Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
Article CommentaryCommentary

Addressing overuse starts with physicians

Choosing Wisely Canada

Kimberly Wintemute, Karen McDonald, Tai Huynh, Ciara Pendrith and Lynn Wilson
Canadian Family Physician March 2016, 62 (3) 199-200;
Kimberly Wintemute
Medical Director of the North York Family Health Team in Toronto, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: k.wintemute@alumni.utoronto.ca
Karen McDonald
Project Manager for Choosing Wisely Canada in Toronto.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tai Huynh
Campaign Manager for Choosing Wisely Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ciara Pendrith
Research Associate for Choosing Wisely Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lynn Wilson
Professor and Chair of Family and Community Medicine at the University of Toronto.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Physicians have a widely understood social contract to first do no harm. Unnecessary tests, treatments, and procedures cause harm to patients, as elegantly illustrated in the article “Rational test ordering in family medicine” in the June 2015 edition of Canadian Family Physician.1

The Institute of Medicine in the United States reports that 30% of health care spending is wasteful and does not add value to the care of patients.2 Such a definitive figure does not currently exist for Canada, but there is a wealth of circumstantial evidence to suggest that the problem is considerable. For example, a Saskatchewan study showed that almost 50% of prescriptions for treatment of respiratory infections in preschool children were inappropriate.3 A study at 2 teaching hospitals in Alberta and Ontario found that 28% of lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging was inappropriate and another 27% was of uncertain value; 9% of head magnetic resonance imaging for headache was inappropriate and an additional 8% was questionable.4 Among patients undergoing low-risk surgeries in Ontario, a recent study found that 31% underwent preoperative tests that might have been unnecessary.5

The campaign

Choosing Wisely Canada (CWC) is a campaign to help physicians and patients engage in conversations about unnecessary tests, treatments, and procedures, and to help physicians and patients make smart and effective choices to ensure high-quality care.6 Internationally, the Choosing Wisely movement involves 18 countries that share the common goal of reducing harm to patients.7 When physicians, administrators, and patient representatives from 12 of these countries met in 2014, they established that several factors contribute to the culture of medical overuse. These include patients’ expectations, providers’ fears of missing a possible diagnosis, malpractice concerns, and reimbursement incentives. Accordingly, participants agreed that transforming the culture of health care is a central goal.8

As physicians, we typically start things, rather than stop things. But we increasingly appreciate the benefit patients derive when we lessen or stop interventions (eg, use of benzodiazepines among the elderly).9 Because we need “nudging” in this regard, all CWC recommendations speak to what we should not do.

It is logical that reducing unnecessary health care activities will reduce system costs. However, in both Canada and the United States, Choosing Wisely focuses on the quality of care and the potential risks to patients, rather than costs. Research shows that the terms right care and avoiding harm resonate for patients, while terms like sustainability and use of finite resources do not.8

Recommendations by medical societies

Choosing Wisely Canada launched in April 2014. To date, more than 150 recommendations have been released by 30 national medical specialty societies, highlighting the need to stop certain practices within their fields. The 11 family medicine recommendations were put forth by the College of Family Physicians of Canada and the Canadian Medical Association’s Forum on General and Family Practice Issues.10 Medical specialty societies develop their lists of “Things Physicians and Patients Should Question” in accordance with the following guidelines:

  • Societies are free to determine the process for creating their lists.

  • Each item on the list should be within the specialty’s scope of practice.

  • Included tests, treatments, or procedures

    • -should be used frequently,

    • -might expose patients to harm,

    • -might contribute to stress and avoidable cost for patients, and

    • -create an increased strain on our health care system.

  • The development process should be thoroughly documented and publicly available upon request.

Doctor-patient relationship

Choosing Wisely Canada challenges us to have conversations that might be difficult, to engage in the complexity of shared decision making, and to participate in mature and respectful doctor-patient relationships.

Studies show that we sometimes struggle to say no to requests for medically unnecessary tests as compared with treatments.11 In a patient-centred clinical approach, discovering each other’s agendas and finding common ground are essential. Relational theory teaches us that an underlying trust is required in order to disagree and stay in a relationship. As family physicians, we have a foundation of trust with our patients, and we are therefore uniquely poised to address overuse.

Social accountability

In addition to reducing harm to individual patients, many of the CWC recommendations speak to reducing harm to society. The expectations of physicians around social accountability are well summarized in the Canadian Medical Association’s Code of Ethics.12

Eight CWC recommendations speak to reducing unnecessary antibiotic use (emergency medicine recommendations 2 and 5, family medicine recommendation 2, geriatrics recommendation 1, hospital medicine recommendation 2, pathology recommendation 5, spine medicine recommendation 5, and urology recommendation 4). This has broad societal benefit in decreasing development of resistant microorganisms. Minimizing duration of the use of proton pump inhibitors (gastroenterology recommendation 1) could help to decrease the possibility of Clostridium difficile bacteria entering our health care institutions. Four CWC recommendations focus on deprescribing or avoiding prescribing sedative-hypnotic medications in the elderly, which can help decrease motor vehicle accidents (geriatrics recommendation 2, hospital medicine recommendation 3, and psychiatry recommendations 9 and 13). Avoiding transfusing patients based on an arbitrary hemoglobin value appears 5 times in the recommendations (hematology recommendation 5, internal medicine recommendation 3, palliative care recommendation 5, and transfusion medicine recommendations 1 and 2). This can help ensure that donated blood products are available for those in critical need. Canadian demographic characteristics and social expectations are clearly mandating a normalization of advance care planning conversations. Three CWC recommendations speak to this pressing social need (oncology recommendation 5 and palliative care recommendations 1 and 2).13

Finally, the 2014 international meeting on Choosing Wisely identified that reducing unnecessary medical activities will also decrease our carbon footprint, with potential benefits to the environment in terms of climate change.14

Conclusion

This edition of Canadian Family Physician showcases the first in a CWC series (page 233).15 We will feature each of the 11 family medicine recommendations, as well as an article on the recommendations being put forth by the Canadian Federation of Medical Students.

Implementation of CWC in family medicine assumes that skilled clinicians strive to provide safe, effective, and evidence-informed care, and that the potential widespread and important effects of this campaign will be found in the quiet confidence of the doctor-patient relationship.

It is time to bring these recommendations into the Patient’s Medical Home.16

Footnotes

  • This article is eligible for Mainpro-M1 credits. To earn credits, go to www.cfp.ca and click on the Mainpro link.

  • Cet article se trouve aussi en français à la page 207.

  • Competing interests

    All authors are members of the Choosing Wisely Canada central team. The authors have no other conflicts to disclose.

  • The opinions expressed in commentaries are those of the authors. Publication does not imply endorsement by the College of Family Physicians of Canada.

  • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Morgan S,
    2. van Driel M,
    3. Coleman J,
    4. Magin P
    . Rational test ordering in family medicine. Can Fam Physician 2015;61:535-7.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Institute of Medicine (US) Roundtable on Evidence-Based Medicine
    . The healthcare imperative: lowering costs and improving outcomes. Workshop series summary. Yong PL, Saunders RS, Olsen LA, editors. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2010.
  3. 3.↵
    1. Wang EE,
    2. Einarson TR,
    3. Kellner JD,
    4. Conly JM
    . Antibiotic prescribing for Canadian preschool children: evidence of overprescribing for viral respiratory infections. Clin Infect Dis 1999;29(1):155-60.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Emery DJ,
    2. Shojania KG,
    3. Forster AJ,
    4. Mojaverian N,
    5. Feasby TE
    . Overuse of magnetic resonance imaging. JAMA Intern Med 2013;173(9):823-5.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Kirkham KR,
    2. Wijeysundera DN,
    3. Pendrith C,
    4. Ng R,
    5. Tu JV,
    6. Laupacis A,
    7. et al
    . Preoperative testing before low-risk surgical procedures. CMAJ 2015;187(11):E349-58.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Choosing Wisely Canada [website]
    . What is CWC? Toronto, ON: Choosing Wisely Canada; 2015. Available from: www.choosingwiselycanada.org/about/what-is-cwc. Accessed 2015 Jul 28.
  7. 7.↵
    1. Hurley R
    . Can doctors reduce harmful medical overuse worldwide? BMJ 2014;349:g4289.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Levinson W,
    2. Kallewaard M,
    3. Bhatia RS,
    4. Wolfson D,
    5. Shortt S,
    6. Kerr EA,
    7. et al
    . ‘Choosing Wisely’: a growing international campaign. BMJ Qual Saf 2015;24(2):167-74.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Tannenbaum C,
    2. Martin P,
    3. Tamblyn R,
    4. Benedetti A,
    5. Ahmed S
    . Reduction of inappropriate benzodiazepine prescriptions among older adults through direct patient education: the EMPOWER cluster randomized trial. JAMA Intern Med 2014;174(6):890-8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Choosing Wisely Canada
    . Family medicine: eleven things physicians and patients should question. Toronto, ON: Choosing Wisely Canada; 2014. Available from: www.choosingwiselycanada.org/recommendations/family-medicine. Accessed 2015 Jul 28.
  11. 11.↵
    1. Fenton JJ,
    2. Franks P,
    3. Feldman MD,
    4. Jerant A,
    5. Henry SG,
    6. Paterniti DA,
    7. et al
    . Impact of patient requests on provider-perceived visit difficulty in primary care. J Gen Intern Med 2015;30(2):214-20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Canadian Medical Association
    . Code of ethics. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Medical Association; 2015. Available from: https://www.cma.ca/En/Pages/code-of-ethics.aspx. Accessed 2015 Sep 2.
  13. 13.↵
    1. Choosing Wisely Canada
    . Physician recommendations. Toronto, ON: Choosing Wisely Canada; 2015. Available from: www.choosingwiselycanada.org/recommendations. Accessed 2015 Jul 28.
  14. 14.↵
    1. Academy of Medical Royal Colleges
    . Promoting resources, promoting value: a doctor’s guide to cutting waste in clinical care. London, Engl: Academy of Medical Royal Colleges; 2014. Available from: www.aomrc.org.uk/dmdocuments/Promoting%20value%20FINAL.pdf. Accessed 2015 Jul 27.
  15. 15.↵
    Choosing Wisely Canada recommendations. Interview with Dr Anthony Train. Can Fam Physician 2016;62:233.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. College of Family Physicians of Canada
    . The Patient’s Medical Home. Mississauga, ON: College of Family Physicians of Canada; 2015. Available from: http://patientsmedicalhome.ca. Accessed 2015 Jul 27.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 62 (3)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 62, Issue 3
1 Mar 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Addressing overuse starts with physicians
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Addressing overuse starts with physicians
Kimberly Wintemute, Karen McDonald, Tai Huynh, Ciara Pendrith, Lynn Wilson
Canadian Family Physician Mar 2016, 62 (3) 199-200;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Addressing overuse starts with physicians
Kimberly Wintemute, Karen McDonald, Tai Huynh, Ciara Pendrith, Lynn Wilson
Canadian Family Physician Mar 2016, 62 (3) 199-200;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • The campaign
    • Recommendations by medical societies
    • Doctor-patient relationship
    • Social accountability
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • The 1% versus the 99%
  • Choosing Wisely Canada recommendations
  • La fin de l’utilisation abusive commence par les médecins
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Primary care management of headaches and how direct-access MRI fits: a qualitative study of UK general practitioners views
  • Doing any test is not better than doing no test
  • The 1% versus the 99%: Reducing unnecessary health care costs
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Environmental racism in Canada
  • Artificial intelligence and predictive algorithms in medicine
  • Linking animal health to human health by establishing veterinary services within a community health clinic
Show more Commentary

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2022 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire