Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
EditorialCommentary

The cannabis paradox

Roger Ladouceur
Canadian Family Physician February 2018, 64 (2) 86;
Roger Ladouceur
Roles: ASSOCIATE SCIENTIFIC EDITOR
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
Figure

This month, Canadian Family Physician is publishing a systematic review of studies evaluating the use of medical cannabinoids (page e78).1 After identifying 1085 articles and retaining 31 relevant publications, the authors arrived at the following conclusions: reasonable evidence exists to support the use of cannabinoids for treating nausea and vomiting associated with chemotherapy; these products might improve spasticity, particularly in multiple sclerosis; and it is uncertain whether cannabinoids are capable of relieving pain, although if they do they only relieve neuropathic pain (with rather modest benefits). However, adverse effects frequently occur, to the point where the authors indicated that the anticipated benefits must be very high before considering the use of these products. They also add the following:

The evidence indicates the most consistent effects of medical cannabinoids are adverse events. A variety of adverse events have a greater magnitude of effect than the potential benefits for the conditions targeted.1

The conclusions drawn by this analysis are not surprising. Study after study, analysis after analysis, and review after review2,3 have all reported the same findings: cannabis has little place within current therapeutic arsenals, except as a last resort in very specific situations or when nothing else has worked.

Despite this, some continue to maintain that cannabinoids could improve users’ quality of life. However, a recent publication has contradicted this belief. The results of this meta-analysis have concluded that it is not possible to establish a relationship between health-related quality of life and the consumption of cannabis.4

Normally, when faced with similar results, we would have stopped dallying over the potential benefits of cannabis and cannabinoids, and closed this debate once and for all. If these products are so ineffective (or only marginally effective), generate so many adverse effects, and do nothing for quality of life, there is no reason to use them except in very specific circumstances. Is that not what we would say in the case of any other substance?

But not with cannabis and cannabinoids!

In this case, there is always a thousand and one reasons to believe (or pretend?) that this substance could be useful in this or that situation. The arguments are always the same: not enough research, insufficient evidence, inhaled marijuana versus cannabinoids, more tetrahydrocannabinol and less cannabidiol, less tetrahydrocannabinol and more cannabidiol … and who knows what else!

But the strangest aspect of this story is certainly its social paradox. If cannabis is ineffective, generates so many adverse effects, and does not improve quality of life, why do 3.4 million Canadians consume it every year?5 Why do these individuals continue to smoke weed when they do not even know its origins? Why do they keep paying for a substance of which they do not know the composition, and keep exposing themselves to the judicial risks associated with its production, possession, and consumption?

For its recreational use, you say? Alright. But what do we mean by recreational use? Undoubtedly, most consumers use it for its psychotropic effects, just as with any other drug, tobacco and alcohol included. They need the excitement, euphoria, or sedation associated with the substance; they are seeking out a sense of well-being, even if fleeting. Why else would they consume an ineffective and useless substance, and why else would they pay for it? This is the paradox. Regardless of what the science tells us, people will continue to consume cannabis.

Consequently, it is in the interest of family physicians to familiarize themselves with cannabinoids, just as they have with tobacco, alcohol, and other psychotropic drugs, to better equip themselves to counsel and assist those among their patients who use them. It is irrelevant whether the substance is being used for medical or recreational purposes.

Footnotes

  • Cet article se trouve aussi en français à la page 87.

  • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Allan GM,
    2. Finley CR,
    3. Ton J,
    4. Perry D,
    5. Ramji J,
    6. Crawford K,
    7. et al
    . Systematic review of systematic reviews for medical cannabinoids. Pain, nausea and vomiting, spasticity, and harms. Can Fam Physician 2018;64:e78-94.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
    . The health effects of cannabis and cannabinoids. The current state of evidence and recommendations for research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2017.
  3. 3.↵
    1. Whiting PF,
    2. Wolff RF,
    3. Deshpande S,
    4. Di Nisio M,
    5. Duffy S,
    6. Hernandez AV,
    7. et al
    . Cannabinoids for medical use: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2015;313(24):2456-73.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Goldenberg M,
    2. Reid MW,
    3. IsHak WW,
    4. Danovitch I
    . The impact of cannabis and cannabinoids for medical conditions on health-related quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Drug Alcohol Depend 2017;174:80-90. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.
    1. Rotermann M,
    2. Langlois K
    . Prevalence and correlates of marijuana use in Canada. Ottawa, ON: Statistics Canada; 2012. 2015. Available from: www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/82-003-x/2015004/article/14158-eng.htm. Accessed 2018 Jan 12.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 64 (2)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 64, Issue 2
1 Feb 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The cannabis paradox
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The cannabis paradox
Roger Ladouceur
Canadian Family Physician Feb 2018, 64 (2) 86;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
The cannabis paradox
Roger Ladouceur
Canadian Family Physician Feb 2018, 64 (2) 86;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Systematic review of systematic reviews for medical cannabinoids
  • Le paradoxe du cannabis
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • A rural physician relates
  • Cannabis view
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Commentary

  • Challenges with new treatments for Alzheimer disease
  • Merging clinical practice guidelines for chronic pain with insights from noninvasive neuroimaging
  • Collaborative mental health care
Show more Commentary

Editorial

  • La douleur chronique en pratique familiale : recherche et réflexions
  • Chronic pain in family practice: research and insights
  • Compression of morbidity is dead; long live compression of morbidity
Show more Editorial

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2023 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire