Pandemic of idiopathic multimorbidity

Thanks to Dr. Muldoon for her thought-provoking letter. There are certainly individuals who present to physicians with seemingly trivial complaints and some who do not follow basic health measures, yet express surprise when they become ill. People are not baffled when poorly maintained or aging automobiles malfunction - yet some people pay little heed to basic self-maintenance and are somehow astonished when they feel unwell. Furthermore, there are individuals who sustain utopian ideals of how they should consistently feel and harbor unrealistic expectations of health providers - expecting to be 'fixed' despite less than ideal health practices. This, however, is not the general presentation of the majority of patients with multimorbidity with sensitivities (MWS) as discussed in the article "Pandemic of idiopathic multimorbidity". Furthermore, with specific laboratory and environmental testing, objective and measurable abnormalities are usually identified when assessing MWS patients.

It is my experience, however, that many physicians are unfamiliar with Sensitivity Related Illness (SRI) and may thus be unable to account for the symptoms and concerns of afflicted MWS patients. I routinely hear the frustration of suffering individuals who comment that their doctors are unable to explain multisystem health complaints and therefore think that such patients are 'whiny' or perhaps mentally ill. I think it is important for us, as physicians, to be cautious that our dismissal of patients' symptoms does not represent a visceral response to our own inability to elucidate the source of their concerns.

Dr. Muldoon's letter provides an opportunity to raise a noteworthy point with regards to physician perspectives. The 2002 Alberta Physicians Study and the 2003 Canadian Medical Association survey of members provide insight into the attitudes, beliefs, and morale of physicians in this country. The findings reveal that many physicians feel discouraged, clinically ineffective, and unproductive in their work. As a result, many find the practice of medicine to be intellectually unrewarding. I have often wondered whether many empathetic practitioners, particularly primary caregivers, find it difficult to repeatedly listen to the sad and sometimes desperate accounts of innumerable chronically ill persons day after day, and perhaps find it hard to maintain motivation when encumbered by a palpable inability to alleviate suffering in many cases. This is particularly relevant as more than 80 percent of healthcare in Canada is now devoted to managing chronic disease, often involving multiple ongoing conditions. The frustration all around is encapsulated by the name of a recent paper in the journal 'Healthcare Policy' entitled '"Where do we go from here?" Health system frustrations expressed by patients with multimorbidity, their caregivers and family physicians' - one of the many dozens of newly released medical publications on this matter in the last few months.

In the two articles on multimorbidity in the June issue of 'Canadian Family Physician', I presented information about SRI - an emerging immune disorder resulting from toxicant exposures - and its relationship to MWS and chronic illness. With the recognition that numerous chronic afflictions can be ameliorated and that health can often be restored with the guidance and care of informed physicians, expectations of good health are very realistic. With the knowledge and tools to investigate and successfully assist many patients to overcome their chronic conditions, the practice of medicine can be effective, intellectually challenging, and immensely rewarding.

Conflict of Interest:

None declared