Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
OtherCollege

Making the case for primary care

Francine Lemire
Canadian Family Physician March 2016, 62 (3) 272;
Francine Lemire
Roles: EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
Figure

Dear Colleagues,

When I applied for my current position at the CFPC, I sought the advice of a mix of national and Chapter elected leaders and staff. What became very clear is that despite considerable progress over the past 60 years, there is still a need to validate the work of family doctors and our contribution to our health care system. In a recent member survey, more than 45% of you believed that your work was not justly recognized by governments and decision makers in our health care system.

Stewart and Ryan, in a Canadian study about the ecology of health care in Canada,1 remind us of the place of family practice in the system. In a population of 1000 Canadians older than 15 years of age, in any given month, 560 have at least 1 chronic condition, and 230 will see their family doctors. More than 80% of Canadians will see their family doctors within a 2-year period.2 Clearly this is a substantial contribution to health care. What, then, are some of the myths that surround family medicine’s contribution and how can we diffuse them?

Myth 1: You are too good to be a family doctor

Such statements might be influenced by evidence that shows primary care outcomes are worse for certain specific diseases. However, population health outcomes for people with chronic diseases managed in primary care are similar to outcomes in specialized care, with lower costs and better quality. For example, specialized diabetes clinics might demonstrate better hemoglobin A1c levels, but the population outcomes for those patients looked after in primary care show lower mortality, better quality of life, and lower costs.3 Katerndahl et al examined the relative complexity of patient encounters for 14 different specialties.4 They found that primary care and generalist physicians care for and manage a broad spectrum of very complex patients.

Myth 2: Family medicine is not an academic discipline

It is fascinating to observe that although more than 80% of Canadians visit primary care physicians within a 2-year period,2 as recently as 10 years ago less than 1% of research funding was dedicated to primary care.5 Despite this, the effects of new knowledge obtained through family medicine research are impressive. Patient-centred care, and the patient-centred clinical method, now being adopted and recognized internationally, was first described and disseminated by Stewart et al in Canada. The authors demonstrated that the patient-centred approach resulted in fewer diagnostic tests and referrals.6 Klein and colleagues’ work on vaginal birth was pivotal in dispelling the presumed necessity of routine episiotomies as part of normal birthing.7 These are examples of important new knowledge generated in family practice that improved how we practise medicine. These and other transformative works are summarized in the CFPC’s The Seven Wonders of Family Medicine Research.8

Myth 3: I don’t need a family doctor—I can go to a walk-in clinic when I am sick

This is not meant to single out walk-in clinics over other practice settings; rather, it is to affirm the sustained body of evidence supporting a whole-person approach. For chronic illnesses, attachment to a family physician or family practice and continuity of care positively affect population outcomes. Hollander et al demonstrated an inverse relationship between attachment to a family practice and cost of care (including emergency visits) for patients with congestive heart failure and diabetes.9

Our story

We must not be afraid to tell our story. Your elected leaders at the CFPC and provincial Chapters are engaged in this, on your behalf, every day. We also know that much of this needs to be reinforced by family physician leaders at the local level. A recently released annotated bibliography highlights the substantial body of research that robustly supports the role of primary care and family practice in influencing better population health outcomes.10 I encourage you to review this important information and use it to address your local and regional needs.

Acknowledgments

I thank Drs Bill Hogg and Rick Glazier for their assistance in reviewing the evidence, and Dr Bill Hogg and Mr Eric Mang for their review of this article.

Footnotes

  • Cet article se trouve aussi en français à la page 271.

  • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Stewart M,
    2. Ryan B
    . Ecology of health care in Canada. Can Fam Physician 2015;61:449-53. (Eng), e249–54 (Fr).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Glazier RH,
    2. Agha MM,
    3. Moineddin R,
    4. Sibley LM
    . Universal health insurance and equity in primary care and specialist office visits: a population-based study. Ann Fam Med 2009;7(5):396-405.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Stange KC,
    2. Ferrer RL
    . The paradox of primary care. Ann Fam Med 2009;7(4):293-9.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Katerndahl Wood R,
    2. Jaén CR
    . Complexity of ambulatory care across disciplines. Healthc (Amst) 2015;3(2):89-96.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Russell G,
    2. Geneau R,
    3. Johnston S,
    4. Liddy C,
    5. Hogg W,
    6. Hogan K
    . Mapping the future of primary healthcare research in Canada. A report to the Canadian Health Services Research Foundation. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Health Services Research Foundation; 2007.
  6. 6.↵
    1. Stewart M,
    2. Brown JB,
    3. Donner A,
    4. McWhinney IR,
    5. Oates J,
    6. Weston WW,
    7. et al
    . The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes. J Fam Pract 2000;49(9):796-804.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Klein MC,
    2. Gauthier RJ,
    3. Jorgensen SH,
    4. Robbins JM,
    5. Kaczorowski J,
    6. Johnson B,
    7. et al
    . Does episiotomy prevent perineal trauma and pelvic floor relaxation? First North American trial of episiotomy. Online J Curr Clin Trials 1992 Jul 1;1. (Doc no. 10).
  8. 8.↵
    The seven wonders of family medicine research. Mississauga, ON: College of Family Physicians of Canada; 2014. Available from: www.cfpc.ca/uploadedFiles/Directories/Sections/7%20Wonders%20of%20FM%20Research%20-%20WEB%20EN.pdf. Accessed 2016 Feb 10.
  9. 9.↵
    1. Hollander MJ,
    2. Kadlec H,
    3. Hamdi R,
    4. Tessaro A
    . Increasing value for money in the Canadian healthcare system: new findings on the contribution of primary care services. Healthc Q 2009;12(4):32-44.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    Primary care and the triple aim. An annotated bibliography. Leawood, KS: American Academy of Family Physicians; 2015. Available from: www.graham-center.org/content/dam/rgc/documents/publications-reports/reports/PRIMARY%20CARE%20AND%20THE%20TRIPLE%20AIM%20-%20An%20Annotated%20Bibliography%20.pdf. Accessed 2016 Feb 10.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 62 (3)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 62, Issue 3
1 Mar 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Making the case for primary care
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Making the case for primary care
Francine Lemire
Canadian Family Physician Mar 2016, 62 (3) 272;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Making the case for primary care
Francine Lemire
Canadian Family Physician Mar 2016, 62 (3) 272;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Myth 1: You are too good to be a family doctor
    • Myth 2: Family medicine is not an academic discipline
    • Myth 3: I don’t need a family doctor—I can go to a walk-in clinic when I am sick
    • Our story
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • À la défense des soins primaires
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

College

  • Scope of work and the future of family practice
  • Portée de la pratique et l’avenir de la médecine de famille
  • Building a family medicine movement
Show more College

Cumulative Profile

  • Scope of work and the future of family practice
  • Building a family medicine movement
  • Addressing family physician shortages
Show more Cumulative Profile

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2022 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire