Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
Review ArticlePractice

Management of gonococcal infection among adults and youth

New key recommendations

Lisa Pogany, Barbara Romanowski, Joan Robinson, Margaret Gale-Rowe, Cathy Latham-Carmanico, Christine Weir and Tom Wong
Canadian Family Physician October 2015, 61 (10) 869-873;
Lisa Pogany
Epidemiologist in the Centre for Communicable Diseases and Infection Control at the Public Health Agency of Canada in Ottawa, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: lisa.pogany@phac-aspc.gc.ca
Barbara Romanowski
Clinical Professor of Medicine in the Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry at the University of Alberta in Edmonton.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joan Robinson
Pediatric infectious diseases physician at the University of Alberta and the Stollery Children’s Hospital in Edmonton.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Margaret Gale-Rowe
Acting Director, Centre for Communicable Diseases and Infection Control at the Public Health Agency of Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cathy Latham-Carmanico
Nurse consultant, Centre for Communicable Diseases and Infection Control at the Public Health Agency of Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christine Weir
Nurse epidemiologist, Centre for Communicable Diseases and Infection Control at the Public Health Agency of Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tom Wong
Past Director of the Professional Guidelines and Public Health Practice Division, Centre for Communicable Diseases and Infection Control at the Public Health Agency of Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objective To provide recommendations on the management of gonococcal infection among adults and youth.

Quality of evidence Treatment recommendations in the Canadian guidelines on sexually transmitted infections are based on review of the literature, as well as the grades of recommendations and the levels of evidence quality determined by a minimum of 2 reviewers. The recommendations are peer-reviewed and require approval by the expert working group.

Main message The new key recommendations for managing gonococcal infection among adults and youth include using culture as a diagnostic tool when practical, providing treatment with combination antibiotic therapy (ceftriaxone combined with azithromycin), and promptly reporting all cases with treatment failure to public health.

Conclusion Following these new key recommendations might reduce treatment failure, contribute to better surveillance of antibiotic-resistance trends in Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and contribute to the prevention of transmission of multidrug-resistant gonorrhea.

The reported incidence of infection caused by Neisseria gonorrhoeae has been increasing since 1997 in Canada.1,2 In 2012, there were 12 561 reported cases, for an incidence of 36.2 cases per 100 000 persons. The highest incidence rates are found among adolescents and young adults: 20- to 24-year-old men, 20-to 24-year-old women, and 15- to 19-year-old adolescent girls (148.5, 153.0, and 141.3 cases per 100 000 in 2012, respectively).2 Eighty cases were also reported among 10- to 14-year-olds, and there were fewer than 5 cases reported among children younger than age 10.2 Since the 1990s, the incidence rate has increased most rapidly among men and women aged 20 to 24.1,2

Long-term sequelae of untreated gonococcal infection can be serious.3–5 Among females, who are often asymptomatic, complications include pelvic inflammatory disease, infertility, ectopic pregnancy, chronic pelvic pain, oculo-urethro-synovial syndrome (reactive arthritis), and disseminated gonococcal infection. Untreated males might develop epididymoorchitis, oculo-urethro-synovial syndrome (reactive arthritis), disseminated gonococcal infection, and (rarely) infertility.

Of further importance is the development of gonococcal antibiotic resistance. Among the N gonorrhoeae samples submitted to the Public Health Agency of Canada’s (PHAC’s) National Microbiology Laboratory, there is documented resistance to penicillins, tetracyclines, quinolones, and macrolides (including azithromycin), as well as, more recently, reduced susceptibility to cephalosporins, which is increasing over time.6–10 Data estimating the true prevalence of antibiotic-resistant gonococcal infection are limited, in part, by the large proportion of infection that is asymptomatic and therefore never diagnosed, and the shift to the use of nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) in place of culture.11 Commercially available NAAT permits rapid diagnosis of gonococcal infection and allows for testing of urine samples. However, unlike culture, it does not currently provide information on antibiotic susceptibilities. Accurate and timely information regarding resistance is critical for management of individual cases and for the development of guidelines because of the potential for treatment failures.

It is essential that family physicians be aware of the most current diagnosis and management recommendations for uncomplicated gonorrhea in youth and adults because incidence has increased and treatment failure resulting in poor health outcomes is a real risk. The primary purpose of this article is to support primary care physicians in best practices as they relate to the use of cultures, combination drug therapy, and follow-up testing.

Quality of evidence

The Canadian Guidelines on Sexually Transmitted Infections12 are created by PHAC under the guidance of an expert working group, which includes experts and researchers from the fields of medicine, nursing, microbiology, pharmacology, and public health. Members volunteer their time as authors and reviewers to maintain updated, evidence-based recommendations for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and management of sexually transmitted infections in Canada.

Recommendations are based on review of the literature, assessment of the quality of evidence, development through an iterative process with the primary authors, and approval by the expert working group. Table 112 summarizes the 5 grades of recommendation, which include recommendations for treatment (grades A and B), no recommendation (grade C), recommendation against treatment (grade D), and insufficient evidence (grade I). Table 212 summarizes the quality of evidence levels, ranging from randomized controlled clinical trials (level 1) to expert opinion (level 3).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Grades of recommendations

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Quality of evidence

The recommendation for combination therapy is based on emerging evidence: at the time of recommendation development, evidence was in press or available at conferences.

Main message

A comprehensive public health approach to management of gonococcal infection includes diagnosis, treatment (Table 37,9,13–25), follow-up (including management of treatment failure), prevention of reinfection, partner notification, and public health reporting. The Canadian Guidelines on Sexually Transmitted Infections can be accessed online for more detailed recommendations.12

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3.

Recommended treatment of uncomplicated anogenital and pharyngeal infections in adults and youth (≥ 9 y of age)

Diagnosis

Diagnosis of gonococcal infection requires obtaining appropriate specimens for testing by either NAAT or culture. In some situations it might be appropriate to obtain specimens for both NAAT and culture. Nucleic acid amplification testing has higher sensitivity and specificity than culture does, which can result in more cases identified.26,27 Also, NAAT provides positive test results sooner after exposure than culture does; therefore, NAAT is the diagnostic method of choice if testing occurs within 48 hours of exposure. Despite these advantages, cultures are recommended for individuals at increased risk of having antibiotic-resistant infection, as well as for the surveillance of trends in antibiotic resistance.28–30 Culture is particularly important and should be used for testing, when practical, among the following populations:

  • men who have sex with men (MSM),

  • survivors of sexual abuse or sexual assault,

  • women with suspected pelvic inflammatory disease,

  • those who acquired the infection in geographic areas (Canadian6 and international) with high levels of antibiotic resistance, or

  • those with suspected treatment failure.

Individuals with gonococcal infection are frequently co-infected with Chlamydia trachomatis; therefore, testing should always be performed for both infections.31 Because of shared transmission routes, the following interventions should be offered: serologic testing for syphilis; HIV testing (if not known to be infected) and counseling; and vaccination for human papillomavirus, hepatitis B, and hepatitis A if indicated.12,32,33

Treatment

In response to increasing antimicrobial resistance, combination therapy is recommended for gonococcal infection. Table 37,9,13–25 presents treatment options; the choice of medications varies by population and site of infection.

  • Among MSM, other adults, and youth (≥ 9 years of age), the first-line therapy for uncomplicated anogenital or pharyngeal infections is ceftriaxone (250 mg intramuscularly, single dose) combined with azithromycin (1 g orally, single dose).

  • For uncomplicated anogenital infection among patients other than MSM, cefixime (800 mg orally, single dose) combined with azithromycin (1 g orally, single dose) is also considered a first-line therapy.

These options use antibiotics with 2 different mechanisms of action and might delay the emergence of further cephalosporin-resistant gonorrhea by providing an additive or synergistic therapeutic effect.34,35 It is desirable to use directly observed therapy in a single dose. The recommended combination therapy also provides effective treatment of chlamydia.31 If cefixime is not available, all cases should be treated with ceftriaxone.

Follow-up

The emergence of N gonorrhoeae with resistance to cephalosporins has created the potential for treatment failure. Treatment failure is defined as the presence of at least 1 of the following (found in an appropriate specimen and in the absence of sexual contact during the posttreatment period):

  • intracellular Gram-negative diplococci on microscopy in specimens taken at least 72 hours after completion of treatment,

  • positive culture results for N gonorrhoeae taken at least 72 hours after completion of treatment, or

  • positive NAAT results collected at least 2 to 3 weeks after completion of treatment.

The recommended timing of follow-up to administer a test of cure varies by method of testing to reduce the occurrence of false-positive results: 3 to 7 days after completion of therapy for cultures, and 2 to 3 weeks posttreatment for NAAT.36,37 Although it is ideal to obtain a test of cure in all infected patients, it is particularly important in certain cases, which are presented in Box 1.

Box 1.

Cases in which test of cure is important to obtain

It is important to obtain test of cure from patients if ...

  • they have pharyngeal infection

  • compliance with therapy is doubtful

  • there was re-exposure to an untreated partner

  • there is documented previous treatment failure

  • they were treated with an antibiotic other than ceftriaxone or cefixime

  • they were treated with quinolones in the absence of confirmed susceptibility

  • antimicrobial resistance to the administered therapy is documented or suspected

  • the case is linked to another case with documented antimicrobial resistance to the treatment given or is linked to a case with treatment failure when the patient was treated with the same antibiotic

  • infection occurred during pregnancy

  • Neisseria gonorrhoeae was isolated from a woman undergoing therapeutic abortion

  • complicated gonococcal infection exists

Screening for new infection should be done routinely 6 months posttreatment.38

Prevention

Prevention of reinfection: Prevention of reinfection is a key component of the management of gonococcal infection. Patients should be advised to abstain from unprotected sex until at least 3 days following completion of treatment and until their symptoms and those of their current sexual contacts have resolved. They should also be counseled on the risk of reinfection and effective prevention practices including safer sexual practices.

Partner notification: Case finding and partner notification are critical strategies to control gonococcal infection. Physicians have an important role in identifying potential cases. Consideration for case finding should be given to all individuals who have had sexual contact with the index case within the previous 60 days, and treatment should be provided regardless of clinical findings and pending laboratory results.39,40 The length of trace-back time should be increased if the partner’s test results are negative for gonococcal infection or if there were no sexual partners during the preceding 60 days.

Public health reporting.

In all provinces and territories, gonococcal infection is a reportable infection. Treatment failures should be promptly reported to the local public health unit, which can inform provincial and territorial public health departments and PHAC.

Conclusion

Despite the inconvenience of cultures relative to NAAT, cultures can yield a number of benefits. First, making antibiotic susceptibility information available ensures patients have been treated with an appropriate antibiotic. Second, cultures inform public health surveillance: positive test results are reported, as gonorrhea is a notifiable disease in Canada. The addition of susceptibility information allows for better monitoring of resistance trends. The National Microbiology Laboratory tracks and reports resistance trends for the purpose of informing clinical and public health practices.

The shift to combination drug therapy is the primary change for family physicians to be aware of in this update. A review of the evidence for the use of single-drug therapy14–25,41–47 and expert opinion on emerging combination drug therapy13 forms the basis of this recommendation. However, recent evidence on combination drug therapies from laboratory,34,35,48 observational,13,49 and randomized clinical trials50 supports this shift. These studies show evidence of additive or synergistic effects resulting from combinations of ceftriaxone and azithromycin,34,35 cefixime and azithromycin,35 and spectinomycin and azithromycin.34 In addition, observational studies suggest that single-drug therapy with an oral cephalosporin has a higher relative risk of treatment failure compared with the ceftriaxone-azithromycin combination, the cefixime-azithromycin combination, and ceftriaxone alone.13 Time-to-treatment-failure analysis also suggests that the ceftriaxone-azithromycin combination is superior to ceftriaxone-doxycycline combinations at 30 and 90 days.49 Most recently, a randomized controlled clinical trial found near 100% efficacy for gentamicin-azithromycin and gemifloxacin-azithromycin combinations when measured by microbiological cure at 10 to 17 days.50

Combination antibiotic therapy provides treatment of gonorrhea with different mechanisms of action, and also treats chlamydia (often found concomitantly). Combination therapy might reduce the possibility of treatment failure and the development of further antimicrobial resistance.

Notes

EDITOR’S KEY POINTS

  • Long-term sequelae of untreated gonococcal infection can be serious for both the male and the female population. Of further importance is the emergence of gonococcal infection with resistance to antibiotics (including to cephalosporins), which has increased the possibility of treatment failure.

  • Combination antibiotic therapy is recommended for treatment of gonococcal infection; the choice of medications varies by population and site of infection. Combination antibiotic therapy provides treatment with different mechanisms of action and might reduce the possibility of treatment failure and the development of further antimicrobial resistance.

  • Using cultures as a diagnostic tool, when practical, ensures patients have been treated with the appropriate antibiotics, and the results inform public health surveillance: positive test results are reported, as gonorrhea is a notifiable disease in Canada. The addition of susceptibility information allows for better monitoring of resistance trends.

Footnotes

  • This article is eligible for Mainpro-M1 credits. To earn credits, go to www.cfp.ca and click on the Mainpro link.

  • This article has been peer reviewed.

  • La traduction en français de cet article se trouve à www.cfp.ca dans la table des matières du numéro d’octobre 2015 à la page e451.

  • Contributors

    All authors contributed to the literature review and analysis, and to preparing the manuscript for submission.

  • Competing interests

    None declared

  • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Public Health Agency of Canada
    . Report on sexually transmitted infections in Canada: 2010. Ottawa, ON: Public Health Agency of Canada; 2012. Available from: http://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2013/aspc-phac/HP37-10-2010-eng.pdf. Accessed 2015 Aug 11.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Totten S,
    2. MacLean R,
    3. Payne E
    . Gonorrhea in Canada: 2003–2012. Can Commun Dis Rep 2015;41(2):26-9. Available from: www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/publicat/ccdr-rmtc/15vol41/dr-rm41-02/surv-2-eng.php. Accessed 2015 Sep 2.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Committee on Infectious Diseases, American Academy of Pediatrics
    . Gonococcal infections. In: Pickering LK, Baker CJ, Kimberlin DW, editors. Red book: 2012. Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases. 29th ed. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2012. p. 336-44.
  4. 4.
    1. Banikarim C,
    2. Chacko MR
    . Pelvic inflammatory disease in adolescents. Semin Pediatr Infect Dis 2005;16(3):175-80.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Burgis JT,
    2. Nawaz H 3rd.
    . Disseminated gonococcal infection in pregnancy presenting as meningitis and dermatitis. Obstet Gynecol 2006;108(3 Pt 2):798-801.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Martin I,
    2. Jayaraman G,
    3. Wong T,
    4. Liu G,
    5. Gilmour M,
    6. Canadian Public Health Laboratory Network
    . Trends in antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolated in Canada: 2000–2009. Sex Transm Dis 2011;38(10):892-8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Allen VG,
    2. Mitterni L,
    3. Seah C,
    4. Rebbapragada A,
    5. Martin I,
    6. Lee C,
    7. et al
    . Neisseria gonorrhoeae treatment failure and susceptibility to cefixime in Toronto, Canada. JAMA 2013;309(2):163-70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.
    1. Tapsall J
    . Multidrug-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae. CMAJ 2009;180(3):268-9.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Martin I,
    2. Sawatzky P,
    3. Allen V,
    4. Hoang L,
    5. Lefebvre B,
    6. Mina N,
    7. et al
    . Emergence and characterization of Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates with decreased susceptibilities to ceftriaxone and cefixime in Canada: 2001–2010. Sex Transm Dis 2012;39(4):316-23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. World Health Organization
    . Global action plan to control the spread and impact of antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Geneva, Switz: World Health Organization; 2012. Available from: www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/rtis/9789241503501/en/index.html. Accessed 2015 Aug 11.
  11. 11.↵
    1. Detels R,
    2. Green AM,
    3. Klausner JD,
    4. Katzenstein D,
    5. Gaydos C,
    6. Handsfield H,
    7. et al
    . The incidence and correlates of symptomatic and asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections in selected populations in five countries. Sex Transm Dis 2011;38(6):503-9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Public Health Agency of Canada [website]
    . Canadian guidelines on sexually transmitted infections. Ottawa, ON: Public Health Agency of Canada; 2015. Available from: www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/std-mts/sti-its/. Accessed 2015 Aug 11.
  13. 13.↵
    1. Barbee LA,
    2. Kerani RP,
    3. Dombrowski JC,
    4. Soge OO,
    5. Golden MR
    . A retrospective comparative study of 2-drug oral and intramuscular cephalosporin treatment regimens for pharyngeal gonorrhea. Clin Infect Dis 2013;56(11):1539-45. Epub 2013 Feb 13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Gil-Setas A,
    2. Navascués-Ortega A,
    3. Beristain X
    . Spectinomycin in the treatment of gonorrhoea. Euro Surveill 2010;15(19):pii/19568.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.
    1. Kojima M,
    2. Masuda K,
    3. Yada Y,
    4. Hayase Y,
    5. Muratani T,
    6. Matsumoto T
    . Single-dose treatment of male patients with gonococcal urethritis using 2 g spectinomycin: microbiological and clinical evaluations. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2008;32(1):50-4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.
    1. Young H,
    2. Moyes A,
    3. McMillan A
    . Azithromycin and erythromycin resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae following treatment with azithromycin. Int J STD AIDS 1997;8(5):299-302.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.
    1. Habib AR,
    2. Fernando R
    . Efficacy of azithromycin 1 g single dose in the management of uncomplicated gonorrhoea. Int J STD AIDS 2004;15(4):240-2.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.
    1. Yuan LF,
    2. Yin YP,
    3. Dai XQ,
    4. Pearline RV,
    5. Xiang Z,
    6. Unemo M,
    7. et al
    . Resistance to azithromycin of Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates from 2 cities in China. Sex Transm Dis 2011;38(8):764-8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.
    1. Katz AR,
    2. Komeya AY,
    3. Soge OO,
    4. Kiaha MI,
    5. Lee MV,
    6. Wasserman GM,
    7. et al
    . Neisseria gonorrhoeae with high-level resistance to azithromycin: case report of the first isolate identified in the United States. Clin Infect Dis 2012;54(6):841-3. Epub 2011 Dec 19.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.
    1. Bai ZG,
    2. Bao XJ,
    3. Cheng WD,
    4. Yang KH,
    5. Li YP
    . Efficacy and safety of ceftriaxone for uncomplicated gonorrhoea: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J STD AIDS 2012;23(2):126-32.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.
    1. Dunnett DM,
    2. Moyer MA
    . Cefixime in the treatment of uncomplicated gonorrhea. Sex Transm Dis 1992;19(2):92-3.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. 22.
    1. Portilla I,
    2. Lutz B,
    3. Montalvo M,
    4. Mogabgab WJ
    . Oral cefixime versus intramuscular ceftriaxone in patients with uncomplicated gonococcal infections. Sex Transm Dis 1992;19(2):94-8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.
    1. Handsfield HH,
    2. McCormack WM,
    3. Hook EW 3rd.,
    4. Douglas JM Jr.,
    5. Covino JM,
    6. Verdon MS,
    7. et al
    . A comparison of single-dose cefixime with ceftriaxone as treatment for uncomplicated gonorrhea. N Engl J Med 1991;325(19):1337-41.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.
    1. Megran DW,
    2. Lefebvre K,
    3. Willetts V,
    4. Bowie WR
    . Single-dose oral cefixime versus amoxicillin plus probenecid for the treatment of uncomplicated gonorrhea in men. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1990;34(2):355-7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Chisholm SA,
    2. Mouton JW,
    3. Lewis DA,
    4. Nichols T,
    5. Ison CA,
    6. Livermore DM
    . Cephalosporin MIC creep among gonococci: time for a pharmacodynamic rethink? J Antimicrob Chemother 2010;65(10):2141-8. Epub 2010 Aug 6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Association of Public Health Laboratories
    . Laboratory diagnostic testing for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Expert consultation meeting summary report. Atlanta, GA: Association of Public Health Laboratories; 2009. Available from: www.aphl.org/aphlprograms/infectious/std/documents/id_2009jan_ctgclab-guidelines-meeting-report.pdf. Accessed 2015 Aug 11.
  27. 27.↵
    1. Kapala J,
    2. Biers K,
    3. Cox M,
    4. Kamionka M,
    5. Sumner J,
    6. Toor R,
    7. et al
    . Aptima combo 2 testing detected additional cases of Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection in men and women in community settings. J Clin Microbiol 2011;49(5):1970-1.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Johnson RE,
    2. Newhall WJ,
    3. Papp JR,
    4. Knapp J,
    5. Black C,
    6. Gift T,
    7. et al
    . Screening tests to detect Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections—2002. MMWR Recomm Rep 2002;51(RR-15):1-38.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  29. 29.
    1. Dillon JA
    . Sustainable antimicrobial surveillance programs essential for controlling Neisseria gonorrhoeae superbug. Sex Transm Dis 2011;38(10):899-901.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. MacDonald NE,
    2. Stanbrook MB,
    3. Flegel K,
    4. Hébert PC,
    5. Rosenfield D
    . Gonorrhea: what goes around comes around. CMAJ 2011;183(14):1567. Epub 2011 Sep 19.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Lyss SB,
    2. Kamb ML,
    3. Peterman TA,
    4. Moran J,
    5. Newman D,
    6. Bolan G,
    7. et al
    . Chlamydia trachomatis among patients infected with and treated for Neisseria gonorrhoeae in sexually transmitted disease clinics in the United States. Ann Intern Med 2003;139(3):178-85.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Public Health Agency of Canada [website]
    . Canadian immunization guide. Ottawa, ON: Public Health Agency of Canada; 2015. Available from: www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/publicat/cig-gci/index-eng.php#toc. Accessed 2013 Dec 12.
  33. 33.↵
    1. Gale-Rowe M,
    2. Dodds J,
    3. Paquette D,
    4. Wong T
    . Synopsis of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) screening and testing guide. Can Commun Dis Rep 2013;39(1):2.
    OpenUrl
  34. 34.↵
    1. Furuya R,
    2. Koga Y,
    3. Irie S,
    4. Ikeda F,
    5. Kanayama A,
    6. Kobayashi I,
    7. et al
    . In vitro activities of antimicrobial combinations against clinical isolates of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J Infect Chemother 2013;19(6):1218-20. Epub 2013 Apr 8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Pereira R,
    2. Cole MJ,
    3. Ison CA
    . Combination therapy for gonorrhoea: in vitro synergy testing. J Antimicrob Chemother 2013;68(3):640-3. Epub 2012 Nov 14.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    1. Hjelmevoll SO,
    2. Olsen ME,
    3. Sollid JU,
    4. Haaheim H,
    5. Melby K,
    6. Moi H,
    7. et al
    . Appropriate time for test-of-cure when diagnosing gonorrhoea with a nucleic acid amplification test. Acta Derm Venereol 2012;92(3):316-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Bachmann LH,
    2. Desmond RA,
    3. Stephens J,
    4. Hughes A,
    5. Hook EW 3rd.
    . Duration of persistence of gonococcal DNA detected by ligase chain reaction in men and women following recommended therapy for uncomplicated gonorrhea. J Clin Microbiol 2002;40(10):3596-601.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    1. De P,
    2. Singh AE,
    3. Wong T,
    4. Kaida A
    . Predictors of gonorrhea reinfection in a cohort of sexually transmitted disease patients in Alberta, Canada, 1991–2003. Sex Transm Dis 2007;34(1):30-6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
    . Update to CDC’s sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2010: oral cephalosporins no longer a recommended treatment for gonococcal infections. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2012;61(31):590-4.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    1. Workowski KA,
    2. Berman S,
    3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
    . Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2010. MMWR Recomm Rep 2010;59(RR-12):1-110. Erratum in: MMWR Recomm Rep 2011;60(1):18.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    1. Tapsall JW
    . What management is there for gonorrhea in the postquinolone era? Sex Transm Dis 2006;33(1):8-10.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. 42.
    1. Tapsall J,
    2. Read P,
    3. Carmody C,
    4. Bourne C,
    5. Ray S,
    6. Limnios A,
    7. et al
    . Two cases of failed ceftriaxone treatment in pharyngeal gonorrhoea verified by molecular microbiological methods. J Med Microbiol 2009;58(Pt 5):683-7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.
    1. Handsfield HH,
    2. Dalu ZA,
    3. Martin DH,
    4. Douglas JM Jr.,
    5. McCarty JM,
    6. Schlossberg D,
    7. et al
    . Multicenter trial of single-dose azithromycin vs. ceftriaxone in the treatment of uncomplicated gonorrhea. Sex Transm Dis 1994;21(2):107-11.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.
    1. Bignell C,
    2. Garley J
    . Azithromycin in the treatment of infection with Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Sex Transm Infect 2010;86(6):422-6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. 45.
    1. Ramus RM,
    2. Sheffield JS,
    3. Mayfield JA,
    4. Wendel GD Jr.
    . A randomized trial that compared oral cefixime and intramuscular ceftriaxone for the treatment of gonorrhea in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;185(3):629-32.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.
    1. Ota KV,
    2. Fisman DN,
    3. Tamari IE,
    4. Smieja M,
    5. Ng LK,
    6. Jones KE,
    7. et al
    . Incidence and treatment outcomes of pharyngeal Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis infections in men who have sex with men: a 13-year retrospective cohort study. Clin Infect Dis 2009;48(9):1237-43.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. 47.↵
    1. Dan M,
    2. Poch F,
    3. Amitai Z,
    4. Gefen D,
    5. Shohat T
    . Pharyngeal gonorrhea in female sex workers: response to a single 2-g dose of azithromycin. Sex Transm Dis 2006;33(8):512-5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. 48.↵
    1. Hottes TS,
    2. Lester RT,
    3. Hoang LM,
    4. McKay R,
    5. Imperial M,
    6. Gilbert M,
    7. et al
    . Cephalosporin and azithromycin susceptibility in Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates by site of infection, British Columbia, 2006 to 2011. Sex Transm Dis 2013;40(1):46-51.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. 49.↵
    1. Schumacher CM,
    2. Ghanem KG
    . Retreatment rates for uncomplicated gonorrhea infection: comparing ceftriaxone and azithromycin versus ceftriaxone and doxycycline. Sex Transm Dis 2013;40(7):539-45.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. 50.↵
    1. Kirkcaldy RD,
    2. Weinstock HS,
    3. Moore PC,
    4. Philip SS,
    5. Wiesenfeld HC,
    6. Papp JR,
    7. et al
    . The efficacy and safety of gentamicin plus azithromycin and gemifloxacin plus azithromycin as treatment of uncomplicated gonorrhea. Clin Infect Dis 2014;59(8):1083-91.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 61 (10)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 61, Issue 10
1 Oct 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Management of gonococcal infection among adults and youth
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Management of gonococcal infection among adults and youth
Lisa Pogany, Barbara Romanowski, Joan Robinson, Margaret Gale-Rowe, Cathy Latham-Carmanico, Christine Weir, Tom Wong
Canadian Family Physician Oct 2015, 61 (10) 869-873;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Management of gonococcal infection among adults and youth
Lisa Pogany, Barbara Romanowski, Joan Robinson, Margaret Gale-Rowe, Cathy Latham-Carmanico, Christine Weir, Tom Wong
Canadian Family Physician Oct 2015, 61 (10) 869-873;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Quality of evidence
    • Main message
    • Conclusion
    • Notes
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Prise en charge de l’infection gonococcique chez les adultes et les jeunes
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Consideration of antimicrobial resistance and contextual factors in infectious disease guidelines: a systematic survey
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Practice

  • Determining if and how older patients can safely stay at home with additional services
  • Managing type 2 diabetes in primary care during COVID-19
  • Effectiveness of dermoscopy in skin cancer diagnosis
Show more Practice

Clinical Review

  • Parkinson disease primer, part 2: management of motor and nonmotor symptoms
  • Parkinson disease primer, part 1: diagnosis
  • Prescribing for common complications of spinal cord injury
Show more Clinical Review

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2023 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire