Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
EditorialCommentary

Golden age of family medicine research

Nicholas Pimlott
Canadian Family Physician June 2015, 61 (6) 489;
Nicholas Pimlott
Roles: SCIENTIFIC EDITOR
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
Figure1

If I have ever made any valuable discoveries, it has been owing more to patient attention, than to any other talent.

Isaac Newton

This month marks the 20th anniversary of the Section of Researchers (SOR) of the College of Family Physicians of Canada and an opportunity for real celebration.

During these 20 years the family medicine research enterprise in Canada has grown enormously and arguably is now coming of age. Before the 1990s family medicine research was mainly a cottage industry, with a handful of professional researchers and a small, but still substantial, minority of family physicians carrying out research “around the kitchen table.”1 With the creation of the first research career-track programs in the larger academic family medicine departments, family medicine has been able to establish a national and internationally recognized group of professional researchers able to compete at the highest levels for research grants and publication in prestigious peer-reviewed journals.2–4 The SOR has been instrumental in this success.

Although they might not realize it, all family physicians engage with and contribute to research on many levels, even if they are not professional researchers themselves. A fundamental way that family physicians engage with research is as consumers of its products—the results of randomized controlled clinical trials of therapies and screening tests, the appropriate use of new and more accurate diagnostic tests, and the implementation of recommendations from clinical practice guidelines, to name but a few.

For busy family physicians, maintaining the skills of acute clinical observation in combination with the ability to write and publish case reports is one of the most meaningful ways to engage in research and contribute to the “database” of family medicine. This remains an important part of the research continuum in family medicine and one of the most accessible ways that the average family physician can contribute to research in our discipline.5 The most useful and practical case reports published in this journal have been those contributed by family physicians.6

The growth of the quality improvement movement has provided opportunities for all family physicians to engage in a microcosmic research experience. Although research might be defined as the generation of generalizable knowledge, the process of studying one’s own practice and behaviour with a view to improving the end product follows a very similar process and is crucial to improving patient care.

There are many problems with current models of clinical practice guideline development and implementation,7 but they represent a tremendous opportunity for greater family physician engagement and influence on both research and knowledge translation.

Although Canada has been slow off the mark compared with other countries, one of the most exciting recent developments in family medicine research has been practice-based research networks, the largest of which is the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network.8 Practice-based research networks will provide unprecedented opportunities for family physicians who make important new clinical observations and who are practising as part of larger practice-based research networks to leverage the expertise of both their research colleagues and the collective clinical data available through the networks. Using evolving information technology to create virtual observatories where clinical observations can be shared and approaches to patient management compared is truly an innovation whose time has come.9

These are exciting times in family medicine research in Canada. If the past 20 years have seen a coming of age of research, surely the years ahead have the potential to be a golden age in which all family physicians—from the community-based family physician to the professional researcher—are fully engaged in the research enterprise of family medicine. The SOR will undoubtedly continue to play a crucial role as we usher this golden age in.

Footnotes

  • Cet article se trouve aussi en français à la page 490.

  • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Falk WA
    . The curious family doctor. Research by family doctors in Canada in the early years. Bloomington, IN: Trafford Publishing; 2001.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Hogg W,
    2. Donskov M,
    3. Russell G,
    4. Pottie K,
    5. Liddy C,
    6. Johnston S,
    7. et al
    . Riding the wave of primary care research. Development of a primary health care research centre. Can Fam Physician 2009;55:e35-40. Available from: www.cfp.ca/content/55/10/e35.full.pdf+html. Accessed 2015 May 7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.
    1. Talbot YR,
    2. Rosser WW
    . Taking the first steps. Research career program in family medicine. Can Fam Physician 2001;47:1254-60.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Rosser W,
    2. Godwin M,
    3. Seguin R
    . Family medicine research capacity building. Five-weekend programs in Ontario. Can Fam Physician 2010;56:e94-100. Available from: www.cfp.ca/content/56/3/e94.full.pdf+html. Accessed 2015 May 7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Pimlott N
    . Two cheers for case reports. Can Fam Physician 2014;60:966. (Eng), 967 (Fr).
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Majerovich JA,
    2. Canty A,
    3. Miedema B
    . Chronic vulvar irritation: could toilet paper be the culprit? Can Fam Physician 2010;56:350-2.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Allan GM,
    2. Kraut R,
    3. Crawshay A,
    4. Korownyk C,
    5. Vandermeer B,
    6. Kolber MR
    . Contributors to primary care guidelines. What are their professions and how many of them have conflicts of interest? Can Fam Physician 2015;61:52-8. (Eng), e50–7 (Fr).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Birtwhistle RV
    . Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network. A developing resource for family medicine and public health. Can Fam Physician 2011;57:1219-20. (Eng), e401–2 (Fr).
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Garies S,
    2. Irving A,
    3. Williamson T,
    4. Drummond N
    . Using EMR data to evaluate a physician-developed lifestyle plan for obese patients in primary care. Can Fam Physician 2015;61:e225-31.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 61 (6)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 61, Issue 6
1 Jun 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Golden age of family medicine research
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Golden age of family medicine research
Nicholas Pimlott
Canadian Family Physician Jun 2015, 61 (6) 489;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Golden age of family medicine research
Nicholas Pimlott
Canadian Family Physician Jun 2015, 61 (6) 489;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • L’âge d’or de la recherche en médecine familiale
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Response
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Commentary

  • Widespread misconceptions about pregnancy for women living with obesity
  • Social prescribing
  • Systemic racism and health disparities
Show more Commentary

Editorial

  • A day in the life of a plague victim
  • Une journée dans la vie d’un pestiféré
  • A journal of the 2020 plague year
Show more Editorial

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2021 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire