Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
Research ArticleResearch

Effect of comorbidities and medications on frequency of primary care visits among older patients

Tina Hu, Neil D. Dattani, Kelly Anne Cox, Bonnie Au, Leo Xu, Don Melady, Liisa Jaakkimainen, Rahul Jain and Jocelyn Charles
Canadian Family Physician January 2017; 63 (1) 45-50;
Tina Hu
Medical student, at the University of Toronto in Ontario.
MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: tina.hu@mail.utoronto.ca
Neil D. Dattani
Second-year family medicine resident, at the University of Toronto in Ontario.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kelly Anne Cox
Medical student, at the University of Toronto in Ontario.
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bonnie Au
Research associate, in the Primary Care Research Unit with the Sunnybrook Academic Family Health Team in Toronto.
MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Leo Xu
Research assistant, in the Primary Care Research Unit with the Sunnybrook Academic Family Health Team in Toronto.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Don Melady
Emergency physician at Mount Sinai Hospital and Assistant Professor in the Department of Family and Community Medicine at the University of Toronto.
MD MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Liisa Jaakkimainen
Family physician at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and Associate Professor in the Department of Family and Community Medicine at the University of Toronto.
MD MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rahul Jain
Family physician at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jocelyn Charles
Family physician at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and a research scientist in the Primary Care Research Unit with the Sunnybrook Academic Family Health Team.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objective To determine if comorbidities and high-risk medications affect the frequency of family physician visits among older patients.

Design Retrospective chart review.

Setting Academic family health team at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre in Toronto, Ont.

Participants Among patients aged 65 years and older who were registered patients of the family health team between July 1, 2013, and June 30, 2014, the 5% who visited their family physicians most frequently and the 5% who visited their family physicians least frequently were selected for the study (N = 265).

Main outcome measures Predictors of frequent visits to family physicians.

Results The significant predictors of being a high-frequency user were female sex (odds ratio [OR] = 2.20, P = .03), age older than 85 years (OR = 5.35, P = .001), and higher total number of medications (OR = 1.49, P < .001). Age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index score, number of Beers criteria medications, and Anticholinergic Risk Scale score were not significant predictors (P > .05).

Conclusion Female sex, age older than 85, and higher total number of medications were independent significant predictors of higher frequency of family physician visits among older patients. Validated tools, such as the Charlson comorbidity index, Beers criteria, and Anticholinergic Risk Scale, did not independently predict the frequency of visits, indicating that predicting frequency of visits is likely complex.

The population of Canada is aging, and the number of people older than 65 years of age is expected to double during the next 25 years.1 Previous research has shown that a higher number of medications, a higher number of inappropriate medications, and a higher anticholinergic burden increase both all-cause and fracture-specific hospital admissions among older patients.2–4 Polypharmacy has been shown to increase the risk of rehospitalization and falls among older patients.3,4 With the increase in the population older than 65, and particularly those older than 85, it is expected that there will be a concurrent rise in both medical comorbidities and number of medications among family practice patients, which might lead to a higher frequency of visits.5

Factors such as sex,6 medical comorbidities,5 and medication use7,8 have been associated with an increased frequency of family physician visits among older patients. Although clinical tools have been developed to evaluate comorbidities,9 potentially inappropriate medications,10 and anticholinergic risk,11 most studies have examined their relationship with hospital admissions,2 adverse events,12 and mortality.9 No study has looked at whether there is a relationship between these factors (as assessed with clinically relevant tools) and frequency of family physician visits among older patients. By understanding the relationship between these specific factors and frequency of family physician visits, policies can be developed to provide more cost-efficient and effective primary care for vulnerable older patients in need of more support.

The goal of this study was to determine if comorbidities and high-risk medications, as assessed with clinically relevant tools, affect the frequency of family physician visits among older patients. We hypothesized that increased comorbidities and high-risk medications would be associated with an increase in frequency of visits.

METHODS

This retrospective chart review was approved by the institutional ethics review board of the University of Toronto in Ontario. Among those aged 65 and older who were registered patients of the Sunnybrook Academic Family Health Team in Toronto between July 1, 2013, and June 30, 2014, we selected the 5% who visited their family physicians the most frequently (median 11 visits) and the 5% who visited their family physicians the least frequently (median 0 visits) for the study. This sample represents patients beyond 2 SDs of the mean in the family practice population (N = 265).

Data collection

Charts were reviewed retrospectively and information regarding patients’ sex, current and previous medical diagnoses, operations, current medications, and number of visits to see their family physicians during the 12 months were recorded. An age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index score was calculated for each patient. The 2012 Beers criteria10 and the Anticholinergic Risk Scale (ARS) were used to identify and score high-risk medications.11 The total number of medications that patients were taking was also recorded. Two reviewers independently calculated these variables for each patient and a consensus was reached when there were discrepancies between scores.

Statistical analysis

All data were anonymized before analysis. One-way ANOVA (analysis of variance) and Embedded Image2 tests were used to compare each variable by frequency of visits to family physicians (low vs high frequency). Logistic regression was used to assess whether sex, age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index score, Beers criteria medications, ARS score, and total number of medications were significant predictors of the frequency of family physician visits. A P value less than .05 was used to determine statistical significance. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS, version 9.2, and SPSS, version 20.

RESULTS

The study sample included 265 patients aged 65 years and older. Women comprised 57% of the study sample. Patient characteristics for the study sample are shown in Table 1. Cohen κ statistics were calculated for each variable to determine if there was agreement between reviewers. There was moderate agreement between reviewers for the age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index score (κ = 0.65, P < .001), total number of medications (κ = 0.71, P < .001), and Beers criteria medications (κ = 0.64, P < .001). There was consensus between reviewers for ARS score (κ = 1.00, P < .001).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Patient characteristics: N = 265.

Patient characteristics by frequency of visits to family physicians are shown in Table 2. The high-frequency group was significantly older (P < .001), with a higher proportion of women (P < .05) compared with the low-frequency group. The high-frequency group also had significantly higher age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index scores, total number of medications, number of Beers criteria medications, and ARS scores (P < .001 for all) compared with the low-frequency group.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Patient characteristics by frequency of visits to their family physicians

Table 3 presents the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs for being in the high-frequency group for each independent predictor, while controlling for all the other variables. Female sex (OR = 2.20, 95% CI 1.07 to 4.52, P = .03) and age older than 85 years (OR = 5.35, 95% CI 1.95 to 14.69, P = .001) were statistically associated with high-frequency users. A 1-unit increase in the total number of medications was also statistically associated with high-frequency users (OR = 1.49, 95% CI 1.32 to 1.70, P < .001).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3.

Adjusted logistic regression for predictors of high frequency of family physician visits: For each variable, all other variables were adjusted in the regression.

DISCUSSION

Our results show that the high-frequency group was mostly composed of older women with a higher mean number of comorbidities, total number of medications, number of Beers criteria medications, and ARS score compared with the low-frequency group. Variables independently associated with an increased likelihood of being in the high-frequency group were female sex, age older than 85, and a higher total number of medications. Scores from the age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index, Beers criteria, and ARS were not independently associated with frequency of visits to family physicians.

Similar to our results, other studies have observed a difference between sexes in the frequency of visits to family physicians. This might be owing to a difference in womens’ attitudes toward and willingness to seek health care services.13 Several studies have observed that older women were more likely to visit family physicians compared with older men, while men were more likely to visit other specialists or emergency departments.6,14,15 Women might be more likely to visit their family physicians owing to lower self-reported health status, higher rates of acute illnesses, and willingness to seek help.6,14 Men might be more likely to delay their visits to family physicians and miss the opportunity for prevention and screening, which might explain their higher prevalence of fatal conditions and higher visit rates to non–family physician specialists and emergency departments.6

Our results showed that age, specifically being older than 85 years, was an independent predictor of high frequency of family physician visits. As patients age, they tend to have increased comorbidities, which result in increased medication use1,8 and might increase family physician and other specialist visits owing to the need for monitoring.5,16–19 Previous research has demonstrated that people older than 65 years account for the largest proportion of physician service use in Ontario, especially family physician services.6,20 Per capita health care spending in Canada increases exponentially with older populations, with those 85 and older consuming $21 000 per capita compared with people aged 65 to 84 years ($17 000) and those aged 1 to 64 years ($1700).21

Our findings revealed that a higher total number of medications was associated with increased frequency of visits, which is similar to findings from other studies.8,22 This might be owing to an increased risk of adverse drug events (ADEs) and the need for closer monitoring. The risk of an ADE is estimated to be 13% with the use of 2 medications, but increases to a risk of 58% with 5 medications and 82% with 7 or more medications.23 Studies have shown that 11% to 63% of older patients use medications inappropriately, with 42% being prescribed at least 1 medication without valid indication and 50% receiving inappropriate doses or extended use.24,25 In family practice settings, ADEs are common, occurring in 25% of patients, with 11% of ADEs being preventable.26 A recent study showed that 27% of older patients reported taking 5 or more medications on a regular basis, with 12% reporting an ADE that required medical attention, compared with the 5% rate among patients taking only 1 to 2 medications.8 Another reason that a higher total number of medications might be associated with increased visit frequency is having the wrong medication prescribed or receiving the wrong dose: older patients taking a higher number of medications were more than twice as likely to report these errors compared with those taking 1 to 2 medications.8

Other studies have found that high-risk medications are associated with ADEs, increased risk of falls, and increased risk of mortality and hospitalization among older patients.10,11 Our study did not find high-risk medications as assessed with Beers criteria or the ARS to be predictive of the frequency of family physician visits, which might be owing to high-risk medications leading to more serious or life-threatening issues requiring emergency department visits or hospitalization.8,27,28

Previous studies have found that comorbidities, which are expected to increase with increasing patient age, are associated with increased health care use, which includes ambulatory visits, laboratory testing, and hospitalizations.21,29 Our study did not find the age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index score to be an individual predictor of frequency of family physician visits. This might be because this index was created to predict mortality rates.30 Other factors that might influence the frequency of visits to family physicians that are not addressed in the age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index are hypertension and depression. Depression is common among older patients and is associated with increased primary care visits.31 One study showed that as depression severity increased among older patients, perceived quality of life and physical and mental functioning decreased and perceived level of disability increased.32 These factors might also influence the frequency of visits to family physicians and would be useful to examine in future studies.

Given the rapidly aging population and its potential for increased health care use,21 being able to predict and provide early support to high-frequency users is important. Longitudinal studies have shown that only a small proportion of older patients are high users of health care services.6,33 One study following older patients for 10 years demonstrated that 42.6% were never hospitalized, 24.6% were consistently low users of health care services, and 4.8% were consistently high users.33 High users in this study had similar characteristics: multiple comorbidities, functional impairment, and inadequate social supports.21,33 Knowing these factors and the individual predictors of frequency of visits found in our study might enable early identification of vulnerable older patients in order to provide support. Supporting these high-frequency users might include implementing increased homecare services,34 which reduce the use of acute care services35 and improve health outcomes36; developing interprofessional collaborative models of care to reduce fragmentation of health care services and provide better case management by addressing the patient’s medical, functional, and psychosocial health care needs34,37; focusing on safer prescribing practices, shared decision making with patients, and medication reviews to prevent ADEs8,34,38; and learning more about the prescribing cascade that is common in geriatric medicine.

Limitations

Limitations of this study include a relatively small sample size at a single site, which limits the precision and generalizability of these findings. Given the retrospective nature of this study, we were unable to ensure that all patients were still being seen at the family practice during the study time frame. We were not able to extract data regarding the nature of each visit to know if the visits were planned and related to chronic disease management, preventive care, and medication monitoring, or unplanned (urgent) and possibly related to increased ADEs. Also, the concept of multimorbidity (existence of 2 or more chronic diseases) was not distinguished from comorbidity (medical conditions that exist at the time of diagnosis of the index disease or later), which might affect visit frequency.39 This is an avenue for future research.

Conclusion

Female sex, age older than 85, and higher total number of medications were independent predictors of higher frequency of family physician visits among older patients. Scores from the age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index, Beers criteria, and ARS were not significantly associated with frequency of visits, suggesting that future studies should explore other factors to better predict and understand the care needs of high users of family medicine services.

Notes

EDITOR’S KEY POINTS

  • Female sex, age older than 85 years, and higher total number of medications were independent predictors of higher frequency of family physician visits among older patients.

  • The high-frequency family physician visit group was mostly composed of older women with a higher mean number of comorbidities, total number of medications, number of Beers criteria medications, and Anticholinergic Risk Scale score compared with the low-frequency group.

  • Scores from the age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index, Beers criteria, and Anticholinergic Risk Scale were not significantly associated with frequency of visits, suggesting that future studies should explore other factors to better predict and understand the care needs of high users of family medicine services.

POINTS DE REPÈRE DU RÉDACTEUR

  • Chez les patients âgés, être une femme, avoir plus de 85 ans et prendre plus de médicaments étaient des prédicteurs indépendants d’un plus grand nombre de visites à un médecin de famille.

  • Le groupe de patients qui consultait le plus souvent un médecin de famille comprenait surtout des femmes âgées présentant un nombre moyen de comorbidités plus élevé, un plus grand nombre de médicaments, plus de médicaments du critère de Beers et un score plus élevé à l’échelle du risque cholinergique par rapport au groupe qui consultait peu souvent.

  • Les scores ajustés pour l’âge obtenus à l’indice de comorbidité de Charlson, au critère de Beers et à l’échelle du risque cholinergique n’étaient pas significativement reliés à la fréquence des visites, ce qui laisse croire à la nécessité d’autres études pour identifier d’autres facteurs susceptibles de mieux prédire et comprendre les soins que requièrent les patients qui utilisent souvent les services de médecine familiale.

Footnotes

  • This article has been peer reviewed.

  • Cet article a fait l’objet d’une révision par des pairs.

  • Contributors

    All authors have participated in determining the concept and design, analysis and interpretation of data, and drafting or revising the manuscript. All have approved the manuscript as submitted, and believe that the manuscript represents honest work.

  • Competing interests

    None declared

  • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Kwan D,
    2. Farrell B
    . Polypharmacy: optimizing medication use in elderly patients. Pharm Pract 2013;20:20-5.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    1. Lu WH,
    2. Wen YW,
    3. Chen LK,
    4. Hsiao FY
    . Effect of polypharmacy, potentially inappropriate medications and anticholinergic burden on clinical outcomes: a retrospective cohort study. CMAJ 2015;187(4):E130-7. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Kojima T,
    2. Akishita M,
    3. Nakamura T,
    4. Nomura K,
    5. Ogawa S,
    6. Iijima K,
    7. et al
    . Association of polypharmacy with fall risk among geriatric outpatients. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2011;11(4):438-44. Epub 2011 May 5.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Sganga F,
    2. Landi F,
    3. Ruggiero C,
    4. Corsonello A,
    5. Vetrano DL,
    6. Lattanzio F,
    7. et al
    . Polypharmacy and health outcomes among older adults discharged from hospital: results from the CRIME study. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2015;15(2):141-6. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Lehnert T,
    2. Heider D,
    3. Leicht H,
    4. Heinrich S,
    5. Corrieri S,
    6. Luppa M,
    7. et al
    . Review: health care utilization and costs of elderly persons with multiple chronic conditions. Med Care Res Rev 2011;68(4):387-420.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Nie JX,
    2. Wang L,
    3. Tracy CS,
    4. Moineddin R,
    5. Upshur RE
    . A population-based cohort study of ambulatory care service utilization among older adults. J Eval Clin Pract 2010;16(4):825-31. Epub 2010 Jun 14.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Fernández-Olano C,
    2. Hidalgo JD,
    3. Cerdá-Díaz R,
    4. Requena-Gallego M,
    5. Sánchez-Castaño C,
    6. Urbistondo-Cascales L,
    7. et al
    . Factors associated with health care utilization by the elderly in a public health care system. Health Policy 2006;75(2):131-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Reason B,
    2. Terner M,
    3. Moses McKeag A,
    4. Tipper B,
    5. Webster G
    . The impact of polypharmacy on the health of Canadian seniors. Fam Pract 2012;29(4):427-32. Epub 2012 Jan 5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Charlson ME,
    2. Pompei P,
    3. Ales KL,
    4. MacKenzie CR
    . A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987;40(5):373-83.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. American Geriatrics Society 2012 Beers Criteria Update Expert Panel.
    American Geriatrics Society updated Beers criteria for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2012;60(4):616-31. Epub 2012 Feb 29.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Rudolph JL,
    2. Salow MJ,
    3. Angelini MC,
    4. McGlinchey RE
    . The Anticholinergic Risk Scale and anticholinergic adverse effects in older persons. Arch Intern Med 2008;168(5):508-13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Nguyen JK,
    2. Fouts MM,
    3. Kotabe SE,
    4. Lo E
    . Polypharmacy as a risk factor for adverse drug reactions in geriatric nursing home residents. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother 2006;4(1):36-41.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Chrischilles EA,
    2. Foley DJ,
    3. Wallace RB,
    4. Lemke JH,
    5. Semla TP,
    6. Hanlon JT,
    7. et al
    . Use of medications by persons 65 and over: data from the established populations for epidemiologic studies of the elderly. J Gerontol 1992;47(5):M137-44.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  14. 14.↵
    1. Bertakis KD,
    2. Azari R,
    3. Helms LJ,
    4. Callahan EJ,
    5. Robbins JA
    . Gender differences in the utilization of health care services. J Fam Pract 2000;49(2):147-52.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Redondo-Sendino Á,
    2. Guallar-Castillón P,
    3. Banegas JR,
    4. Rodríguez-Artalejo F
    . Gender differences in the utilization of health-care services among the older adult population of Spain. BMC Public Health 2006;6(6):155.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Van Oostrom SH,
    2. Picavet HS,
    3. de Bruin SR,
    4. Stirbu I,
    5. Korevaar JC,
    6. Schellevis FG,
    7. et al
    . Multimorbidity of chronic diseases and health care utilization in general practice. BMC Fam Pract 2014;15:61.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.
    1. Laux G,
    2. Kuehlein T,
    3. Rosemann T,
    4. Szecsenyi J
    . Co- and multimorbidity patterns in primary care based on episodes of care: results from the German CONTENT project. BMC Health Serv Res 2008;8:14.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.
    1. Salisbury C,
    2. Johnson L,
    3. Purdy S,
    4. Valderas JM,
    5. Montgomery AA
    . Epidemiology and impact of multimorbidity in primary care: a retrospective cohort study. Br J Gen Pract 2011;61(582):e12-21.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Van den Bussche H,
    2. Schön G,
    3. Kolonko T,
    4. Hansen H,
    5. Wegscheider K,
    6. Glaeske G,
    7. et al
    . Patterns of ambulatory medical care utilization in elderly patients with special reference to chronic diseases and multimorbidity—results from a claims data based observational study in Germany. BMC Geriatr 2011;11:54.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Jaakkimainen L,
    2. Upshur REG,
    3. Klein-Geltink JE,
    4. Leong A,
    5. Maaten S,
    6. Schultz SE,
    7. et al.
    , editors. Primary care in Ontario: ICES atlas. Toronto, ON: Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; 2006.
  21. 21.↵
    1. Sinha SK
    . Why the elderly could bankrupt Canada and how demographic imperatives will force the redesign of acute care service delivery. Healthc Pap 2011;11(1):46-51.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Aparasu RR,
    2. Mort JR,
    3. Brandt H
    . Polypharmacy trends in office visits by the elderly in the United States, 1990 and 2000. Res Social Adm Pharm 2005;1(3):446-59.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Prybys KM,
    2. Melville KA,
    3. Hanna JR
    . Polypharmacy in the elderly: clinical challenges in emergency practice. Part I: overview, etiology, and drug interactions. Emerg Med Rep 2002;1:145-51.
    OpenUrl
  24. 24.↵
    1. Guaraldo L,
    2. Cano FG,
    3. Damasceno GS,
    4. Rozenfeld S
    . Inappropriate medication use among the elderly: a systematic review of administrative databases. BMC Geriatr 2011;11:79.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Hanlon JT,
    2. Artz MB,
    3. Pieper CF,
    4. Lindblad CI,
    5. Sloane RJ,
    6. Ruby CM,
    7. et al
    . Inappropriate medication use among frail elderly inpatients. Ann Pharmacother 2004;38(1):9-14.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Gandhi TK,
    2. Weingart SN,
    3. Borus J,
    4. Seger AC,
    5. Peterson J,
    6. Burdick E,
    7. et al
    . Adverse drug events in ambulatory care. N Engl J Med 2003;348(16):1556-64.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Budnitz DS,
    2. Shehab N,
    3. Kegler SR,
    4. Richards CL
    . Medication use leading to emergency department visits for adverse drug events in older adults. Ann Intern Med 2007;147(11):755-65.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Gurwitz JH,
    2. Field TS,
    3. Harrold LR,
    4. Rothschild J,
    5. Debellis K,
    6. Seger AC,
    7. et al
    . Incidence and preventability of adverse drug events among older persons in the ambulatory setting. JAMA 2003;289(9):1107-16.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Charlson ME,
    2. Charlson RE,
    3. Peterson JC,
    4. Marinopoulos SS,
    5. Briggs WM,
    6. Hollenberg JP
    . The Charlson comorbidity index is adapted to predict costs of chronic disease in primary care patients. J Clin Epidemiol 2008;61(12):1234-40. Epub 2008 Jul 10.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Sundararajan V,
    2. Henderson T,
    3. Perry C,
    4. Muggivan A,
    5. Quan H,
    6. Ghali WA
    . New ICD-10 version of the Charlson comorbidity index predicted in-hospital mortality. J Clin Epidemiol 2004;57(12):1288-94.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Callahan CM,
    2. Hui SL,
    3. Nienaber NA,
    4. Musick BS,
    5. Tierney WM
    . Longitudinal study of depression and health services use among elderly primary care patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 1994;42(8):833-8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Noël PH,
    2. Williams JW,
    3. Unützer J,
    4. Worchel J,
    5. Lee S,
    6. Cornell J,
    7. et al
    . Depression and comorbid illness in elderly primary care patients: impact on multiple domains of health status and well-being. Ann Fam Med 2004;2(6):555-62.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Wolinsky FD,
    2. Stump TE,
    3. Johnson RJ
    . Hospital utilization profiles among older adults over time: consistency and volume among survivors and decedents. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 1995;50(2):S88-100.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Sinha SK
    . Living longer, living well. Report submitted to the Minister of Health and Long-Term Care and the Minister Responsible for Seniors on recommendations to inform a seniors strategy for Ontario. Toronto, ON: Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care; 2012.
  35. 35.↵
    1. Seow H,
    2. Barbera L,
    3. Howell D,
    4. Dy SM
    . Using more end-of-life homecare services is associated with using fewer acute care services: a population-based cohort study. Med Care 2010;48(2):118-24.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Tinetti ME,
    2. Baker D,
    3. Gallo WT,
    4. Nanda A,
    5. Charpentier P,
    6. O’Leary J
    . Evaluation of restorative care vs usual care for older adults receiving an acute episode of home care. JAMA 2002;287(16):2098-105.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Tracy CS,
    2. Bell SH,
    3. Nickell LA,
    4. Charles J,
    5. Upshur REG
    . The IMPACT clinic. Innovative model of interprofessional primary care for elderly patients with complex health care needs. Can Fam Physician 2013;59:e148-55. Available from: www.cfp.ca/content/59/3/e148.full.pdf+html. Accessed 2016 Nov 28.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    1. Milos V,
    2. Rekman E,
    3. Bondesson Å,
    4. Eriksson T,
    5. Jakobsson U,
    6. Westerlund T,
    7. et al
    . Improving the quality of pharmacotherapy in elderly primary care patients through medication reviews: a randomised controlled study. Drugs Aging 2013;30(4):235-46.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Ording AG,
    2. Sørensen HT
    . Concepts of comorbidities, multiple morbidities, complications, and their clinical epidemiologic analogs. Clin Epidemiol 2013;5:199-203.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 63 (1)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 63, Issue 1
1 Jan 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Effect of comorbidities and medications on frequency of primary care visits among older patients
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Effect of comorbidities and medications on frequency of primary care visits among older patients
Tina Hu, Neil D. Dattani, Kelly Anne Cox, Bonnie Au, Leo Xu, Don Melady, Liisa Jaakkimainen, Rahul Jain, Jocelyn Charles
Canadian Family Physician Jan 2017, 63 (1) 45-50;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Effect of comorbidities and medications on frequency of primary care visits among older patients
Tina Hu, Neil D. Dattani, Kelly Anne Cox, Bonnie Au, Leo Xu, Don Melady, Liisa Jaakkimainen, Rahul Jain, Jocelyn Charles
Canadian Family Physician Jan 2017, 63 (1) 45-50;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Notes
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Systematic review on the instruments used for measuring the association of the level of multimorbidity and clinically important outcomes
  • Characteristics of consistently high primary health care users in the DELPHI database: Retrospective study of electronic medical records
  • The primary care and other health system use of home care patients: a retrospective cohort analysis
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Primary care reform in Alberta
  • Administrative burden in primary care
  • Burden of administrative responsibilities in primary care
Show more Research

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2025 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire