Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
Article CommentaryCommentary

Telehealth and patient-doctor relationships in rural and remote communities

Nathan Toh, John Pawlovich and Stefan Grzybowski
Canadian Family Physician December 2016, 62 (12) 961-963;
Nathan Toh
Medical student at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: nathan.toh@alumni.ubc.ca
John Pawlovich
Practising family physician in Abbotsford, BC, Program Coordinator of the Rural Education Action Plan in the Rural Coordination Centre of BC, and Clinical Associate Professor in the Department of Family Practice at the University of British Columbia.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stefan Grzybowski
Practising family physician on Salt Spring Island, BC, Director of the Rural Health Services Research Network of BC, Professor in the Department of Family Practice and Co-Director of the Centre for Rural Health Research at the University of British Columbia, and Honorary Professor at the University of Sydney in Australia.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

In Canada, as in many other parts of the world, telehealth is becoming an increasingly common method of facilitating health care delivery, especially for rural and remote communities. Although the definition is still evolving, telehealth refers to the provision of health care, health resources, and health education through electronic information and communication technologies. A common and useful way to differentiate between various types of telehealth is to classify the modalities as either synchronous (real time) or asynchronous (store and forward).1 Synchronous telehealth allows for live interaction between users and includes media such as videoconferencing, while asynchronous forms of telehealth allow for storage and release of information over time and include examples such as medical image sharing or texting. The flexibility of different modes of telehealth to support communication at a distance is especially important for patients in rural and remote communities, where health care access is often inadequate; not only is accessing specialized services challenging, but also receiving holistic, longitudinal generalist care in such communities can be difficult for many residents. In addition to issues of accessibility, the effectiveness of care is built on a foundation of a strong therapeutic relationship between patient and physician. The diversity and quality of modern telehealth modalities has the potential to not only provide access, but also actually improve the ways that generalist care providers connect with their rural and remote patients; this relationship no longer has to be established and enhanced only through face-to-face interaction.

The importance of a positive patient-doctor relationship is undeniable. When patients and physicians have the chance to develop a familiarity with each other over time, care improves because it becomes more tailored to the individual, and patient satisfaction increases accordingly.2 The result is a therapeutic relationship with stronger communication, more effective patient education, greater trust and patient disclosure, increased patient compliance, and better health outcomes.3,4 Consequently, the existing research into what generates an effective patient-doctor relationship is vast, but it can be condensed into several key determinants. The physician’s approach can be first divided into 2 components: emotional care and cognitive or informational care.5 Emotional care entails efforts to develop mutual trust, express empathy, exchange respect, convey warmth, and employ other similar practices that fulfil the emotional needs of patients, and much of this is communicated nonverbally. Informational care involves activities like medical information gathering, patient education, and management of health outcome expectations.6 These communication goals are intertwined and mutually interreliant, and together can be achieved through clear and respectful communication, active and facilitative listening, collaboration with patients in their management and treatment, acknowledgment of patient values and ideas, and continuity of care.7

Accordingly, achieving a strong patient-doctor relationship comes from both verbal and nonverbal modes of communication. However, because emotional exchange plays such a prominent role in developing this relationship, it is not surprising that nonverbal forms of communication play a moderately larger role.8 A physician who can connect with patients both verbally and nonverbally will generate the kind of positive therapeutic relationship that optimizes whole-person care and patient satisfaction.9 A review of the literature identifies 9 main forms of nonverbal communication that are important for developing and maintaining this relationship: strong eye contact, awareness of voice intonation, respectful touch for both social and diagnostic purposes, assuring body posture and gestures, emotional expressiveness and perceptiveness, professional appearance, appropriate use of physical space, facilitative conversational behaviour, and effective time management.9 Most of these communication mechanisms can be conveyed through telehealth connections.

Means to connect

Modern telehealth technologies are rapidly increasing in quality, accessibility, and popularity. These technologies have immense potential to facilitate relationship building in clinical practice between patients, their generalist practitioners, and specialist consultants. Synchronous modalities give the advantage of immediate, clear, and accurate communication in real time. Key forms include telephone and audioconferencing, live bio-signal monitoring, interactive robotic equipment, and videoconferencing. Of these, videoconferencing is quickly becoming the primary synchronous modality because it allows for the exchange of both verbal and nonverbal cues in virtual encounters, thereby facilitating most of the key determinants of normal patient-doctor relationships. In fact, it allows for 7 of the 9 overarching forms of nonverbal communication, with touch and physical closeness being the only exceptions. In addition, videoconferencing allows patients to connect with a physician in the comfort and convenience of their own community without some of the traditional stresses of traveling for visits, meaning that rural patients can focus on their clinical encounter within a familiar and supportive environment.

Asynchronous telehealth modalities also foster relationships by allowing the recording, storage, and forwarding of digital information at the convenience of the users without both parties needing to be present simultaneously. Asynchronous forms include audio and video recordings, medical image sharing, biosignal collection, e-mail, texting, and instant messaging. While all are important clinically, the modalities with the greatest potential for building therapeutic relationships are e-mail, texting, and instant messaging because of their widespread use. Texting has especially become the primary method of communicating since the advent of mobile devices, specifically among today’s generation of youth. It thus presents an opportunity for physicians to interact with patients in the way that is most comfortable and familiar for patients, whether it is for patient education, treatment monitoring, or connecting relationally. Instant messaging (which can also be used synchronously) is becoming a similarly used tool among the general public through applications like WhatsApp, Messenger, Google Hangouts, and iMessage. In this context, where the communication medium is familiar, clinicians have even found that sometimes patients will be more willing to divulge sensitive information than they would in a face-to-face encounter.10

While these evolving technologies affect the way we think about modern health care delivery in general, the potential implications of telehealth communication for relationship building are substantial in rural and remote communities. In Canada, many of those living in these areas continue to lack access to much-needed health services and often have to travel far to get even basic generalist care. So what are the implications for the patient-doctor relationship when technology arrives on the stage? The truth is, we do not exactly know; there is a dearth of research surrounding this question. Ironically, it is in the context of generalist care that a strong patient-doctor relationship is especially important for essential holistic care.

Anecdotally we know that telehealth can be used to help build and sustain these critical relationships. For example, co-author Dr John Pawlovich, and other physicians like him, supports patient populations in 5 remote northern aboriginal communities through a range of telehealth modalities and regular monthly in-person visits.11 Similarly, the First Nations Health Authority in BC has been implementing a Telehealth Expansion Project since 2006, based on research and successful experience, which seeks to provide health care access to underserved First Nations communities across BC.12 Across the country, other successful telehealth initiatives are also servicing patients with diverse needs as evidenced by examples like the Saskatoon-based Rural and Remote Memory Clinic described by Morgan et al,13 which incorporates telehealth into assessments and follow-up, and the Ontario Telemedicine Network’s Telehomecare program, which helps patients to remotely manage their chronic diseases in partnership with their health care team.14 The desired end point of efforts like these is that an array of communication methods will allow physicians to meet their patients living in rural and remote areas, provide timely access to care, and foster enriched relationships, and do so in a way that respects the cultural context of the patient. (For example, in many aboriginal communities in Canada, it is not customary to maintain eye contact.)

Strengthening relationships

In the past few years there has been some trepidation accompanying telehealth expansion owing to uncertainties about how much the virtual nature of the interaction might affect delivery of care and the patient-doctor relationship. Three especially important challenges continue to be subjected to examination and improvement by many providers who use telehealth: the creation of sufficient infrastructure, the assurance of robust privacy, and the provision of funding. However, despite these existing issues, there is ongoing evidence that telehealth is a highly useful, efficient, popular, and timely communication method that is already enhancing regular clinical and relational care by physicians. It is clear that the inclusion of telehealth will make the patient-physician relationship better. Text messages, instant messages, e-mail communications, etc, have replaced telephone conversations for the daily back and forth between patients and health care providers.

Telehealth involves a range of tools that are each optimally useful in different settings and should accordingly be selected when most applicable. Ultimately, the goal is to bring people closer together when they are geographically separated. Enhanced timely access to high-quality generalist services, improved outcomes and experiences for patients, and enriched relationships between all stakeholders are some important end points that coincide with the goals of the Triple Aim Initiative.15 Ideally telehealth modalities will be incorporated collectively into a holistic, multi-dimensional, patient-centred communication strategy. The relationship between technology and medicine is evolving. As we think about the future, it actually becomes difficult to envision a health care system without telehealth modalities used to support patient-centred care and enhanced relationships.

Footnotes

  • This article has been peer reviewed.

  • La traduction en français de cet article se trouve à www.cfp.ca dans la table des matières du numéro de décembre 2016 à la page e715.

  • Competing interests

    None declared

  • The opinions expressed in commentaries are those of the authors. Publication does not imply endorsement by the College of Family Physicians of Canada.

  • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Deshpande A,
    2. Khoja S,
    3. McKibbon A,
    4. Jadad AR
    . Real-time (synchronous) telehealth in primary care: systematic review of systematic reviews. Technology report no. 100. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2008.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Goold SD,
    2. Lipkin M Jr.
    . The doctor-patient relationship. Challenges, opportunities, and strategies. J Gen Intern Med 1999;14(Suppl 1):S26-33.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. King A,
    2. Hoppe RB
    . “Best practice” for patient-centered communication: a narrative review. J Grad Med Educ 2013;5(3):385-93.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Kearley KE,
    2. Freeman GK,
    3. Heath A
    . An exploration of the value of the personal doctor-patient relationship in general practice. Br J Gen Pract 2001;51(470):712-8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Di Blasi Z,
    2. Harkness E,
    3. Ernst E,
    4. Georgiu A,
    5. Kleijnen J
    . Influence of context effects on health outcomes: a systematic review. Lancet 2001;357(9258):757-62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Kelley JM,
    2. Kraft-Todd G,
    3. Schapira L,
    4. Kossowsky J,
    5. Riess H
    . The influence of the patient-clinician relationship on healthcare outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One 2014;9(4):e94207. Erratum in: PLoS One 2014;9(6):e101191.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Jagosh J,
    2. Boudreau JD,
    3. Steinert Y,
    4. Macdonald ME,
    5. Ingram L
    . The importance of physician listening from the patients’ perspective: enhancing diagnosis, healing, and the doctor-patient relationship. Patient Educ Couns 2011;85(3):369-74. Epub 2011 Feb 18.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Mast MS
    . On the importance of nonverbal communication in the physician-patient interaction. Patient Educ Couns 2007;67(3):315-8. Epub 2007 May 2.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Grzybowski SC,
    2. Stewart MA,
    3. Weston WW
    . Nonverbal communication and the therapeutic relationship. Can Fam Physician 1992;38:1994-8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Birch J,
    2. Ruttan L,
    3. Muth T,
    4. Baydala L
    . Culturally competent care for aboriginal women: a case for culturally competent care for aboriginal women giving birth in hospital settings. J Aborig Health 2009;4(2):24-33.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    1. De Leeuw S
    . Indigenous relationships, logging roads, and first-class medicine. Can Fam Physician 2016;62:68-71. (Eng), e44–7 (Fr).
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. First Nations Health Authority [website]
    . Telehealth. West Vancouver, BC: First Nations Health Authority; 2015. Available from: www.fnha.ca/what-we-do/ehealth/telehealth. Accessed 2015 Jul 28.
  13. 13.↵
    1. Morgan DG,
    2. Crossley M,
    3. Kirk A,
    4. D’Arcy C,
    5. Stewart N,
    6. Biem J,
    7. et al
    . Improving access to dementia care: development and evaluation of a rural and remote memory clinic. Aging Ment Health 2009;13(1):17-30.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Ontario Telehomecare [website]
    . North York, ON: Ontario Telemedicine Network; 2016. Available from: http://ontariotelehomecare.ca/. Accessed 2016 Jul 26.
  15. 15.↵
    1. Institute for Healthcare Improvement [website]
    . IHI Triple Aim Initiative. Cambridge, MA: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2015. Available from: www.ihi.org/Engage/Initiatives/TripleAim/Pages/default.aspx. Accessed 2015 Aug 31.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 62 (12)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 62, Issue 12
1 Dec 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Telehealth and patient-doctor relationships in rural and remote communities
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Telehealth and patient-doctor relationships in rural and remote communities
Nathan Toh, John Pawlovich, Stefan Grzybowski
Canadian Family Physician Dec 2016, 62 (12) 961-963;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Telehealth and patient-doctor relationships in rural and remote communities
Nathan Toh, John Pawlovich, Stefan Grzybowski
Canadian Family Physician Dec 2016, 62 (12) 961-963;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Means to connect
    • Strengthening relationships
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • La télésanté et les relations patient-médecin dans les communautés rurales et éloignées
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Systemic racism and health disparities
  • Making social determinants of health screening truly universal means including adolescents
  • Challenges in the virtual assessment of COVID-19 infections in the community
Show more Commentary

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2021 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire