Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
OtherCommentary

New category of opioid-related death

Romayne Gallagher
Canadian Family Physician February 2018, 64 (2) 95-96;
Romayne Gallagher
Palliative care physician in the Department of Family and Community Medicine with Providence Health Care and Clinical Professor in the Division of Palliative Care at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: rgallagher@providencehealth.bc.ca
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
Submit a Response to This Article
Compose eLetter

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

  • RE:
    Rupa Patel
    Published on: 25 February 2018
  • Purdue's influence continues
    Dan W Hunt
    Published on: 21 February 2018
  • RE: Opioid-related deaths
    GORDON FERGUSON
    Published on: 20 February 2018
  • Taking unnecessary aim at MAID
    Edward S Weiss
    Published on: 19 February 2018
  • Published on: (25 February 2018)
    RE:
    • Rupa Patel, Family Physician, Kingston Community Health Center, Assistant Professor Queens University Department of Family Medicine

    Upon reading this article, I was reminded of former NEJM editor, Dr. Marcia Angell, and her article titled: "Is Academic Medicine for Sale?". Written in 2000, she explains the need for those writing a commentary or editorial to have a strict standard for freedom from bias. As editorialists do not provide data, but instead selectively review the literature and offer their judgments, it is important they have no important financial ties to companies that make products related to the issues they discuss. (1)

    In this article, the author compares the experience of people living with chronic pain with those who are facing imminent death. This comparison is inaccurate and diminishes the experience of terminal illness. However, my main issue of concern is that an author with obvious conflicts of interest was allowed to publish an opinion piece.

    The factors that created the opioid crisis have shown us that the influence of industry in academia is not a relationship that is unbiased or mutually beneficial. I would have expected that the editors of a national journal of Family Medicine would understand this. I suggest the editors at CFP take a look at Dr. Angell's prescient article and adopt the higher standards needed to maintain integrity in academic journals.

    Reference: 1. Angell M. Is academic medicine for sale? [editorial] N Engl J Med 2000;342: 1516-1518.

    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (21 February 2018)
    Purdue's influence continues
    • Dan W Hunt, Rural Family Doctor, Lecturer in the Department of Family Medicine at the University of Manitoba

    I'm disappointed that CFP continues to publish pro-opioid articles by authors who have declared conflicts of interest with opioid manufacturers. I think it's telling that the only authors for the YES side of the debate around the new opioid guidelines both have conflicts of interest with opioid manufacturers.

    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (20 February 2018)
    RE: Opioid-related deaths
    • GORDON FERGUSON, family doctor, West Nipissing Community Health Centre

    I am disturbed that the CFP has published this article. I do not know Dr Gallagher, but an article touting the benefits of treating non-cancer pain with opioids - in the elderly - by someone who has received honoraria from Purdue Pharma, a big seller of opioids, strikes me as not too far from the key opinion leader articles which encouraged the opioid crisis in the first place. At the very least we should be aware of the size of the honoraria before deciding on the value of the piece.

    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (19 February 2018)
    Taking unnecessary aim at MAID
    • Edward S Weiss, Family Physician and MAID Provider, n/a

    I appreciate Dr. Gallagher's concern for the inadequate treatment of pain in our elderly patients, and I concur that the judicious use of opioid therapy can make a world of difference to patients suffering from chronic degenerative diseases, such as osteoarthritis and spinal stenosis. However, I take issue with her insinuation that medical assistance in dying (MAID) will become a de facto alternative to proper pain management.

    Multiple studies have shown that the majority of patients who seek MAID do so not because of unrelieved symptoms, such as chronic pain, but because of more existential suffering, such as loss of autonomy and an inability to enjoy life. (1,2) This is borne out by my clinical experience as a MAID provider, and many of my colleagues anecdotally report this as well. A great majority of the patients I assess have already been receiving exemplary palliative care and symptom management, and in those few situations where unrelieved pain is the primary driver of a patient's MAID request, it is most often the case that they have already tried multiple therapeutic strategies, including various opioid analgesics, to help ameliorate their suffering, without significant success.

    Untreated and undertreated pain in the elderly is a real and worrisome phenomenon, but it should not be conflated with unfounded fears and prejudices about MAID.

    References:

    1. Hedberg K and New C. Oregon's Death With Dignity Act: 20 Years of...

    Show More

    I appreciate Dr. Gallagher's concern for the inadequate treatment of pain in our elderly patients, and I concur that the judicious use of opioid therapy can make a world of difference to patients suffering from chronic degenerative diseases, such as osteoarthritis and spinal stenosis. However, I take issue with her insinuation that medical assistance in dying (MAID) will become a de facto alternative to proper pain management.

    Multiple studies have shown that the majority of patients who seek MAID do so not because of unrelieved symptoms, such as chronic pain, but because of more existential suffering, such as loss of autonomy and an inability to enjoy life. (1,2) This is borne out by my clinical experience as a MAID provider, and many of my colleagues anecdotally report this as well. A great majority of the patients I assess have already been receiving exemplary palliative care and symptom management, and in those few situations where unrelieved pain is the primary driver of a patient's MAID request, it is most often the case that they have already tried multiple therapeutic strategies, including various opioid analgesics, to help ameliorate their suffering, without significant success.

    Untreated and undertreated pain in the elderly is a real and worrisome phenomenon, but it should not be conflated with unfounded fears and prejudices about MAID.

    References:

    1. Hedberg K and New C. Oregon's Death With Dignity Act: 20 Years of Experience to Inform
    the Debate. Ann Intern Med. 2017;167:579-583.

    2. Li M et al. Medical Assistance in Dying — Implementing a Hospital-Based Program in Canada. N Engl J Med. 2017 May 25;376(21):2082-2088.

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: I am on the Physicians' Advisory Committee of Dying with Dignity Canada, and am a member of the Canadian Association for MAID Assessors and Providers. I have no financial conflicts of interest.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 64 (2)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 64, Issue 2
1 Feb 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
New category of opioid-related death
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
New category of opioid-related death
Romayne Gallagher
Canadian Family Physician Feb 2018, 64 (2) 95-96;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
New category of opioid-related death
Romayne Gallagher
Canadian Family Physician Feb 2018, 64 (2) 95-96;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Argument for adequate pain management
    • Regulatory sanctions and increased scrutiny
    • Focus on treatment, not drug regulation
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Nouvelle catégorie de décès dus aux opioïdes
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Complexity of the opioid problem
  • Addressing the objections to an article
  • Authors honoraria from opioid seller
  • Purdues influence continues
  • Taking unnecessary aim at MAID
  • Les nouvelles recommandations sur les opioides nuiront-elles plus quelles aideront les gens?: Oui
  • Will the new opioid guidelines harm more people than they help?: Yes
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Adaptive family physicians
  • Implementing patient-centred integrated care for multiple chronic conditions
  • Evaluating routine pediatric growth measurement as a screening tool for overweight and obese status
Show more Commentary

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2021 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire