Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
OtherReflections

Not a loss of professionalism

Kendall Noel
Canadian Family Physician September 2014, 60 (9) 833;
Kendall Noel
Assistant Professor in the Department of Family Medicine at the University of Ottawa, affiliated with the Montfort Hospital teaching site, in Ontario. He is working toward completing his doctorate in family medicine at Western University in London, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Not a loss of professionalism, but an expression of unselfish love, that is the mark of a healer.

Stange’s definition of friendship in medicine1

Recently I came across a series of articles authored by Dr Stange and his colleagues that were published in the Annals of Family Medicine.1–7 They immediately captivated me. It was Dr Stange’s article on the science of connectedness that particularly, well, connected with me.2

While many of the concepts and theories of Dr Stange were unknown to me, I was struck by how strongly they resonated with what I had observed more than a decade earlier as a family medicine resident and student. Perhaps more surprising was how much they ran counter to what I was taught during medical school. As a medical student I found that much time and effort was spent on distancing one’s self emotionally from the patient. In fact, so much effort was spent in the preclinical years on reinforcing this professional divide that once we began to move into the clinical setting, the benefits that came from connecting with patients seemed to contradict what we had been taught.

Admittedly, with the clock reading 2:00 am as I completed the second of 3 admissions during one overnight call in internal medicine, this emotionally distant definition of professionalism was easy to accept. It had been made clear to me during the course of the admission that this second patient had inoperable cancer and that her ascites were a result of the intra-abdominal metastasis. Nothing good would come from tapping the abdomen, so I shouldn’t even consider it. But, as the days went by and the patient dealt with nausea, constipation, and generalized weakness, she expressed her concerns that the end was near and that she might never go home. As I got to know the patient and her family, I found myself growing unhappy with the plan. I had connected with her and no longer saw it as simply my professional duty to medically usher in her final days. Instead, I began feeling that it was my duty to re-explore all the possibilities for providing treatment to a fellow human being—a mother, a grandmother, a friend—who was relying on me to help her with my knowledge.

After I hounded my chief resident, he decided to take advantage of the situation to teach me how to do a paracentesis. When I failed, my senior stepped in, and when he failed, we decided to refer the patient for an ultrasound-guided paracentesis. Nearly 4 L of drained fluid later, my friend was a new person—sitting up in her bed during my morning rounds, with enough “vim and vigour” to actually be considered for discharge. She felt great—or as good as someone with a diagnosis of ovarian cancer could feel—and thanked me for taking an interest in her case.

Now a practising family physician in a small town, I often think of the many patients I met during medical school. In particular I think about those whose care I could not limit to their disease, and whose experience of illness I felt obligated to consider as well. At the time, I questioned why I even bothered. Was it not a sign of a poor clinician, to be so dedicated to the psychosocial elements of health? But then I found small-town family medicine: a place where the doctor was just Doc, or even just plain old Steve. The powerful relationship between patient and doctor that develops over years of visits for colds, routine annual examinations, poison ivy, questions about medications, and chest pain, ultimately to become a trusted bond—a friendship—is healthy, but its full effects are still not completely understood.

Should we not ensure that we have a better understanding of the nature of this relationship before delegating it away to other primary health care providers? It is at the heart of what we do, and yet, we, the everyday practitioners, know so little about it.

My residents will read Stange’s articles, and I encourage you all to read and share these pieces. Thank you, Dr Stange, for reminding us that there is still much to learn about the science of connectedness.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests

    None declared

  • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Stange KC
    . The generalist approach. Ann Fam Med. Vol. 7.(3) p. 198-203.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Stange KC
    . A science of connectedness. Ann Fam Med. Vol. 7.(5) p. 387-95.
  3. 3.
    1. Stange KC,
    2. Ferrer RL,
    3. Miller WL
    . Making sense of health care transformation as adaptive-renewal cycles. Ann Fam Med. Vol. 7.(6) p. 484-7.
  4. 4.
    1. Stange KC,
    2. Ferrer RL
    . The paradox of primary care. Ann Fam Med. Vol. 7.(4) p. 293-9.
  5. 5.
    1. Stange KC
    . The problem of fragmentation and the need for integrative solutions. Ann Fam Med. Vol. 7.(2) p. 100-3.
  6. 6.
    1. Stange KC
    . Power to advocate for health. Ann Fam Med. Vol. 8.(2) p. 100-7.
  7. 7.↵
    1. Stange KC
    . Ways of knowing, learning, and developing. Ann Fam Med. Vol. 8.(1) p. 4-10.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 60 (9)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 60, Issue 9
1 Sep 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Not a loss of professionalism
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Not a loss of professionalism
Kendall Noel
Canadian Family Physician Sep 2014, 60 (9) 833;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Not a loss of professionalism
Kendall Noel
Canadian Family Physician Sep 2014, 60 (9) 833;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • What they teach us
  • Communion in the clinic
  • Hello from the other side
Show more Reflections

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2021 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire