Article Figures & Data
Figures
- Figure 1.
Participants who indicated a change in intent to apply to FM residency after their rotation versus participants who did not indicate a change
FM—family medicine.
Tables
CHARACTERISTIC N (%) Sex • Male 36 (30) • Female 85 (70) Age, y • 19–24 77 (64) • 25–27 24 (20) • ≥ 28 19 (16) • Prefer not to disclose 1 (< 1) Children • Yes 8 (7) • No 113 (93) Year of study • Third 90 (74) • Fourth 31 (26) Preliminary training • Yes 56 (46) • No 65 (54) Affiliated university • University of Montreal 118 (98) • Other 3 (2) Preferred career path at preclinical stage • Undecided 32 (26) • Family medicine 32 (26) • Internal medicine 28 (23) • Surgical specialty 9 (7) • Other 20 (17) Originally from rotation site region • Yes 51 (42) • No 70 (58) FACTOR SA* P VALUE Degree of exposure to different areas of practice 0.330 .002 Perception of overall atmosphere 0.336 < .001 Presence of a role model 0.390 < .001 Interest in returning to rotation site to practise 0.390 < .001 Perception of physician interest in their work 0.230 .014 Rural rotation 0.227 .044 Positive interactions with physicians 0.209 .035 Perception of rotation’s level of difficulty 0.231 .025 Level of satisfaction with final assessment 0.253 .008 Degree of contact with residents 0.161 .197 Degree of exposure to continuity of care† 0.138 .341 Perception of initial rotation orientation 0.115 .532 Participation in informal activities with the medical team (eg, social or volunteer activities) 0.103 .534
