Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
EditorialCommentary

What’s the prognosis, Doc?

Roger Ladouceur
Canadian Family Physician August 2017; 63 (8) 584;
Roger Ladouceur
MD MSc CCMF(SP) FCMF
Roles: ASSOCIATE SCIENTIFIC EDITOR
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
Figure

Physicians, particularly family physicians, are frequently called upon to provide an opinion on a patient’s prognosis. Physicians might be asked to justify a patient’s disability leave by anticipating the duration of leave or determining if a disability is temporary or permanent; explain home-care needs or request admission into a long-term care facility; or determine the evolution of an illness and establish the level of care required.

To do so, physicians typically consider a number of factors including primary diagnosis; severity, stage, and evolution of the illness; comorbidities; and the patient’s clinical state and access to personal and community resources. Sometimes prognosis is easy to determine, as with patients suffering from chemotherapy- and radiation-resistant metastatic lung cancer, who are nearing death. Other times it becomes more complicated, as with patients suffering from severe heart or lung diseases who, despite experiencing disturbed ventricular and expiratory functions, might survive for several years. In these cases, physicians often rely on personal experience or subjective intuition (a “clinical gut feeling”) to establish prognosis.

How much confidence can we actually place in personal intuition when establishing patient prognosis? In 2008, researchers set out to discover whether a simple question could prove effective in establishing a medium-term prognosis for sick patients. That question was “Would you be surprised if this person died within the next 12 months?”1 The study included 147 hemodialysis patients and demonstrated that physicians were able to predict their patients’ mortality reasonably well. Probability of death within a year for patients in the “I would not be surprised” group was 3.5 times higher than in the other group (odds ratio = 3.507, calculated by logistic regression; 95% CI 1.356 to 9.067). Since the study was conducted, use of this question has been strongly encouraged to establish long-term and palliative care needs.

However, a recently published meta-analysis has shed some doubt upon this conviction.2 The authors identified 16 prospective studies (17 cohorts) using this “surprise question.” Their combined results indicated the question had a sensitivity of 67% and a specificity of 80%. However, the authors calculated a positive predictive value of only 37%. This means that only about one-third of patients in the “I would not be surprised” group actually died in the next 12 months (time frame used in all but 3 studies). The results were somewhat better in studies consisting of cancer patients (positive predictive value of 47%), but prediction was quite low in other patients (positive predictive value of 31%). As such, seriously ill patients who want to know whether they will live another year are better off flipping a coin than asking their doctor!

These findings are troubling, particularly with respect to medical assistance in dying. Indeed, patient prognosis is among the required criteria for receiving this assistance. Federal law stipulates that death must be reasonably foreseeable,3 while in Quebec patients must be at the end-of-life stage (Article 26).4 Yet upon considering the above findings, it becomes evident that it is not easy to predict the fates of our patients. Certainly, it is easier when death is imminent—when a person is bedridden, incapacitated, unconscious, unable to eat or drink, at a stage when it is clear that he or she will not survive long. But the further removed a patient is from imminent death, the more difficult it is to predict.

Together these factors raise doubt in the ability of physicians to truly predict a prognosis for their patients. The most absurd aspect of this story is that, despite these gaps, physicians remain the most reasonably apt to establish prognosis. However, it is important to recognize that our predictions are far from infallible.

Footnotes

  • Cet article se trouve aussi en français à la page 585.

  • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Moss AH,
    2. Ganjoo J,
    3. Sharma S,
    4. Gansor J,
    5. Senft S,
    6. Weaner B,
    7. et al
    . Utility of the “surprise” question to identify dialysis patients with high mortality. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2008;3(5):1379-84. Epub 2008 Jul 2.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Downar J,
    2. Goldman R,
    3. Pinto R,
    4. Englesakis M,
    5. Adhikari NKJ
    . The “surprise question” for predicting death in seriously ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ 2017;189(13):E484-93.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Government of Canada
    . Eligibility criteria. Medical assistance in dying. Ottawa, ON: Government of Canada; 2017. Available from: www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/medical-assistance-dying.html#a2. Accessed 2017 Jul 7.
  4. 4.↵
    Projet de loi nº 52 (2014, chapitre 2). Loi concernant les soins de fin de vie. Quebec city, QC: Assemblée nationale du Québec; 2014. Available from: www2.publicationsduquebec.gouv.qc.ca/dynamicSearch/telecharge.php?type=5&file=2014C2F.PDF. Accessed 2017 Jul 7.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 63 (8)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 63, Issue 8
1 Aug 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
What’s the prognosis, Doc?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
What’s the prognosis, Doc?
Roger Ladouceur
Canadian Family Physician Aug 2017, 63 (8) 584;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
What’s the prognosis, Doc?
Roger Ladouceur
Canadian Family Physician Aug 2017, 63 (8) 584;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Docteur, quel est le pronostic?
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Estimating prognosis is a poor use of physicians time
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Commentary

  • Navigating Canada’s primary care crisis
  • Stepwise considerations when using artificial intelligence tools for administrative tasks in primary care
  • Equipping family physicians to thrive
Show more Commentary

Editorial

  • Solving the family medicine crisis
  • Résoudre la crise en médecine familiale
  • Pride and learning in reverse
Show more Editorial

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2025 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire