Article Figures & Data
Figures
- Figure 1.
A 1000-person tool illustrating outcomes for 1000 eligible people screened for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography
Reproduced from the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care with permission.3
Tables
- Table 1.
The SURE test: A response of yes scores 1 and a response of no scores 0; a score of < 4 is a positive result for the patient to be at risk of clinically significant decisional conflict.
SURE ACRONYM TEST Sure of myself Do you feel SURE about the best choice for you? Understand information Do you know the benefits and risks of each option? Risk-benefit ratio Are you clear about which benefits and risks matter most to you? Encouragement Do you have enough support and advice to make a choice? Copyright O’Connor and Légaré, 2008.
Reprinted from Légaré et al.11
In this issue
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- Dissemination and implementation of clinical practice guidelines: a longitudinal, mixed-methods evaluation of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Cares knowledge translation efforts
- Depistage en prevention primaire des fractures de fragilisation: Combien de temps faut-il?
- Screening for primary prevention of fragility fractures: How much time does it take?
- What should educators teach to improve preventive health care?
- Que devraient enseigner les educateurs pour ameliorer les soins de sante preventifs?
- Grossesse, allaitement et vaccin contre le SRAS-CoV-2 : cadre ethique pour la prise de decision partagee
- Pregnancy, breastfeeding and the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine: an ethics-based framework for shared decision-making
- Physician Perspectives on Mammography Screening for Average-Risk Women: "Like a Double-Edged Sword"
- Recommandations canadiennes pour les pratiques optimales de soins de lAVC, septieme edition : lacide acetylsalicylique pour la prevention devenements vasculaires
- Faut-il partager ou non?: Quand la decision partagee est-elle la meilleure option?
- To share or not to share: When is shared decision making the best option?
- Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations, seventh edition: acetylsalicylic acid for prevention of vascular events
- Age to stop?: Appropriate screening in older patients
- Est-ce lage darreter?: Depistage approprie chez les patients ages
- Quality of the screening process: An overlooked critical factor and an essential component of shared decision making about screening
- Qualite du processus de depistage: Un facteur critique neglige et un element essentiel de la prise de decision partagee concernant le depistage
- Recommendations on screening for breast cancer in women aged 40-74 years who are not at increased risk for breast cancer
- Screening: when things go wrong
- Depistage : quand les choses tournent mal
- Choosing guidelines to use in your practice
- Choisir les guides de pratique clinique a utiliser
- Supporting adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities to participate in health care decision making
- Comprendre et expliquer le risque: Mesurer les resultats et lampleur des bienfaits et des prejudices
- Understanding and communicating risk: Measures of outcome and the magnitude of benefits and harms
- Clarifier les valeurs et preferences des patients pour eclairer la prise de decision partagee sur le depistage preventif
- Eliciting patient values and preferences to inform shared decision making in preventive screening
- Periodic preventive health visits: a more appropriate approach to delivering preventive services: From the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care
- Visites medicales preventives periodiques : une meilleure prestation des services de prevention: Par le Groupe detude canadien sur les soins de sante preventifs