Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
Research ArticleResearch

Antibiotic prescribing for pediatric respiratory infections

What explains a large variation among physicians?

Rachel McKay, David M. Patrick, Kimberlyn McGrail and Michael R. Law
Canadian Family Physician June 2019; 65 (6) e278-e291;
Rachel McKay
Postdoctoral fellow in the Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health at McGill University in Montreal, Que.
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: rachel.mckay@mail.mcgill.ca
David M. Patrick
Professor in the School of Population and Public Health and Medical Epidemiology Lead for Antimicrobial Resistance in the British Columbia Centre for Disease Control at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver.
MD FRCPC MHSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kimberlyn McGrail
Associate Professor in the School of Population and Public Health and in the Centre for Health Services and Policy Research at the University of British Columbia.
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael R. Law
Associate Professor in the School of Population and Public Health and in the Centre for Health Services and Policy Research at the University of British Columbia.
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objective To explore whether there are observable physician characteristics associated with antibiotic prescribing for pediatric respiratory tract infections (RTIs).

Design Population-based cohort study using a hierarchical generalized linear mixed-model analysis.

Setting British Columbia.

Participants All pediatric visits for RTIs between 2005 and 2011.

Main outcome measures The association between an antibiotic prescription being dispensed within 5 days after each visit and patient, physician, and regional characteristics.

Results Overall, 27.9% of RTI visits were followed by an antibiotic prescription. After accounting for observed patient, physician, and regional factors, median 2-fold variation was found across physicians in their odds of prescribing. Observable physician characteristics explained nearly half of the variation between them. Higher prescribing was evident among physicians with more years of clinical experience (odds ratio [OR] of 1.46, 95% CI 1.33 to 1.61), international medical graduates (OR = 1.73, 95% CI 1.63 to 1.83), and physicians with proportionally fewer recent visits for RTIs (OR = 1.45, 95% CI 1.38 to 1.52). Female physicians prescribed less often than male physicians did (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.86 to 0.96).

Conclusion Substantial variations were found among physicians in prescribing antibiotics for pediatric RTIs. Observable characteristics accounted for a meaningful proportion of this variation; however, some physicians have a higher propensity to prescribe than others do, which remains unexplained. Patient and regional characteristics did not explain much of the variation across physicians. In future, behavioural interventions should be designed and evaluated to target physicians with higher propensity to prescribe.

Antibiotic resistance is an important and growing public health issue. Antibiotic use is one of the most important drivers of antibiotic resistance.1 Recent estimates suggest that up to 50% of antibiotic use for respiratory tract infections (RTIs) in children2 and adults3 is likely unnecessary or inappropriate.

Prescribing decisions are complex, and there are documented variations in antibiotic prescribing both across medical practice networks4 and across individual physicians5,6 that cannot be fully explained by patients’ clinical presentations. Patient,7 physician,8–10 and geographic11–13 characteristics have been previously associated with antibiotic prescribing, both for RTIs and more generally. However, investigations of these factors with consideration of patient and physician characteristics simultaneously are sparse,5,6 as are studies specifically of children. Given the high rate of potentially inappropriate prescriptions for this common set of syndromes,2 understanding antibiotic prescribing for pediatric RTIs is important for improvements in practice and policy to support the judicious use of these medicines.

Therefore, we used population-based data to study variations in antibiotic prescribing for children with RTIs to assess which observable physician characteristics are associated with prescribing after controlling for relevant patient and regional variables. In particular, we sought to identify demographic and practice-related characteristics that would help inform the design and targeting of future interventions.

METHODS

Data sources

We used administrative data for all residents of British Columbia (BC).14 Population Data BC provided de-identified data sets with common unique study identifiers attached. We linked data on physician visits,15 prescription drug dispensing,16 hospitalizations,17 and patient14 and physician demographic characteristics.18

Study cohort

We identified all pediatric visits for RTIs between 2005 and 2011 using existing methods.19 We then identified a subset of visits for acute syndromes less likely to require an antibiotic prescription: nasopharyngitis, sinusitis, pharyngitis, tonsillitis, laryngitis and tracheitis, upper respiratory infections of multiple or unspecified sites, bronchitis or bronchiolitis, viral pneumonia, or influenza (ICD-9 codes 460 to 466, 480, or 487).20 To ensure stability and adequate follow-up time, we restricted our cohort to individuals registered with the provincial public insurance program for 275 or more days in each studied year.21

Measurements

Outcome.

To determine whether an encounter resulted in prescribing, we identified the closest prescription matching both patient and prescriber for an antibiotic (ATC [Anatomic Therapeutic Chemical] code J01) filled within 5 days of a physician visit.

Factors.

The selection of factors was informed by socioecologic frameworks of behaviour,22 health promotion models,23 a health services research approach to understanding variations in care,24 and a previous systematic review of factors associated with antibiotic prescribing decisions for RTIs.25

Patient level: Patient demographic characteristics included age, sex, and neighbourhood income quintile as an indicator of socioeconomic status. As a proxy for patient attachment with the GP, we calculated the proportion of GP visits in the previous 3 years with the same physician as the RTI visit,26 and dichotomized this variable at the median (0.1). We used 2 measures of comorbidity. First, we summed the number of Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups System aggregated diagnosis groups as a measure of general comorbidity.27 Second, we identified individuals with 1 of 8 high-risk indications within the past 2 years (≥ 2 physician visits or ≥ 1 hospitalization): asthma, chronic kidney disease, chronic liver disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, cystic fibrosis, diabetes, and immunosuppression. Finally, we defined recent antibiotic users as those with any antibiotic prescription in the 6 months before the RTI visit, and follow-up visits as any visit within 14 days of another RTI visit.

Physician level: Physician demographic variables included sex, place of medical school graduation (Canada vs elsewhere), specialty, and years since medical school graduation. We calculated daily volume as the total number of claims billed on the day of the RTI visit, and frequency of RTI management as the proportion and number of visits in the past 30 days and the past year, respectively, with an RTI diagnosis.

Regional level: There are 89 local health areas (LHAs) nested within 5 geographic health authorities in BC. We calculated annual measures of LHA population demographic characteristics, and used meteorologic temperature readings assigned to each LHA28 to calculate a 28-day moving average for each visit day.

Statistical analysis

We used generalized linear mixed models to estimate variance parameters for the physician clustering level, and log-odds parameters for the covariates. We randomly selected 1 visit per child to overcome issues of modeling patient-level variation, in line with previous analyses.6

We first estimated an empty random intercept model. We then estimated a series of successive models by adding blocks of variables in the following order: year and quarter of the visit to address seasonality; patient-level variables to assess how physician-level effects resulted from differences in patient composition29; physician-level variables; and finally regional-level variables. All variables were retained in subsequent models, regardless of statistical significance.

We describe the variation in several ways. First, we calculated the intraclass correlation (ICC) according to the latent variable method.30 We also report the median odds ratio (OR), which can be interpreted as the median of the distribution of ORs that could theoretically be obtained by comparing 2 randomly chosen patients (with the same covariate values) from 2 different physicians.29,31,32 Finally, we report the proportion change in the variance as the relative change in the physician-level variance parameter between different models.33

RESULTS

Between 2005 and 2011, we identified about 3 million pediatric RTI visits. Randomly selecting 1 visit per person left 671 342 observations, of which 27.3% were associated with an antibiotic dispensing. Table 1 shows descriptive statistics for both the complete data set and the analytic subset. Half of the visits in the complete data set were with female patients (47.5%), and the median patient age was 4 years (interquartile range [IQR] of 2 to 9). Figure 1 shows overall monthly trends in RTI visits.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Distribution of variables by antibiotic prescription for RTI visits in children

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 1.

Monthly number of visits and visits with antibiotic prescriptions, and monthly proportions of visits with antibiotic prescriptions, from 2005 to 2011 in British Columbia: The spike in RTI visits at the end of 2009, and related decrease in proportion of visits associated with a prescription, is likely attributable to the H1N1 influenza pandemic.

RTI—respiratory tract infection.

These visits were conducted by 6404 unique physicians. In 27.7% of visits the physician was female, 95.7% of visits were with a GP, and across visits, physicians had an average of 22.5 years of experience. In the complete data set, 8.2% of practitioners (527 of 6404) never prescribed antibiotics. These practitioners had fewer visits overall (median [IQR] 3 [1 to 8]). Figure 2 shows the variation in prescribing rates by physician; the median proportion of visits associated with a prescription was 19.2% (IQR 10.0% to 33.1%).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 2.

Histogram of proportion of pediatric RTI visits associated with an antibiotic prescription, per physician, between 2005 and 2011: Frequencies are weighted by the total number of RTI visits.

RTI—respiratory tract infection.

Model results

Results of the series of models are presented in Table 2. The final model, with all covariates, was based on 645 094 observations owing to missing data (3.9% of the observations were excluded).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Generalized linear mixed model of antibiotic prescription for pediatric RTIs: A) Effect estimates and B) measures of model fit and variance.

Model variation

Before accounting for other variables, the ICC was 22.6%, indicating that between-physician differences accounted for nearly one-quarter of the total variation in antibiotic prescribing. Patients seen by higher-prescribing physicians had a median 2.55 times higher odds of receiving a prescription compared with peers seen by a lower-prescribing physician.

After adjusting for patient, physician, and regional factors, the between-physician differences (ie, ICC) accounted for 18.8% of the total variation. Patients seen by higher-prescribing physicians had a median 2.30 times higher odds of receiving a prescription compared with peers seen by another physician. We observed the largest decrease in between-physician variation when the physician-level characteristics were included in the model. Controlling for these characteristics explained nearly one-fifth of the variation attributed to physicians (the proportional change in variance relative to the empty model is 18.55%), whereas controlling for patient-level characteristics only explained 5.96%. The inclusion of a few select regional-level variables, including gross-level geographic indicators, while statistically significant, did not explain much of the physician-level variation. Overall, this suggests that most variation was random (according to the characteristics that we measured), and thus more likely to be driven by individual physician practice styles.

Patient-level factors

As shown in our final model, having a recent outpatient antibiotic prescription (at any time in the past 6 months) was associated with a lower probability of prescribing. Older children, and children with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, had higher odds of receiving a prescription. A lack of physician familiarity was also associated with more prescribing: patients who had less than 30% of their medical visits in the past 3 years with the RTI visit physician had a higher likelihood of prescribing (OR = 1.07, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.09), as did those with no documented visits with any provider in the past 3 years (OR = 1.21, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.24).

Clinician-level factors

Pediatricians had lower odds of prescribing compared with GPs (OR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.56). Physicians who graduated medical school outside of Canada had 1.73 times greater odds of prescribing (95% CI 1.63 to 1.83). The number of US-trained physicians was small, and grouping them with Canadian graduates did not change the results (data not shown). The number of years in practice was also associated with higher prescribing: physicians with more than 40 years of experience had odds of prescribing 1.46 times higher (95% CI 1.33 to 1.61) than newly graduated physicians had. Finally, physicians who had seen relatively fewer RTIs in the past 30 days were more likely to prescribe compared with those for whom 20% or more of their visits were coded as RTIs.

DISCUSSION

In the past 10 years, strong public health messages have promoted reductions in prescribing of antibiotics for RTIs. We found that 27.9% of visits for RTIs between 2005 and 2011 in BC were associated with an antibiotic prescription, which is similar to the proportions reported in other studies.3,34 After accounting for a number of relevant patient, physician, and regional factors, we found 2-fold variation in the odds of prescribing. Physician-level factors had the most influence, as observed factors decreased the between-physician variance by 18.55%, but more important, the rest of the variation remains unaccounted for. This suggests that individual physician practice style is driving a notable amount of the variation in antibiotic prescribing for RTIs. In comparison, patient and regional effects were relatively small.

Evidence of provider-level variation in prescribing has been previously reported5,6,35; the current study extends these findings with a population-based analysis of children across 7 years of data using a multilevel modeling framework. Additionally, we were able to include measures of health care usage and clinician practice characteristics.

Our findings suggest that a substantial amount of variability in antibiotic prescribing among physicians remains unexplained by observed factors, and might be more strongly related to individual practice styles. Efforts to measure prescriptions, and to target physicians with higher propensities to prescribe, might be the most promising interventions. Our findings also suggest a potential benefit from focusing on physicians who have been in practice longer and internationally trained physicians. Provision of individualized feedback via prescription database extracts, targeting of continuing education and academic detailing efforts, and tailoring our foreign-trained licensing requirements might be relevant approaches in these respects.

Limitations

Several limitations are worth bearing in mind as our results are interpreted. A previous systematic review of factors associated with antibiotic prescribing for RTI identified a number of patient-clinical and patient-physician communication factors as relevant.25 The present study was unable to include many of these measures owing to the nature of our data, and their inclusion could have explained more of the variation. However, we have addressed many known determinants in our model. A number of variables had missing data, as is common with administrative data. Physician demographic variables, in particular, had a higher rate of missing values. We did not specifically aim to assess the appropriateness of prescriptions. Rather, we considered any prescription for RTIs as potentially unnecessary, for the purpose of exploring factors associated with prescribing. In this regard, we caution against an interpretation of these findings as relating to inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions.

Conclusion

This population-level analysis demonstrated that variations exist among physicians in the antibiotic management of pediatric RTIs. Physician characteristics account for some, but not all, of the observed variations. The design of effective community-oriented programs and policies should aim to address variations in use of these essential drugs by focusing on physicians with higher-prescribing practices.

Acknowledgments

Dr McKay was supported by a Canadian Institutes of Health Research Doctoral Award (Frederick Banting and Charles Best Canada Graduate Scholarship). A University of British Columbia Centre for Disease Control Communal Fund Grant was awarded to Drs Patrick and McKay for this project. This study was also supported by a Canadian Institutes of Health Research Foundation Scheme Grant (Improving Access to Medicines in Canada and Abroad). Dr Law received salary support through a Canada Research Chair and a Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research Scholar Award. Population Data BC also granted a student waiver of some costs associated with the acquisition of the data. The British Columbia Ministry of Health approved access to and use of the data facilitated by Population Data BC for this study. All inferences, opinions, and conclusions drawn in this article are those of the authors and do not reflect the opinions or policies of the data stewards.

Notes

Editor’s key points

  • ▸ Despite knowledge that reducing inappropriate antibiotic use is important to decrease resistance, meaningful physician behaviour change has remained difficult to achieve.

  • ▸ The findings suggest that a substantial amount of variability in antibiotic prescribing among physicians remains unexplained by observed factors, and might be more strongly related to individual practice styles. Efforts to measure prescriptions, and to target physicians with higher propensities to prescribe, might be the most promising interventions.

  • ▸ There might be a potential benefit from focusing on physicians who have been in practice longer and on internationally trained physicians, as they were more likely to prescribe antibiotics for pediatric respiratory tract infections.

Points de repère du rédacteur

  • ▸ Même si limportance de réduire le recours inapproprié aux antibiotiques pour freiner la résistance est bien connue, il est demeuré difficile de changer le comportement des médecins de manière significative.

  • ▸ Les constatations de létude font valoir que la variation considérable entre les médecins dans la prescription dantibiotiques demeure inexpliquée par les facteurs observés, et pourrait être plus fortement liée aux styles de pratique individuels. Des efforts pour mesurer le nombre de prescriptions et pour cibler les médecins plus enclins à prescrire des antibiotiques pourraient se révéler les interventions les plus prometteuses.

  • ▸ Il y aurait peut-être lieu de cibler les médecins qui exercent depuis plus longtemps et ceux formés à létranger, car ils ont une plus forte propension à prescrire des antibiotiques pour une infection des voies respiratoires chez les enfants.

Footnotes

  • Contributors

    Dr McKay, who takes responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, from inception to published article, led the conception and design of the study and acquisition of data; conducted the analysis and preliminary interpretation; and drafted the article and gave final approval of the version to be published. Drs Patrick, McGrail, and Law contributed to the conception and design of the study, acquisition of data, and interpretation of the results; and revised the article critically for important intellectual content and gave final approval of the version to be published.

  • Competing interests

    None declared

  • This article has been peer reviewed.

  • Cet article a fait l’objet d’une révision par des pairs.

  • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Davies J,
    2. Davies D
    . Origins and evolution of antibiotic resistance. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2010;74(3):417-33.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Kronman MP,
    2. Zhou C,
    3. Mangione-Smith R
    . Bacterial prevalence and antimicrobial prescribing trends for acute respiratory tract infections. Pediatrics 2014;134(4):e956-65. Epub 2014 Sep 15.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Fleming-Dutra KE,
    2. Hersh AL,
    3. Shapiro DJ,
    4. Bartoces M,
    5. Enns EA,
    6. File TM Jr,
    7. et al
    . Prevalence of inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions among US ambulatory care visits, 2010–2011. JAMA 2016;315(17):1864-73.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Butler CC,
    2. Hood K,
    3. Verheij T,
    4. Little P,
    5. Melbye H,
    6. Nuttall J,
    7. et al
    . Variation in antibiotic prescribing and its impact on recovery in patients with acute cough in primary care: prospective study in 13 countries. BMJ 2009;338:b2242.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Jones BE,
    2. Sauer B,
    3. Jones MM,
    4. Campo J,
    5. Damal K,
    6. He T,
    7. et al
    . Variation in outpatient antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory infections in the veteran population: a cross-sectional study. Ann Intern Med 2015;163(2):73-80.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Mousquès J,
    2. Renaud T,
    3. Scemama O
    . Is the “practice style” hypothesis relevant for general practitioners? An analysis of antibiotics prescription for acute rhinopharyngitis. Soc Sci Med 2010;70(8):1176-84.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Brookes-Howell L,
    2. Hood K,
    3. Cooper L,
    4. Coenen S,
    5. Little P,
    6. Verheij T,
    7. et al
    . Clinical influences on antibiotic prescribing decisions for lower respiratory tract infection: a nine country qualitative study of variation in care. BMJ Open 2012;2(3). pii:e000795.
  8. 8.↵
    1. Arnold SR,
    2. To T,
    3. McIsaac WJ,
    4. Wang EE
    . Antibiotic prescribing for upper respiratory tract infection: the importance of diagnostic uncertainty. J Pediatr 2005;146(2):222-6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.
    1. Rutschmann OT,
    2. Domino ME
    . Antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections in ambulatory practice in the United States, 1997–1999: does physician specialty matter? J Am Board Fam Pract 2004;17(3):196-200.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Petursson P
    . GPs’ reasons for “non-pharmacological” prescribing of antibiotics. A phenomenological study. Scand J Prim Health Care 2005;23(2):120-5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Mueller T,
    2. Östergren PO
    . The correlation between regulatory conditions and antibiotic consumption within the WHO European Region. Health Policy 2016;120(8):882-9. Epub 2016 Jul 12.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.
    1. Koller D,
    2. Hoffmann F,
    3. Maier W,
    4. Tholen K,
    5. Windt R,
    6. Glaeske G
    . Variation in antibiotic prescriptions: is area deprivation an explanation? Analysis of 1.2 million children in Germany. Infection 2013;41(1):121-7. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Marra F,
    2. Mak S,
    3. Chong M,
    4. Patrick DM
    . The relationship among antibiotic consumption, socioeconomic factors and climatic conditions. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol 2010;21(3):e99-106.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. British Columbia Ministry of Health.
    Consolidation file [data extract]. Vancouver, BC: Population Data BC; 2013. Available from: www.popdata.bc.ca/data. Accessed 2019 May 10.
  15. 15.↵
    1. British Columbia Ministry of Health.
    Medical Services Plan (MSP) payment information file [data extract]. Vancouver, BC: Population Data BC; 2014. Available from: www.popdata.bc.ca/data. Accessed 2019 May 10.
  16. 16.↵
    1. British Columbia Ministry of Health.
    PharmaNet [data extract]. Vancouver, BC: British Columbia Ministry of Health; 2011. Available from: www.popdata.bc.ca/data. Accessed 2019 May 10.
  17. 17.↵
    1. Canadian Institute for Health Information.
    Discharge Abstract Database (hospital separations) [data extract]. Vancouver, BC: Population Data BC; 2014. Available from: www.popdata.bc.ca/data. Accessed 2017 Jul 25.
  18. 18.↵
    1. British Columbia Ministry of Health.
    Medical Services Plan (MSP) practitioner file. Vancouver, BC: Population Data BC; 2014. Available from: www.popdata.bc.ca/data. Accessed 2019 May 28.
  19. 19.↵
    1. Cadieux G,
    2. Tamblyn R
    . Accuracy of physician billing claims for identifying acute respiratory infections in primary care. Health Serv Res 2008;43(6):2223-38. Epub 2008 Jul 28.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Blondel-Hill E,
    2. Fryters S
    . Bugs & drugs: an antimicrobial/infectious diseases reference. Edmonton, AB: Alberta Health Services; 2012.
  21. 21.↵
    1. Morgan SG,
    2. Cunningham CM,
    3. Hanley GE
    . Individual and contextual determinants of regional variation in prescription drug use: an analysis of administrative data from British Columbia. PLoS One 2010;5(12):e15883.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Weissman J,
    2. Besser RE
    . Promoting appropriate antibiotic use for pediatric patients: a social ecological framework. Semin Pediatr Infect Dis 2004;15(1):41-51.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Green LW,
    2. Kreuter MW
    . Health promotion planning. An educational and environmental approach. 2nd ed. Mountainview, CA: Mayfield Publishing Company; 1991.
  24. 24.↵
    1. Wennberg JE,
    2. Barnes BA,
    3. Zubkoff M
    . Professional uncertainty and the problem of supplier-induced demand. Soc Sci Med 1982;16(7):811-24.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. McKay R,
    2. Mah A,
    3. Law MR,
    4. McGrail K,
    5. Patrick DM
    . Systematic review of factors associated with antibiotic prescribing for respiratory tract infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2016;60(7):4106-18.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Breslau N,
    2. Reeb KG
    . Continuity of care in a university-based practice. J Med Educ 1975;50(10):965-9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Weiner JP,
    2. Starfield BH,
    3. Steinwachs DM,
    4. Mumford LM
    . Development and application of a population-oriented measure of ambulatory care case-mix. Med Care 1991;29(5):452-72.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Henderson SB,
    2. Wan V,
    3. Kosatsky T
    . Differences in heat-related mortality across four ecological regions with diverse urban, rural, and remote populations in British Columbia, Canada. Health Place 2013;23:48-53. Epub 2013 Apr 29.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Merlo J,
    2. Chaix B,
    3. Ohlsson H,
    4. Beckman A,
    5. Johnell K,
    6. Hjerpe P,
    7. et al
    . A brief conceptual tutorial of multilevel analysis in social epidemiology: using measures of clustering in multilevel logistic regression to investigate contextual phenomena. J Epidemiol Community Health 2006;60(4):290-7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Goldstein H,
    2. Browne W,
    3. Rasbash J
    . Partitioning variation in multilevel models. Understanding Stat 2002;1(4):223-31.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  31. 31.↵
    1. Larsen K,
    2. Petersen JH,
    3. Budtz-Jørgensen E,
    4. Endahl L
    . Interpreting parameters in the logistic regression model with random effects. Biometrics 2000;56(3):909-14.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Larsen K,
    2. Merlo J
    . Appropriate assessment of neighborhood effects on individual health: integrating random and fixed effects in multilevel logistic regression. Am J Epidemiol 2005;161(1):81-8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Nakagawa S,
    2. Schielzeth H
    . A general and simple method for obtaining R from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods Ecol Evol 2013;4(2):133-42. Epub 2012 Dec 3.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  34. 34.↵
    1. Dekker AR,
    2. Verheij TJ,
    3. van der Velden AW
    . Inappropriate antibiotic prescription for respiratory tract indications: most prominent in adult patients. Fam Pract 2015;32(4):401-7. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Cordoba G,
    2. Siersma V,
    3. Lopez-Valcarcel B,
    4. Bjerrum L,
    5. Llor C,
    6. Aabenhus R,
    7. et al
    . Prescribing style and variation in antibiotic prescriptions for sore throat: cross-sectional study across six countries. BMC Fam Pract 2015;16:7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 65 (6)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 65, Issue 6
1 Jun 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Antibiotic prescribing for pediatric respiratory infections
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Antibiotic prescribing for pediatric respiratory infections
Rachel McKay, David M. Patrick, Kimberlyn McGrail, Michael R. Law
Canadian Family Physician Jun 2019, 65 (6) e278-e291;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Antibiotic prescribing for pediatric respiratory infections
Rachel McKay, David M. Patrick, Kimberlyn McGrail, Michael R. Law
Canadian Family Physician Jun 2019, 65 (6) e278-e291;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Evaluation of the WHO standards to assess quality of care for children with acute respiratory infections: findings of a baseline multicentre assessment (CHOICE) in Italy
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Primary care reform in Alberta
  • Administrative burden in primary care
  • Burden of administrative responsibilities in primary care
Show more Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Collection française
    • Résumés de recherche

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2025 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire