Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
LetterLetters

Response

G. Michael Allan and Nicholas Pimlott
Canadian Family Physician November 2016, 62 (11) 874-875;
G. Michael Allan
Edmonton, Alta
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicholas Pimlott
Toronto, Ont
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Dr D’Urzo has responded to our articles1,2 and suggested that the most important issue driving family physicians’ underrepresentation in their own guidelines is that they do not participate in or perform original research.

We agree that in the past family physician researchers have not been well represented in clinical research. The causes of this have been multifactorial, ranging from issues such as the lack of training and career tracks for family medicine researchers to the lack of funding opportunities for family medicine research. However, even several decades ago, many family physicians were making inroads in clinical research.

We disagree that this is currently true. Over the past decade or more family physicians have been leading a multitude of clinical research projects and networks within primary care research. The future of family medicine research looks brighter with each passing year.3,4 One area of research where non–family physician specialists are far more likely to be involved than family physicians is in randomized controlled trials of pharmacotherapies (for a multiplicity of reasons), but this might not be a liability when it comes to participating in guidelines.

All that said, we believe this alone would have little effect on family physicians’ ability to participate in developing their own guidelines. Family medicine–driven clinical research will undoubtedly improve the care of our patients. However, we think it is a mistake to assume that the ability to carry out solid clinical research alone will lead to inclusion of primary care clinicians in guidelines. Further, we would argue that researchers focused in specific areas might not be ideal guideline participants. The predisposition bias and overreliance on their own research would compound the known challenges experts seem to have when interpreting evidence.

For those of us who have participated in clinical practice guidelines led by non–family physician specialists, we have seen that the selection of those with specific areas of interest and research focus is a pervasive problem contributing to many of the common biases and issues seen in clinical practice guidelines. In addition, many of these same individuals have industry affiliations that can compound their biases. So, even as family physicians participate in more primary care research, we would argue that any researchers (primary care, specialty, doctoral, etc) should only play a minor role in any guideline team.

We would like to address 2 final issues raised by Dr D’Urzo.

First, critical appraisal skills alone cannot be considered the primary requisite for guideline inclusion. To clarify, critical appraisal often implies the ability to use simplified checklists of criteria to determine validity and reliability. We believe that the skills required for a thorough analysis of the medical literature and its application to primary care go far beyond that and those are the precise skills we require in guideline participants. Paradoxically, these skills are not consistently found in all researchers. So yes, critical analysis and application skills are necessary over research experience.

Finally, we do not believe it is unrealistic for our leadership, including the College of Family Physicians of Canada, to limit endorsement of guidelines targeting primary care that have not had adequate primary care involvement or governance. It is somewhat sad that any primary care clinician believes otherwise. It will take leadership from the highest levels to ensure this becomes the priority it so desperately needs to be— otherwise, this pervasive problem will never change.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests

    None declared

  • The opinions expressed in letters are those of the authors. Publication does not imply endorsement by the College of Family Physicians of Canada.

  • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Pimlott N
    . For family physicians, by family physicians? Can Fam Physician 2016;62:699. (Eng), 700 (Fr).
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Allan GM
    . Should primary care guidelines be written by family physicians? Yes [Debates]. Can Fam Physician 2016;62:705-6. (Eng), 708–10 (Fr).
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Pimlott N
    . Golden age of family medicine research. Can Fam Physician 2015;61:489. (Eng), 490 (Fr).
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Hogg W,
    2. Donskov M,
    3. Russell G,
    4. Pottie K,
    5. Liddy C,
    6. Johnston S,
    7. et al
    . Riding the wave of primary care research. Development of a primary health care research centre. Can Fam Physician 2009;55:e35-40. Available from: www.cfp.ca/content/55/10/e35.full.pdf+html. Accessed 2016 Oct 3.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 62 (11)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 62, Issue 11
1 Nov 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Response
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Response
G. Michael Allan, Nicholas Pimlott
Canadian Family Physician Nov 2016, 62 (11) 874-875;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Response
G. Michael Allan, Nicholas Pimlott
Canadian Family Physician Nov 2016, 62 (11) 874-875;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Response
  • Third year will erase rural medicine
  • Consult the members
Show more Letters

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2023 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire