Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
Research ArticlePractice

Artificial nutrition and hydration in advanced dementia

Irene Ying
Canadian Family Physician March 2015, 61 (3) 245-248;
Irene Ying
Palliative care consultant at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre in Toronto, Ont, Assistant Professor in the Department of Family and Community Medicine at the University of Toronto, and a member of the Joint Centre for Bioethics at the University of Toronto.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Mrs N. is an 80-year-old woman with Alzheimer dementia first diagnosed 7 years ago. Her disease has progressed and she is now bed-bound and dependent in all her activities of daily living. She is largely unaware of her surroundings and at times she does not recognize her daughter or son-in-law, with whom she lives. Fortunately, agitation and other behavioural concerns have been minimal. Her daughter has been able to stay at home to be Mrs N.’s primary caregiver.

You have been Mrs N. and her daughter’s family physician for many years. During a checkup, Mrs N.’s daughter asks if a feeding tube for her mother would be beneficial, as Mrs N. is having increasing difficulty eating and often chokes when being fed.

Risks of artificial nutrition and hydration in advanced dementia

It is estimated that up to one-third of nursing home patients with severe cognitive impairment in the United States have feeding tubes.1 A systematic review of treatment decisions around artificial nutrition and hydration (ANH) in patients at risk of diminished mental capacity revealed that the primary reason for initiating ANH, including in patients with dementia, was to prolong life.2 However, evidence indicates that ANH in advanced dementia does not prolong survival or improve quality of life.3,4 In fact, enteral feeding puts patients at higher risk of several complications and indignities (Box 1). Studies have shown, despite the conventional wisdom that artificial nutrition would mitigate the risks of aspiration and help with wound healing, that the opposite is true: risk of aspiration5,6 and the development of pressure ulcers in fact increase with the initiation of tube feeding.7,8 In the latter case, it is postulated that by increasing the amount of stool output, oftentimes as diarrhea, we thereby provide a moist environment conducive to skin breakdown.

Box 1.

Risks and harms associated with feeding tubes in those with advanced dementia

The following are among the risks and harms of tube feeding:

  • Pain and other complications (eg, infection, bleeding) directly associated with placement of tube

  • Increased risk of aspiration

  • Increased risk of pressure ulcers

  • Gastrointestinal symptoms from feeding (eg, diarrhea, constipation, reflux)

  • Physical and chemical restraints to prevent patient from pulling out feeding tube

  • Fluid overload leading to increased pulmonary or peripheral edema, upper airway secretions

  • Can increase the perception of hunger

In 1989, bioethicist Dr Mark Yarborough questioned the growing use of tube feeding.9 Yarborough drew parallels to the idea of enteral feeding as a form of “force-feeding” in certain populations. Although unrestrained in its imagery, it is nonetheless an apt comparison in the context of patients with advanced dementia, as it introduces the concept that with enteral feeding we are likely providing the body with a load greater than it is able to tolerate. Even so, we continue to use ANH in patients with advanced dementia at alarming rates.

Social, cultural, and ethical considerations

Despite the known and mounting evidence that artificial nutrition in persons with advanced dementia is harmful, it continues to be an intervention that is frequently used in this patient population. It would be unfair to point to any one particular group as the cause of this phenomenon, when in fact the cause is likely multifactorial (Box 2).

Box 2.

Factors that might influence the use of feeding tubes in advanced dementia

Patient and family factors

  • Unawareness of or difficulty coping with the terminal prognosis of dementia

  • Unawareness of the lack of benefit and increased harm of feeding tubes in advanced dementia

  • Perception of “starvation” without artificial nutrition and hydration that might be influenced by cultural or religious factors

  • Extra time required to provide oral feeding

  • Complicated social dynamics (eg, viewing interventions as a representation of high-quality care)

  • Lack of advance directives specifically addressing artificial nutrition and hydration

Clinician factors

  • Unawareness of the lack of benefit and increased harm of feeding tubes in advanced dementia

  • Lack of familiarity with techniques to address thirst and hunger

  • Avoidance of difficult discussions or belief that the discussion will be held by a different clinician (eg, family physician, geriatrician, interventional radiologist)

  • Fear of litigation

Administrative and systemic factors

  • Extra time and staff needed to assist with oral feeding in patients with advanced dementia

  • Financial incentives (eg, institutions might benefit financially from caring for patients with feeding tubes)

For patients and families, food and water can have important meaning for religious, cultural, or personal reasons. Those who have experienced starvation, for example, whether through persecution or poverty, might view the lack of provision of nutrition in any situation as an indignity that exceeds the potential harms that tube feeding might hold. It is particularly important to be mindful of this consideration in our multicultural population; many Canadian residents have come from places—both abroad and within our own country—where living situations might have been quite dire.

Physicians and other clinicians also play a role in perpetuating the overuse of feeding tubes in patients with advanced dementia. There is evidence of a considerable knowledge gap among physicians who, for example, often incorrectly cite aspiration pneumonia as being an important indication for feeding tube insertion in patients with dementia.10 Likewise, many speech-language pathologists erroneously believe that tube feeding in advanced dementia and dysphagia improves nutritional status and prolongs survival.11

Patients under the care of subspecialists are also more likely to receive feeding tubes compared with those cared for by generalists.12 The reasons for this are unclear but might relate to generalists’ propensity to take a more wide-angled view of patient care.

Guidelines put forth by the American Geriatrics Society13 discourage the use of feeding tubes in patients with advanced dementia and promote instead the use of careful hand feeding. Certainly in circumstances where careful hand feeding is available, it is a preferred alternative. However, the reality is that many patients with severe cognitive impairment often find themselves cared for by overwhelmed “sandwich generation” children or in institutional settings where one-on-one time can be limited. An American study demonstrated that day-to-day costs for residents with feeding tubes were lower than costs for residents without. However, when looking at Medicare billings, patients with feeding tubes necessitated much higher reimbursement costs associated with tube insertion and hospitalizations for management of subsequent complications.14 This puts nursing homes in a difficult situation as they are challenged to balance their own books while considering the well-being of the patient and costs to the health care system as a whole.

Risks and benefits of parenteral hydration

Although some of the risks and harms conferred by tube feeding are also relevant in the case of parenteral hydration (eg, pulmonary or peripheral edema, increased secretions), there might be circumstances in which a limited and focused trial of parenteral hydration might have some benefit. For example, hydration could help to mitigate some causes of delirium such as opioid toxicity or hypercalcemia. Despite your explanation that a gastrostomy tube insertion in Mrs N.’s situation would, on balance, be more harmful and cause more discomfort, Mrs N.’s daughter cannot shake the belief that her mother is going to starve to death.

Approach to a family requesting ANH

The decision to initiate ANH should ideally be a collaborative one among the physician, the patient, and the family, weighing the benefits (both physical and psychological) against the harms. From a legal perspective, decision making should be undertaken by the designated person according to each province’s hierarchy of substitute decision makers (SDMs). In general, such decisions should be based first and foremost on the previously expressed wishes of the patient—which can only be known by asking patients before the onset of dementia or early in the dementia trajectory. In the absence of such knowledge, the decisions should be based on the best interests of the patient.

Most feeding tube insertions occur during acute hospital admissions,15 when specialists and clinicians who do not have ongoing relationships with patients and families are providing medical care, and often pressure on families to make decisions seems heightened.16 Therefore, as family physicians, again it is important to have a discussion with the patient and family early on in the dementia trajectory around the lack of evidence supporting artificial nutrition in the advanced stages of disease.

Elicit understanding

Before engaging in a discussion around the harms and benefits of ANH, it is imperative to first understand the particular concerns of the friends and family of the patient. Are the concerns centred on beliefs that their loved one is “thirsty or starving to death”? Or is there a perception that more technologically advanced interventions equate to better-quality care? Or are decisions being driven by other complex family dynamics? Without this knowledge, it will be extremely challenging to support the family and patient effectively.

Educate

In addition to the aforementioned myths surrounding ANH, concerns around hunger and thirst are commonly at the forefront of caregivers’ minds. Although thirst and dry mouth are common at the end of life, intravenous fluids do not seem to ameliorate these symptoms.17 In patients with advanced disease, enteral feeding might even worsen the sensation of hunger.18 Both hunger and thirst are effectively treated near the end of life with small amounts of food, fluids, artificial saliva, and good mouth care.19,20

Support

The role of the SDM can be fraught with uncertainty and anxiety, and SDMs should be made aware of potential supports, such as social work or spiritual care, that are available to them. In situations where cultural or religious beliefs are the basis for the family’s objection, it might be helpful to offer to speak with the patient’s cultural or spiritual leader to understand the nuances of the beliefs and to ensure that information is being communicated clearly. For example, suffering in some cultures is considered an important aspect of the human experience, and so the risk of discomfort might not be a deterrent from pursuing a certain intervention. However, this is different from the risk of harm or altering the dying process in the last days of life, which is explicitly prohibited in some cultures and religions. Continuous communication is important to delineate these often blurry lines.

Set expectations and parameters, but be flexible

In instances where ANH has been initiated, it is often useful to give guidelines to loved ones on signs and symptoms that would indicate that the intervention should be altered or withdrawn. Pre-emptively discussing events that would necessitate a reevaluation of the harms of ANH, such as signs of shortness of breath from pulmonary edema, diarrhea and the development of pressure ulcers, or patients pulling out feeding tubes or intravenous lines, can help to prepare the family for the withdrawal of ANH. In situations where friends and family still seem torn between the symbolic nature of providing “sustenance” and the apparent harms it is causing, a more flexible approach might be warranted, in which feeding and fluid rates are brought down to levels low enough to avoid symptoms. This sometimes might involve negligible rates. Such a symbolic gesture might buy enough time for loved ones to emotionally come to terms with their loss and ease the grieving process. You understand that Mrs N.’s daughter is concerned about her mother “starving to death,” and you have reviewed the limitations and harms of ANH with her. Mrs N.’s daughter decides to continue with careful hand feeding. Over the next 6 months Mrs N. becomes increasingly somnolent and her daughter requests a trial of hydration. You agree to a trial of hypodermoclysis (subcutaneous fluid infusion) at levels that do not cause additional symptoms. Her daughter is ultimately able to come to terms with Mrs N.’s advanced disease, and eventually the infusion is withdrawn.

Notes

BOTTOM LINE

  • There is no evidence that artificial nutrition prolongs life in advanced dementia, or that artificial nutrition and hydration (ANH) improves hunger or thirst symptoms. Parenteral hydration can be considered on a case-by-case basis as it might, in some circumstances, improve symptoms.

  • Eating and drinking have strong symbolic connotations that cannot be discounted when weighing the harms and benefits of ANH. Family physicians and generalists play an important role in counseling families on the risks and benefits of ANH in advanced dementia, as they have a holistic perspective that might be lacking during encounters with subspecialists.

  • Discussions should take place in a preventive fashion, before complications and hospitalizations arise from swallowing difficulties and ideally when patients are still able to express their wishes.

Palliative Care Files is a quarterly series in Canadian Family Physician written by members of the Palliative Care Committee of the College of Family Physicians of Canada. The series explores common situations experienced by family physicians doing palliative care as part of their primary care practice. Please send any ideas for future articles to palliative_care{at}cfpc.ca.

Footnotes

  • This article is eligible for Mainpro-M1 credits. To earn credits, go to www.cfp.ca and click on the Mainpro link.

  • La traduction en français de cet article se trouve à www.cfp.ca dans la table des matières du numéro de mars 2015 à la page e125.

  • Competing interests

    None declared

  • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Mitchell SL,
    2. Teno JM,
    3. Roy J,
    4. Kabumoto G,
    5. Mor V
    . Clinical and organizational factors associated with feeding tube use among nursing home residents with advanced cognitive impairment. JAMA 2003;290(1):73-80.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Clarke G,
    2. Harrison K,
    3. Holland A,
    4. Kuhn I,
    5. Barclay S
    . How are treatment decisions made about artificial nutrition for individuals at risk of lacking capacity? A systematic literature review. PLoS ONE 2013;8(4):e61475.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Hoffer LJ
    . Tube feeding in advanced dementia: the metabolic perspective. BMJ 2006;333(7580):1214-5.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Sampson EL,
    2. Candy B,
    3. Jones L
    . Enteral tube feeding for older people with advanced dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;(2):CD007209.
  5. 5.↵
    1. Feinberg MJ,
    2. Knebl J,
    3. Tully J
    . Prandial aspiration and pneumonia in an elderly population followed over 3 years. Dysphagia 1996;11(2):104-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Finucane TE,
    2. Christmas C,
    3. Travis K
    . Tube feeding in patients with advanced dementia: a review of the evidence. JAMA 1999;282(14):1365-70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Hanson LC,
    2. Ersek M,
    3. Gilliam R,
    4. Carey TS
    . Oral feeding options for people with dementia: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc 2011;59(3):463-72.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Teno JM,
    2. Gozalo P,
    3. Mitchell SL,
    4. Kuo S,
    5. Fulton AT,
    6. Mor V
    . Feeding tubes and the prevention or healing of pressure ulcers. Arch Intern Med 2012;172(9):697-701.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Yarborough M
    . Why physicians must not give food and water to every patient. J Fam Pract 1989;29(6):683-4.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Vitale CA,
    2. Hiner T,
    3. Ury WA,
    4. Berkman CS,
    5. Ahronheim JC
    . Tube feeding in advanced dementia: an exploratory survey of physician knowledge. Care Manag J 2006;7(2):79-85.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Sharp HM,
    2. Shega JW
    . Feeding tube placement in patients with advanced dementia: the beliefs and practice patterns of speech-language pathologists. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2009;18(3):222-30.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Teno J,
    2. Meltzer DO,
    3. Mitchell SL,
    4. Fulton AT,
    5. Gozalo P,
    6. Mor V
    . Type of attending physician influenced feeding tube insertions for hospitalized elderly people with severe dementia. Health Aff (Millwood) 2014;33(4):675-82.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Daniel K,
    2. Rhodes R,
    3. Vitale C,
    4. Shega J,
    5. American Geriatrics Society
    . Feeding tubes in advanced dementia position statement. New York, NY: American Geriatrics Society; 2013. Available from: www.americangeriatrics.org/files/documents/feeding.tubes.advanced.dementia.pdf. Accessed 2014 Sep 15.
  14. 14.↵
    1. Mitchell SL,
    2. Buchanan JL,
    3. Littlehale S,
    4. Hamel MB
    . Tube-feeding versus hand-feeding nursing home residents with advanced dementia: a cost comparison. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2004;5(2 Suppl):S22-9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Kuo S,
    2. Rhodes RL,
    3. Mitchell SL,
    4. Mor V,
    5. Teno JM
    . Natural history of feeding-tube use in nursing home residents with advanced dementia. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2009;10(4):264-70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Teno JM,
    2. Mitchell SL,
    3. Kuo SK,
    4. Gozalo PL,
    5. Rhodes RL,
    6. Lima JC,
    7. et al
    . Decision-making and outcomes of feeding tube insertion: a five-state study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2011;59(5):881-6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Musgrave CF,
    2. Bartal N,
    3. Opstad J
    . The sensation of thirst in dying patients receiving i.v. hydration. J Palliat Care 1995;11(4):17-21.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Scott AG,
    2. Austin HE
    . Nasogastric feeding in the management of severe dysphagia in motor neurone disease. Palliat Med 1994;8(1):45-9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. McCann RM,
    2. Hall WJ,
    3. Groth-Juncker A
    . Comfort care for terminally ill patients: the appropriate use of nutrition and hydration. JAMA 1994;272(16):1263-6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Brody H,
    2. Campbell ML,
    3. Faber-Langendoen K,
    4. Ogle KS
    . Withdrawing intensive life-sustaining treatment: recommendations for compassionate clinical management. N Engl J Med 1997;336(9):652-7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 61 (3)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 61, Issue 3
1 Mar 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Artificial nutrition and hydration in advanced dementia
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Artificial nutrition and hydration in advanced dementia
Irene Ying
Canadian Family Physician Mar 2015, 61 (3) 245-248;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Artificial nutrition and hydration in advanced dementia
Irene Ying
Canadian Family Physician Mar 2015, 61 (3) 245-248;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Risks of artificial nutrition and hydration in advanced dementia
    • Social, cultural, and ethical considerations
    • Risks and benefits of parenteral hydration
    • Approach to a family requesting ANH
    • Notes
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Alimentation et hydratation artificielles dans les cas de démence avancée
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • David Oliver: Tube feeding and deteriorating patients--guidelines can take us only so far
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Practice

  • Is 45 the new 50 in colorectal cancer screening?
  • Approach to diagnosis and management of childhood attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
  • Determining if and how older patients can safely stay at home with additional services
Show more Practice

Palliative Care Files

  • Pharmacologic management of adult breakthrough cancer pain
  • Continuous palliative sedation therapy
Show more Palliative Care Files

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2023 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire