Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
EditorialCommentary

Assessment of family medicine residents

Roger Ladouceur
Canadian Family Physician August 2018; 64 (8) 560;
Roger Ladouceur
MD MSc CCMF(SP) FCMF
Roles: ASSOCIATE SCIENTIFIC EDITOR
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

This article has a correction. Please see:

  • Correction - October 01, 2018
Figure

There was once a time when resident assessments were conducted in a very strange way. After doing their best during their clerkships, residents would receive a single assessment from a single supervisor with the power to unilaterally rate their performance as “exceeds, meets, or does not meet expectations” without ever having provided any previous feedback. Sometimes these assessments were delivered by a third party, like a teaching secretary, leaving students with no other choice but to dutifully read and sign the document. The oldest among us can still remember that era.

Conversely, sometimes weak students who clearly had not met the standards of practice were given a passing grade. This scenario is understandable: failing a resident on his or her clerkship is not easy, especially if the supervisor has never made the resident aware of his or her weaknesses. The burden of proof is on the supervisor, who must be able to justify his or her decision and document his or her reasons for awarding the failing grade. It is much easier to turn a blind eye and pass the student instead. This phenomenon is widely known in education as “failure to fail.”1 As a result, some residents have become certified physicians regardless of their limited competencies, blatantly inadequate communication skills, and inability to collaborate with others.

Today, this type of assessment is impossible. The College’s Red Book has established requirements for the accreditation of programs and specific expectations for resident assessments.2

The Red Book indicates that

in-training assessment systems must be competency-based and mainly formative in nature, with honest, helpful, and timely feedback provided to each resident .... Assessment and feedback must not be limited to the end of an activity or clinical experience .... [They] must be documented and reflect resident performance with respect to the competencies in question .... All pertinent activities, both clinical and non-clinical, should be assessed, and the assessment should be specific to the activities, clearly reflecting the competency objectives of family medicine.2

Field notes are the cornerstone of resident assessments:

Programs should use field notes (or equivalent) to gather qualitative comments on resident performance during daily clinical practice and should integrate them into their regular teaching and supervision. They should generate a sufficient number of field notes to provide and document meaningful, formative assessment and feedback.2

[Summative reports] must be based on multiple independently documented observations from several observers in different situations, and be compiled and judged by more than one clinical faculty.2

Even if this approach is preferable to those used in the past, we should question whether so many observations might result in unintended consequences or whether they are even necessary. A study recently published in JAMA Internal Medicine3 reveals as much. Not only did increased supervision fail to have any substantial effect on the rate of medical errors, but the study found that residents spoke less while their supervisors were present and reported feeling less efficient and less autonomous.

As such, it is pertinent to consider the intensity and frequency of supervision in family medicine. We should also consider the adverse effects of high-intensity and high-frequency supervision. For example, could a resident whose actions are constantly observed using daily (or even more frequent) field notes eventually become insecure and less productive? According to student associations and physician support programs, such a risk exists.

In andragogy, we know there is an inverse correlation between stress and learning. The absence of stress does not promote learning, but excessive stress is equally unfavourable. One assessment per month is certainly insufficient, but 2 or 3 field notes per day is undoubtedly too much. It would suit the interests of accreditation organizations and program directors to further reflect upon the frequency and intensity of the supervision family medicine residents receive.

Footnotes

  • Cet article se trouve aussi en français à la page 561.

  • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Dudek NL,
    2. Marks MB,
    3. Regehr G
    . Failure to fail: the perspectives of clinical supervisors. Acad Med 2005;80(10 Suppl):S84-7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Division of Academic Family Medicine
    . Specific standards for family medicine residency programs accredited by the College of Family Physicians of Canada. The red book. Mississauga, ON: College of Family Physicians of Canada; 2016. Available from: www.cfpc.ca/uploadedFiles/Red%20Book%20English.pdf. Accessed 2018 Jul 4.
  3. 3.↵
    1. Finn KM,
    2. Metlay JP,
    3. Chang Y,
    4. Nagarur A,
    5. Yang S,
    6. Landrigan CP,
    7. et al
    . Effect of increased inpatient attending physician supervision on medical errors, patient safety, and resident education: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med 2018;178(7):952-9.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 64 (8)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 64, Issue 8
1 Aug 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Assessment of family medicine residents
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Assessment of family medicine residents
Roger Ladouceur
Canadian Family Physician Aug 2018, 64 (8) 560;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Assessment of family medicine residents
Roger Ladouceur
Canadian Family Physician Aug 2018, 64 (8) 560;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • L’évaluation des résidents en médecine familiale
  • Correction
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Correction
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Commentary

  • Reflections on the value of Canadian multiculturalism in health care delivery
  • The environmental elephant in the office: medications
  • Six-sentence and 3-citation research proposals
Show more Commentary

Editorial

  • Plus ça change, plus c’est pareil
  • The more things change, the more they stay the same
  • Qualitative research in family medicine
Show more Editorial

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2025 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire