Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
Article CommentaryCommentary

Integrating legal services with primary care

The Health Justice Program

Gregory Drozdzal, Rami Shoucri, Johanna Macdonald, Kim Radford, Andrew David Pinto and Nav Persaud
Canadian Family Physician April 2019; 65 (4) 246-248;
Gregory Drozdzal
Was at the time of writing, a research assistant at the Centre for Urban Health Solutions at St Michael’s Hospital in Toronto, Ont.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rami Shoucri
Family physician with St Michael’s Academic Family Health Team and Assistant Professor in the Department of Family and Community Medicine at the University of Toronto.
MD LLB LLM CCFP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Johanna Macdonald
Was at the time of writing, the on-site lawyer for the Health Justice Program and worked for Neighbourhood Legal Services in Toronto.
LLB LLM
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kim Radford
Research coordinator at the Centre for Urban Health Solutions at St Michael’s Hospital.
MSW
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew David Pinto
Family physician with St Michael’s Academic Family Health Team, Scientist at the Centre for Urban Health Solutions at St Michael’s Hospital, and Assistant Professor in the Department of Family and Community Medicine at the University of Toronto.
MD MSc CCFP FRCPC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nav Persaud
Family physician with St Michael’s Academic Family Health Team, Scientist at the Centre for Urban Health Solutions at St Michael’s Hospital, and Assistant Professor in the Department of Family and Community Medicine at the University of Toronto.
MD MSc CCFP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: nav.persaud@utoronto.ca
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Patients often leave a medical clinic with the same social and economic problems that caused them to need care in the first place.1,2 Providing legal services in health care settings can help address upstream factors that contribute to poor health.1

Since the 1974 Lalonde report,3 officially titled A New Perspective on the Health of Canadians,3 health professionals, public health authorities, and other stakeholders in Canadian health care systems have placed greater emphasis on the instrumental role of social factors in the health of Canadians. Income and social status, social support networks, education and literacy, employment, social environment, sex, and culture are now among the influential factors, termed social determinants of health, formally recognized by the Public Health Agency of Canada.4 The effect of social determinants of health is seen in a body of evidence that suggests inequalities in society beget inequalities in health, and that this relationship is not always altered by improvements in health care.2,5 Although this claim is now a cornerstone of public health, the disconnect between knowledge and its realization in medical practice represents a long-standing problem.6,7

Social factors contributing to poor health often overlap with specific legal needs, particularly relating to income security, insurance, housing, employment, and legal status.8–11 Vulnerable people—those who belong to “groups that are not well-integrated into the health care system due to ethnic, cultural, economic, geographical, or health characteristics”10—are often deprived of the benefits and protection afforded by the law owing to considerable gaps in access to affordable, appropriate, and timely legal services.9–14 Further, traditional community legal services are typically inundated with acute legal problems and few resources are able to be spared to address systemic and preventive legal needs.10,15

In the United States, efforts to address these gaps via integration of health and legal services within a shared physical setting have been under way since the 1990s, and the “medical-legal partnership” (MLP) model has become a nation-wide movement.9,13,16 In contrast to the United States, where more than 292 MLPs are established,17 only a handful are operating in Canada.

The Health Justice Program (HJP) aims to bridge the gap between social determinants of health knowledge and practice through a multi-partner medical-legal program informed by the MLP model. In 2014, the pilot phase of the program was launched as a partnership among the following groups in Toronto, Ont: St Michael’s Academic Family Health Team, St Michael’s Hospital, the ARCH Disability Law Centre, Aboriginal Legal Services of Toronto, HIV & AIDS Legal Clinic Ontario, and Neighbourhood Legal Services. This commentary describes the development and operation of the HJP and is intended to motivate family practice groups across Canada to implement similar practical solutions in their communities.

Program development

St Michael’s Academic Family Health Team is a multidisciplinary, multiclinic primary care organization in Toronto’s downtown core, serving approximately 45 000 patients, including people who are street-involved and unstably housed. A needs assessment conducted by clinicians estimated that 1980 patients, representing more than half of the patients referred to social workers, had at least one legal issue. The legal issues covered a range of fields handled by community legal clinics, including tenant rights, disability, immigration and refugee, human rights, and employment law.

The development of the HJP involved a systematic review of the literature pertaining to the MLP model and consultation with organizations and individuals in Canada, the United States, and Australia who were experienced in MLP implementation. Clinicians from the health team then approached potential community legal partners and, after 18 months of pre-launch planning, the pilot phase launched in 2014 out of the clinic site where the program’s on-site lawyer was based.

Direct services

Informal screening for legal needs by each patient’s family physician, social worker, nurse, or other clinician serves as a starting point for accessing legal services. Clinicians are encouraged to consider which aspects of patients’ medical concerns might be related to remediable legal issues; there is no tool or standardized method of screening, rather, the particulars of screening are left to the discretion of individual clinicians. A standardized referral form is available via the clinic electronic medical record system; alternatively, the option for patients to self-refer exists, respecting patient autonomy.

The on-site lawyer is assigned an examination room at one of the clinic sites. Services are advertised with posters (available in 6 languages) placed in each clinical encounter room and in waiting areas. As we recognize that many patients will encounter barriers to attending traditional, booked appointments, legal services are offered on both a referral and a drop-in basis. The type and nature of the direct legal service provided is tailored to each patient’s particular needs and his or her willingness to pursue different legal options. Table 1 outlines the types of services offered.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Types of direct legal services provided between December 2014 and December 2016

Patients choose what information, if any, clinicians should disclose to the on-site lawyer. Documents generated by the lawyer or program assistant are primarily stored on an external legal aid network. If paper documents must be retained, they are stored in a securely locked area of the clinic and marked as property of the legal clinic. This arrangement balances efficiency with strengthening the privacy protection of client information.

Multidisciplinary learning

The HJP and community legal clinic partners host a wide array of formal teaching sessions for clinic staff and family medicine residents based at the clinics. Twelve group meetings, using a blend of lecture-style teaching and case-based learning, were provided in each year for this purpose. A 1-hour “grand rounds” lecture was organized and delivered to the broader St Michael’s Hospital community to educate members on social determinants of health and access-to-justice themes. The HJP staff also contributed to a grand rounds panel discussion on medical assistance in dying, which was organized in conjunction with hospital staff, including family physicians, administrators, and a bioethicist.

The HJP also provides an environment in which to train legal professionals in aspects of poverty law and, accordingly, provides practicum opportunities on a for-credit or volunteer basis to law students.

Systemic advocacy

Partnership between health care and legal practitioners yields both enhanced identification of system-level pitfalls and innovative solutions that consider legal and clinical issues together.9 Literature reviews, written submissions, and oral advocacy have been jointly contributed by HJP members targeting various laws, regulations, and procedures of regional and federal governments and agencies that are identified as maintaining conditions promoting inequality, and whose modification has the potential to improve health outcomes.

Community advisory training workshops open to the public are held to increase individuals’ knowledge of their rights, teach practical problem-solving skills, and address the community’s use of individual and systemic social justice advocacy tools.

More than 27 publications have been created by HJP team members, representing a mixture of presentations, fact sheets, case studies, webpages, and template advocacy letters. Fact sheets and template advocacy letters that address topics such as violence, immigration resources, and disability tax credits are readily available for clinician use as printable handouts from the electronic medical record. These tools provide a means for health care practitioners to directly advocate for their patients without the need to involve legal professionals, when the situation permits.

Discussion

The collaborative interprofessional model adopted by the HJP captures legal needs that affect the social determinants of health for many patients served by the primary care centre. The embedded nature of the program can serve as a gateway for accessing legal services aimed at addressing legal issues that adversely affect health. Identified legal needs might be effectively addressed either via direct services offered by the program’s legal team, through referrals to private bar partners, or through identification of chronic overarching justice problems that require legislative reform. In its multidisciplinary approach to addressing patients’ needs, the HJP breaks down silos in health and legal services and equips practitioners with an expanded armamentarium with which to resolve issues that would otherwise frustrate their efforts to effectively serve their patients and communities.

The HJP also promotes interprofessional exchange of ideas and, by extension, institutional change, in addition to increasing the likelihood of broader policy issues being identified and effectively addressed. For those issues that cannot be “resolved” through direct legal services, clinicians learn about the social-legal factors influencing the health of their patients, and can consider involvement in broader advocacy. Patients can also gain knowledge and feel empowered to voice systemic concerns.

Despite considerable advances in public health knowledge and Canadian academics’ leadership role in this arena, critics note that Canada lags behind other high-income nations in application of this knowledge,6,7,18 resulting in suboptimal deployment of resources and public policy that fails to improve health for all Canadians. Collaborative programs such as the HJP might be key innovations contributing to the leveling of social and economic disparities responsible for inequalities in health .

Acknowledgments

Funding support for the Health Justice Program was provided by Legal Aid Ontario and in-kind support was provided by St Michael’s Hospital, St Michael’s Academic Family Health Team, ARCH Disability Law Centre, Aboriginal Legal Services of Toronto, HIV & AIDS Legal Clinic Ontario, and Neighbourhood Legal Services.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests

    None declared

  • The opinions expressed in commentaries are those of the authors. Publication does not imply endorsement by the College of Family Physicians of Canada.

  • This article has been peer reviewed.

  • La traduction en français de cet article se trouve à www.cfp.ca dans la table des matières du numéro d’avril 2019 à la page e129.

  • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Sandel M,
    2. Suther E,
    3. Brown C,
    4. Wise M,
    5. Hansen M
    . The MLP vital sign: assessing and managing legal needs in the healthcare setting. J Leg Med 2014;35(1):41-56.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    1. Marmot MG
    . Understanding social inequalities in health. Perspect Biol Med 2003;46(Suppl 3):S9-23.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. 3.↵
    1. Lalonde M
    . A new perspective on the health of Canadians: a working document. Ottawa, ON: Government of Canada; 1974.
  4. 4.↵
    1. Public Health Agency of Canada [website]
    . What makes Canadians healthy or unhealthy? Ottawa, ON: Government of Canada; 2013. Available from: www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/ph-sp/determinants/determinants-eng.php#gender. Accessed 2019 Feb 20.
  5. 5.↵
    1. Atkins D,
    2. Heller SM,
    3. DeBartolo E,
    4. Sandel M
    . Medical-legal partnership and healthy start: integrating civil legal aid services into public health advocacy. J Leg Med 2014;35(1):195-209.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Raphael D
    . Escaping from the phantom zone: social determinants of health, public health units and public policy in Canada. Health Promot Int 2009;24(2):193-8. Epub 2009 Feb 28.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Bryant T,
    2. Raphael D,
    3. Schrecker T,
    4. Labonte R
    . Canada: a land of missed opportunity for addressing the social determinants of health. Health Policy 2011;101(1):44-58. Epub 2010 Oct 2.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Cohen E,
    2. Fullerton DF,
    3. Retkin R,
    4. Weintraub D,
    5. Tames P,
    6. Brandfield J,
    7. et al
    . Medical-legal partnership: collaborating with lawyers to identify and address health disparities. J Gen Intern Med 2010;25(Suppl 2):S136-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Sandel M,
    2. Hansen M,
    3. Kahn R,
    4. Lawton E,
    5. Paul E,
    6. Parker V,
    7. et al
    . Medical-legal partnerships: transforming primary care by addressing the legal needs of vulnerable populations. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010;29(9):1697-705.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Lawton EM,
    2. Sandel M
    . Investing in legal prevention: connecting access to civil justice and healthcare through medical-legal partnership. J Leg Med 2014;35(1):29-39.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    1. Pettignano R,
    2. Bliss L,
    3. Caley S
    . The health law partnership: a medical-legal partnership strategically designed to provide a coordinated approach to public health legal services, education, advocacy, evaluation, research, and scholarship. J Leg Med 2014;35(1):57-79.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.
    1. Zuckerman B,
    2. Sandel M,
    3. Smith L,
    4. Lawton E
    . Why pediatricians need lawyers to keep children healthy. Pediatrics 2004;114(1):224-8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Zuckerman B,
    2. Sandel M,
    3. Lawton E,
    4. Morton S
    . Medical-legal partnerships: transforming health care. Lancet 2008;372(9650):1615-7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Tsai J,
    2. Jenkins D,
    3. Lawton E
    . Civil legal services and medical-legal partnerships needed by the homeless population: a national survey. Am J Public Health 2017;107(3):398-401. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    1. Weintraub D,
    2. Rodgers MA,
    3. Botcheva L,
    4. Loeb A,
    5. Knight R,
    6. Ortega K,
    7. et al
    . Pilot study of medical-legal partnership to address social and legal needs of patients. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2010;21(Suppl 2):157-68.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. National Center for Medical Legal Partnership [website]
    . Partnerships. Washington, DC: National Center for Medical Legal Partnership; 2019. Available from: http://medical-legalpartnership.org/partnerships/. Accessed 2019 Feb 20.
  17. 17.↵
    1. Tsai J,
    2. Middleton M,
    3. Retkin R,
    4. Johnson C,
    5. Kenneally K,
    6. Sherman S,
    7. et al
    . Partnerships between health care and legal providers in the Veterans Health Administration. Psychiatr Serv 2017;68(4):321-3. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.↵
    1. Raphael D,
    2. Brassolotto J,
    3. Baldeo N
    . Ideological and organizational components of differing public health strategies for addressing the social determinants of health. Health Promot Int 2015;30(4):855-67. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 65 (4)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 65, Issue 4
1 Apr 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Integrating legal services with primary care
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Integrating legal services with primary care
Gregory Drozdzal, Rami Shoucri, Johanna Macdonald, Kim Radford, Andrew David Pinto, Nav Persaud
Canadian Family Physician Apr 2019, 65 (4) 246-248;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Integrating legal services with primary care
Gregory Drozdzal, Rami Shoucri, Johanna Macdonald, Kim Radford, Andrew David Pinto, Nav Persaud
Canadian Family Physician Apr 2019, 65 (4) 246-248;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Program development
    • Direct services
    • Multidisciplinary learning
    • Systemic advocacy
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Intégrer les services juridiques et les soins primaires
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • A Brief Tool to Screen Patients for Precarious Employment: A Validation Study
  • Integrer les soins de sante et laide sociale pour les enfants au Canada
  • Integrating health and social care for children in Canada
  • Supporting patients to shape social determinants of health through democratic engagement
  • Aider les patients a faconner les determinants sociaux de la sante par un engagement democratique
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Equipping family physicians to thrive
  • Will blended family physician payment models revive primary care in Canada?
  • Toward an identity and team-based practice rooted in transdisciplinarity
Show more Commentary

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2025 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire