Women and family medicine

Dr Dhara, I was moved by your gutsy and heartfelt article “Smile! Women as family doctors,” which appeared in the July issue of Canadian Family Physician.¹ I was moved enough to respond with an acknowledgment of your experience to mitigate the risk of minimizing an everyday experience for most, if not all, female physicians.

I suspect you debated whether it was even worthwhile to put your thoughts down, let alone think them. After all, you are a practising family physician and a faculty member who is a role model and who teaches future physicians. Why make a fuss? we might all ask.

Well, I for one am glad you did. First, you decided to reflect on why this incident with the nurse who called out for you to smile got under your skin.¹ That is notable when we as female physicians have become quite accustomed to what Beagan² refers to as microaggressions throughout our training. These daily transgressions that communicate that we do not belong, or are not equal, have a cumulative effect that whittles away at self-image. Virtually every female physician experiences these events—none of them “big enough” or egregious enough to comment on or complain about. Just many ... daily.

The coping strategies we employ include self-blame (I could read this all through your statements¹), disengagement, desensitization, and finally resignation. We call them coping, but with the evidence that female medical students become less confident as their training proceeds (compared with our male colleagues whose self-confidence increases with training),^3,4 can we really sit complacently and ignore the effects these experiences have on more than 50% of our trainees? You and other readers might find a newly published book, Female Doctors in Canada. Experience and Culture,^5,6 to be informative and engaging.

You tie your experience of marginalization as a female physician to the issue of career choice and a restriction or narrowing of the career choices of female medical students. I concur that this is a very important consideration in the choices that female students make and how the not so “hidden curriculum” of medicine is a gendered experience.⁷ Female and male students have considerably different experiences in their medical education. The result is a horizontal segregation of female students into a narrower career choice than our male colleagues have. Moulton and colleagues refer to this as paradigmatic trajectories and suggest that female physicians are absent from many disciplines because they lack opportunities to see and experience that discipline owing to gendered exclusion, and they think that they are not welcomed as legitimate participants in that discipline’s community.⁸

Female medical students when making career choices have a complex and conflicted task. In our 2018 study about medical students’ career choices published in Teaching and Learning in Medicine, colleagues and I identified differences in how male and female students articulated the factors in their career choice.⁹ Male students appeared to have a very harmonious integration of their personal and professional goals. Female students on the other hand experienced numerous conflicts between the personal and the professional. These contextual factors that created dissonance we identified as part of the culture of sexism, including lack of mentorship; inequitable treatment on clinical teams; stereotypes of “appropriate” specialty choices perpetuated by faculty, friends, family, and the students themselves; expectations of and commentary on their appearance and choice of dress; and partner and future family influence.

So women do choose family medicine more often than men do, and this is partly because of the factors articulated above—perhaps because they “see” themselves in family medicine and the fit feels good.

Certainly, society benefits from having so many capable, competent, and compassionate female physicians providing exemplary care. We should be loud and proud about what we bring to the practice of medicine and the care of our patients. Indeed, we know the evidence about how health care systems are best when supported by excellent primary care. However, choosing family medicine because it is what we want is different from choosing it because other doors are not open to us. Equity in medical education will only come when we begin to address the gendered experiences of female students. Speaking out, as you have, will foster a most needed dialogue about all students feeling welcome, included, and respected for what they bring to the practice of medicine.

Thank you, Dr Dhara, for your candid comments and your willingness to put them out there.

• Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada