Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
Research ArticleResearch

Proximity and emergency department use

Multilevel analysis using administrative data from patients with cardiovascular risk factors

Patrick Bergeron, Josiane Courteau and Alain Vanasse
Canadian Family Physician August 2015; 61 (8) e391-e397;
Patrick Bergeron
Professor in the Department of Biological Sciences at Bishop’s University in Sherbrooke, Que.
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Josiane Courteau
Scientific Research Assistant for the Groupe de recherche PRIMUS in Sherbrooke.
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alain Vanasse
Family physician and Full Professor in the Département de médecine de famille et de médecine d’urgence at the University of Sherbrooke and Director of the Groupe de recherche PRIMUS.
MD PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: alain.vanasse@usherbrooke.ca
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 1.

    Distribution of EDs in the census metropolitan area of Montreal in Quebec

    ED—emergency department.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 2.

    Study cohort

    CMA-M—census metropolitan area of Montreal, CVD—cardiovascular disease, ICD—International Classification of Diseases.

    *A patient was considered to be at risk of CVD if he or she had received a primary or secondary diagnosis of hypertension (ICD-9 code 401, ICD-10 code I10), diabetes (ICD-9 code 250, ICD-10 code E10–E14), or dyslipidemia (ICD-9 code 272, ICD-10 code E78) during a hospitalization or at least 3 physician claims within 1 y with an identical diagnosis.

    †A patient could be present in more than 1 disease-specific cohort (eg, a patient with hypertension could also have diabetes).

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 3.

    Cumulative number of ED visits in the 1-year follow-up period according to the cumulative proportion of patients

    ED—emergency department.

    *By reverse order of the number of ED visits.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 4.

    Crude and adjusted ORs for the probability of being an ED user and a frequent ED user (among ED users) according to distance to EDs: The reference group was patients living 10 km or farther from EDs.

    ED—emergency department, OR—odds ratio.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Health conditions and their associated classification codes

    HEALTH CONDITIONICD-9 CODEICD-10 CODE
    Gestational-related event630–676, 760–779, V22–V24, V27–V28O00–O99, Z32–Z39
    Diabetes250E10–E14
    Hypertension401I10
    Dyslipidemia272E78
    Cardiovascular disease410–414, 428, 430–438I20–I25, I50, I60–I69
    • ICD—International Classification of Diseases.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Characteristics of the study cohort

    CHARACTERISTICSTOTALED NONUSERS (NO VISIT)ED USERS (≥ 1 VISITS)P VALUE*ED OCCASIONAL USERS (1–3 VISITS)ED FREQUENT USERS (≥ 4 VISITS)P VALUE*
    Total, n (%)99 400 (100.0)73 511 (74.0)25 889 (26.0)NA21 326 (21.5)4563 (4.6)NA
    No. of ED visits, mean (SD)0.62 (1.62)0.00 (0.00)2.40 (2.41)NA1.58 (0.73)6.19 (3.61)NA
    Sex, n (%)< .001.284
      • Female55 018 (55.4)40 241 (54.7)14 777 (57.1)12 140 (56.9)2637 (57.8)
      • Male44 382 (44.6)33 270 (45.3)11 112 (42.9)9186 (43.1)1926 (42.2)
    Age in years, mean (SD)64.7 (13.0)64.4 (12.8)65.6 (13.8)< .00165.4 (13.6)66.6 (14.5)< .001
    Comorbidity index score,† mean (SD)1.67 (2.01)1.53 (1.85)2.06 (2.35)< .0011.92 (2.23)2.67 (2.80)< .001
    Previous hospitalization, n (%)29 231 (29.4)18 678 (25.4)10 553 (40.8)< .0018095 (38.0)2458 (53.9)< .001
    Immigration score,‡ mean (SD)0.16 (3.70)0.08 (3.69)0.39 (3.73)< .0010.36 (3.74)0.54 (3.69).003
    Material deprivation score,§ mean (SD)0.46 (1.83)0.40 (1.83)0.60 (1.82)< .0010.58 (1.83)0.70 (1.77)< .001
    Social deprivation score,§ mean (SD)0.38 (1.96)0.31 (1.95)0.57 (1.95)< .0010.53 (1.96)0.77 (1.94)< .001
    Distance to nearest ED in km, mean (SD)4.51 (4.04)4.62 (4.11)4.20 (3.85)< .0014.27 (3.89)3.88 (3.65)< .001
    Distance to nearest ED in km, n (%)< .001< .001
      • < 110 183 (10.2)7107 (9.7)3076 (11.9)2452 (11.5)624 (13.7)
      • ≥ 1 to < 218 411 (18.5)13 311 (18.1)5100 (19.7)4158 (19.5)942 (20.6)
      • ≥ 2 to < 319 194 (19.3)14 010 (19.1)5184 (20.0)4208 (19.7)976 (21.4)
      • ≥ 3 to < 520 761 (20.9)15 382 (20.9)5379 (20.8)4466 (20.9)913 (20.0)
      • ≥ 5 to < 1021 233 (21.4)16 278 (22.1)4955 (19.1)4177 (19.6)778 (17.1)
      • ≥ 109618 (9.7)7423 (10.1)2195 (8.5)1865 (8.7)330 (7.2)
    • DA—dissemination area, ED—emergency department, NA—not applicable.

    • ↵* P values are associated with t tests (continuous variables) or χ2 tests (categorical variables).

    • ↵† Higher scores indicate greater comorbidity.

    • ↵‡ Higher scores indicate higher levels of immigration in the DA.

    • ↵§ Higher scores indicate greater deprivation in the DA.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 61 (8)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 61, Issue 8
1 Aug 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Proximity and emergency department use
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Proximity and emergency department use
Patrick Bergeron, Josiane Courteau, Alain Vanasse
Canadian Family Physician Aug 2015, 61 (8) e391-e397;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Proximity and emergency department use
Patrick Bergeron, Josiane Courteau, Alain Vanasse
Canadian Family Physician Aug 2015, 61 (8) e391-e397;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Primary care reform in Alberta
  • Administrative burden in primary care
  • Burden of administrative responsibilities in primary care
Show more Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Collection française
    • Résumés de recherche

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2025 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire