Clinical question
Is acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) effective in reducing cardiovascular (CV) events in patients without preexisting CV disease (CVD)?
Bottom line
Three recent large RCTs of moderate-risk, elderly, and diabetic patients do not support the use of ASA for primary prevention. The potential absolute benefit of about 1% is offset by a similar increase in major bleeding. All-cause and cancer mortality were either unchanged or increased with ASA.
Evidence
There were 3 high-quality, placebo-controlled RCTs of 100 mg per day of ASA.
One followed 12 546 patients at moderate CV risk (10-year risk of 10% to 20% [mean 17%]).1 Patients were predominantly men (71%); mean age was 64 years.
- After 5 years, there was no difference in composite CV events (4.3% vs 4.5% for placebo). The mortality rate was 2.6% in each arm.
- Major gastrointestinal bleeds increased with ASA (0.3% vs 0.1% for placebo; number needed to harm [NNH] of 345).
One followed 15 480 patients with diabetes (94% had type 2) and a mean age of 63 years; 63% were men.2
- After 7.4 years, ASA patients had decreased composite CV events (8.5% vs 9.6% for placebo; number needed to treat of 91) and increased fatal or major bleeding (4.1% vs 3.2% for placebo; NNH = 112).
- There was no difference in all-cause mortality or cancer incidence.
Another followed 19 114 elderly patients (median age 74 years) primarily from Australia.3,4 After 4.7 years (trial stopped for futility), ASA patients had no difference in composite CV events (3.5% vs 3.9% for placebo).3
Context
Implementation
Primary CVD prevention should focus on proven lifestyle and pharmacologic therapies, rather than ASA. Smoking cessation is most effective, reducing CVD by more than 50%.8 Weekly exercise (150 minutes) can reduce CV mortality by up to 37% compared with no exercise.9 Mediterranean diets can reduce CV events by about 25%,10 while statins reduce CV events by 25% to 35%, depending on dose.11 Treating hypertension can reduce CV events by about 20% per 10 mm Hg reduction, depending on baseline blood pressure.12 Reductions are relative and benefits depend on baseline risk. Practitioners should use calculators13 to estimate CV risk and benefit of interventions.
Notes
Tools for Practice articles in Canadian Family Physician are adapted from articles published on the Alberta College of Family Physicians (ACFP) website, summarizing medical evidence with a focus on topical issues and practice-modifying information. The ACFP summaries and the series in Canadian Family Physician are coordinated by Dr G. Michael Allan, and the summaries are co-authored by at least 1 practising family physician and are peer reviewed. Feedback is welcome and can be sent to toolsforpractice{at}cfpc.ca. Archived articles are available on the ACFP website: www.acfp.ca.
Footnotes
Competing interests
None declared
The opinions expressed in Tools for Practice articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily mirror the perspective and policy of the Alberta College of Family Physicians.
- Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada