Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
OtherRebuttal

Rebuttal: Do electronic medical records improve quality of care?

Yes

Donna P. Manca
Canadian Family Physician October 2015; 61 (10) e435;
Donna P. Manca
Family physician at the Grey Nuns Family Medicine Centre in Edmonton, Alta, Director of Research in the Department of Family Medicine Research Program at the University of Alberta, and Director of the Northern Alberta Primary Care Research Network, a network contributing data to the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network project.
MD MClSc FCFP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: dpmanca@ualberta.ca
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Dr Greiver states that there is “little conclusive evidence that EMRs [electronic medical records] make a substantial difference in the quality of care provided to patients.”1 This conclusion is based primarily on the neutral results of systematic reviews. Systematic reviews require numerous homogeneous, high-quality studies to demonstrate a causal effect. The research on smoking is a good example of why we cannot rely on high-level systematic reviews alone. Evidence of the health risks from smoking began to manifest in the 1970s; however, no systematic review precisely quantified the relationship between smoking and lung cancer until recently.2 The research on EMRs is even more heterogeneous, with numerous outcome indicators for quality of care, wide variation in the quality of EMRs, and a large range in EMR skills of and use by clinicians. The resultant studies could be interpreted as having overall neutral results. However, we need to look deeper, and when we do we find early evidence of the positive effect that EMRs have had on quality of care. Improved quality of care outcomes have been demonstrated in a study that compares EMRs to paper charts,3 and in other studies that illustrate positive effects through the additional resources that EMRs bring to the point of care.4–6

I agree with Dr Greiver that it is the quality of the EMR and how we use it that improves the quality of care; we are at a tipping point. There is wide variation in the quality of EMRs, and minimal standards to ensure that each EMR on the market supports the Patient’s Medical Home.7 Standards are especially important to ensure minimum reporting and analytical properties. We need to bring new skills and approaches to the team setting; it is not only the family physician who needs to change. Electronic medical records require a new set of skills in data entry and data management to avoid the “garbage in, garbage out” scenario. But other systems, such as electronic health records, must also be adapted to communicate seamlessly with the EMR. Finally, we need unfettered access to our EMR data. Electronic medical records are tools that can improve quality of care if we adapt them and use them appropriately.

Footnotes

  • La traduction en français de cet article se trouve à www.cfp.ca dans la table des matières du numéro d’octobre 2015 à la page e437.

  • Competing interests

    None declared

  • These rebuttals are responses from the authors of the debates in the October issue (Can Fam Physician 2015;61:846–9 [Eng], 850–3 [Fr]).

  • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Greiver M
    . Do electronic medical records improve quality of care? No [Debates]. Can Fam Physician 2015;61:847-9. (Eng), 852–3 (Fr).
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Lee PN,
    2. Forey BA,
    3. Coombs KJ
    . Systematic review with meta-analysis of the epidemiological evidence in the 1900s relating smoking to lung cancer. BMC Cancer 2012;12:385.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Kern LM,
    2. Barrón Y,
    3. Dhopeshwarkar RV,
    4. Edwards A,
    5. Kaushal R,
    6. HITEC Investigators
    . Electronic health records and ambulatory quality of care. J Gen Intern Med 2013;28(4):496-503. Epub 2012 Oct 3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. O’Connor PJ,
    2. Desai JR,
    3. Butler JC,
    4. Kharbanda EO,
    5. Sperl-Hillen JM
    . Current status and future prospects for electronic point-of-care clinical decision support in diabetes care. Curr Diab Rep 2013;13(2):172-6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.
    1. O’Connor PJ,
    2. Sperl-Hillen JM,
    3. Rush WA,
    4. Johnson PE,
    5. Amundson GH,
    6. Asche SE,
    7. et al
    . Impact of electronic health record clinical decision support on diabetes care: a randomized trial. Ann Fam Med 2011;9(1):12-21.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Rose HL,
    2. Miller PM,
    3. Nemeth LS,
    4. Jenkins RG,
    5. Nietert PJ,
    6. Wessell AM,
    7. et al
    . Alcohol screening and brief counseling in a primary care hypertensive population: a quality improvement intervention. Addiction 2008;103(8):1271-80. Epub 2008 Apr 16.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. College of Family Physicians of Canada [website]
    . Best advice guide: adopting EMRs in a Patient’s Medical Home. Mississauga, ON: College of Family Physicians of Canada; 2014. Available from: http://patientsmedicalhome.ca/resources/best-advice-guide-adopting-emrs/. Accessed 2015 Sep 5.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 61 (10)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 61, Issue 10
1 Oct 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Rebuttal: Do electronic medical records improve quality of care?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Rebuttal: Do electronic medical records improve quality of care?
Donna P. Manca
Canadian Family Physician Oct 2015, 61 (10) e435;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Rebuttal: Do electronic medical records improve quality of care?
Donna P. Manca
Canadian Family Physician Oct 2015, 61 (10) e435;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Réfutation : Les dossiers médicaux électroniques améliorent-ils la qualité des soins?
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Autoimmune haemolytic anaemia due to immunodeficiency
  • Precision medicine in COPD: where are we and where do we need to go?
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Rebuttal: Will the new opioid guidelines harm more people than they help?
  • Rebuttal: Will the new opioid guidelines harm more people than they help?
  • Rebuttal: Should family physicians prescribe medication for obesity?
Show more Rebuttal

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2025 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire