Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
EditorialCommentary

Holding a wolf by the ears

Preventive care and the family physician

Nicholas Pimlott
Canadian Family Physician July 2017, 63 (7) 502;
Nicholas Pimlott
Roles: SCIENTIFIC EDITOR
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
Figure

But, as it is, we have the wolf by the ear, and we can neither hold him, nor safely let him go.

Thomas Jefferson

Canada is known for many great medical “inventions”—insulin, the electron microscope, and the external pacemaker, to name only a few.1 Some others are detailed in the Cover Story on page 556.2 But one of Canada’s best medical inventions is not a thing, but a committee—the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination, created in 1976 by the Conference of Deputy Ministers of Health of the 10 Canadian provinces and reborn as the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (CTFPHC) in 2012. After the establishment of the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination, other countries such as the United States went on to establish their own committees.

One of the many words that have walked “arm in arm with righteousness”3 over the years is prevention. As long ago as 1972 David Sackett wrote in the pages of Canadian Family Physician (CFP):

Multiphasic screening and periodic health examination programs are enormously attractive to physicians, other health professionals and the general public as they join forces to reduce the awesome toll of disability and untimely death resulting from chronic disease.4

After careful analysis of the existing evidence he concluded that while screening for certain conditions had some value, existing programs “have little hope of reducing risk or even maintaining health in the general population.”4

Three decades later, in the aftermath of the results of the Women’s Health Initiative study, Sackett argued that preventive medicine displayed all the elements of arrogance—that it was aggressively assertive in the pursuit of telling symptomless individuals what they must do to remain healthy; that it was presumptuous that its interventions would do more good than harm to those who followed them; and last, that it was overbearing, attacking anyone who questioned the value of its recommendations.5

While the prevention of disease is a worthwhile goal, there are limitations to its effectiveness that need to be acknowledged.6,7 Both physicians and the public overestimate the benefits and underestimate the risks of screening maneuvers and preventive care interventions.8 The physician office-based approach to primary disease prevention might arguably be the least effective one when it comes to promoting complex behaviour such as regular exercise and healthy eating. And with routine check-up visits comprising almost half of all medical visits in the United States9 and the amount of time spent by family physicians on the delivery of preventive care estimated at more than 7 hours per working day,10 might not this time be better spent attending to the more pressing acute health care needs of our patients?

In this issue of CFP we launch the first in a series of articles by the CTFPHC designed to help busy family physicians manage the many challenges of delivering office-based preventive health care. In the introductory commentary the task force members provide a concise history of the task force, its processes, and its methods for evaluating the evidence, and set the stage for the series (page 504).11 As they point out, most task force recommendations are weak recommendations, meaning that increasingly family physicians must engage in shared, informed decision making as they help their patients understand the likelihood and nature of the benefits and harms of screening. The first article in the series, “Better Decision Making in Preventive Health Screening. Balancing Benefits and Harms”8 sets the scene (page 521).

The CTFPHC is one of many great Canadian medical inventions, helping Canada’s family physicians and other primary health care providers provide patient-centred preventive care with humility for more than 3 decades. We at CFP are pleased to bring readers this series.

Footnotes

  • Cet article se trouve aussi en français à la page 503.

  • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Johnston D,
    2. Jenkins T
    . Ingenious. How Canadian innovators made the world smarter, smaller, kinder, safer, healthier, wealthier and happier. Toronto, ON: Signal; 2017.
  2. 2.↵
    1. With glowing hearts
    . Reflecting on a few things that Canada has brought to the world. Can Fam Physician 2017;63:556-7. (Eng), e355–6 (Fr).
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Heath I
    . “Arm in arm with righteousness”. Philos Ethics Humanit Med 2015;10:7.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Sackett DL
    . The family physician and the periodic health examination. Can Fam Physician 1972;18:61-5.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Sackett DL
    . The arrogance of preventive medicine. CMAJ 2002;167(4):363-4.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Heath I
    . Who needs health care—the well or the sick? BMJ 2005;330(7497):954-6.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Mangin D,
    2. Sweeney K,
    3. Heath I
    . Preventive health care in elderly people needs rethinking. BMJ 2007;335(7614):285-7.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Bell NR,
    2. Grad R,
    3. Dickinson JA,
    4. Singh H,
    5. Moore AE,
    6. Kasperavicius D,
    7. et al
    . Better decision making in preventive health screening. Balancing benefits and harms. Can Fam Physician 2017;63:521-4. (Eng), 525–8 (Fr).
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Laine C
    . The annual physical examination: needless ritual or necessary routine? Ann Intern Med 2002;136(9):701-3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Yarnall KS,
    2. Pollak KI,
    3. Østbye T,
    4. Krause KM,
    5. Michener JL
    . Primary care: is there enough time for prevention? Am J Public Health 2003;93(4):635-41.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Thombs BD,
    2. Lewin G,
    3. Tonelli M
    . Implementing preventive health care recommendations in family medicine. Introducing a series from the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. Can Fam Physician 2017;63:504-5. (Eng), e328–9 (Fr).
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 63 (7)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 63, Issue 7
1 Jul 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Holding a wolf by the ears
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Holding a wolf by the ears
Nicholas Pimlott
Canadian Family Physician Jul 2017, 63 (7) 502;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Holding a wolf by the ears
Nicholas Pimlott
Canadian Family Physician Jul 2017, 63 (7) 502;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • With Glowing Hearts
  • Implementing preventive health care recommendations in family medicine
  • Better decision making in preventive health screening
  • Tenir un loup par l’oreille
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Preventive care at both ends of life
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Commentary

  • Challenges with new treatments for Alzheimer disease
  • Merging clinical practice guidelines for chronic pain with insights from noninvasive neuroimaging
  • Collaborative mental health care
Show more Commentary

Editorial

  • La douleur chronique en pratique familiale : recherche et réflexions
  • Chronic pain in family practice: research and insights
  • Compression of morbidity is dead; long live compression of morbidity
Show more Editorial

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2023 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire