin cancer diagnosis
    • Spontaneous pneumothorax in children
    Show more Practice

    Clinical Review

    • Parkinson disease primer, part 2: management of motor and nonmotor symptoms
    • Parkinson disease primer, part 1: diagnosis
    • Prescribing for common complications of spinal cord injury
    Show more Clinical Review

    Similar Articles

    Navigate

    • Home
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Collections - English
    • Collections - Française

    For Authors

    • Authors and Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Permissions
    • Terms of Use

    General Information

    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Subscribers

    Journal Services

    • Email Alerts
    • Twitter
    • RSS Feeds

    Copyright © 2023 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

    Powered by HighWire