Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
Article CommentaryCommentary

Other ways of knowing

Using critical discourse analysis to reexamine intraprofessional collaboration

Rene Wong, Simon Kitto and Cynthia Whitehead
Canadian Family Physician September 2016, 62 (9) 701-703;
Rene Wong
Assistant Professor in the Department of Medicine at the University of Toronto in Ontario, Research Fellow at the Wilson Centre for Research in Education, and a doctoral candidate in the Institute of Medical Sciences at the University of Toronto.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: rene.wong@utoronto.ca
Simon Kitto
Associate Professor and Director of Research in the Office of Continuing Professional Development in the Department of Innovation in Medical Education at the University of Ottawa in Ontario.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cynthia Whitehead
Associate Professor in the Department of Family and Community Medicine at the University of Toronto and Director of the Wilson Centre for Research in Education.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Common clinical scenario

Kevin is a 64-year-old man who works full time and takes medication for type 2 diabetes, high cholesterol levels, depression, and hypertension. When first diagnosed with diabetes, his previous family physician had referred Kevin to see an endocrinologist, whom he continues to see yearly. During his periodic health review, Dr Lee, his new family physician, notices Kevin’s glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level is above guideline-recommended targets. She reinforces the importance of lifestyle modification and suggests an additional glucose-lowering medication. Kevin has already taken time off work owing to chronic low back pain and arthritis. He is concerned that a new medication might interact with his other medications, causing him to miss more time at work. They make a shared decision to focus on alleviating his pain. When Kevin sees his endocrinologist for his yearly appointment, the endocrinologist notes the elevated HbA1c level and asks Kevin why Dr Lee did not start the additional medication as recommended by guidelines. Rather than make recommendations to Dr Lee, the endocrinologist decides to prescribe a new medication and book follow-up appointments with Kevin every 3 months until Kevin’s HbA1c level is at target.

Successful management of chronic disease requires effective intraprofessional collaboration between family physicians and other specialist physicians.1,2 However, prejudice, lack of trust and respect, and differing views of patient care impede the cultivation and maintenance of collegial relationships necessary for effective physician collaboration.3–7 While consensus statements have defined core competencies to facilitate teaching and learning about intraprofessionalism,2 more work is needed to promote models of physician intraprofessional collaboration in practice that value relationships and the unique expertise provided by family physicians.5,8

Critical discourse analysis

We suggest that perhaps theories from the social sciences, such as critical discourse analysis (CDA), might provide a valuable lens to explore problems in physician intraprofessional collaboration in new ways, toward imagining new models. Already, such social science approaches have proved useful for researching power and hierarchies in patient-physician encounters, prompting a shift away from physician-centric encounters toward an emphasis on patient-centredness, patient empowerment, and patient satisfaction.9 Similarly, identifying issues of power, professional hierarchies, and conflict that counter the spirit of interprofessional care has been instrumental in shaping more efficient models of team-based primary care.10

Thus far, social science approaches such as CDA, which bring to attention issues of power and inequities that might otherwise go unnoticed, have yet to be used to understand the challenges in physician intraprofessional collaboration. Critical discourse analysis examines use of language to understand the boundaries for what can or cannot be said about a topic, and what roles people can or cannot play.11 By making visible the historically locatable origins of dominant ways of thinking, talking, and writing about a topic, and the marginalization of other ways of knowing, CDA could illuminate the ways in which power relations and hierarchies between family physicians and other specialists are created and maintained. Once “previously invisible” problems are made visible, “newly visible problems can then be studied” from which “newly visible solutions can be implemented.”12

Newly visible problems

We will now demonstrate how CDA can be used to examine problems in physician intraprofessional collaboration as depicted by the clinical scenario of the patient with diabetes. First, CDA makes visible that family physicians and other specialists might differ in their beliefs about and priorities within providing high-quality diabetes care. For example, Kevin’s endocrinologist views the elevated HbA1c level as a marker of inadequate care, thus justifying the need for an additional medication with less attention paid to other health issues. Kevin’s family physician places value on helping Kevin balance living with diabetes in the context of dealing with his more pressing concern of back pain and arthritis, and stresses the importance of coming to a shared decision. By illuminating the presence of multiple “truth systems” about diabetes care, CDA generates new and important research questions about physician intraprofessional collaboration. For example, to what extent do family physicians and other specialists differ in their beliefs about diabetes care? To what extent do differing views of diabetes care affect the relationship between family physicians and diabetes specialists, and consequently, collaboration?

Second, CDA makes visible the extent to which diabetes guidelines set the terms and conditions around physician intraprofessional collaboration. For example, in the scenario the elevated HbA1c level stimulates the endocrinologist to assume a more direct role in care, potentially affecting the relationship between Kevin and his family physician. Diabetes biomarkers (glucose levels, blood pressure, cholesterol levels) directly influence the referral-consultation process; biomarkers above target signal when a family physician should refer a patient to a diabetes education centre or diabetes specialist,13 whereas biomarkers at or below guideline-recommended targets signal when a diabetes specialist should transfer care back to a family physician.14 In contrast, the diabetes referral-consultation literature does not discuss the importance of physicians’ roles in facilitating shared decision making or helping patients balance diabetes against other problems. By making visible how certain voices, roles, and expertise are legitimized (and others marginalized) in diabetes guidelines, new research questions can then be asked about how to promote the role and expertise of family physicians. For example, what is the unique expertise of family physicians in diabetes management? How could the expertise of family physicians be used to improve current referral-consultation models? In what circumstances should diabetes specialists ask family physicians for advice?

Third, and arguably most important, CDA illuminates the potential for guidelines to not only set the terms for how family physicians and other specialists should collaborate, but to set them in a way that reinforces a power differential. In the scenario, the decision of Kevin’s endocrinologist to see him more frequently implies doubt cast on Dr Lee’s ability to provide care to Kevin. Despite well documented concerns raised about guideline-based care (for example, lack of patient-centred content in guidelines,15 lack of primary care representation on guidelines committees,16 and lack of consideration of the elderly or those with comorbidities17), family physicians continue to be judged by the extent to which they adhere to guidelines.18 As a consequence family physicians are constructed, albeit unintentionally, as a problem for which other specialists are constructed to be part of the solution directly through consultation or shared-care models, or indirectly through continuing education and other forms of knowledge exchange.13 Thus, by making visible unintentional effects of guidelines, CDA helps generate important research questions about the roles, identities, and scopes of practices of family physicians. For example, to what extent does referring a patient deemed “uncontrolled” reinforce a hierarchical relationship between family physicians and diabetes specialists? What are the negative effects of guidelines on the roles of family physicians and their relationships with patients? To what extent is collaboration affected?

Beaulieu argues there is a need to “invent” new models of collaboration between family physicians and other specialists.19 We argue that theories and methodologies from the social sciences such as CDA, already used to untangle problems encountered in patient-physician relationships and interprofessional collaboration, can make visible how the expertise of family physicians has been marginalized and under-valued in current constructions of physician intraprofessional collaboration. Critical discourse analysis can provide a valuable framework for teaching and researching aspects of collaboration that have yet to be explored, including how guidelines and other decision-making tools reflect certain beliefs about health at the expense of other beliefs, how guidelines might be inadvertently creating and reinforcing power dynamics between family physicians and other specialists, and how the resultant hierarchical relationship might impede effective collaboration. Only once these previously hidden problems in physician intraprofessional collaboration are identified can their changeable nature become apparent, and subsequently the discovery of appropriate solutions becomes possible.

Footnotes

  • This article has been peer reviewed.

  • La traduction en français de cet article se trouve à www.cfp.ca dans la table des matières du numéro de septembre 2016 à la page e501.

  • Competing interests

    None declared

  • The opinions expressed in commentaries are those of the authors. Publication does not imply endorsement by the College of Family Physicians of Canada.

  • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Kripalani S,
    2. LeFevre F,
    3. Phillips CO,
    4. Williams MV,
    5. Basaviah P,
    6. Baker DW
    . Deficits in communication and information transfer between hospital-based and primary care physicians: implications for patient safety and continuity of care. JAMA 2007;297(8):831-41.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. College of Family Physicians of Canada, Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada
    . Conjoint discussion paper. Family physicians and other specialists: working and learning together. Ottawa, ON: Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; 2006. Available from: www.royalcollege.ca/portal/page/portal/rc/common/documents/advocacy/conjoint_discussion_paper_e.pdf. Accessed 2015 Dec 14.
  3. 3.↵
    1. Berendsen AJ,
    2. Benneker WH,
    3. Schuling J,
    4. Rijkers-Koorn N,
    5. Slaets JP,
    6. Meyboom-de Jong M
    . Collaboration with general practitioners: preferences of medical specialists—a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2006;6:155.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.
    1. Berendsen AJ,
    2. Benneker WH,
    3. Meyboom-de Jong B,
    4. Klazinga NS,
    5. Schuling J
    . Motives and preferences of general practitioners for new collaborative models with medical specialists—a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2007;7:4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Manca D,
    2. Varnhagen S,
    3. Brett-MacLean P,
    4. Allen GM,
    5. Szafran O
    . RESPECT from specialists. Concerns of family physicians. Can Fam Physician 2008;54:1434-5.e1–5. Available from: www.cfp.ca/content/54/10/1434.full.pdf+html. Accessed 2016 Jul 21.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.
    1. Beaulieu MD,
    2. Samson L,
    3. Rocher G,
    4. Rioux M,
    5. Boucher L,
    6. Del Grande C
    . Investigating the barriers to teaching family physicians’ and specialists’ collaboration in the training environment: a qualitative study. BMC Med Educ 2009;9:31.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    System issues, policies and practices affecting physician intraprofessionalism. Backgrounder commissioned by the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, the College of Family Physicians of Canada, and the Canadian Medical Association to inform future discussions and work. Mississauga, ON: College of Family Physicians of Canada; 2011. Lisa Little Consulting. Available from: www.cfpc.ca/uploadedFiles/Directories/Committees_List/System_Issues_Policies_and_Practices_Affecting_Physician_Intraprofessionalism.pdf. Accessed 2015 Dec 14.
  8. 8.↵
    1. Manca DP,
    2. Breault L,
    3. Wishart P
    . A tale of two cultures. Specialists and generalists sharing the load. Can Fam Physician 2011;57:576-84.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. May C,
    2. Allison G,
    3. Chapple A,
    4. Chew-Graham C,
    5. Dixon C,
    6. Gask L,
    7. et al
    . Framing the doctor-patient relationship in chronic illness: a comparative study of general practitioners’ accounts. Sociol Health Illn 2004;26(2):135-58.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. San Martín-Rodríguez L,
    2. Beaulieu MD,
    3. D’Amour D,
    4. Ferrada-Videla M
    . The determinants of successful collaboration: a review of theoretical and empirical studies. J Interprof Care 2005;19(Suppl 1):132-47.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Hodges BD,
    2. Kuper A,
    3. Reeves S
    . Discourse analysis. BMJ 2008;337:a879.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Hodges BD,
    2. Kuper A
    . Theory and practice in the design and conduct of graduate medical education. Acad Med 2012;87(1):25-33.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Clement M,
    2. Harvey B,
    3. Rabi D,
    4. Roscoe RS,
    5. Sherifali D,
    6. Canadian Diabetes Association 2013 Clinical Practice Guideline Expert Committee
    . Guidelines for the prevention and management of diabetes in Canada: organization of diabetes care. Can J Diabetes 2013;37(Suppl 1):S20-5.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.↵
    1. Malcolm J,
    2. Liddy C,
    3. Rowan M,
    4. Maranger J,
    5. Keely E,
    6. Harrison C,
    7. et al
    . Transition of patients with type 2 diabetes from specialist to primary care: a survey of primary care physicians on the usefulness of tools for transition. Can J Diabetes 2008;32(1):37-45.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    1. McCormack JP,
    2. Loewen P
    . Adding “value” to clinical practice guidelines. Can Fam Physician 2007;53:1326-7.e1–8. Available from: www.cfp.ca/content/53/8/1326.full.pdf+html. Accessed 2016 Jul 21.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Allan GM,
    2. Kraut R,
    3. Crawshay A,
    4. Korownyk C,
    5. Vandermeer B,
    6. Kolber MR
    . Contributors to primary care guidelines. What are their professions and how many of them have conflicts of interest? Can Fam Physician 2015;61:52-8. (Eng), e50–7 (Fr).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Mutasingwa DR,
    2. Ge H,
    3. Upshur RE
    . How applicable are clinical practice guidelines to elderly people with comorbidities? Can Fam Physician 2011;57:e253-62. Available from: www.cfp.ca/content/57/7/e253.full.pdf+html. Accessed 2016 Jul 21.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Leiter LA,
    2. Berard L,
    3. Bowering CK,
    4. Cheng AY,
    5. Dawson KG,
    6. Ekoé JM,
    7. et al
    . Type 2 diabetes mellitus management in Canada: is it improving? Can J Diabetes 2013;37(2):82-9. Epub 2013 Apr 23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Beaulieu MD
    . Primary and secondary care: breaking down barriers for our patients with chronic diseases. Can Fam Physician 2013;59:221. (Eng), 222 (Fr).
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 62 (9)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 62, Issue 9
1 Sep 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Other ways of knowing
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Other ways of knowing
Rene Wong, Simon Kitto, Cynthia Whitehead
Canadian Family Physician Sep 2016, 62 (9) 701-703;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Other ways of knowing
Rene Wong, Simon Kitto, Cynthia Whitehead
Canadian Family Physician Sep 2016, 62 (9) 701-703;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Common clinical scenario
    • Critical discourse analysis
    • Newly visible problems
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • D’autres façons de savoir
  • For family physicians, by family physicians?
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • For family physicians, by family physicians?
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Family physicians as advocates for community water fluoridation
  • The consultation
  • Family doctors well suited to being climate leaders
Show more Commentary

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2023 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire