Article Figures & Data
Tables
- Table 1.
Characteristics of the 54 potential participants and of the 12 participants selected for interviews
CHARACTERISTIC INTERVIEW PARTICIPANTS, N (%) TRIAL PARTICIPANTS, N (%) Sex • Male 8 (67) 30 (56) • Female 4 (33) 24 (44) Years in practice • 3–10 3 (25) 14 (26) • 11–25 4 (33) 18 (33) • > 25 5 (42) 22 (41) Location • Rural 7 (58) 26 (48) • Urban 5 (42) 28 (52) Practice size • < 600 patients 2 (17) 15 (28) • 600–1000 patients 4 (33) 18 (33) • > 1000 patients 6 (50) 21 (39) - Table 2.
Selected barriers and suggested areas for future research when conducting audit and feedback for quality improvement in primary care
BARRIERS IDENTIFIED AREAS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH Discordance between patient-centred ideals and quality improvement goals Holistic measures of quality covering all domains—effectiveness measures must have patient-level data Competing priorities and goal conflict Provide data for areas of high priority and focus on improvement for higher-risk patients Lack of technical expertise or human resources dedicated to quality improvement External support to manage data and support quality improvement activities while developing in-house capacity
Additional Files
CFPlus Additional Information
This data supplement contains sample feedback reports.
Files in this Data Supplement:
In this issue
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- Utilisation of a cocreation methodology to develop claims-based indicators for feedback on implementation of comparative effectiveness research results into practice
- Mailed feedback to primary care physicians on antibiotic prescribing for patients aged 65 years and older: pragmatic, factorial randomised controlled trial
- Do medical specialists accept claims-based Audit and Feedback for quality improvement? A focus group study
- You can lead clinicians to water, but you cant make them drink: the role of tailoring in clinical performance feedback to improve care quality
- 'Give me something meaningful: GPs perspectives on how to improve an audit and feedback report provided by health insurers - an exploratory qualitative study
- Empowering frontline providers to deliver universal primary healthcare using the Practical Approach to Care Kit
- SMASH! The Salford medication safety dashboard
- Experiences of practice facilitators working on the Improved Delivery of Cardiovascular Care project: Retrospective case study
- Data quality in electronic medical records in Manitoba: Do problem lists reflect chronic disease as defined by prescriptions?