Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
OtherCommentary

Dangerous ideas

Top 3 proposals presented at Family Medicine Forum

Ilona Hale, Nav Persaud and Ankit Kapur
Canadian Family Physician February 2018, 64 (2) 97-98;
Ilona Hale
Kimberley, BC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: ilona.hale@alumni.ubc.ca
Nav Persaud
Toronto, Ont
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: nav.persaud@utoronto.ca
Ankit Kapur
La Ronge, Sask
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: ankit@kapur.org
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

The Dangerous Ideas Soapbox is a session presented annually at Family Medicine Forum (FMF) by the College of Family Physicians of Canada’s Section of Researchers. This session invites innovative ideas that might advance our profession through family medicine research. There were 122 Dangerous Ideas submitted for the 2017 FMF in Montreal, Que. All submissions were reviewed and scored by 3 reviewers. Dangerous Ideas are judged by the reviewers, and later by the audience at FMF, on 3 criteria: 1) Is the idea novel? 2) Does the idea offer a challenge? and 3) Could the idea make a difference? Dangerous Ideas are selected for presentation at FMF based on reviewers’ scores, and the innovators are required to attend the Dangerous Ideas Soapbox session to present and defend their idea in person. Each innovator gets 3 minutes to convince the audience of the importance and robustness of his or her idea. Presentations are followed by an 8-minute question-and-answer period.

At the 2017 Dangerous Ideas Soapbox session at FMF, we had 3 presenters in attendance. At the end of the session the audience was asked to applaud for the best and most robust Dangerous Idea. To measure audience members’ applause, an “official” applause meter app was downloaded. Audience members had a lot of fun voting for their favourite idea. All 3 ideas received “fantastic” applause based on the applause meter; however, 1 idea reached the level of “amazing” and was declared the winner.

Fantastic idea: Stop telling people to lose weight

Weight loss does not work. Although many studies, even meta-analyses, suggest that it does, careful reading of these studies reveals that weight loss rarely lasts longer than 1 to 2 years, and study authors, in that time frame, can only measure surrogate outcomes like body mass index, reduced lipid levels, waist circumference, and blood sugar levels. Longer-term studies confirm what we already know from experience: most people will regain the lost weight and more. There is no proof that telling people to lose weight causes them to be healthier, happier, or live longer. On the contrary, repeated weight cycling appears to cause metabolic changes that make it even more difficult to lose weight. The frustration and negative self-image resulting from repeated “failure” to maintain the weight loss can have important consequences for patients’ mental health and for the physician-patient relationship. For most people, the tendency to gain weight was established before they were born, and although the environment and individual behaviour play an important role, once the weight is established, it is next to impossible for most people to lose it permanently. There are exceptions but they are rare. Family physicians should stop telling patients that they need to do what almost none of them will succeed in doing. Instead, we should encourage all of our patients, regardless of their weight, to focus on making the changes that have been shown to alter important end outcomes of death and disease: increasing physical activity and choosing healthier foods. By doing this, some will lose weight and many will not, but they will all be healthier and, more important, they will leave our office with their dignity intact and our relationship with them will be preserved, allowing us to continue to work with them over the long term.

Fantastic idea: Admit patients to hospital administratively so they can access medications

The 3 million Canadians who cannot afford medicines could be administratively admitted to hospital—without ever actually setting foot in hospital—so that they can access lifesaving treatments. Family physicians could fulfil their duty to patients by facilitating access to treatments for diabetes, hypertension, HIV or AIDS, and other medicines that promote health for our vulnerable patients. The Canada Health Act requires governments to publicly fund medications for inpatients, and any patient can be administratively admitted (and put on leave) for the sole purpose of accessing publicly funded medicines. This approach is legal, ethical, and evidence-based. Why aren’t we doing this right now?

Amazing idea: Blind medical school and CaRMS applications of all applicant names until interview selections are complete

Compared with the general population, Canadian physicians have a skewed demographic profile, with less economic diversity; underrepresentation of black Canadians, First Nations people, and Hispanic Canadians; and an overrepresentation of Chinese and South-Asian Canadians. Because a person’s name can reveal ethnicity, religion, sex, and perhaps even socioeconomic strata, it serves as a potential source of unconscious or unacknowledged bias in the minds of those who review the files. This bias can further exacerbate the asymmetry in medical schools and residencies. There is good evidence to show patient health and satisfaction improve with increasing similarity to their physicians; for this reason we should aim to produce a physician pool that more closely matches the general population. By eliminating applicants’ names until after interview invitations are sent we would be following the example of numerous postsecondary institutions globally in an attempt to reduce the risk of discrimination for applicants and hopefully increase our medical communities’ diversity so as to better serve our patients.

Footnotes

  • The opinions expressed in commentaries are those of the authors. Publication does not imply endorsement by the College of Family Physicians of Canada.

  • These abstracts have been peer reviewed.

  • La traduction en français de cet article se trouve à www.cfp.ca dans la table des matières du numéro de février 2018 à la page e56.

  • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 64 (2)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 64, Issue 2
1 Feb 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Dangerous ideas
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Dangerous ideas
Ilona Hale, Nav Persaud, Ankit Kapur
Canadian Family Physician Feb 2018, 64 (2) 97-98;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Dangerous ideas
Ilona Hale, Nav Persaud, Ankit Kapur
Canadian Family Physician Feb 2018, 64 (2) 97-98;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Fantastic idea: Stop telling people to lose weight
    • Fantastic idea: Admit patients to hospital administratively so they can access medications
    • Amazing idea: Blind medical school and CaRMS applications of all applicant names until interview selections are complete
    • Footnotes
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Idées dangereuses
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Stop invoking evidence-based data!
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Training policy limits career exploration in family medicine
  • Our role in making the Canadian health care system one of the world’s best
  • Food for thought, feeding the medical soul: COVID-19 pandemic lessons and reflections
Show more Commentary

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2023 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire