Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
EditorialCommentary

What is a medical journal good for?

Nicholas Pimlott
Canadian Family Physician September 2017, 63 (9) 662;
Nicholas Pimlott
Roles: SCIENTIFIC EDITOR
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
Figure

We must dare to think about “unthinkable things” because when things become unthinkable, thinking stops and action becomes mindless.

James William Fulbright

Over the past 8 years I have been presenting talks and workshops on writing for publication in medical journals to family physicians and other health care professionals across the country. One of the many things I have learned from doing so has been that for most family physicians, including university-affiliated academic family physicians like me, medical journals remain a mysterious “black box.”

Not long after I became the Scientific Editor at Canadian Family Physician (CFP) in 2009, I read The Trouble with Medical Journals1 by the former editor of the BMJ, Richard Smith. Arguably, I might have been better off reading the book before I took on the job at CFP, as Dr Smith carefully and systematically (but also, fortunately, humorously) cataloged and discussed the many problems of medical journals ranging from the pitfalls of peer review—lousy at detecting fraud or plagiarism— to the conflicts of interest that many medical journals have, particularly with the pharmaceutical industry.1 The Trouble with Medical Journals should be mandatory reading for all doctors.

More recently, in 2016, Dr Smith gave a talk to the International Society of Medical Publication Professionals at which he reflected on the many functions of medical journals and then ranked them on how he thought they were doing.2 In what most of us consider to be their primary functions—selecting and publishing relevant, high-quality research and supporting continuing professional development—he rated journals poorly at somewhere between 2 and 4 out of a score of 10.

Paradoxically, he rated medical journals highly (a score of 9 out of 10) for the very thing we least expect them to do: putting issues on the agenda—like, for example, the social determinants of health,3,4 climate change,5 and the effects of colonization on the health of Indigenous people6—all issues that CFP has brought to the fore for family physicians over the past few years.

The relaunch of the CFP website earlier this year has allowed us to provide yet another forum to put important issues on the family medicine agenda through the creation of a new blog space. The first blog contributions have been posted (www.cfp.ca/blog)7 and we encourage readers to access them and to contribute their own reflection or opinion on an issue or a situation in family medicine or health care by going to our guidelines page on the website (www.cfp.ca/content/cfp-blog-guidelines). Over time we hope to create a space at CFP where family physicians can contribute to a national conversation about the things that our profession needs to think about in a rapidly changing and challenging world.

Although Dr Smith laments that few journals attempt the role of putting issues on the agenda, CFP has been very effective at doing so over the years, publishing thoughtful and sometimes provocative editorials, commentary, and debates—and the September issue is no exception.

In a commentary (page 664) entitled “Competing demands and opportunities in primary care,”8 Christina Korownyk and her colleagues compare the relative benefits of interventions in primary care—from the treatment of acute symptomatic illness to prevention and health promotion—using evidence from randomized controlled trials to ask where our priorities should lie. In a world in which the time pressures on family physicians to provide care to the acutely ill and those with complex chronic health conditions, as well as to deliver comprehensive preventive care, continues to grow9 the authors ask a timely question.

As Richard Smith puts it, “Although ‘good at telling people what to think about [medical journals] are less good at telling them what to think,’ which, I think, is a good thing.”2

So do we.

Footnotes

  • Cet article se trouve aussi en français à la page 663.

  • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Smith R
    . The trouble with medical journals. London, Engl: Royal Society Medical Press; 2007.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Smith R
    . What are medical journals for and how well do they fulfil those functions? [blog]. BMJ Opinion 2016 Apr 19. Available from: http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2016/04/19/richard-smith-what-are-medical-journals-forand-how-well-do-they-fulfil-those-functions. Accessed 2017 Jul 31.
  3. 3.↵
    1. De Leeuw S
    . Physician activism and prescribing against poverty. Can Fam Physician 2016;62:332-5. (Eng), e218–21 (Fr).
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Buchman S,
    2. Woollard R,
    3. Meili R,
    4. Goel R
    . Practising social accountability. From theory to action. Can Fam Physician 2016;62:15-8. (Eng), 24–7 (Fr).
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. De Leeuw S
    . Beyond frozen ground. Climate change and health. Can Fam Physician 2016;62:424-7. (Eng), e278–81 (Fr).
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. De Leeuw S
    . Indigenous medicine. Approaching the challenges with courage and humility. Can Fam Physician 2017;63:468-71. (Eng), e324–7 (Fr).
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Canadian Family Physician [website]
    . Blog posts. Mississauga, ON: Canadian Family Physician; 2017. Available from: www.cfp.ca/blog. Accessed 2017 Jul 31.
  8. 8.↵
    1. Korownyk C,
    2. McCormack J,
    3. Kolber MR,
    4. Garrison S,
    5. Allan GM
    . Competing demands and opportunities in primary care. Can Fam Physician 2017;63:664-8. (Eng), e371–6 (Fr).
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Pimlott N
    . Who has time for family medicine? Can Fam Physician 2008;54:14-6.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 63 (9)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 63, Issue 9
1 Sep 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
What is a medical journal good for?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
What is a medical journal good for?
Nicholas Pimlott
Canadian Family Physician Sep 2017, 63 (9) 662;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
What is a medical journal good for?
Nicholas Pimlott
Canadian Family Physician Sep 2017, 63 (9) 662;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Competing demands and opportunities in primary care
  • À quoi une revue médicale sert-elle?
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Commentary

  • Training policy limits career exploration in family medicine
  • Our role in making the Canadian health care system one of the world’s best
  • Food for thought, feeding the medical soul: COVID-19 pandemic lessons and reflections
Show more Commentary

Editorial

  • An inside perspective of Parkinson disease
  • Le Parkinson vu de l’intérieur
  • La crise dans les soins de santé au Canada
Show more Editorial

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2023 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire