Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
OtherCollege

Wanting family medicine without primary care

Jordyn Lerner
Canadian Family Physician February 2018, 64 (2) 155-156;
Jordyn Lerner
Resident physician at the University of Manitoba in Winnipeg.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
Figure

Over the past decade, more and more medical students have matched to family medicine.1 The prevailing mantra is that this trend is unquestionably good. More medical students matching to family medicine means more physicians practising primary care. Having more primary care physicians is better for the health care system. The problem is that some medical students who match to family medicine have no intention of practising primary care.2

Family medicine is pitched to medical students with some of the following points: residency is only 2 years, jobs are available across Canada, and graduates can shape their practices.3,4 It is that last point that really attracts students to family medicine even if they do not have an interest in primary care.

At the Medical Student and Family Medicine Resident Networking Luncheon at the 2016 Family Medicine Forum in Vancouver, BC, I overheard residents explicitly telling medical students that they could do whatever they wanted with a CCFP designation. If they wanted to do just sports medicine, they could do just sports medicine. If they wanted to do just emergency medicine, they could do just emergency medicine.

Some medical students enter family medicine residency as a backdoor way to pursue their desired specialty. I had an elective student in clinic who wanted to match to dermatology; and he knew that if he did not match to dermatology, he could match to family medicine and pursue a focused practice in dermatology. He is not alone. In a 2009 survey of medical students at Western University in London, Ont, 35% of students interested in the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada emergency medicine fellowship program said they intended to apply to family medicine as a backup. The study authors suggested that, based on these results, there was the potential that students were matching to family medicine with no intention of pursuing general practice.2

The interest in focused practices continues even after the medical students enter residency. At a Section of Communities of Practice in Family Medicine (CPFM) networking breakfast at Family Medicine Forum, newly minted residents were already approaching section members to ask how they too could have a focused practice.

In the 1999–2000 fiscal year, Ontario Health Insurance Plan data showed that 54% of the family physicians with emergency medicine Certification from the CFPC derived less than 10% of their annual patient volume from scheduled family practice visits. Fifty-six percent of the family physicians with emergency medicine Certification said they were practising “almost all” or “mostly” emergency medicine. Those physicians were likely to be younger than those practising mostly nonemergency medicine or almost no emergency medicine.5

Publicly, the CFPC promotes the idea that the scope of practice in family medicine can be as much or as little as physicians want. On its website, the CFPC notes that it is the “professional home for family physicians who provide comprehensive, continuing care to their patients as well as family physicians who focus some or all of their practices in certain domains of care.”6

There is now an entire generation of family medicine residents who entered residency on the premise that they could pursue as narrow and focused a practice as they wanted. Of course, not all residents want a focused practice, but some do. Those residents matched to family medicine without ever intending to practise primary care, seemingly with the blessing of the CFPC. However, these residents are going to be surprised to learn what the prevailing opinion about focused practices actually is within the CFPC.

While the CFPC might publicly promote focused practices, they certainly do not do so privately. It has been my experience that committee and council members of the CFPC have a strong commitment to generalism, and only generalism. Endorsing focused practices during meetings inevitably leads to comments during breaks about the erosion of generalism within family medicine and concern for the future of the profession. Even at sessions by the Section of CPFM, arguably the most pro–focused practice body at the College, many section members preface their public statements with a remark about their commitment to generalism or note that their focused practice is firmly rooted in generalism.

As a resident, I think it is unfair to enter family medicine on a promise from the CFPC to be able to have a focused practice, but then face resistance from the CFPC for choosing a focused practice. There is more at stake than my sense of fairness.

The CFPC can publicly endorse but privately disapprove of focused practices for only so long. There is inevitably going to be a situation where the interests of generalism and the interests of focused practices cannot be reconciled. When that situation comes, the CFPC is going to isolate a large part of its membership, whether it sides with generalism or focused practices.

In my opinion, the CFPC has 2 main options. It can fully accept that some family physicians have focused practices, or it can wholly commit to generalism.

Fully accepting focused practices means fully welcoming physicians with focused practices into the College, not just into the CPFM. Physicians with focused practices should be welcome on various committees and councils, even the education ones that influence the development of future family physicians. Most important, these physicians should not be shamed at CFPC meetings for having focused practices.

Accepting focused practices means a fundamental shift in how family medicine has traditionally been defined. No longer will family medicine be defined by comprehensiveness and breadth of knowledge. This change will get a lot of push back from physicians who believe in family medicine as it is.

On the other hand, committing to generalism means formalizing a generalist definition of family medicine. It also means using all the College’s tools to enforce that definition. The CFPC could go so far as to restrict continuing professional development availability only to physicians who practise comprehensive medicine.

Enforcing a definition of generalism means that some family physicians with focused practices will leave the College. They will find themselves closer to the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada than to the CFPC.

The CFPC’s decision is time sensitive. Every year, more and more medical students match to family medicine with the intention of pursuing a focused practice. If the CFPC is going to commit to generalism, it needs to do so now. Physicians with focused practices will continue to grow, especially as more Certificates of Added Competence are approved. If the CFPC waits long enough, eventually, it will be the generalists who seem out of place.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests

    None declared

  • La traduction en français de cet article se trouve à www.cfp.ca dans la table des matières du numéro de février 2018 à la page e104.

  • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. CaRMS [website]
    . R-1 match reports. Ottawa, ON: CaRMS; 2017. Available from: www.carms.ca/en/data-and-reports/r-1-match-trends/. Accessed 2017 Apr 14.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Hillier M,
    2. McLeod S,
    3. Mendelsohn D,
    4. Moffat B,
    5. Smallfield A,
    6. Arab A,
    7. et al
    . Emergency medicine training in Canada: a survey of medical students’ knowledge, attitudes, and preferences. CJEM 2011;13(4):251-8, E18-27.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Scott I,
    2. Chami G
    . Why family medicine? A fact sheet for prospective family physicians. Mississauga, ON: CFPC;
  4. 4.↵
    1. Canadian Medical Association
    . Family medicine profile. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Medical Association; Available from: www.cma.ca/Assets/assets-library/document/en/advocacy/Family-e.pdf. Accessed 2017 Apr 14.
  5. 5.↵
    1. Chan BT
    . Do family physicians with emergency medicine certification actually practise family medicine? CMAJ 2002;167(8):869-70.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. CFPC [website]
    . Certificates of Added Competence in family medicine. Mississauga, ON: CFPC; 2018. Available from: www.cfpc.ca/CAC/. Accessed 2017 Apr 14.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 64 (2)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 64, Issue 2
1 Feb 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Wanting family medicine without primary care
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Wanting family medicine without primary care
Jordyn Lerner
Canadian Family Physician Feb 2018, 64 (2) 155-156;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Wanting family medicine without primary care
Jordyn Lerner
Canadian Family Physician Feb 2018, 64 (2) 155-156;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Vouloir la médecine familiale sans les soins primaires
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Factors influencing focused practice: A qualitative study of resident and early-career family physician practice choices
  • Is having broad experience a red flag in the CaRMS match?
  • The times, are they a-changin?
  • Career in family medicine
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

College

  • L’importance de l’espace pour l’apprentissage et les soins en équipe
  • 1361 raisons de garder espoir
  • 1361 reasons for hope
Show more College

Residents’ Views

  • Relieving suffering
  • Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on residents’ training experiences
  • From geographic to social isolation
Show more Residents’ Views

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2023 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire