Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
EditorialEditorial

For the scholarly, free-thinking family physician

Roger Ladouceur
Canadian Family Physician January 2018; 64 (1) 6;
Roger Ladouceur
MD MSc CCMF(SP) FCMF
Roles: ASSOCIATE SCIENTIFIC EDITOR
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
Figure

A commentary published in the November issue of Canadian Family Physician stated that annual physical examinations are no longer necessary: “The traditional annual physical examination of asymptomatic adults is not supported by evidence of effectiveness and might result in harm. It should not be a regular activity.”1 This is important news considering the substantial role played by annual physical examinations within family practice. Visiting your family physician every year was, until recently, the norm advocated by all and sundry.

Yet this claim was not made by some quack with a sudden epiphany or in pursuit of sensationalism, but by the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care, a prestigious organization that has directed our preventive practices for more than 40 years. They are the Canadian equivalent of the US Preventive Services Task Force. This is hardly insignificant! What is more, this recommendation is similar to a statement made in 2016 by Choosing Wisely Canada (another highly respected body) in their list of 11 things that family physicians and patients should question: “Don’t do annual physical exams on asymptomatic adults with no significant risk factors.”2

If today these recommendations seem reasonable and generally well accepted, understand that, not so long ago, this was not at all the case. Barely 5 to 10 years ago, doubting the value of annual physical examinations would have been viewed negatively. I know this because in 2013 I published a blog entitled, “What If Annual Physical Examinations Were Useless?”3 You should have seen the reactions! Even though the article merely asked some simple questions and was evidence-based, it provoked a massive stir in my sphere: public health was up in arms; threats of reprisal were fired from all directions. Simply put, had we been in the Wild West, they would have hung me high and dry; in the Middle Ages they would have burned me alive or until I admitted heresy! Clearly, I am exaggerating, but it goes to show that any family physician who dares deviate in the slightest from normal practices exposes themselves to the risk of prejudice. As though we need to subscribe absolutely to the idea of “do it because everyone else is doing it.”

In reality, this brings into question the right of family physicians to contest the validity of the many recommendations we receive. Must family physicians silently and unconditionally adhere to every recommendation made? Do we need to apply every recommendation given exactly to the letter and without questioning the strength of the evidence, as though they were dogma or divine word? Must we blindly prescribe every new allegedly miraculous and “clearly superior” drug classification or medication raved about by advertisements, “continuing medical education” (!), and key leaders of opinion, without confirming that their claims are true?

Surely not.

Family physicians have good reason to doubt them. Scholarship and critical thinking are intrinsic requirements for all physicians. Reading “A Decade of Reversal: An Analysis of 146 Contradicted Medical Practices,”4 published in the Mayo Clinic Proceedings in 2013, is enough to confirm this. More than 40% of recommendations on standards of practice were ultimately revealed to be wrong. It is highly probable that within the next 5 to 10 years, several of the certainties that we hold dear today will also be revealed as erroneous.

Is this a bad thing? Absolutely not. It simply demonstrates the importance of scientific thought in advancing our knowledge. You need only read the history of Captain James Cook’s fight against scurvy in Yuval Noah Harari’s Sapiens.5 It demonstrates how doubting and questioning contributes to scientific advancement.

There is definitely a place for scholarship and critical thinking in family medicine.

Footnotes

  • Cet article se trouve aussi en français à la page 7.

  • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Birtwhistle R,
    2. Bell NR,
    3. Thombs BD,
    4. Grad R,
    5. Dickinson JA
    . Periodic preventive health visits: a more appropriate approach to delivering preventive services. From the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. Can Fam Physician 2017;63:824-6. (Eng), e449–51 (Fr).
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Choosing Wisely Canada
    . Family medicine: eleven things physicians and patients should question. Toronto, ON: Choosing Wisely Canada; 2016. Available from: https://choosingwiselycanada.org/family-medicine. Accessed 2016 May 9.
  3. 3.↵
    1. Ladouceur R
    . Et si l’examen médical périodique était inutile. Montreal, QC: Profession Santé; 2013.
  4. 4.↵
    1. Prasad V,
    2. Vandross A,
    3. Toomey C,
    4. Cheung M,
    5. Rho J,
    6. Quinn S,
    7. et al
    . A decade of reversal: an analysis of 146 contradicted medical practices. Mayo Clin Proc 2013;88(8):790-8. Epub 2013 Jul 18.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Harari YN
    , editor. Sapiens. A brief history of humankind. Toronto, ON: Signal; 2014. The marriage of science and empire; p. 275-304.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 64 (1)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 64, Issue 1
1 Jan 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
For the scholarly, free-thinking family physician
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
For the scholarly, free-thinking family physician
Roger Ladouceur
Canadian Family Physician Jan 2018, 64 (1) 6;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
For the scholarly, free-thinking family physician
Roger Ladouceur
Canadian Family Physician Jan 2018, 64 (1) 6;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Pour un médecin de famille érudit et libre penseur
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Checking in on the annual checkup
  • Annual history and physical examination has been dead for decades
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Pride and learning in reverse
  • Fierté et apprentissage en sens inverse
  • Plus ça change, plus c’est pareil
Show more Editorial

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2025 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire