Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
OtherCollege

Physical examination in patient-centred care

Is the pendulum swinging too far the other way?

Francine Lemire
Canadian Family Physician September 2019, 65 (9) 672;
Francine Lemire
Roles: EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
Figure

Dear Colleagues,

A body of literature is questioning the value of the so-called annual physical1—so much so, that it is no longer funded in several provincial and territorial jurisdictions. We are now talking about a more focused examination, targeted to specific age-related risk factors, or an examination similar to the annual physical but performed less frequently.2,3 What is the role of the physical examination (PE) in the context of a patient encounter regarding a problem requiring further evaluation? Is the stethoscope really passé in the evaluation of cardiac complaints?4 Should we really ditch the PE in this context because the guidelines do not include any information about its value?

The bedside ultrasound as a point-of-care testing device is often mentioned in these discussions as replacing the stethoscope, which has been an enduring tool for evaluating cardiac concerns for 203 years. Mention is made of the enhanced information bedside ultrasound can provide in imaging and function, the portability of the information across practice settings (eg, from the emergency department to the operating room), and the perception of enhanced objectivity.4 This is in the context of recent studies showing that the ability of physicians to make a clinical cardiac diagnosis is very limited, in the range of 20% to 40%.4,5

Those concerned about the technological trend replacing the primacy of the PE offer differing views, starting with the concept that the value of the PE goes well beyond its diagnostic usefulness.6 There is a great deal of uncertainty in medicine. A complaint such as “left shoulder pain” could be musculoskeletal in origin but could also be referred pain from any of various sources. What type of and how many point-of-care tools will we need if we do not begin with a good history and an appropriate PE? Recent breast screening guidelines do not recommend self- or clinician breast examination.7 Yet, a 2016 Quebec study shows that 5% of breast cancer lesions are missed with mammography and ultrasound and can only be detected by examination.8 In a recent CFPC presentation about virtual care and telemedicine, participants were reminded that “a major challenge to virtual care is the overcoming of scope of practice limitations that are caused by the inability to perform most PE maneuvers.”9

The burgeoning of clinical practice guidelines and initiatives such as Choosing Wisely are bringing renewed interest in these discussions; however, these conversations are not new. Think of the introduction of obstetric forceps for obstructed labour in the 1730s or the advent of the incubator for premature newborns at the beginning of the 20th century—each innovation with its share of opponents. My hope for the future, as these conversations mature, is that we will avoid looking at this in a binary, “either-or” manner. This is not about the primacy of technology versus the PE, but more about the humans who use these tools, in the context of producing and nurturing caring, compassionate, person-centred clinicians. There are important implications for undergraduate and postgraduate education and for continuing professional development. We also need to create and support a robust research agenda that includes comparison of PE with medical devices, the results of assessments with and without PE, and the engagement of Canadians. As we move forward we will need the courage to question ourselves and be prepared to make bold decisions regarding the current and future education of physicians in terms of situational awareness and metacognitive skills to facilitate safe and productive interactions between humans and computers or other devices.10 I look forward to working with others on this robust agenda. The CFPC’s Outcomes of Training project (www.cfp.ca/content/64/11/866)11,12 and work by the Professional Development and Practice Support division will be instrumental in helping to shape this.

Footnotes

  • Cet article se trouve aussi en français à la page 671.

  • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Howard-Tripp M
    . Should we abandon the periodic health examination? Yes [Debates]. Can Fam Physician 2011;57:158, 160. (Eng), 164,166 (Fr).
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Mavriplis CA
    . Should we abandon the periodic health examination? No [Debates]. Can Fam Physician 2011;57:159, 161. (Eng), 165,167 (Fr).
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Greiver M
    . Finding a better balance for the periodic health examination [Letters]. Can Fam Physician 2011;57:415.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Ste Marie M
    . L’examen physique: un art qui se pert. Montreal, QC: Profession Santé; 2019.
  5. 5.↵
    1. Vukanovic-Criley JM,
    2. Criley S,
    3. Warde CM,
    4. Boker JR,
    5. Guevara-Matheus L,
    6. Churchill WH,
    7. et al
    . Competency in cardiac examination skills in medical students, trainees, physicians, and faculty: a multicenter study. Arch Intern Med 2006;166(6):610-6. Erratum in: Arch Intern Med 2006;166(12):1294.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Costanzo C,
    2. Verghese A
    . The physical examination as ritual: social sciences and embodiment in the context of the physical examination. Med Clin N Am 2018;102(3):425-31.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    1. Klarenbach S,
    2. Sims-Jones N,
    3. Lewin G,
    4. Singh H,
    5. Thériault G,
    6. Tonelli M,
    7. et al
    . Recommendations on screening for breast cancer in women aged 40–74 years who are not at increased risk for breast cancer. CMAJ 2018;190(49):E1441-51.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Provencher L,
    2. Hogue JC,
    3. Desbiens C,
    4. Poirier B,
    5. Poirier E,
    6. Boudreau D,
    7. et al
    . Is clinical breast examination important for breast cancer detection? Curr Oncol 2016;23(4):e332-9. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
    OpenUrl
  9. 9.↵
    1. Dermer M
    . Telemedicine: disrupting and redefining patient-centred care.; Presented at: CFPC’s Annual Leaders Forum; 2019 May 24–25; Mississauga, ON.
  10. 10.↵
    1. Hodges BD
    . Learning from Dorothy Vaughan: artificial intelligence and the health professions. Med Educ 2017;52(1):11-3. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    1. Lemire F,
    2. Fowler N
    . Linking education and practice. The Outcomes of Training project. Can Fam Physician 2018;64:866. (Eng), 865 (Fr).
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Sawchuk P
    . Outcomes of Training. Preparing for the future. Can Fam Physician 2019;65:301. (Eng), 302 (Fr).
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 65 (9)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 65, Issue 9
1 Sep 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Physical examination in patient-centred care
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Physical examination in patient-centred care
Francine Lemire
Canadian Family Physician Sep 2019, 65 (9) 672;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Physical examination in patient-centred care
Francine Lemire
Canadian Family Physician Sep 2019, 65 (9) 672;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • L’examen physique dans les soins centrés sur le patient
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

College

  • Le cheminement vers la réconciliation
  • Journey of reconciliation
  • Adapter la formation à la réalité d’aujourd’hui
Show more College

Cumulative Profile

  • Scope of work and the future of family practice
  • Building a family medicine movement
  • Addressing family physician shortages
Show more Cumulative Profile

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2023 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire