Advance care planning (ACP) is an increasingly important topic in primary care as more patients with multiple comorbidities and chronic diseases are living longer owing to advances in medical treatment. Family physicians are well positioned to guide ACP discussions given the longitudinal care they provide, yet many physicians, including resident physicians, feel uncomfortable directing these conversations. In this article we will describe ACP and its importance, as well as present a framework that we have developed to guide the ACP process.
What is ACP?
Advance care planning is a process that includes reflection and communication about a patient’s values, beliefs, goals, and preferences to best prepare for his or her future medical care. The designation of a substitute decision maker (SDM) is a key element of ACP.1
Why is ACP important?
Up to 76% of patients will be unable to participate in some or all of the decisions affecting their own health care at the end of life,2 and 47% of Canadians have not had a discussion with a family member or friend about what they would want or not want if they were ill and unable to communicate.3 Without the direction provided by ACP, families often feel burdened by directing medical care in crisis situations and might feel ill-prepared to make decisions owing to a lack of understanding of the patient’s values and preferences. When no previous direction has been documented, physicians often resort to using full resuscitative and medical care. This can mean aggressive treatments that the patient might not have wanted, and might result in unnecessary suffering for both the patient and family members.
Previous research has highlighted numerous benefits of ACP, including the following: improved quality of end-of-life care4; improved patient and family satisfaction with end-of-life care5; reduced stress and anxiety for families5; reduced hospital admissions and length of stay6; increased use of hospice care6; and shorter stays in the intensive care unit.7
Why is ACP important in family medicine?
Family physicians have long-standing relationships with their patients. They are the health care professionals who best know the health status, personal priorities, and social context of their patients. Furthermore, they have the advantage of being able to engage in the ACP process over several visits. For these reasons, family physicians are best positioned to conduct these sensitive conversations with their patients.4
Despite the importance of ACP in family medicine, there is a lot of discomfort and uncertainty among resident physicians when engaging in ACP with patients. Based on the results of a survey, only 40% of family medicine residents at Canadian institutions think that they are prepared to guide patients in ACP discussions following their residency (K.D., D.J., R.T., Y.Y., unpublished data, December 2016). This discomfort appears to carry over into practice, as a national survey showed that 26% of practising primary care physicians are comfortable leading ACP discussions with their patients and 67% believe they need more resources in order to do this.8
Approach to ACP conversations
Most (80%) family medicine residents indicated that a clinical aid or how-to guide would be helpful for performing ACP (K.D., D.J., R.T., Y.Y., unpublished data, December 2016). To address this need, we conducted an extensive review of ACP literature and existing resources, as well as engaged in consultations with education and ACP experts, and then devised a simple framework for ACP: the Introduce, Discuss, Decide, and Document (ID3) framework (Table 1).9 The goal of this framework is to provide structure for ACP discussions and it is not meant to replace formal ACP instruction and education.
Introduce, Discuss, Decide, and Document framework: Use the following framework for ACP discussions.
How to perform ACP
Consider the following when performing ACP with patients.
Triage the discussion according to the patient’s health status (Table 2).
Check for and review previous ACP conversations.
Plan for a serious discussion in an appropriate setting. (For patients who are well, this discussion might take only a couple of minutes; for patients with more serious conditions, this conversation will take some time.)
Encourage the patient’s SDM to be present for ACP discussions.
Revisit the ACP discussion over multiple visits or discussions as appropriate given the patient’s health status.
When to have an ACP discussion with your patient
The ID3 framework for ACP discussions
The ID3 framework provides an approach for clinicians to conduct ACP discussions. It might not be possible or appropriate to complete the full ID3 process during a single discussion. Between appointments, encourage patients to review patient resources from the Speak Up campaign website (www.advancecareplanning.ca) and to discuss their values and preferences with their family members and SDMs.
Conclusion
Advance care planning allows patients to assert their values and priorities for care throughout their disease course and throughout their lifespan, so that when unexpected situations arise and patients are unable to make treatment decisions, physicians and family members can direct care in a manner that is in keeping with the wishes of patients. In doing so, ACP not only improves the quality of patient care, but also might help direct constrained health care resources to areas of greater need, increasing the efficiency of the health care system. Engaging in ACP with patients might be challenging for some resident physicians. The ID3 framework provides structure to ACP discussions, and we encourage resident physicians to use this approach during ACP conversations with patients.
Acknowledgments
Support for this article was received from the Section of Residents Council of the College of Family Physicians of Canada.
Footnotes
Competing interests
None declared
La traduction en français de cet article se trouve à www.cfp.ca dans la table des matières du numéro de mai 2018 à la page e249.
- Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada
