Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
OtherPractice

Conservative therapy for appendicitis in children

Syunsuke Yamanaka, Erik D. Skarsgard and Ran D. Goldman
Canadian Family Physician August 2018, 64 (8) 574-576;
Syunsuke Yamanaka
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erik D. Skarsgard
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ran D. Goldman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: rgoldman@cw.bc.ca
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Question A 10-year-old girl who was seen in my office last week with acute-onset abdominal pain and fever was referred to an emergency department, was diagnosed with appendicitis, and was treated conservatively with antibiotics, without surgery. Has the paradigm for treating appendicitis changed, and which is the preferred treatment of appendicitis in children: antibiotics or appendectomy?

Answer For more than 100 years, surgical management was the principal treatment of acute appendicitis. Potential adverse events associated with appendectomy include bleeding, surgical site infection, and ileus, as well as stress for children and their parents. The option of treating appendicitis with antibiotics has been known for decades, which has led to consideration of antibiotics alone as a therapeutic alternative to surgery for uncomplicated appendicitis. While there is a reasonable body of evidence in support of this practice in adults, the accumulation of evidence of the safety and effectiveness of non-operative management in children is ongoing. Large studies are still needed, and those are being conducted at this time, with results expected in the next few years.

Acute appendicitis is the most common surgical emergency in children,1 with a lifetime risk of 8.6% and 6.7% among male and female populations, respectively. Appendicitis occurs throughout childhood and adulthood; however, the incidence is highest among those between the ages of 10 and 19.2 While the exact pathogenesis of acute appendicitis is still unclear, several theories relate to mucosal inflammation, lymphoid hyperplasia, or the presence of a fecalith. The latter causes luminal obstruction, distention, and inflammation of the appendix wall, resulting in suppurative transmural inflammation, ischemia, infarction, and perforation of the appendix.3

Symptoms often include fever, colicky periumbilical pain, migration of pain to the right iliac region, and anorexia and nausea and vomiting. However, diagnosing appendicitis in preschool children might be difficult owing to atypical presentation and limited communication skills. Among 120 children from the US (mean age 3.6 years), almost all those younger than 1 year of age had perforated appendicitis at diagnosis, which was primarily attributable to delays in diagnosis.4 It has been estimated that 7.7% of patients develop appendiceal perforation within 24 hours of the onset of symptoms.5

The Pediatric Appendicitis Score (PAS) has been validated in a Canadian centre for the diagnosis of appendicitis.6 In a systematic review and meta-analysis including 21 studies with 8605 patients aged 21 and younger, presenting to an emergency department (ED) with complaints of undifferentiated abdominal pain or suspected acute appendicitis, cough or hop pain (positive likelihood ratio of 7.6, 95% CI 5.9 to 9.8) and a PAS of 9 or greater (positive likelihood ratio of 5.3, 95% CI 3.34 to 8.3) increased the probability of acute appendicitis in patients with undifferentiated abdominal pain.7

It has been more than 130 years since Fitz wrote Perforating Inflammation of the Vermiform Appendix,8 in which he reported the treatment of acute appendicitis as appendectomy. It is a safe, effective, and time-proven operation that has been further refined with the advancement of laparoscopic techniques. Despite improvements in surgical and perioperative care, the risks of general anesthesia and surgery, and the potential for postoperative complications9 represent a sufficient level of stress and uncertainty for some patients and families10 to justify the search for an effective alternative to surgery for a child with uncomplicated appendicitis.

Non-operative therapy

The surgical dogma dictating emergent appendectomy has seen a paradigm shift to a non-operative approach.11 In a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials including 5 studies and 1430 adult patients with uncomplicated acute appendicitis, the success rate of antibiotic treatment during the initial hospitalization was 84%. Readmission for recurrent appendicitis requiring treatment occurred in another 21% of patients during the subsequent year of follow-up. Overall, treatment with antibiotics was associated with a 39% risk reduction in complications compared with those undergoing appendectomy.11

Similar observations have been emerging in children.10,12,13 In 1956, Coldrey reported successful conservative treatment, with a combination of ampicillin with sulbactam until abdominal pain resolved, and among 137 patients 1 died.14 In 2007, Abeş and colleagues performed an observational study in which 16 of 136 children aged 5 to 13 were selected for non-operative treatment, and successful resolution of abdominal tenderness was reported in 15 of them (93.7%).13

In a randomized controlled trial from Sweden, aiming to evaluate the feasibility and safety of non-operative treatment of acute nonperforated appendicitis with antibiotics,15 50 children (mean age was 11.2 years) were assigned to have surgery with 1 dose of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis (metronidazole) or intravenous antibiotics (meropenem and metronidazole) for at least 48 hours. While the study was underpowered to detect differences between groups, the findings showed that most (92%) patients treated with antibiotics achieved initial resolution of symptoms, and only 1 patient (5%) had recurrence of histologically proven acute appendicitis during the 1-year follow-up.

Recently, 3 systematic reviews and meta-analyses16–18 provided further evidence for the use of conservative treatment of children with appendicitis. A report from Switzerland18 with 3 prospective cohort studies, 1 retrospective cohort study, and 1 randomized study included 442 patients (189 received conservative treatment and 253 underwent surgical intervention) and defined efficacy of appendectomy as the absence of postoperative complications, including readmission. Non-operative treatment was considered successful if no serious posttherapeutic complications developed, including the absence of the following: failure of antibiotic treatment or recurrence of appendicitis requiring appendectomy, or development of serious posttherapeutic, postoperative complication including readmission. Conservative therapy was associated with reduced efficacy (relative risk [RR] of 0.77, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.84; P < .001), increased readmission rate (RR = 6.98, 95% CI 2.07 to 23.6; P < .001), and a comparable rate of complications (RR = 1.07, 95% CI 0.26 to 4.46). In Kessler and colleagues’ analysis, 7 children had complications (3 of 189 who received conservative treatment vs 4 of 253 who underwent appendectomy). Even after excluding appendicitis with fecalith, evidence of lower treatment efficacy (RR = 0.8, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.88; P < .001) and a higher readmission rate (RR = 6.3, 95% CI 1.44 to 27.5; P < .05) remained. Based on limited efficacy of conservative treatment and the higher readmission rate, the authors suggested appendectomy as the treatment of choice for the management of uncomplicated appendicitis in children.18

In another systematic meta-analysis16 with 10 studies, conservative management was unsuccessful as initial treatment in 17 of 413 children (it was successful in 97% of children [95% CI 96% to 99%]) and resulted in appendectomy. Children treated with appendectomy had a shorter initial length of stay in the hospital compared with children with conservative management (mean difference 0.5 days; 95% CI 0.2 to 0.8). There were no serious adverse events related to conservative management. After 8-week to 4-year follow-up, conservative management remained effective in 82% of children (95% CI 77% to 87%). Conservative management as a first-line therapy was safe, but follow-up was relatively short and methodology included mostly retrospective cohort designs with only 1 randomized controlled study.15

Similarly, Hung and colleagues reported in their meta-analysis17 5 studies with 442 children for whom non-operative treatment had a lower treatment efficacy (RR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.84; P < .001) and increased readmission rate (RR = 6.98, 95% CI 2.07 to 23.6; P < .001) over 1 to 4 years of follow-up.17

Conclusion

Non-operative treatment provides parents and children with an additional option of therapy for uncomplicated appendicitis. However, current findings suggest lower efficacy, prolonged length of hospital stay, and increased readmission rates compared with surgical appendectomy. Prospective research is needed in order to definitively determine the safety and efficacy of antibiotics alone, as an alternative to appendectomy. Three such studies are ongoing: the APPY study19 (a multicentre, randomized controlled trial comparing non-operative treatment [antibiotics] with surgery [appendectomy] in children aged 5 to 16), the CONTRACT (CONservative TReatment of Appendicitis in Children) study20 (a randomized controlled trial of children aged 4 to 15), and APRES21 (a prospective randomized controlled noninferiority study to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of non-operative management for appendicitis in children aged 5 to 15 with acute uncomplicated appendicitis), which will include qualitative components. These studies are conducted with a multicentre, randomized methodology comparing conservative treatment to appendectomy for acute uncomplicated appendicitis in children. These prospective trials will hopefully provide families with the data they need to make a choice on how to treat their children with appendicitis. For some, avoidance of anesthesia, surgery, and potential complications will be important factors, while for others, a definitive, durable treatment will be more important.

Notes

Child Health Update is produced by the Pediatric Research in Emergency Therapeutics (PRETx) program (www.pretx.org) at the BC Children’s Hospital in Vancouver, BC. Drs Yamanaka and Skarsgard are members and Dr Goldman is Director of the PRETx program. The mission of the PRETx program is to promote child health through evidence-based research in therapeutics in pediatric emergency medicine.

Do you have questions about the effects of drugs, chemicals, radiation, or infections in children? We invite you to submit them to the PRETx program by fax at 604 875-2414; they will be addressed in future Child Health Updates. Published Child Health Updates are available on the Canadian Family Physician website (www.cfp.ca).

Footnotes

  • Competing interests

    None declared

  • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. St Peter SD,
    2. Sharp SW,
    3. Holcomb GW 3rd,
    4. Ostlie DJ
    . An evidence-based definition for perforated appendicitis derived from a prospective randomized trial. J Pediatr Surg 2008;43(12):2242-5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Addiss DG,
    2. Shaffer N,
    3. Fowler BS,
    4. Tauxe RV
    . The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 1990;132(5):910-25.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Stringer MD
    . Acute appendicitis. J Paediatr Child Health 2017;53(11):1071-6. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Nance ML,
    2. Adamson WT,
    3. Hedrick HL
    . Appendicitis in the young child: a continuing diagnostic challenge. Pediatr Emerg Care 2000;16(3):160-2.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Narsule CK,
    2. Kahle EJ,
    3. Kim DS,
    4. Anderson AC,
    5. Luks FI
    . Effect of delay in presentation on rate of perforation in children with appendicitis. Am J Emerg Med 2011;29(8):890-3. Epub 2010 Jul 13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Goldman RD,
    2. Carter S,
    3. Stephens D,
    4. Antoon R,
    5. Mounstephen W,
    6. Langer JC
    . Prospective validation of the pediatric appendicitis score. J Pediatr 2008;153(2):278-82. Epub 2008 Mar 19.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Benabbas R,
    2. Hanna M,
    3. Shah J,
    4. Sinert R
    . Diagnostic accuracy of history, physical examination, laboratory tests, and point-of-care ultrasound for pediatric acute appendicitis in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Emerg Med 2017;24(5):523-51.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Fitz RH
    . Perforating inflammation of the vermiform appendix: with special reference to its early diagnosis and treatment. Philadelphia, PA: Dornan; 1886.
  9. 9.↵
    1. Cundy TP,
    2. Sierakowski K,
    3. Manna A,
    4. Cooper CM,
    5. Burgoyne LL,
    6. Khurana S
    . Fast-track surgery for uncomplicated appendicitis in children: a matched case-control study. ANZ J Surg 2017;87(4):271-6. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    1. López JJ,
    2. Deans KJ,
    3. Minneci PC
    . Nonoperative management of appendicitis in children. Curr Opin Pediatr 2017;29(3):358-62.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    1. Rollins KE,
    2. Varadhan KK,
    3. Neal KR,
    4. Lobo DN
    . Antibiotics versus appendicectomy for the treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis: an updated meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. World J Surg 2016;40(10):2305-18.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Steiner Z,
    2. Buklan G,
    3. Gutermacher M,
    4. Litmanovitz I,
    5. Landa T,
    6. Arnon S
    . Conservative antibiotic treatment for acute uncomplicated appendicitis is feasible. Pediatr Surg Int 2018;34(3):283-8. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.↵
    1. Abeş M,
    2. Petik B,
    3. Kazil S
    . Nonoperative treatment of acute appendicitis in children. J Pediatr Surg 2007;42(8):1439-42.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Coldrey E
    . Treatment of acute appendicitis. BMJ 1956;2(5007):1458-61.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Svensson JF,
    2. Patkova B,
    3. Almström M,
    4. Naji H,
    5. Hall NJ,
    6. Eaton S,
    7. et al
    . Nonoperative treatment with antibiotics versus surgery for acute nonperforated appendicitis in children: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2015;261(1):67-71.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Georgiou R,
    2. Eaton S,
    3. Stanton MP,
    4. Pierro A,
    5. Hall NJ
    . Efficacy and safety of nonoperative treatment for acute appendicitis: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics 2017;139(3):e20163003. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Huang L,
    2. Yin Y,
    3. Yang L,
    4. Wang C,
    5. Li Y,
    6. Zhou Z
    . Comparison of antibiotic therapy and appendectomy for acute uncomplicated appendicitis in children: a meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr 2017;171(5):426-34.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Kessler U,
    2. Mosbahi S,
    3. Walker B,
    4. Hau EM,
    5. Cotton M,
    6. Peiry B,
    7. et al
    . Conservative treatment versus surgery for uncomplicated appendicitis in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Dis Child 2017;102(12):1118-24. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Hall NJ,
    2. Eaton S,
    3. Abbo O,
    4. Arnaud AP,
    5. Beaudin M,
    6. Brindle M,
    7. et al
    . Appendectomy versus non-operative treatment for acute uncomplicated appendicitis in children: study protocol for a multicentre, open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. BMJ Paediatr Open 2017;1(1).
  20. 20.↵
    1. Hutchings N,
    2. Wood W,
    3. Reading I,
    4. Walker E,
    5. Blazeby JM,
    6. van’t Hoff W,
    7. et al
    . CONTRACT study - CONservative TReatment of Appendicitis in Children (feasibility): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2018;19(1):153.
    OpenUrl
  21. 21.↵
    1. Xu J,
    2. Liu YC,
    3. Adams S,
    4. Karpelowsky J
    . Acute uncomplicated appendicitis study: rationale and protocol for a multicentre, prospective randomised controlled non-inferiority study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of non-operative management in children with acute uncomplicated appendicitis. BMJ Open 2016;6(12):e013299.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 64 (8)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 64, Issue 8
1 Aug 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Conservative therapy for appendicitis in children
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Conservative therapy for appendicitis in children
Syunsuke Yamanaka, Erik D. Skarsgard, Ran D. Goldman
Canadian Family Physician Aug 2018, 64 (8) 574-576;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Conservative therapy for appendicitis in children
Syunsuke Yamanaka, Erik D. Skarsgard, Ran D. Goldman
Canadian Family Physician Aug 2018, 64 (8) 574-576;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Non-operative therapy
    • Conclusion
    • Notes
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Practice

  • Is 45 the new 50 in colorectal cancer screening?
  • Approach to diagnosis and management of childhood attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
  • Determining if and how older patients can safely stay at home with additional services
Show more Practice

Child Health Update

  • Neuroimaging to diagnose central nervous system tumours in children
  • Corticosteroids for infectious mononucleosis
  • Insulin pump complications among children with diabetes
Show more Child Health Update

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2023 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire